cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Muchtar A H Labetubun
Contact Email
mahlabetubun@gmail.com
Phone
+6285243175321
Journal Mail Official
bacaritalawjournal@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Ir. M. Putuhena Campus Poka-Ambon
Location
Kota ambon,
Maluku
INDONESIA
Bacarita Law Journal
Published by Universitas Pattimura
ISSN : -     EISSN : 27759407     DOI : 10.30598/bacarita
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
BACARITA LAW JOURNAL Adalah jurnal Yang Diterbitkan Oleh Program Studi Hukum, Program Studi Diluar Kampus Utama (PSDKU) Universitas Pattimura di Kepulauan Aru, Dua Kali Setahun Pada Bulan April Dan November. Tujuan Jurnal Ini Adalah Untuk Menyediakan Tempat Bagi Akademisi, Peneliti Dan Praktisi Untuk Menerbitkan Artikel Penelitian Asli Atau Artikel Ulasan. Jurnal Ini Menyediakan Akses Terbuka Langsung Ke Kontennya Dengan Prinsip Bahwa Membuat Penelitian Tersedia Secara Bebas Untuk Mendukung Pertukaran Pengetahuan Global Yang Lebih Besar. BACARITA LAW Tersedia Dalam Versi Cetak Dan Online. Bahasa Yang Digunakan Dalam Jurnal Ini Adalah Bahasa Indonesia Dan Bahasa Inggris. Ruang Lingkup Artikel Yang Diterbitkan Dalam Jurnal Ini Membahas Berbagai Topik Ilmu Hukum Khususnya Berkaitan Dengan Hukum Keperdataan, Hukum Pidana, Hukum Tata Negara/Administrasi Negara, Dan Hukum Internasional
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 123 Documents
 9   10   11   12   13 
Analisis Judge's Consideration of the Elements of State Financial Loss: Study of Decision Number: 78/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2024/PN Jkt.Pst Arter Lukas Tulia; Christenia Gladysthea Arvita Andries
Bacarita Law Journal Vol 6 No 2 (2026): April (2026) BACARITA Law Journal
Publisher : Programs Study Outside the Main Campus in Law Pattimura University ARU Islands Regency

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30598/bacarita.v6i2.18406

Abstract

The purpose is to analyze the Judge's considerations in the Central Jakarta District Court Decision Number 78/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2024/PN Jkt.Pst regarding the element of state financial losses in Article 2 paragraph (1) of Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption. This research uses normative juridical methods with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The results showed that after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 25/PUU-XIV/2016, the element of state financial loss must be proven in actual loss, not just potential loss. However, in practice, law enforcers, especially in Decision Number 78/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2024/PN Jkt.Pst, seem to ignore this. In the Budi Said case, the defendant was found guilty even though the gold that was the object of the case had not been received factually, so that the element of state loss had not been fulfilled in reality and the actions of PT Antam Tbk were civil actions in the private sphere so that they could not be qualified as state financial losses. This journal criticizes law enforcement that pays less attention to the meaning of material offenses in corruption cases, especially related to proving state financial losses and ignoring incracht civil decisions on legal events a quo.
Personal Data Protection for Health Data Security Governance in E-Health System Nazwa Putri Mbuinga; Inayah R Bempah; Zalwa Natasha Anggreini Manoppo
Bacarita Law Journal Vol 6 No 2 (2026): April (2026) BACARITA Law Journal
Publisher : Programs Study Outside the Main Campus in Law Pattimura University ARU Islands Regency

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30598/bacarita.v6i2.23679

Abstract

Personal data, including medical information, is highly vulnerable to leaks, which can trigger various cybercrimes such as identity theft and fraud. This study uses a normative legal approach with conceptualization methods and a review of legislation to examine the challenges and solutions in implementing data protection in accordance with Law Number 27 of 2022. The research findings indicate that despite increasingly strengthened legal support, various obstacles such as low public awareness, limited law enforcement resources, and complexity remain major barriers. Therefore, it is recommended that regulations be harmonized, encryption technology implemented, and public literacy and training for healthcare providers be improved to maintain patient data privacy and security.
Preventive and Repressive Legal Protection in Cross-Sectoral Business Contracts in Production Forest Areas Muhammad Fauzi Achmad Bahtar; M Syahrul Borman
Bacarita Law Journal Vol 6 No 2 (2026): April (2026) BACARITA Law Journal
Publisher : Programs Study Outside the Main Campus in Law Pattimura University ARU Islands Regency

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30598/bacarita.v6i2.24558

Abstract

The practice of cross-sectoral business contracts in Indonesia, especially in production forest areas, still often faces the problem of unbalanced bargaining positions of the parties, weaknesses in the formulation of contract clauses, and the lack of optimal protection of legal rights and obligations. This condition can be seen in the cooperation agreement between forestry companies holding Timber Forest Products Utilization Business Permits (IUPHHK) and mining companies that utilize production forest areas for the construction and use of transportation roads. Without a comprehensive and fair contract design, differences in sectoral interests and high environmental risks and long-term investment have the potential to lead to legal disputes. This study aims to analyze the form of preventive and repressive legal protection in cross-sectoral business contracts in production forest areas, formulate crucial contractual clauses, and assess the effectiveness of alternative dispute resolution in providing legal certainty for the parties. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory and conceptual approach through the study of legal norms, treaty principles, and relevant legal doctrines. The results of the study show that preventive and repressive legal protection has not been fully accommodated optimally in cooperation agreements. Improving contracts through cost-sharing arrangements, tariff adjustments, environmental protection responsibilities, force majeure clauses, default sanctions, and alternative dispute resolution mechanisms that are clear and effective are needed to strengthen legal certainty and prevent and resolve disputes in a fair manner.

Page 13 of 13 | Total Record : 123

 9   10   11   12   13 

Filter by Year

2020 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 6 No 2 (2026): April (2026) BACARITA Law Journal Vol 6 No 1 (2025): August (2025) BACARITA Law Journal Vol 5 No 2 (2025): April (2025) BACARITA Law Journal Vol 5 No 1 (2024): Agustus (2024) BACARITA Law Journal Vol 4 No 2 (2024): April 2024 BACARITA Law Journal Vol 4 No 1 (2023): Agustus (2023) BACARITA Law Journal Vol 3 No 2 (2023): April (2023) BACARITA Law Journal Vol 3 No 1 (2022): Agustus (2022) BACARITA Law Journal Vol 2 No 2 (2022): April (2022) BACARITA Law Journal Vol 2 No 1 (2021): Agustus (2021) Bacarita Law Journal Vol 1 No 2 (2021): April (2021) Bacarita Law Journal Vol 1 No 1 (2020): Agustus (2020) Bacarita Law Journal More Issue