cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Shofwan Al Banna Choiruzzad
Contact Email
shofwan.albanna@gmail.com
Phone
+62217873744
Journal Mail Official
global@ui.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Prof. Selo Soemardjan, Nusantara 2 2nd Floor, Faculty of Social and Political Science Universitas Indonesia, Depok City 16424, Indonesia
Location
Kota depok,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional
Published by Universitas Indonesia
ISSN : 14115492     EISSN : 25798251     DOI : https://doi.org/10.7454/global
Core Subject :
Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional is a biannual peer-reviewed journal that specialises in foreign policy, international security, international political economy, and transnational issues involving actors of the Global South, having implications towards the Global South, or perspectives from the Global South that are often overlooked in the mainstream journals in the Global North. With its first issue published in 1990, Global is the oldest university-based journal of International Relations in Indonesia, a historically leading actor in the Global South. Hosted by the Department of International Relations, Universitas Indonesia, Global has been serving as one of the primary platforms for ideas exchanges among Indonesia’s most influential thinkers and beyond. In its attempt to internationalise and further bridge the North and South perspectives, the journal welcomes submission of manuscripts that would be of interest to scholarly communities and policymakers. For this purpose, since 2019 Global only publishes articles in English. Global publishes two types of articles: original research articles offering theory-driven empirical analysis and review articles that critically examine contemporary debates in International Relations literature.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 7 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 6, No. 2" : 7 Documents clear
EKONOMI POLITIK DAN REKONSTRUKSI IRAK Sihbudi, Riza
Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional Vol. 6, No. 2
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The plan for Iraqi reconstruction was formulated long time prior to the US-led coalition invasion in Iraq. Initial estimates place the cost of reconstruction (and the costs of maintaining a military presence) in Iraq to be anywhere between $100 billion and $500 billion, although the ultimate costs on the amount of time and number of US personnel stationed there. So, the Iraqi reconstruction is the most US ambitious project since the Second World War. Reconstruction is being managed by USAID under the control of the Pentagon, rather than the USAID normal operations supervised by the Department of State. In other words, the Pentagon that was dominated by the so-called Zionist mafia controlled both the invasion and the reconstruction. will depend As D. Albert Pastore stated, the Pentagon is under the control of a hard core group of Zionist Mafia led by "the gang of 3" that is Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, and Douglas Feith. Therefore, the Iraqi reconstruction is a planning which does not serve the basic interest in the long run of the American nation. It serves the imperialistic interest of Israel and the Zionist groups --who now have a great say in the US policy under the President George Bush --to realize their dream of "the Great Israel". W.
PARADOKS PASAR BEBAS DAN DEMOKRASI DALAM BINGKAI KERESAHAN ETNIS Budiyani, Annisa E.
Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional Vol. 6, No. 2
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Many believe that the ongoing process of exporting free-market democracy is the best prescription for multiple ills in the so-called 'under-developed' non-western societies. The combination of free-market principles in economy and free election system of political democracy is believed to bring an ultimate solution lead to global peace, prosperity, as well as stability. These have misled us in a very critical way. Exporting free-market democracy, instead of bringing global peace, prosperity, and justice, has been the source of instability, global resentment, and, moreover, violence. Amy Chua rose up an argument that globalizing free-market democracy has been the source for worldwide group hatred and ethnic violence. It is because in most of non-western societies, live what she calls 'the market-dominant minority', ethnic minorities who, for widely varying reasons, tend under market conditions to dominante economically, often to a startling extent, the"indigenous" majorities around them. Her book has been the story of contradictory relations between those of the 'chosen' few and those of the rest of the many. It explained how free-market system of economic and democratic system of politic tend to benefit different groups, widen the existing gap within society, increase exclusiveness as well as the sense of ethno-nationalism, and thus, bring about global clashes and instability.
KEDAULATAN POPULER DI TENGAH KEDAULATAN NEGARA, YURIDIKSI DOMESTIK, DAN INTERVENSI Zein, Patra M
Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional Vol. 6, No. 2
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Under the theme of state's sovereignty, this article puts intervention as its main framework, from the use of traditional threats, i.e. the threat of physical power and state's illegal actions, to the indirect threats which are contained by international trade's unfair conduct. Using international law perspective as its background, this article describes the "death" of absolute sovereignty as a concept. Nowadays, the concepts of sovereignty are dominated by interventions and the new growing concept of popular sovereignty. In line the doctrine of domestic jurisdiction must also face a real challenge from the borderless universal jurisdiction. The last point with this tendency, of this article is marked by a statement that questions Indonesia's sovereignty as a state.
KEDAULATAN NEGARA VS TANGGUNG JAWAB NEGARA DALAM UPAYA PERLINDUNGAN LINGKUNGAN GLOBAL Isnaeni, Nurul
Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional Vol. 6, No. 2
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The dominance of the concept of sovereignty has been challenged in the term of international environmental relations. The development of issues with its transboundary character is one of the challenger. Normatively and empirically, the concept of sovereignty, which refers to a state's right to, inter alia, exploit its natural resources, has now been challenged by the concept of state responsibility, which refers to the state's obligation to manage the sustainability of its resources. This can be seen in various international environmental regimes. Though, the principles in the regimes are of softer status that they do not create substantive obligations that are actionable in their own right.
CITES DAN KERJA SAMA INTERNASIONAL PENANGANAN PERDAGANGAN SATWA LIAR Jaslim, Rio Syahrial
Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional Vol. 6, No. 2
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article generally discusses the regime of CITES and how it managed international cooperation on handling the wildlife trade since its entry had come into force. The article then attempts to define the dynamics of wildlife trade issues, particularly those dealing with legal problem at the level of international system, to answer these following questions: How was CITES convention being implemented, and what are the barriers that should be overcome by international cooperation to handle wildlife trade by using environmental regimes?
KEDAULATAN, TERITORIALITAS, DAN KEAMANAN PASCA WESTPHALIA Anggoro, Kusnanto
Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional Vol. 6, No. 2
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

There are real technological and normative changes that have strengthened the need to re­conceptualize the concepts of statehood, security, and sovereignty. The sources of sovereignty, internal legitimacy, and external recognition, have been in serious flux. More than ever before, power or authority had been defined along functional, not territorial lines. The individual right to security of person entails an obligation on the part of the state to implement this right and that individual right to security of state entails an obligation the part of international community to implement this right. Norms are getting more imperative in international relations. Recent development shows that coercive power is being introduced in this phenomenon. This article argues that sovereignty is nonetheless an empirical phenomenon less than a legal on and social phenomenon. A nebulous future awaits. In the absence of world government capable of asserting its legitimate claim, normative authority would confront the fortress of power demanding sort of non-compliance sovereignty. The struggle for global norms through coercive sovereignty may end up with global anarchy.
TANTANGAN DALAM PERLUASAN UNI EROPA KE NEGARA-NEGARA EROPA TENGAH DAN TIMUR Chandrawati, Nurani
Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional Vol. 6, No. 2
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article tries to explain several challenges that must be faced by European Union (EU) about its decision to enlarge its membership by admitting eight Central and Eastern European Countries (CEECs) on May 1st, 2004. This is not an easy decision, because the eight new members from CEECs are still going through a transformation period. An interesting question derived from this phenomena is whether the entry of eight CEECs into the EU will increase EU's level of integration into federalism or, on will the contrary, add many new problems for the integration process. Overall, there are three challenges facing the European Union in its sixth enlargement process by admitting eight CEECs. The first challenge is the alleged negative motivation of the new members; second, the problem of decision making process inside EU institutions; and thirdly, financial burden caused by the funding of transformation processes in the eight CEECs. Altogether, these challenges will lead EU into intergovernmentalism and not federalism, which might be the prominent desire of EU's founding fathers.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 7

 1 

Filter by Year

2004 2004


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 27, No. 1 Vol. 26, No. 2 Vol. 26, No. 1 Vol. 25, No. 2 Vol. 25, No. 1 Vol. 24, No. 2 Vol. 24, No. 1 Vol. 23, No. 2 Vol. 23, No. 1 Vol. 22, No. 2 Vol. 22, No. 1 Vol. 21, No. 2 Vol. 21, No. 1 Vol. 20, No. 2 Vol. 20, No. 1 Vol. 17, No. 1 Vol. 19, No. 2 Vol. 19, No. 1 Vol. 18, No. 2 Vol. 18, No. 1 Vol. 16, No. 2 Vol. 16, No. 1 Vol. 15, No. 2 Vol. 15, No. 1 Vol. 13, No. 1 Vol. 10, No. 2 Vol. 10, No. 1 Vol. 9, No. 2 Vol. 9, No. 1 Vol. 8, No. 2 Vol. 8, No. 1 Vol. 7, No. 2 Vol. 7, No. 1 Vol. 6, No. 2 Vol. 6, No. 1 Vol. 5, No. 1 Vol. 3, No. 0 More Issue