cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Ebit Bimas Saputra
Contact Email
dinasti.info@gmail.com
Phone
+628117404455
Journal Mail Official
editor@dinastires.org
Editorial Address
Case Amira Prive Jl. H. Risin No. 64 D, Pondok Jagung Timur, Serpong Utara - Tangerang Selatan
Location
Kota tangerang selatan,
Banten
INDONESIA
Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities
Published by Dinasti Research
ISSN : 27471985     EISSN : 29622816     DOI : https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities is a research journal in Law, Humanities and Politics published since 2020 by the Dinasti Research. This journal aims to disseminate research results to academics, practitioners, students, and other parties who are interested in the fields of Law, Humanities and Politics which includes Curriculum Management, Graduate Management, Learning Process Management, Facilities and Infrastructure Management, Education Management, Funding Management, Management of Assessment, Management of Educators and Education Personnel, etc.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Sosial (Lain-Lain)
Articles 1,424 Documents
 139   140   141   142   143 
Criminal Law Policy on the Application of Restorative Justice to Traffic Offenses Resulting in Death Wayan Santoso; Nyoman Abraham Jason Santoso
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 6 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i6.3886

Abstract

There are interpretive issues regarding traffic offenses resulting in death as regulated under Article 310 paragraph (4) of Law Number 22 of 2009 which stands at the intersection between the exclusion clauses of Article 82 letters e and f of the new Criminal Procedure Code. This study aims to analyze the juridical position of restorative justice following the reform of the Criminal Code and Criminal Procedure Code, as well as to formulate a more proportional direction for criminal law policy in its application to fatal traffic offenses. The research employs a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings show that restorative justice constitutes a manifestation of the objectives of punishment under Articles 51 and 54 of the National Criminal Code, a textual disharmony exists between Article 82 letters e and f of the Criminal Procedure Code concerning fatal traffic offenses. A systematic examination of the structure of the National Criminal Code reveals a separation between intentional homicide offenses (Chapter XXI) and negligence-based offenses causing death (Chapter XXIII). Article 310 paragraph (4) of the Road Traffic Law is more appropriately classified as a negligence-based offense. This normative ambiguity still requires further clarification through legislative harmonization.
Population Administration Service Policy Innovation Through E-SPASI in the City of Bandung Fery Rosa Nuryadi; Tati Sarihati
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 6 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i6.3888

Abstract

This research is motivated by the ongoing problem of queues in population administration services even though the E-SPASI (Electronic Queue Registration System Via SMS) program has been implemented by the Population and Civil Registration Office of the City of Bandung since 2016. The research gap was identified because previous studies on similar digital innovations in population administration generally only examined one stakeholder perspective and rarely integrated the perspectives of policy makers, technical implementers, system managers, and service users at the same time. This study aims to analyze the implementation of E-SPASI using the theory of Rogers Innovation Diffusion (2003), including relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability, and observability. The method used is qualitative descriptive, with data obtained through in-depth interviews with the Head of Service, service staff, system managers, and the service user community, supported by observation and documentation. The results of the study show that E-SPASI provides real benefits in the form of ease of registration, efficiency of waiting times, and service effectiveness, and has adapted to technological developments through the switch from SMS to WhatsApp. However, its implementation still faces dependence on third-party technical infrastructure, limited access for digitally vulnerable groups, limited daily quotas, and uneven socialization. As a novelty, this multi-stakeholder analysis reveals that the main obstacle to innovation lies not in the complexity of the system, but in the reliability of technical infrastructure and the dissemination of official information that is not yet optimal.
Quality of Marriage Registration Services at the Religious Affairs Office (KUA) of Ciparay District, Bandung Regency Heri Hermawan; Tati Sarihati
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 6 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i6.3889

Abstract

This research is motivated by indications that the quality of service at the Religious Affairs Office (KUA) of Ciparay District, Bandung Regency, has not fully met the expectations of the community, despite the improvement of facilities and the implementation of an online registration system. The research gap was identified because previous studies on marriage registration services generally only relied on the SERVQUAL model to describe the perception of services, without explaining why frontline officers behaved in this way. This study aims to analyze the quality of marriage registration services at the Ciparay District KUA based on five dimensions, namely tangible, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy. The method used is qualitative descriptive, with data collection through in-depth interviews, observations, and document reviews, and analyzed through source triangulation. The results of the study show that services in general have run well in all dimensions, characterized by improving facilities, compliance with procedures, disseminating information through various channels, technological assistance, and friendly attitude of officers. Shortcomings are still found in the completeness of information, certain delays, lack of officer initiatives, and gaps in technology access in rural areas.
The Direction of Indonesian Criminal Law Policy in Addressing Artificial Intelligence Disruption in the Digital Era Medrico Aditya Ednur
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 6 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i6.3897

Abstract

The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the digital era has created significant disruptions that not only affect technological aspects but also challenge the classical constructs of Indonesian criminal law. Possessing analytical capabilities and decision-making autonomy without human psychological dimensions, AI presents normative dilemmas regarding the principle of culpability (mens rea) and legal certainty. This study aims to analyze the current legal construction of AI regulation within the Indonesian criminal law system and to formulate the future direction of an adaptive and equitable criminal law policy. Utilizing a normative legal research method, this study analyzes relevant statutes and legal policy literature. The findings reveal that current AI regulations in Indonesia remain partial, indirect, and fragmented (such as within the Electronic Information and Transactions Law), leading to normative gaps, difficulties in attributing criminal liability, algorithmic evidentiary challenges (the "black box" phenomenon), and elevated risks of AI-driven cybercrimes. The future direction of Indonesian criminal law policy must be anticipatory and progressive by establishing dedicated risk-based regulations, reconstructing criminal responsibility frameworks (including corporate and strict liability), strengthening preventive measures, enhancing law enforcement capacity, and harmonizing with international legal standards.

Page 143 of 143 | Total Record : 1424

 139   140   141   142   143 

Filter by Year

2020 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 6 No. 6 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 4 No. 6 (2024): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (September-October 2024) Vol. 4 No. 5 (2024): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (July-August 2024) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2024): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (May-June 2024) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (March - April 2024) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (January - February 2024) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (November - December 2023) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2023): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (August 2023) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (May 2023) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (February 2023) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (November 2022) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2022): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (August 2022) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (May 2022) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (February 2022) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (November 2021) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2021): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (August 2021) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2021): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (May 2021) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (February 2021) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (November 2020) More Issue