cover
Contact Name
Rustamaji
Contact Email
verstek@mail.uns.ac.id
Phone
+6285865999842
Journal Mail Official
verstek@mail.uns.ac.id
Editorial Address
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret Gedung 3, Departemen Hukum Acara Alamat: Ir. Sutami No. 36A,Kentingan, Surakarta
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Verstek
ISSN : -     EISSN : 23550406     DOI : https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v9i3.55027
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Jurnal Verstek is a peer-reviewed journal published by Procedural Law Department, Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret three times a year in April, August, and December. This Journal aims primarily to facilitate undergraduate students paper over current developments on procedural law issues in Indonesia as well as to publish innovative legal researches concerning Indonesian procedural laws and legal system. It provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to public support a greater global exchange of knowledge. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Procedural Law, included but not limited to legal construction of procedural law, critical construction of procedural law in practice, trends and changes in procedural law, and the technical challenges faced in proedural law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 14 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 1, No 1 (2013)" : 14 Documents clear
Studi Penanganan Korupsi Audit Pembangkit Tenaga Listrik Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 216 K/Pid.Sus/2009 Oktavia Pramita Putri
Verstek Vol 1, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (220.209 KB) | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v1i1.38790

Abstract

    Based on the results of this study, it could be concluded that the basis of an appeal by the prosecution to prove that the Judex factie decision is not free in the case of pure corruption audit powerhouse with the defendant Ir. Darwin Abbas which is in conformity with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code. The prosecution argument to boils down is that the South Jakarta District Court has passed a ruling in check and try the case "does not apply the rules of law or apply the law not as it should be" of Article 253 paragraph (1) letter a Criminal Code). Prosecutor reason to appeals in the Supreme Court considered that the reasons are justified and in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code. Justices of the Supreme Court agrees with the prosecution that it is true Judex factie not apply the law or apply the law not as it should be. From that judgment the Supreme Court granted a prosecution appeal and the verdict free from all charges or acquittal called impure because of what the charges are proven even if the act is not a criminal act. This is in accordance with the provisions of Article 191 paragraph (2) Criminal Procedure Code stating that if the acts charged against the defendant has been proven, but the act was not a crime then it should be cut off from all charges.       Keywords: Reason Cassation, Judgement Free, Argument Supreme Court Judge 
Telaah Pengajuan Kasasi Oleh Penuntut Umum Dengan Alasan Judex Factie Mengabaikan Rasa Keadilan Dalam Perkara Persetubuhan Dengan Anak Ratih Perwira Hutami
Verstek Vol 1, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v1i1.38797

Abstract

      The objective of research is to find out the compatibility of Public Prosecutor’s appeal to Supreme Court with the rationale that judex factie overrides the society’s justice feeling in sentencing the copulation with minor case with KUHAP. This study was a doctrinal normative law research. The approach used was case approach method. The type of data used was secondary data, the one from library materials including: books, literatures, legislations, official documents, research finding in the form of report and other sources relevant to this research.       The result of research showed that the public prosecutor’s appeal to supreme court with the rationale that judex factie overrides the society’s justice feeling in sentencing in fact had been consistent with the provision of KUHAP and concerning the judge of Supreme Court’s legal argument in examining and sentencing the public prosecutor’s appeal to supreme court regarding the intended case (copulation with minor case), the author could found some legal arguments regarding the judge’s qualifying, constant, and constituting attitude. The meaning of qualifying is the judge will be qualifying about criminal offense  to committed by the offender. The next is constant which means the judge will include act judge will include acts committed by the offender according to the law set out in the legislation. And the last is constituting attitude which means the judge will determines the law beyond reasonable doubt in accordance with criminal offenses in accordance with the evidence.       The benefit of research was that it gave the Judge input in deliberating the public prosecutor’s prosecution wisely and prudently in order to prevent the judex factie from misapplying the law. Then to a victim encountering copulation crime, protection and rehabilitation should be given. Finally, to this copulation crime perpetrator, appropriate punishment should be imposed. Keywords: judex factie, copulation, verdict.
Analisa Pengajuan Upaya Hukum Kasasi Oleh Penuntut Umum Terhadap Putusan Lepas Dari Segala Tuntutan Hukum Dalam Perkara Korupsi Pito Junar Windramara
Verstek Vol 1, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v1i1.38791

Abstract

      Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui Pengajuan Upaya Hukum Kasasi Oleh Penuntut Umum Terhadap Putusan Dilepas Dari Segala Tuntutan Hukum (Onslag Van Alle Rechtsvervolging) Dalam Perkara Korupsi (studi kasus dalam Putusan MA No. 1036k/Pid-Sus/2010 tanggal 28 April 2011).     Hasil peneliti menunjukkan alasan-alasan pengajuan kasasi yang  diajukan oleh jaksa penuntut umum dalam putusan bebas terhadap terdakwa Hamnir yang dijatuhkan oleh Pengadilan Negeri Palopo diterima oleh hakim pada Mahkamah Agung pertimbangan hakim pada Mahkamah Agung menunjukkan kontruksi hukum yang objektif dan logis. Argumentasi hakim pada Mahkamah Agung disusun atas dasar keilmuan yang bisa dipertanggungjawabkan.      Kata kunci : Pengajuan kasasi, putusan lepas dari segala tuntutan hukum
Putusan Lepas (Onslag Van Alle Rect Vervolging) Dengan Alasan Judex Factie Mengabaikan Ahli BPKP Dalam Perkara Korupsi Jeelyke Nilaria Suki Putri
Verstek Vol 1, No 1 (2013)
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v1i1.38784

Abstract

    This study aims to determine the prosecutor's building laws, in asking the reason the reason in order to appeal against the decision off Judex factie and legal argument Judge Appeals to consider the reason the appeal of the Public Prosecutor in the Supreme Court No.1036.K/Pid.Sus/2010.     This research is a normative prescriptive law, USING case approach. The type of material used is a source of law primary legal materials in the form of  Law No. 8 of 1981 on the Law of Criminal Procedure (Criminal Code), Act No. 5 of 2004 on amendments to the Law No. 14 year 1985 on the Supreme Court, Law Number 31 of 1999 on the eradication of corruption, as amended and supplemented by Act 20 of 2001 Number. Secondary sources of legal materials in the form of books, papers, papers, articles, source of internet-related, and other legal materials in the form of tertiary Big Indonesian Dictionary, law dictionary. Technical analysis of the legal materials is to use deductive analysis is to draw conclusions from things that are common to the problems faced concrete.Keywords: Reason Cassation, Expert BPKP, Argument Supreme Court Judges, Corruption. 

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 14