cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Rustamaji
Contact Email
verstek@mail.uns.ac.id
Phone
+6285865999842
Journal Mail Official
verstek@mail.uns.ac.id
Editorial Address
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret Gedung 3, Departemen Hukum Acara Alamat: Ir. Sutami No. 36A,Kentingan, Surakarta
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Verstek
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : -     EISSN : 23550406     DOI : https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v9i3.55027
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Verstek is a peer-reviewed journal published by Procedural Law Department, Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret three times a year in April, August, and December. This Journal aims primarily to facilitate undergraduate students paper over current developments on procedural law issues in Indonesia as well as to publish innovative legal researches concerning Indonesian procedural laws and legal system. It provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to public support a greater global exchange of knowledge. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Procedural Law, included but not limited to legal construction of procedural law, critical construction of procedural law in practice, trends and changes in procedural law, and the technical challenges faced in proedural law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 24 Documents
 1   2   3 
Search results for , issue "Vol 5, No 2 (2017)" : 24 Documents clear
Kajian Yuridis Penggunaan Keterangan Ahli Dalam Tindak Pidana Memperdagangkan Barang Bermerek Palsu Dominikus Andhika Prakosa
Verstek Vol 5, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v5i2.33474

Abstract

         The aim of this research is to know how to use the expert testimony in case evidentiari hearing of couterfeited branded goods trading. The brand which counterfeited by Tri Harsari are CARDILAX,CANADA,JUSTINU,CARDINAL and this research in to know the coresponding of using the expert testimony on case investigation about couterfeiting of branded goods with article 184 of Penal Procedural Law about evidence.           This law research is  normative law  prescriptive with using a case approach, The data collection technique is by using study literature , using deductive, and qualitatively analysis .          Counterfeiting brands are contravene with article 91 on Act no 15 years 2001 about Brands so as to be sentenced for one months and 20 day’s .The investigation cases forgery is using an expert testimony on  the process of verification         The result of this research is explained that the judge assesment on the power of expert testimony on giving an evidence for strengthen the approvement are very considered by judge and affect the judge confidence on giving his decision. The use of expert testimony in explanation on case investigation about couterfeiting of branded goods are in accordance with the provisions of the article 184 of Penal Procedural Law because the information is an instrument of evidence that outlined in article 184 Penal Procedural Law. Keywords: caption expert , a criminal act , marque false trade
Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Menjatuhkan Sanksi Pidana Penjara Terhadap Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Tanpa Menerapkan Rehabilitasi Medis Aswin Pramudita
Verstek Vol 5, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v5i2.33482

Abstract

      This study aims to determine the legal considerations imprisonment judge to impose sanctions against the abuse of drugs are in accordance Criminal Procedure Code and Law No. 35 Year 2009 on Narcotics and to implement the court ruling without medical rehabilitation of perpetrators of abuse of narcotics in accordance Supreme Court Circular No. 4 of 2010.This research is an applied prescriptive normative legal research. The approach used was statute and concept approaches. The law material used consisted of primary and secondary law source. Technique of collecting data used was document study, while technique of analyzing data used in this research was syllogism method with deductive thinking pattern.Legal considerations Surakarta District Court in examining and deciding the case of narcotics cases by case Number: 100 / Pid.Sus / 2015 / PN.SKT with sanctions of imprisonment in accordance with the Criminal Procedure Code and Law No. 35 Year 2009 on Narcotics. In accordance with the adoption of the law on justice and the rule of law. Surakarta District Court in deciding the case with No. 100 / Pid.Sus / 2015 / PN.SKT with cases of drug abuse which penalize without applying medical rehabilitation is not in accordance with the adoption of laws or in this case are not in accordance with SEMA No. 4 2010 on "Placement abuse and drug addicts into rehabilitation institute of medical and social rehabilitation". In SEMA No. 4 of 2010 it was said that the victim and the obligation to conduct rehabilitation of drug addicts.        Keywords: Legal Considerations, Rehabilitation, Narcotics
Kesesuaian Alasan Pengajuan Peninjauan Kembali Dalam Tindak Pidana Penipuan Dengan Ketentuan KUHAP Ismail Eka Syahrial
Verstek Vol 5, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v5i2.33472

Abstract

      This research aims is to find out whether the reason for the submission of a review in supreme court by the convicted person on the ground of novum is in compliance with article 263 paragraph (2) letter a Code Of Criminal Procedure on the basis of the review request as well as to find out whether the legal consideration of Supreme Court Justices grant the petition for review in the case of fraud is in compliance with article 266 Code Of Criminal Procedure regarding the result of the request for review.     Types of legal research this is a normative legal research that is both prescriptive and applied. Type of data used are secondary data. Study document used as data collection techniques.      The results obtained from the research are : first, the reason for filing the review by Widar Kusuma convict on fraud lawsuit on the basis of novum has pursuant to section 263 subsection (2) letter a Code Of Criminal Procedure on the basis of a request for review. Second, consideration of the law of the Supreme Court Justices grant the petition for review in the case of fraud on a Supreme Court Verdict Number 36/PK/Pid/2013 have been in accordance with the article 266 Code Of Criminal Procedure regarding the result of the request for review, namely the suspension of the verdict of the District Court and the deliverance of the convicted person.      Keywords : The Basis Of The Review Request, Novum, The Case Of Fraud, Legal Consideration Of Supreme Court Justices
Dasar Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Menjatuhkan Sanksi Dalam Perkara Kekerasan Terhadap Barang Diska Harsandini
Verstek Vol 5, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v5i2.33496

Abstract

     Demonstration is one part of democratic life to express opinions in public with certain demands to those that sued. Demonstration is legal in a democratic constitutional state and it is guaranteed and protected by law. It applies in Indonesia. Based on the Law No. 9 of 1998 Freedom of Expression in Public that freedom expression in public is a human right which is guaranteed under Article 28 of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945.     At the end of 2013, there was a demonstration conducted by two students in Majalengka, namely, Yogi Nandang Ruhiyat and Iwan Sulistiawan, both defendants are members of the PMII organization. The demonstrations ended with vandalism of public facilities and property of PMII organizations. The defendant’s reason to take the action is because their disappointments with the policy of the PMII organization.    The conclusion of this study explained that the basic of decision-making by Supreme Court judges has changed the Bandung High Court Decision No. 172 / PID / 2014 / PT.Bdg is in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. Based on the Supreme Court Decision No. 1217 K / Pid / 2014 that providing sanctions of imprisonment is appropriate because it contains elements of good judgments.     Keywords: demonstrations, basic decision-making, Justices considerations, and the elements of good judgments

Page 3 of 3 | Total Record : 24

 1   2   3 

Filter by Year

2017 2017


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 12, No 4: OKTOBER - DESEMBER 2024 Vol 12, No 3: JULI - SEPTEMBER 2024 Vol 11, No 4 (2023) Vol 11, No 3: 2023 Vol 11, No 2: 2023 Vol 11, No 1: JANUARI - APRIL 2023 Vol 11, No 1: 2023 Vol 10, No 4: 2022 Vol 10, No 3: 2022 Vol 10, No 2: 2022 Vol 10, No 1 (2022): JANUARI - APRIL Vol 10, No 1: 2022 Vol 9, No 4: 2021 Vol 9, No 3: 2021 Vol 9, No 3 (2021) Vol 9, No 2 (2021) Vol 9, No 2: 2021 Vol 9, No 1: 2021 Vol 9, No 2: MEI - AGUTUS Vol 8, No 3 (2020): DESEMBER JURNAL VERSTEK VOL. 8 NO. 3 ( SEPTEMBER - DESEMBER 2020 ) Vol 8, No 2 (2020): AGUSTUS Vol 8, No 1 (2020): APRIL Vol 8, No 3: SEPTEMBER - DESEMBER Vol 8, No 2: MEI - AGUSTUS Vol 8, No 1: JANUARI-APRIL Vol 7, No 3 (2019): DESEMBER Vol 7, No 2 (2019): AGUSTUS Vol 7, No 2 (2019) Vol 7, No 1 (2019): APRIL Vol 7, No 1 (2019): Foreword Vol 7, No 3: SEPTEMBER - DESEMBER Vol 7, No 2: MEI - AGUSTUS Vol 7, No 1: JANUARI-APRIL Vol 6, No 3 (2018) Vol 6, No 3 (2018): DESEMBER Vol 6, No 2 (2018): AGUSTUS Vol 6, No 2 (2018) Vol 6, No 1 (2018) Vol 5, No 3 (2017) Vol 5, No 2 (2017) Vol 5, No 1 (2017) Vol 4, No 3 (2016) Vol 4, No 2 (2016) Vol 4, No 1 (2016) Vol 3, No 2 (2015) Vol 3, No 1 (2015) Vol 2, No 3 (2014) Vol 2, No 2 (2014) Vol 2, No 1 (2014) Vol 1, No 3 (2013) Vol 1, No 2 (2013) Vol 1, No 1 (2013) More Issue