cover
Contact Name
Murdani Abdullah
Contact Email
ina.jghe@gmail.com
Phone
+6285891498517
Journal Mail Official
ina.jghe@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Divisi Gastroenterologi, Departemen Ilmu Penyakit Dalam, FKUI/RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo, Jl. Diponegoro No. 71 Jakarta 10430 Indonesia
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Digestive Endoscopy
ISSN : 14114801     EISSN : 23028181     DOI : -
Core Subject : Health,
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Digestive Endoscopy is an academic journal which has been published since 2000 and owned by 3 Societies: The Indonesian Society of Gastroenterology; Indonesian Association for the Study of the Liver; The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy. The aim of our journal is to advance knowledge in Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy fields. We welcome authors for original articles, review articles, and case reports in the fields of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy.
Articles 11 Documents
Search results for , issue "VOLUME 10, ISSUE 2, August 2009" : 11 Documents clear
The Result Discrepancies between Histological and PCR Method for Detecting Helicobacter pylori in Patients with Dyspepsia due to Inappropriate Preparation before Endoscopy Maruni Wiwin Diarti; Haris Widita; Soewignjo Soemohardjo; Weny Astuti; Troef Sumarno; Yunan Jiwintarum; Zainul Mutaqin; Retno Handayani
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 10, ISSUE 2, August 2009
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/102200946-50

Abstract

Background: False negative result of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) detection in gastric tissue can be due to inappropriate preparation before endoscopy. The objectives of this study is to compare the result of H. pylori detection in gastric biopsy by histological method and ure C polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in patients with dyspepsia who underwent upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy without preparations other than six hours fasting before endoscopy. Method: We obtained 156 paraffin blocks of gastric endoscopic biopsy samples, taken from antrum and corpus of patients with dyspepsia who underwent endoscopic examination at the Endoscopy Unit of Biomedika hospital, Mataram. All biopsy samples were stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin for tissue diagnosis and Giemsa stain for detecting H. pylori Ure C PCR were done on all blocks. Cag PCR were performed on all Ure C PCR positive samples. Results: Of 156 paraffin blocks, only 17 blocks (10.9%) were positive for H. pylori by histological examination. All of the 17 samples showed positive results on PCR method. Of 156 paraffin blocks, positive results were found in 73 patients (45.9%) by ure C PCR method. The PCR method has increased the positivity rates of H. pylori more than four times compared to histological method. This study showed that the rate of cag a was 63.0%. Conclusion: Ure C PCR is superior to histological examination in patients who did not stop consuming acid supressor drug and antibiotic two weeks prior to endoscopy. This phenomenon can be explained by the change of spiral form into coccoid form of H. pylori, which is hardly detected using Giemsa stain.   Keywords: Helicobacter pylori, histology, ureC, Cag a, PCR
Comparison of Polymerase Chain Reaction and Histopathology for the Detection of Helicobacter pylori in Gastric Biopsies Ari Fahrial Syam
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 10, ISSUE 2, August 2009
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/102200939-40

Abstract

.
Hospital-based Survey on Knowledge and Attitude toward Colorectal Cancer Screening among Indonesian Population Murdani Abdullah; Achmad Fauzi; Ari Fahrial Syam; Dadang Makmun; Marcellus Simadibrata; Chudahman Manan; Joseph JY Sung; Abdul Aziz Rani
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 10, ISSUE 2, August 2009
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/102200951-55

Abstract

Background: Several western countries have recommended colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, however the yield of CRC screening is still low. The acceptability of CRC screening is influenced by people’s knowledge and attitude. This study was conducted to evaluate the knowledge and attitude of Indonesian people toward CRC screening. Method: Adult Indonesian population aged 19–65 years was recruited in this hospital-based survey. Knowledge and attitude toward CRC screening were assessed by using structured questionnaires consisting of nine chapters. Result: There were 614 respondents recruited in this study. Most respondents (36.2%) incorrectly pointed out abdominal pain or pain around anus as the symptom of bowel cancer. Regarding CRC risk factors, eating fruits or vegetables rarely was the most frequent answer (28.5%) encountered. Only one-third (28%) of respondents mentioned colonoscopy as the Method for CRC screening. There were 38.1% of respondents who believed that CRC screening test might be harmful to the body. Up to 70.8% of the respondents agreed and strongly agreed that CRC screening test might cause physical discomfort. Two fifth (41.5%) of respondents believed that CRC screening test was embarrassing. More than half (58.8%) of respondents were afraid of having the CRC screening test. The test was too expensive according to 79.5% of respondents. Conclusion: The knowledge on CRC symptoms, risk factors, and screening tests is still low among Indonesian population. Our study result indicates that the lack of knowledge and the discouraging attitude among Indonesian population will be the major barriers to implement CRC screening in Indonesia.   Keywords: colorectal cancer, screening, knowledge, attitude
Ileal Endometriosis Tjahjadi Robert Tedjasaputra; Marcellus Simadibrata; Diah Rini Handjari
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 10, ISSUE 2, August 2009
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/102200982-84

Abstract

Endometriosis at the ileum site is a rare case and among the difficult cases of endometriosis. Intestinal endometriosis may cause obstructing symptoms, which is difficult to be distinguished from malignant or inflammatory disease. We report a case of 33-year-old woman, who admitted to the hospital because of sub-ileus intestinal obstruction. She underwent one session laparoscopy and laparatomy operation. Her ileum showed obstruction because of stenosis and adhesion with an ovarian brown cyst. She experienced terminal ileal resection, ileocaecostomy anastomosis, followed by laparatomy ovarial cystectomy and appendectomy. Microscopic evaluation of the intestine revealed vascular congestion, lymph nodes inflammation, and typical endometrial glands in the muscle layer of ileum. There was no sign of malignancy. These findings led to the diagnosis of ileal endometriosis. The ovarian cyst was actually the endometrial cyst of the ovary.   Keywords: sub-ileus obstructive, ileal endometriosis, endometrial cyst
Correlation between the Degree of Esophageal Varices and Liver Stiffness in Liver Cirrhosis Patients Femmy Nurul Akbar; Tjahjadi Robert Tedjasaputra; Dadang Makmun; Nurul Akbar
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 10, ISSUE 2, August 2009
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/102200963-65

Abstract

Background: Bleeding due to rupture of esophageal varices is one of main cause of death in liver cirrhosis, that endoscopy screening is recommended. However endoscopy is invasive and frequently cannot be performed due to contraindication, high-cost or uncomfortable effect to the patients, particularly on patients have not had any bleeding before. Consequently, it is necessary to find other assessment which can predict the presence of esophageal varices. Recent studies found liver stiffness measurement by the liver transient-elastography is one of non invasive measurement to evaluate liver fibrosis.This study was designed to know the correlation between degree of the esophageal varices and the degree of liver stiffness. Method: This was cross sectional study. Liver cirrhosis patients were consecutively enrolled in this study. They underwent endoscopy to determine esophageal varices and subsequently the liver transient- elastography by Fibroscan technique to determine liver stiffness. Degree of the esophageal varices based on OMED criteria. Liver stiffness are expressed in kilopascal (kPa). Correlation analysis was done to assess this study. Result: There were 13 subjects. Most subjectswere male, age 50 years and Child-Pugh A or B. The mean value of liver stiffness was 35.55 ± 23.60 kPa and mean OMED was 5.61 ± 2.14. The coefficient correlation between degree esophageal varices and degree liver stiffnes was 0.492, p = 0.087. Conclusion: There is moderate correlation but not statistically significant between the degree of liver stiffness and the degree of esophageal varices. Larger sample size is necessary to find the correlation between the degree of liver stiffness and esophageal varices.   Keywords: liver cirrhosis, degree of esophageal varices, liver stiffness
Hemobilia after 49-days Accidental Hepatic Trauma and Twice Perihepatic Packing Dedy Gunawanjati Sudrajat; Gunawanjati Sudrajat; Ellen Susanti; Sumaryono Sumaryono; Ari Fahrial Syam; Abdul Aziz Rani
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 10, ISSUE 2, August 2009
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/102200985-89

Abstract

Hemobilia occurs in only 1.2–5% of patients with accidental liver trauma. Clinical presentation of hemobilia include one symptom and two signs known as the classic Quinke triad, upper abdominal pain, upper gastrointestinal bleeding and jaundice. This report describes a case of patient with hemobilia that had been diagnosed 49 days after accidental hepatic trauma and twice perihepatic packing. A 29-year old man with hematemesis melena came to the hospital with the history of hepatic accidental trauma and had already received twice perihepatic packing treatment. At first, the esophagogastroduodenoscopy could only find gastritis and duodenal ulcer. Subsesquently, the ultrasonography revealed liver hematoma. Diagnosis of hemobilia was made when bleeding exiting from the ampulla of Vater which then was confirmed by the second esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Surgery had been planned but the patient and his family had refused the procedure. Hemobilia should be considered in patients presenting with gastrointestinal blood loss after liver injury. The diagnosis is confirmed by esophagogastroduodenoscopy and angiography. Modalities used to stop bleeding include angiography with embolization, surgical intervention, observation, and electro- coagulation or photocoagulation.   Keywords: hematemesis, melena, liver injury, hemobilia, esophagogastroduodenoscopy
Effects of BCAA Enteral Nutrition to the Change of Nutritional Status and Hepatic Encephalopathy Parameters in Liver Cirrhosis Patient with Hepatic Encephalopathy Achmad Fauzi; Unggul Budihusodo; Nurul Akbar; Pradana Suwondo; Suhardjono Suhardjono; Abdul Aziz Rani
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 10, ISSUE 2, August 2009
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/102200956-62

Abstract

Background: This study was also conducted to determine the effects of high-branched chain amino acid (BCAA) enteral supplementation on altered nutritional status parameters (including plasma prealbumin) and hepatic encephalopathy parameters in liver cirrhosis patients with hepatic encephalopathy. Method: Our study was a randomized, single-blinded experimental study comparing between control group of liver cirrhosis patients with standard hospital liver diet (40 kcal/kgBW/day for male and 35 kcal/kgBW/day for female; protein 1.25 g/kgBW/day) and experimental group of liver cirrhosis patients with liver diet modification high in BCAA supplementation, which had similar protein and calorie calculation as the control group. Results: Subclinical hepatic encephalopathy prevalence was 32%. In the experimental group, prealbumin plasma, arm circumference, body weight and body mass index (BMI) increased; whereas in the control group, prealbumin plasma, arm circumference, body weight and BMI decreased (p 0.05). In experimental group, the ammonia level significantly decreased (p 0.01). Clinical hepatic encephalopathy, flapping tremor, the number connection test (NCT) did not show significant changes between the two groups. However, there was worsening trend in the control group. Level of albumin, bilirubin, AST, ALT did not show any significant difference between both groups. Conclusion: High-BCAA enteral supplementation which is administered to liver cirrhosis patients with hepatic encephalopathy for 14 days could improve plasma prealbumin level, arm circumference, body weight, BMI and could decrease the plasma ammonia level. However, it does not improve Fischer ratio, psychometric test and electroencephalography   Keywords: malnutrition, liver cirrhosis, BCAA, Fisher ratio
The Profile of Hospitalized Patients with Esophageal Cancer at Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General National Hospital in 2002-2008 Bambang Sutopo; Dadang Makmun; Marcellus Simadibrata
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 10, ISSUE 2, August 2009
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/102200966-69

Abstract

Background: Esophageal cancer is a rare but fatal disease. Neither data nor patterns of the disease have been published in Indonesia. Therefore, we aim to identify the profiles of patients with esophageal cancer who were hospitalized at Cipto Mangunkusumo hospital. The objective of our study was to recognize the prevalence of esophageal cancer, characteristics of the disease, diagnostic procedures and the treatment. Method: This was a retrospective study. The data was obtained from medical records of patients with esophageal cancer who were hospitalized at Cipto Mangunkusumo hospital from 2002 to 2008. Results: Twenty three patients, 13 males, were diagnoses with esophageal cancer during 2002–2008. All diagnoses were confirmed by histological examinations. Almost all patients were anemic at first presentation, but hipoalbuminemia were observed only in three patients. CT scan examination was more superior to chest X-ray and abdominal ultrasonography on detecting distant metastasis. Esophageal mass at 1/3 proximal of esophagus was found in four patients during endoscopic examination; while seven patients had esophageal mass located at 1/3 mid-portion of esophagus and 12 patients had esophageal mass located at 1/3 distal of the esophagus. Histological findings showed that 11 patients had adeno-carcinomas, eight patients had squamous cell carcinomas, three patients had squamous- adenocarcinomas and a patient was suspected to have sarcoma. Therapeutic measures had been done for 10 patients including gastrostomia in six patients, gastroesophageal resection in two patients and two patients received chemotherapy. Conclusion: We found that adenocarcinomas is more common than squamous-cell carcinomas among patients with esophageal cancer. Almost all esophageal cancer patients came to the hospital in late stage.   Keywords:  esophageal  cancer,  adenocarcinomas,  squamous-cell  carcinomas,  squamous- adenocarcinomas, sarcomas
Barrettƒ's Esophagus Irfan Maulani; Murdani Abdullah; Marcellus Simadibrata
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 10, ISSUE 2, August 2009
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/102200975-81

Abstract

Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is a predisposing factor of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Metaplasia on BE occurs due to imbalance between esophageal defensive and reluxate materials offensive factors. Nowadays, it is believed that gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of major risk factors of BE. Patients with BE generally have lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure, shorter LES and intra- abdominal esophageal length, and longer acid exposure than patients with severe esophagitis. Acid exposure has pro-proliferation and anti-apoptosis effect which can facilitate BE occurrence. Currently BE management has gone through various advance, especially in its diagnostic section, from the development of sophisticated endoscopic modality to the finding of biomarker to predict cancer occurrence on BE. Therapeutic section has also been progressing, especially with its endoscopic and chemoprevention therapy. This review article addresses the latest update of BE management.   Keywords: Barrett’s esophagus, GERD, management
Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Complications at Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital Rolan Sitompul; Achmad Fauzi; Dadang Makmun; Murdani Abdulah; Ari Fahrial Syam; Marcellus Simadibrata
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 10, ISSUE 2, August 2009
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/102200941-45

Abstract

Background: This study retrospectively evaluated post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) complications at Cipto Mangunkusumo hospital in order to improve management of a subsequent prospective study of post-ERCP complications.Method: The indications, findings, diagnostic or therapeutic procedure, cannulation, devices used during the procedure, and complications of patients treated consecutively with ERCP between January 2004 and November 2008 were evaluated retrospectively.Results: Of 176 ERCP patients who were initially evaluated, 38% had undergone diagnostic ERCP and 62% therapeutic ERCP. The median age of the patients was 49 years (range 18–80 years); 95 (53.9%) were male. Only 54 of these 176 procedures could be evaluated for post-ERCP complications. A computed tomographic abdominal scan or magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography was performed in 23 (42.6%) patients and a biliary sphincterotomy in 14 (25.9%) patients. The overall complication rate was 33.3%: 14.8% after diagnostic ERCP and 18.5% after therapeutic ERCP. The complications after diagnostic ERCP were pancreatitis in 3 (15%) patients, cholangitis in 3 (15%) patients, hemorrhage in 1 (5%) patient, pancreatitis and hemorrhage in 1 (5%) patient; the complications after therapeutic ERCP were pancreatitis in 6 (17.6%) patients, cholangitis in 3 (8.8%) patients, hemorrhage in none, and concomitant pancreatitis with hemorrhage in 1 (2.9%) patient. No significant difference was observed between the complication rates and the type of ERCP performed.Conclusion: There were no differences in the complications after diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP. As our study shows the post-ERCP complication rate to be higher than those of other large retrospective and prospective studies, we must evaluate it in a prospective study.Keywords: post-ERCP, complications, therapeutic ERCP, diagnostic ERCP

Page 1 of 2 | Total Record : 11


Filter by Year

2009 2009


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 26, No 2 (2025): VOLUME 26, NUMBER 2, AGUSTUS, 2025 Vol 26, No 1 (2025): VOLUME 26, NUMBER 1, April, 2025 Vol 25, No 3 (2024): VOLUME 25, NUMBER 3, December, 2024 Vol 25, No 2 (2024): VOLUME 25, NUMBER 2, August, 2024 Vol 25, No 1 (2024): VOLUME 25, NUMBER 1, April, 2024 Vol 24, No 3 (2023): VOLUME 24, NUMBER 3, December, 2023 Vol 24, No 2 (2023): VOLUME 24, NUMBER 2, August, 2023 Vol 24, No 1 (2023): VOLUME 24, NUMBER 1, April, 2023 Vol 23, No 3 (2022): VOLUME 23, NUMBER 3, December 2022 Vol 23, No 2 (2022): VOLUME 23, NUMBER 2, August 2022 Vol 23, No 1 (2022): VOLUME 23, NUMBER 1, April 2022 Vol 22, No 3 (2021): VOLUME 22, NUMBER 3, December 2021 Vol 22, No 2 (2021): VOLUME 22, NUMBER 2, August 2021 Vol 22, No 1 (2021): VOLUME 22, NUMBER 1, April 2021 Vol 21, No 3 (2020): VOLUME 21, NUMBER 3, December 2020 Vol 21, No 2 (2020): VOLUME 21, NUMBER 2, August 2020 Vol 21, No 1 (2020): VOLUME 21, NUMBER 1, April 2020 Vol 20, No 3 (2019): VOLUME 20, NUMBER 3, December 2019 Vol 20, No 2 (2019): VOLUME 20, NUMBER 2, August 2019 Vol 20, No 1 (2019): VOLUME 20, NUMBER 1, April 2019 Vol 19, No 3 (2018): VOLUME 19, NUMBER 3, December 2018 Vol 19, No 2 (2018): VOLUME 19, NUMBER 2, August 2018 Vol 19, No 1 (2018): VOLUME 19, NUMBER 1, April 2018 Vol 18, No 3 (2017): VOLUME 18, NUMBER 3, DECEMBER 2017 Vol 18, No 2 (2017): VOLUME 18, NUMBER 2, AUGUST 2017 Vol 18, No 1 (2017): VOLUME 18, NUMBER 1, April 2017 Vol 17, No 3 (2016): VOLUME 17, NUMBER 3, December 2016 Vol 17, No 2 (2016): VOLUME 17, NUMBER 2, August 2016 Vol 17, No 1 (2016): VOLUME 17, NUMBER 1, April 2016 Vol 16, No 3 (2015): VOLUME 16, NUMBER 3, December 2015 Vol 16, No 2 (2015): VOLUME 16, NUMBER 2, August 2015 Vol 16, No 1 (2015): VOLUME 16, NUMBER 1, April 2015 Vol 15, No 3 (2014): VOLUME 15, NUMBER 3, December 2014 Vol 15, No 2 (2014): VOLUME 15, NUMBER 2, August 2014 Vol 15, No 1 (2014): VOLUME 15, NUMBER 1, April 2014 VOLUME 14, NUMBER 3, December 2013 VOLUME 14, NUMBER 2, August 2013 VOLUME 14, NUMBER 1, April 2013 VOLUME 13, NUMBER 3, Desember 2012 VOLUME 13, NUMBER 2, August 2012 VOLUME 13, NUMBER 1, April 2012 VOLUME 12, NUMBER 3, December 2011 VOLUME 12, NUMBER 2, August 2011 VOLUME 12, NUMBER 1, April 2011 VOLUME 11, NUMBER 3, December 2010 VOLUME 11, NUMBER 2, August 2010 VOLUME 11, NUMBER 1, April 2010 VOLUME 10, NUMBER 3, December 2009 VOLUME 10, ISSUE 2, August 2009 VOLUME 10, ISSUE 1, April 2009 VOLUME 9, ISSUE 3, December 2008 VOLUME 9, ISSUE 2, August 2008 VOLUME 9, ISSUE 1, April 2008 VOLUME 8, ISSUE 3, December 2007 VOLUME 8 ISSUE 2 August 2007 VOLUME 8, ISSUE 1, April 2007 VOLUME 7, ISSUE 3, December 2006 VOLUME 7, ISSUE 2, August 2006 VOLUME 7, ISSUE 1, April 2006 VOLUME 6, ISSUE 3, December 2005 VOLUME 6, ISSUE 2, August 2005 VOLUME 6, ISSUE 1, April 2005 VOLUME 5, ISSUE 3, December 2004 VOLUME 5, ISSUE 2, August 2004 VOLUME 5, ISSUE 1, April 2004 VOLUME 4, ISSUE 3, December 2003 VOLUME 4, ISSUE 2, August 2003 VOLUME 4, NUMBER 1, April 2003 VOLUME 3, NUMBER 3, December 2002 VOLUME 3, NUMBER 2, August 2002 VOLUME 3, NUMBER 1, April 2002 VOLUME 2, NUMBER 3, December 2001 VOLUME 2, NUMBER 2, August 2001 VOLUME 2, NUMBER 1, April 2001 VOLUME 1, NUMBER 1, December 2000 More Issue