cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Noel Ghota Prima Bayu Surbakti
Contact Email
noelsurbakti1993@gmail.com
Phone
+6285221243925
Journal Mail Official
sttsriwijaya@yahoo.com
Editorial Address
Jalan Boom Pecah, Desa Pangkalan Benteng, Kec. Talang Kelapa, Kab. Banyuasin (30761), Sumatera Selatan
Location
Kab. banyuasin,
Sumatera selatan
INDONESIA
Mitra Sriwijaya: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristen
Published by Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Sriwijaya
ISSN : 2723326X     EISSN : 27228487     DOI : https://doi.org/10.46974/ms
Core Subject : Religion, Humanities, Education,
Religion Humanities Education
Mitra Sriwijaya merupakan jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Agama Kristen yang menjadi wadah publikasi penelitian STT Sriwijaya. Adapun tema-tema yang menjadi scope jurnal ini yakni: kebangsaan, ekologi dan kontekstualisasi. Mitra Sriwijaya menerima penelitian akan tema-tema tersebut yang ditinjau dari bidang: 1. Biblika 2. Teologi Sistematika 3. Sejarah Gereja 4. Pastoral 5. Pendidikan Agama Kristen 6. Etika Kristen 7. Misiologi dll. Mitra Sriwijaya terbit dua kali dalam setahun yakni pada bulan Juli dan Desember
Arjuna Subject : Seni dan Humaniora - Studi Agama
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020): Juli 2020" : 5 Documents clear
Hermeneutika Alkitab Dalam Sejarah: Prinsip Penafsiran Alkitab Dari Masa ke Masa Yohanes Verdianto
Mitra Sriwijaya: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristen Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020): Juli 2020
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (384.257 KB) | DOI: 10.46974/ms.v1i1.2

Abstract

The practice of hermeneutics has become an inseparable part of human history. Hermeneutics as human activity arises from the need to interpret thoughts or texts written by others. A historical search reveals that there have been some changes in the principles of biblical hermeneutics. This paper aims to find out what are the principles of hermeneutics that developed from the early church up to the postmodern era. This paper is a historical approach using documentary research method. The results of this study state that there are at least three principles of biblical interpretation from the early church to postmodern times. First, the literal hermeneutics of the Bible was agreed upon by all early church Fathers, although contextual, grammatical, and historical interpretation of the Bible was emphasized by two church Fathers, namely Theodore and Chrysostom. This literal hermeneutics was used until the reform era. Second, modern hermeneutics refers to reason rather than the literal principle. This is the emerge of hermeneutics of relativism which bases truth on the senses and reasons. This principle agrees the application of rationalism to the Bible which leads to historical-critical. Third, contemporary (postmodern) hermeneutics is more towards a process of understanding that is temporary. This means that understanding has no clear boundaries, and that interpreters cannot reach a fully certain understanding. Thus, contemporary biblical hermeneutics is full of subjectivism, relativism, pluralism and is temporary.
Merengkuh Yang Lain: Dialog Interreligius Dan Transformasi Diri Terhadap Yang Lain Danang Kristiawan
Mitra Sriwijaya: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristen Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020): Juli 2020
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (500.743 KB) | DOI: 10.46974/ms.v1i1.4

Abstract

An issue that has been a discussion in interreligious dialogue is about how we creatively frame the tensions between the identity and the solidarity, the commitment and the openness, the uniqueness and the togetherness, the particularity and the universality each religion. That tensions create a trade-off between the universalism and the particularism. The universalism assumes that there is a common ground as the prerequisite of the dialogue found inside or outside the religions. On the other side, particularism understands that every religion is unique and different. It forms the experience of the community and can only be understood by the community itself. Both opposite viewpoints are important to acknowledge in order to keep the creative tensions between the identity and the solidarity in the interreligious dialogue. The following writing will explain some efforts to bridge the tensions between the identity and the solidarity in the interreligious dialogue. Furthermore, the writing will present the imagination of “embrace” by Miroslav Volf as an appreciative-critical-transformative interreligious dialogue. It includes some notes of how interreligious embrace can be done in practice.
Sidang Ilahi Elohim Dalam Mazmur 82:1 Marthin Steven Lumingkewas; Firman Panjaitan
Mitra Sriwijaya: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristen Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020): Juli 2020
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (622.798 KB) | DOI: 10.46974/ms.v1i1.5

Abstract

In the Old Testament Yahweh is frequently called El. The question is raised whether Yahweh was a form of the god El from the beginning or whether they were separate deities who only became equated later. They whom uphold theory Yahweh and El were conceived as separate deities holds that Yahweh was a southern storm god from Seir and so on, which was brought by the Israelites and conflated with the Jerusalem patriarchal deity.On the other side there are scholars who hold and conceived Yahweh and El as one single deity. These scholars defend this position most commonly on the grounds that no distinction between the two can be clearly found in the Hebrew Bible. The methodology used in this paper is literary – historical and social interpretations, with the main method being the "diachronic and dialectical theology of Hegel". The simple Hegelian method is: A (thesis) versus B (anti-thesis) equals C (synthesis). The author analyzes (thesis) by collecting instruments related to ancient Semitic religions; it includes data on El and Yahweh assembly obtained from Hebrew text sources and extra-biblical manuscripts which are then processed in depth. The antithesis is to analyze El's assembly development in Israel – especially in Psalm 82. While the synthesis appears in the nuances of the El’s assembly believe in ancient Israel. The focus of this paper's research is to prove 2 things: first, is Psalm 82: 1, is an Israeli Psalm that uses the patterns and forms of the Canaanite Psalms; especially regarding religious systems that use the terminology of the divine council. Second, to prove that El and Yahweh in the context of this Psalm are two different gods, of which this view contradicts several ANET experts such as Michael S, Heisser who sets El and Yahweh in this text as identical gods. The results of this study attempt to prove that Israel and the Canaan contextually share the same religious system, and are seen to be separated in the Deuteronomist era with their Yahwistic reforms.
Tohu Wabohu dan Creatio ex Nihilo: Tafsir Kejadian 1:1-2 Sebagai Perspektif Memahami Realitas Anomali Agus Kriswanto
Mitra Sriwijaya: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristen Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020): Juli 2020
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (511.972 KB) | DOI: 10.46974/ms.v1i1.6

Abstract

Some interpreters have argued that the doctrine of creatio ex nihilo cannot be based on the reading of Genesis 1: 1-2. Genesis 1: 1-2 shows that the earth which was in a state of tohu wabohu (chaos) was the initial condition of pre-creation. Chaos was then organized into a new order. This paper argues that Genesis 1: 1-2 can be read, both as creation ex nihilo as well as transformation from chaos into harmony. This research is a qualitative research with descriptive-analytical method. The description of the meaning of Genesis 1: 1-2 is done through syntactic analysis, the literary context of Ancient Near Eastern cosmogony, and the relation of Genesis 1 to the world view of the priesthood. The results of this study indicate that although Genesis 1: 1-2 echoes the expression of ancient chaos, it has been placed as a consequence of God's creative act. The creation ex nihilo of heaven and earth, carries the risk of chaos which is further arranged by God into a good order. In addition, if it is related to the worldview that forms the basis of ritual, Genesis 1: 1-2 not only gives a picture of the origin of the world, but also provides a perspective to understand reality, both harmony and anomalies.
Kurikulum Pendidikan Agama Kristen di Indonesia Nancy F.L. Tobing
Mitra Sriwijaya: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristen Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020): Juli 2020
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (655.811 KB) | DOI: 10.46974/ms.v1i1.8

Abstract

This paper explain that the curriculum of Christian education at Indonesia should stress Christianity learning and learning about Christianity. Christian education courses have an aim to distribute faith and belief with Christian attributes or characteristics that can be learned and teached, either inside or outside the classroom. The problem is the courses have a difference contexts or can be say that each student have its own context. Meanwhile, Christian education focus on achieve the first aim that is to enable every person to reach growth as fullness of Christ. For it, the process of development of Christian education curriculum needs to design and suit to Christianity value. I’ll applied literature methods to analize every design of Christian education curriculum which has been appointed by goverment. According to title of this paper, I’ll make critical observation and evaluation by analize the important thing in organizing and developing the Christian education curriculum, as one of subject that has been appointed by the government. 

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2020 2020


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Desember 2025 Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Juli 2025 Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): Desember 2024 Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): Juli 2024 Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): Desember 2023 Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023): Juli 2023 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022): Desember 2022 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022): Juli 2022 Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): Desember 2021 Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021): Juli 2021 Vol. 1 No. 2 (2020): Desember 2020 Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020): Juli 2020 More Issue