cover
Contact Name
Afandi Sitamala
Contact Email
asitamala@untirta.ac.id
Phone
+6285601938531
Journal Mail Official
adil@untirta.ac.id
Editorial Address
Faculty of Law, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa Jl. Tirtayasa, Sindangsari, Kec. Pabuaran, Serang, Provinsi Banten Telp. (0254) 280330 Ext. 218, Fax.: (0254) 281254 Website: https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/nhk E-mail : yustisia.tirtayasa@untirta.ac.id
Location
Kab. serang,
Banten
INDONESIA
Yustisia Tirtayasa: Jurnal Tugas Akhir
ISSN : 28072863     EISSN : 28071565     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.51825/yta
Yustisia Tirtayasa: Jurnal Tugas Akhir also known as Yustisia Tirtayasa is national peer review journal on legal studies. The journal aims to publish new work of the highest calibre across the full range of legal scholarship, which includes but not limited to works in the law and history, legal philosophy, sociology of law, Socio-legal studies, International Law, Environmental Law, Criminal Law, Private Law, Islamic Law, Agrarian Law, Administrative Law, Criminal Procedural Law, Commercial Law, Constitutional Law, Human Rights Law, Civil Procedural Law and Adat Law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 12 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 2 No. 3 Desember 2022" : 12 Documents clear
Perbandingan Perlindungan Hukum Merek antara Prinsip First to File Hukum Indonesia dan Prinsip First to Use pada Hukum Australia Neisa Ines Tritanaya; Wiwin Yulianingsih
Yustisia Tirtayasa Vol. 2 No. 3 Desember 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/yta.v2i3.16987

Abstract

Intellectual Property Rights are the exclusive rights to do something on the intellectual property, which is regulated by the norms or applicable laws. This study aims to determine the difference between the first to file principle in Indonesian law and the first to use principle in Australian law and to determine the strengths and weaknesses between the two principles. Indonesia adheres to a “first to file” system, which requires a trademark to be registered to obtain legal protection. While "first to use" is a brand protection system that recognizes unregistered/unregistered marks used as trademarks. This study uses a normative juridical research method with data sources obtained from literature studies consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials derived from interviews, books, scientific journals, and legislation, then analyzed using the method descriptive analysis. The results of the study indicate that there are several differences regarding the regulation of trademarks that have not been regulated in Indonesian law but are regulated in Australian law. The principles adopted by Indonesia are easier to prove in the event of a dispute compared to the principles adopted by Australia
Intersepsi Pesawat Sipil Ryanair FR4978 oleh Pesawat Militer Belarusia Ditinjau dari Konvensi Chicago 1944 Sharin Yuniar Permata; Danial Danial; Surya Anom
Yustisia Tirtayasa Vol. 2 No. 3 Desember 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/yta.v2i3.15880

Abstract

Aircraft Interception is an action in which an aircraft moves towards another aircraft in an effort to intercept an aircraft entering national airspace without a flight plan, and an aircraft experiencing communication failure or cannot be identified. Interception actions are allowed in order to protect the sovereign territory of a country, as stated in Article 1 of the 1944 Chicago Convention which recognizes that every sovereign state has complete and complete sovereignty. However, the purpose of interception is limited to determining the identity of the aircraft, directing the aircraft beyond the boundaries of national airspace, directing it away from restricted, restricted or dangerous areas or ordering it to land at a designated airport.. The identification of the problem in this research is, How is the regulation of the interception of civil aircraft by state military aircraft reviewed based on the 1944 Chicago Convention? and What are the legal consequences of the actions of the Belarusian Military Aircraft against the interception of the Ryanair FR4978 Civil Aircraft?This research was conducted using a normative juridical research method. The data collection technique was carried out by literature study and the analysis used in this paper is qualitative analysis by describing or explaining the subject or object of research.The results of this study are first, the regulation of interception actions on civil aircraft is specifically regulated in Article 3 bis of the Chicago Convention 1944 as well as in additional arrangements in Annex 2 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation Rules of the Air which contains instruments or procedures for interception. . Second, the legal consequences received by Belarus for unlawful acts that threaten the security of civil aviation are the imposition of sanctions by the international community in the form of flight restrictions and restrictions on the economic sector, as well as the summons of the Belarusian Ambassador to the European Union

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 12