cover
Contact Name
Afandi Sitamala
Contact Email
asitamala@untirta.ac.id
Phone
+6285601938531
Journal Mail Official
adil@untirta.ac.id
Editorial Address
Faculty of Law, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa Jl. Tirtayasa, Sindangsari, Kec. Pabuaran, Serang, Provinsi Banten Telp. (0254) 280330 Ext. 218, Fax.: (0254) 281254 Website: https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/nhk E-mail : yustisia.tirtayasa@untirta.ac.id
Location
Kab. serang,
Banten
INDONESIA
Yustisia Tirtayasa: Jurnal Tugas Akhir
ISSN : 28072863     EISSN : 28071565     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.51825/yta
Yustisia Tirtayasa: Jurnal Tugas Akhir also known as Yustisia Tirtayasa is national peer review journal on legal studies. The journal aims to publish new work of the highest calibre across the full range of legal scholarship, which includes but not limited to works in the law and history, legal philosophy, sociology of law, Socio-legal studies, International Law, Environmental Law, Criminal Law, Private Law, Islamic Law, Agrarian Law, Administrative Law, Criminal Procedural Law, Commercial Law, Constitutional Law, Human Rights Law, Civil Procedural Law and Adat Law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 2 Documents
Search results for , issue "vol 6, no 1 (2026): in press" : 2 Documents clear
Legal Protection of Student Victims of Sexual Violence in Educational Settings: A Victimological and Child Protection Perspective Cahyaningrum, Nike; Kurnianingsih, Marisa
Yustisia Tirtayasa : Jurnal Tugas Akhir Vol 6, No 1 (2026): IN PRESS
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/yta.v6i1.39383

Abstract

Sexual violence against students in Indonesia is an escalating concern that highlights urgent gaps in effective legal protection. This study examines the implementation of legal protection for student victims in Jatisrono District and identifies key obstacles that hinder its effectiveness. Using an empirical legal method, data were collected through in depth interviews with law enforcement, educational authorities, child protection agencies, and civil society organizations. The findings show that despite the existence of comprehensive legal frameworks, particularly Law No. 12 of 2022 on Sexual Violence Crimes and Law No. 35 of 2014 on Child Protection, protection remains suboptimal. Structural and cultural barriers, including limited institutional capacity, low legal awareness, and weak inter agency coordination, significantly impede implementation. The novelty of this study lies in its victimological and child protection perspective within a semi rural educational context. It contributes by offering context sensitive policy recommendations to strengthen local legal protection mechanisms for student victims.
Judicial Consideration of State Financial Loss Calculations by The Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia and Regional Inspectorates Matris Ijham; Fenty U. Puluhulawa; Suwitno Y. Imran
Yustisia Tirtayasa : Jurnal Tugas Akhir Vol 6, No 1 (2026): IN PRESS
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/yta.v6i1.39461

Abstract

This study examines judicial considerations in the use of state financial loss calculations prepared by the Audit Board of Indonesia (BPK) and Regional Inspectorates in corruption cases. The research focuses on the legal standing, evidentiary value, and institutional characteristics of calculations produced by both bodies, particularly regarding whether they possess equivalent authority and are derived from comparable evidentiary standards in assisting judges to construct legal reasoning. Employing normative legal research through statutory and conceptual approaches, this study analyzes the position of state financial loss assessments within Indonesia’s criminal justice system. The findings demonstrate that both BPK and Regional Inspectorates possess legally recognized authority to calculate state financial losses within the scope of their respective institutional mandates. However, the determination of evidentiary weight remains subject to judicial assessment in accordance with the principles of proof in criminal proceedings. Consequently, judges retain discretionary authority in evaluating whether such calculations sufficiently establish elements of corruption offenses. In practice, judicial consideration is not limited to financial loss assessments alone, but also incorporates witness testimony, expert opinions, documentary evidence, and the substantive criminal law framework under Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code. This study contributes to the discourse on evidentiary harmonization and institutional authority in Indonesia’s anti-corruption adjudication system.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 2