cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Risqi Maydia Putri
Contact Email
admin@jfpublisher.com
Phone
+6281358580584
Journal Mail Official
admin@jfpublisher.com
Editorial Address
GRAHA INDAH E-11 Gayung Kebonsari, Gayungan, Surabaya, East Java. 60235
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Yuris: Journal of Court and Justice
Published by JF Publisher
ISSN : -     EISSN : 28097572     DOI : https://doi.org/10.56943/jcj
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
In 2022, YURIS (Journal of Court and Justice) giving opportunities for legal researcher to publish scientific article The editorial team of YURIS seek publication on the paper which related to the contribution of law theory and enforcement and to consider them carefully for external review. By following the standard and procedures which published four times a year. It goes by the review process from expert and external reviewer.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 111 Documents
 8   9   10   11   12 
Reconstructing Curator Liability for Creditor Losses in Indonesian Bankruptcy Law Made Warka; Indra Triantoro; Krinasi Nasution
YURIS: Journal of Court and Justice [IN PRESS] Vol. 5 Issue 3 (2026)
Publisher : jfpublisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56943/jcj.v5i3.1034

Abstract

Article 72 of Indonesian Bankruptcy Law obliges a curator to compensate losses arising from fault or negligence in managing and settling bankrupt assets, yet the provision does not define how fault should be measured, how causation should be proven, or what defense a curator may raise, which leaves both creditors and curators exposed to inconsistent outcomes. Prior studies on curator accountability have examined this problem mainly through procedural or criminal law lenses, leaving the underlying structure of Article 72 itself largely unexamined. This study addresses that gap by reconstructing Article 72 through the theory of the purpose of law and the theory of responsibility. Using normative legal research, the study applies the statutory, conceptual, philosophical, and comparative approaches, drawing on Indonesian bankruptcy law, comparative insolvency practice in selected jurisdictions, and relevant legal theory. The findings show that Article 72 correctly adopts liability based on fault but lacks the normative detail needed to apply that principle consistently, including graduated standards of fault, defined causation, and a good faith defense. Comparative practice in the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, the United States, and Germany confirms that fault-based liability, refined through professional oversight, remains the dominant model. The study concludes that reconstruction should refine rather than replace the fault-based principle, strengthening proportionality, legal certainty, and balanced protection between creditors and curators within Indonesia's bankruptcy system.

Page 12 of 12 | Total Record : 111

 8   9   10   11   12 

Filter by Year

2022 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue [IN PRESS] Vol. 5 Issue 3 (2026) Vol. 5 Issue 2 (2026) Vol. 5 Issue 1 (2026) Vol. 4 Issue 4 (2025) Vol. 4 Issue 3 (2025) Vol. 4 Issue 2 (2025) Vol. 4 Issue 1 (2025) Vol. 3 Issue 4 (2024) Vol. 3 Issue 3 (2024) Vol. 3 Issue 2 (2024) Vol. 3 Issue 1 (2024) Vol. 2 Issue 4 (2023) Vol. 2 Issue 3 (2023) Vol. 2 Issue 2 (2023) Vol. 2 Issue 1 (2023) Vol. 1 Issue 4 (2022) Vol. 1 Issue 3 (2022) Vol. 1 Issue 2 (2022) Vol. 1 Issue 1 (2022) More Issue