cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku
Contact Email
dewamangku.undiksha@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
dewamangku.undiksha@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jalan Udayana No. 11 Singaraja - Bali
Location
Kota denpasar,
Bali
INDONESIA
Jurnal Locus Delicti
Published by Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
ISSN : 27237427     EISSN : 28076338     DOI : https://doi.org/10.23887/jld.v2i2.462
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Locus Delicti (JLD) is a journal that has a field of legal science. This journal is published by the Law Studies Program, Department of Law and Citizenship, Faculty of Law and Social Sciences, Ganesha Singaraja University of Education, Bali. Jurnal Locus Delicti (JLD) is intended for academics, practitioners, and students / the general public who are open to writings in the field of law in the form of research articles and conceptual studies. Areas of manuscripts published in this journal are related to legal research in the field of law: Criminal Law; Civil law; Constitutional law; Administrative Law; International law; Islamic law; Health Law; Environmental law; Labor Law; Customary law; Hindu Law. As well as other current topics in relevant legal fields. JLD is published every 2 times a year, namely April and October.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 33 Documents
 1   2   3   4 
THE IMPACT OF DIGITAL DEVELOPMENT ON THE DUTIES AND AUTHORITIES OF NOTARIES IN INDONESIA Windari Praptonowati Square
Jurnal Locus Delicti Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Oktober, Jurnal Locus Delicti
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jld.v6i2.6224

Abstract

The development of digital technology has has brought changes significant in system service law, including in field notary as public officials who have authority For make authentic deeds faced with challenges adaptation to system Work digital- based research This aim For analyze implications development digital technology towards implementation duties and authorities notaries in Indonesia. The study focused on the use of sign hand electronics, services General Legal Administration (AHU Online), as well as digitalization document like Certificate Electronic Property Rights. Research results state that digital transformation in practice Notary Public is an inevitability that must be balanced with regulatory reform, increasing capacity technology notary, and strengthening protection law to document electronics. Recommendations main proposed is compilation regulations special about digital notary and strengthening infrastructure and training based technology in econotarial system national.
Legal System Transformation As A Foundation For An Inclusive And Sustainable Future In Law Enforcement That Is Responsive To Global And Local Challenges Dinar Galuh Sangesti
Jurnal Locus Delicti Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Oktober, Jurnal Locus Delicti
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jld.v6i2.6226

Abstract

The transformation of the legal system has become an urgent necessity in responding to the complexity of global and local challenges, including technological advancements, transnational crimes, environmental crises, and the demand for justice that is both inclusive and sustainable. Existing legal frameworks, often constrained by rigid structures and outdated norms, face limitations in ensuring responsive and adaptive law enforcement. This study aims to formulate a transformative legal system model that strengthens law enforcement practices while integrating inclusivity, sustainability, and responsiveness to diverse socio-cultural contexts. The research employs a normative juridical method supported by a comparative approach, analyzing statutory regulations, international legal instruments, and academic literature to identify relevant principles and innovative practices. The results indicate that an effective transformation requires the integration of universal human rights, the philosophical foundation of Pancasila, technology-based enforcement mechanisms, and community participation in dispute resolution. These elements collectively enhance institutional capacity, legal certainty, and public trust. In conclusion, a responsive and sustainable legal system must embrace continuous reform, promote institutional collaboration, and ensure adaptability to emerging issues, thereby establishing law enforcement as a robust pillar of justice at both national and international levels.
RESPONSIVE LAW ENFORCEMENT IN HANDLING CIVIL- MILITARY JURISDICTION CASES IN INDONESIA Susanto Santiago Pararuk; Hibnu Nugroho; Agus Raharjo
Jurnal Locus Delicti Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Oktober, Jurnal Locus Delicti
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jld.v6i2.6227

Abstract

Handling Civil-Military Jurisdiction Cases (In Indonesian, it is called Perkara Koneksitas) is the resolution of participation offenses (deelneming) carried out jointly by those who are subject to the general court judiciary and the military justice judiciary. The handling of these cases is carried out by two judicial subsystems, namely general justice and military justice, which jointly resolve connection cases. However, the current law does not clearly regulate the handling of Civil-Military Jurisdiction Cases, so law enforcement officials deviate from the provisions for handling. This article examines the Responsive law enforcement in handling civil-military jurisdiction cases with the conclusion that handling Civil-Military Jurisdiction Cases is part of general justice and military justice. Since there are two courts competent to enforce the law in the handling of such cases, under the provisions of Articles 89 to 94 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the handling of such cases is carried out jointly by the subsystem in general justice and the subsystem in military justice. Investigations by the Police, Prosecutors and Military Poms/Oditors, Prosecution by Prosecutors and Oditurs, Trial by Judges from the General Court and Military Justice in a balanced manner. Because the two courts have very different case handling cultures, and until now there are no clear rules governing the technique of handling cases in connection, where there are two procedural laws that apply.

Page 4 of 4 | Total Record : 33

 1   2   3   4 

Filter by Year

2020 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Oktober, Jurnal Locus Delicti Vol 3 No 2 (2022): Oktober, Jurnal Locus Delicti Vol 3 No 1 (2022): April, Jurnal Locus Delicti Vol 2 No 2 (2021): Oktober, Jurnal Locus Delicti Vol 2 No 1 (2021): April, Jurnal Locus Delicti Vol 1 No 2 (2020): Oktober, Jurnal Locus Delicti Vol 1 No 1 (2020): April, Jurnal Locus Delicti