cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Andi Akram
Contact Email
sekretariatjurnalkumdil@gmail.com
Phone
+6221-29079286
Journal Mail Official
jurnalhukumperadilan@mahkamahagung.go.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Jend. A. Yani Kav. 58 Lt. 10 Cempaka Putih Jakarta Pusat
Location
Kota bogor,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan
Published by Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hukum dan Peradilan MA RI
ISSN : 23033274     EISSN : 25281100     DOI : https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp
Core Subject : Economy, Social,
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan (JHP) is published by the Research Center for Law and Judiciary of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. JHP aimed to be a peer-reviewed platform and an authoritative source of information on legal and judiciary studies. The scope of JHP is analytical, objective, empirical, and contributive literature on the dynamics and development of legal studies, specifically in Indonesia. JHP welcomes scientific papers on a range of topics from research studies, judicial decisions, theoretical studies, literature reviews, philosophical and critical consultations that are analytical, objective, and systematic. However, from a wide range of topics that researchers can choose from, JHP puts more attention to the papers focusing on the sociology of law, living law, legal philosophy, history of national law, customary law, literature studies, international law, interdisciplinary, and empirical studies. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan (JHP) is a media dedicated to judicial personnel, academician, practitioners, and law expertise in actualizing the idea of research, development, and analysis of law and judiciary. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan comes out three times a year in March, July, and November.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 10 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 4, No 2 (2015)" : 10 Documents clear
PEMANFAATAN TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI UNTUK MENDORONG PERCEPATAN PENYELESAIAN PERKARA DI MAHKAMAH AGUNG Asep Nursobah
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 4, No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.4.2.2015.323-334

Abstract

Utilization of information technology by Supreme Court is to boost the eficiency and effectivity the resolution of the case, but in fact the Utilization of information technology still focus on electronic record only, the technology hasn’t been optimalized yet to improve the performance of judiciary institution.Keywords: Information Technology, Cases Settlement, Supreme Court
PENGHINAAN TERHADAP PENGADILAN VERSUS KEBEBASAN PERS Bagir Manan
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 4, No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.4.2.2015.189-198

Abstract

Press is manifestation of public soverignty to the power. Press control function covers critic, analytic, and information to the public, so all the activities which are from branches of power based on the public wish and hope. Freedom of press is limited by the press law and code of conduct. The freedom of press can not be used for humaliation, harassment, or interference of judicature process. Press must respect the institution and independency of judiciary.Keywords : Contempt of Court, Freedom and Press
URGENSI DAN PROSPEK PENGATURAN (IUS CONSTITUENDUM) UU TENTANG CONTEMPT OF COURT UNTUK MENEGAKKAN MARTABAT DAN WIBAWA PERADILAN Lilik Mulyadi
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 4, No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.4.2.2015.275-298

Abstract

Contempt of court law is urgent, immediately, and urge, so need critically, academicly, and comprehendship analyzing and research to protect the honour and uphold the dignity and souverignty of the courtKeywords : Ius Constituendum, Contempt of Court, Court Dignity
PENCEMARAN DAN PERUSAKAN LINGKUNGAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM ISLAM Abdul Manan
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 4, No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.4.2.2015.223-240

Abstract

Regulations governing the environment in Indonesia are many and scattered in various regulations. But it seems that these regulations stand alone, no activity and effectiveness. How to environmental management are not planned and are not integrated in a harmonious and integral cause destruction and environmental pollution. Islamic law has principles that must form the basis and starting point of the activity of the social forces in order to ensure an orderly life, balance, and harmony so there is no pollution and environmental destruction that causes loss of balance and harmony of life in this world. Among these principles, namely equality, balance, benefit, mutual cooperation and justice. Through the implementation of these principles is expected to rule on the environment that has been set it can run properly.Keywords : Environmental Pollution and Destruction, Environment,Islamic law
URGENSI PEMBUATAN UNDANG-UNDANG CONTEMPT OF COURT UNTUK MENEGAKKAN MARTABAT DAN WIBAWA PERADILAN HP Panggabean
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 4, No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.4.2.2015.241-256

Abstract

It’s time to draft the contempt of court bill to guarantee the dignity and soverignity of court institution and the law enforcement process, the supreme of court makes strong effort to improve the supervision of judge performance quality and administrative official judiciaryKeywords : Act Urgency, Contempt of Court, Court Dignity
ASPEK HUKUM PENINJAUAN KEMBALI LEBIH DARI SATU KALI DALAM PERKARA PIDANA (PERSPEKTIF PENEGAKAN KEADILAN, KEPASTIAN DAN KEMANFAATAN HUKUM) Budi Suhariyanto
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 4, No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.4.2.2015.335-350

Abstract

Constitutional Court Decision No. 34 / PUU-XI / 2013 has opened the space PK is not just one time as provided for by the Article 268 paragraph (3) Criminal Procedure Code so that PK can be done many times during found and submission of PK Novum although it has done previously. Perspective is the basis of this decision is justice. Responding to the verdict of the Constitutional Court, the Supreme Court publishes SEMA No. 7 Year 2014 on Reconsideration Request Submission In Criminal Case. Through the SEMA Supreme Court warned that provisions PK only once outside the Article 268 Criminal Procedure Code which was canceled by the Constitutional Court, therefore, PK criminal cases (in a similar case) is more than 1 (one) can not be accepted. Restrictions on the desired PK criminal case the Supreme Court is to provide legal certainty in the process of final settlement of criminal matters. Government through Minister of Law and Human Rights take strategic steps in resolving the legal expediency vision polemic filing legal remedies PK criminal cases, by coordinating state agencies and relevant ministries so as to produce an agreement that filing PK many times can not be executed until the issuance of PP. Therefore still valid set forth in the Judicial Authority Law and the Law on the Supreme Court.Keywords : Legal Aspects, Reconsideration, Criminal Case
CONTEMPT OF COURT DI INDONESIA, PERLUKAH? Otto Hasibuan
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 4, No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.4.2.2015.267-274

Abstract

Contempt of Court law needs to be made apart with specific law, but waiting or at least fulfillment at once the changed of law system with the comprehendship way and improving the professionalism of judge, attorney, police officer, advocat, journalist, and socialization to the society of justice seeker.Keywords : Contempt of Court, Indonesia
MASALAH “LEGAL STANDING” DALAM PUTUSAN - PUTUSAN HAK UJI MATERIIL MAHKAMAH AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA TAHUN 2012 – 2014 Dani Elpah
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 4, No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.4.2.2015.299-322

Abstract

The paradigm has changed from disadvantaged right equalized with the interest, without classifying the requirement of disadvantaged right that must fulfill 5 (five) requirement, those are : (a) there is a right for applicant that is given on law and regulation (b) this right is disadvantaged if considered by applicant c) the disadvantage must be specific and actual or at least potential (d) causality connectivity must be exist; (e) the disadvantage will not happen if the application is acceptedKeywords : Legal Standing, Judicial Review, Supreme Court
URGENSI PEMBENTUKAN UNDANG-UNDANG TENTANG PENGHINAAN DALAM PERSIDANGAN (CONTEMPT OF COURT) UNTUK MENEGAKKAN MARTABAT DAN WIBAWA PERADILAN Sareh Wiyono M
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 4, No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.4.2.2015.257-266

Abstract

The law of contempt of court must be formed immediately along with the restriction of which action becomes part of contempt in the court or which one doesn’t. The judge must improve the professionalism and self-Integrity in running the duty and obligationKeywords : Urgency, Contempt, Court
UPAYA PERANCANGAN UNDANG-UNDANG TENTANG LARANGAN MERENDAHKAN MARTABAT PENGADILAN Jimly Asshiddiqie
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 4, No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.4.2.2015.199-222

Abstract

To protect the dignity and soverignty of judiciary not only uses criminal law mechanism but also uses both civil contempt of court and ethical contempt of court integrally.Keywords : Act Proposal, Contempt of Court

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 10

 1 

Filter by Year

2015 2015


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 14 No 3 (2025) Vol 14 No 2 (2025) Vol 14 No 1 (2025) Vol 13 No 3 (2024) Vol 13, No 3 (2024) Vol 13, No 2 (2024) Vol 13 No 2 (2024) Vol 13, No 1 (2024) Vol 13 No 1 (2024) Vol 12 No 3 (2023) Vol 12, No 3 (2023) Vol 12 No 2 (2023) Vol 12, No 2 (2023) Vol 12 No 1 (2023) Vol 12, No 1 (2023) Vol 11 No 3 (2022) Vol 11, No 3 (2022) Vol 11, No 2 (2022) Vol 11 No 2 (2022) Vol 11, No 1 (2022) Vol 11 No 1 (2022) Vol 10 No 3 (2021) Vol 10, No 3 (2021) Vol 10, No 2 (2021) Vol 10 No 2 (2021) Vol 10, No 1 (2021) Vol 10 No 1 (2021) Vol 9, No 3 (2020) Vol 9 No 3 (2020) Vol 9, No 2 (2020) Vol 9 No 2 (2020) Vol 9, No 1 (2020) Vol 9 No 1 (2020) Vol 8, No 3 (2019) Vol 8 No 3 (2019) Vol 8 No 2 (2019) Vol 8, No 2 (2019) Vol 8, No 1 (2019) Vol 8 No 1 (2019) Vol 7 No 3 (2018) Vol 7, No 3 (2018) Vol 7 No 2 (2018) Vol 7, No 2 (2018) Vol 7, No 1 (2018) Vol 7 No 1 (2018) Vol 6 No 3 (2017) Vol 6, No 3 (2017) Vol 6 No 2 (2017) Vol 6, No 2 (2017) Vol 6, No 1 (2017) Vol 6 No 1 (2017) Vol 5, No 3 (2016) Vol 5 No 3 (2016) Vol 5 No 2 (2016) Vol 5, No 2 (2016) Vol 5, No 1 (2016) Vol 5 No 1 (2016) Vol 4, No 3 (2015) Vol 4 No 3 (2015) Vol 4, No 2 (2015) Vol 4 No 2 (2015) Vol 4 No 1 (2015) Vol 4, No 1 (2015) Vol 3 No 3 (2014) Vol 3, No 3 (2014) Vol 3 No 2 (2014) Vol 3, No 2 (2014) Vol 3 No 1 (2014) Vol 3, No 1 (2014) Vol 2 No 3 (2013) Vol 2, No 3 (2013) Vol 2, No 2 (2013) Vol 2 No 2 (2013) Vol 2 No 1 (2013) Vol 2, No 1 (2013) Vol 1, No 3 (2012) Vol 1 No 3 (2012) Vol 1, No 2 (2012) Vol 1 No 2 (2012) Vol 1 No 1 (2012) Vol 1, No 1 (2012) More Issue