cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Ahmad
Contact Email
estudiante02lawjournal@gmail.com
Phone
+6281213569044
Journal Mail Official
ahmad_wijaya@ung.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Jend. Sudirman No. 6 Kota Gorontalo
Location
Kota gorontalo,
Gorontalo
INDONESIA
Estudiante Law Journal
Published by Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
ISSN : -     EISSN : 2987114X     DOI : 10.33756
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Estudiante Law Journal is a peer reviewed journal published by the Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo. This journal is published three times every February, July and November of the same year. EsLaw aims to be a scientific and research journal for all legal observers and activists with a journal focus relating to all issues related to legal studies. EsLaw Journal publishes contemporary articles on law, book reviews, and case analysis, as well as journals published in Indonesian and/or English.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 9 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "vol. 8 no. 2 june 2026" : 9 Documents clear
Deliberation as an Alternative for Resolving Land Disputes in Telaga District, Gorontalo Regency Melysa Wahab Kilo; Mutia Cherawaty Thalib; Nurul Fazri Elfikri
Estudiante Law Journal VOL. 8 No. 2 JUNE 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33756/eslaj.v8i2.36464

Abstract

This study examines deliberation as an alternative mechanism for resolving land disputes in Telaga District, Gorontalo Regency. Using empirical legal research, it draws on interviews with village officials in eight villages and district records of 18 land dispute cases from 2021 to 2023. The findings show that deliberation remains an initial and widely accepted means of settlement, with 11 of the 18 recorded cases resolved through the process. Its continued use is supported by family values, local customs, and the community’s preference for an accessible and less formal process. However, procedures, administrative practices, and outcomes differ among villages, creating unevenness in implementation and legal certainty. The study argues that a district-level regulatory framework is needed to establish minimum procedural and administrative standards, including documentation and follow-up, while preserving the local character of deliberation. Strengthening village capacity and clearer procedural guidance can improve accountability and sustainable dispute resolution.
Enforcing Environmental Law Against Ecosystem Degradation in the Kasintuwu Protected Forest, Luwu Timur Achdiat Mubaraq; Laola Subair; Salmi Salmi
Estudiante Law Journal VOL. 8 No. 2 JUNE 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33756/eslaj.v8i2.34006

Abstract

Indonesia governs its protected forests through a dense body of legislation, yet ecosystem degradation caused by illegal logging continues largely unchecked. This article asks why environmental law enforcement fails in the Kasintuwu Protected Forest, Mangkutana District, Luwu Timur Regency, South Sulawesi. Applying an empirical legal method, it combines interviews at four institutions, examination of their case registers, and statutory analysis, in order to trace where forestry cases are lost along the enforcement chain. Between 2017 and 2023 residents lodged ninety-four reports of illegal logging, while only ten case files reached the public prosecutor and nine cases were registered at the district court, and enforcement clustered almost entirely in a single year. Three obstacles explain this attrition: evidentiary difficulty produced by imprecise forest-boundary designation and overlapping licensing; institutional incapacity, with three forest rangers responsible for 163,283.30 hectares; and alleged informal levies that terminate reports before investigation. The article argues that the enforcement deficit is structural rather than normative, and recommends boundary re-demarcation with legal certainty, a minimum ranger-to-area ratio, independent oversight of pre-investigation screening, and community-based conservation incentives
Judicial Disparity in Indonesian Polygamy Permits: Misapplication of Al-Shatibi’s Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah and Legal Certainty Muhammad Farrel Irawan; Siti Rohmah; Fitri Hidayat
Estudiante Law Journal VOL. 8 No. 2 JUNE 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33756/eslaj.v8i2.34586

Abstract

This study examines judicial disparity in applications for polygamy permits before the Indonesian Religious Courts using Al-Shatibi’s framework of Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah. Addressing the tension between judicial discretion and statutory norms, the article analyses Decision Number 1286/Pdt.G/2014/PA.Mlg, which granted permission despite non-fulfilment of the alternative requirements, and Decision Number 1332/Pdt.G/2025/PA.Pwd, which rejected the application on a strict reading of Article 4 paragraph (2) of Law Number 1 of 1974. The study uses normative legal research with statutory, case and conceptual approaches. It finds that the disparity stems from divergent interpretative methods: the Malang decision employed a subjective-teleological interpretation that misapplied the maxim darʿ al-mafāsid, whereas the Purwodadi decision adhered to a formalist-grammatical interpretation. Viewed through Al-Shatibi’s hierarchy, the grounds advanced in both cases, namely the desire for more offspring and a high sexual drive, fall squarely within taḥsīniyyah, the level of complementary or embellishing needs. Overriding mandatory statutory provisions for taḥsīniyyah motives undermines legal certainty and judicial predictability. The article proposes methodological parameters for Islamic judicial discretion in order to prevent judicial overreach.
Constitutional Engineering and Transitional Design Following Constitutional Court Decision Number 135/PUU-XXII/2024 Rifqi Qonita Hulwana; Muhammad Riyadi
Estudiante Law Journal VOL. 8 No. 2 JUNE 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33756/eslaj.v8i2.40728

Abstract

This study examines the constitutional implications of Constitutional Court Decision Number 135/PUU-XXII/2024 for the transitional design of local elections in Indonesia. The Decision separates national elections from local elections by approximately 2–2.5 years, creating a temporal mismatch between the expiration of existing regional mandates and the implementation of the new local electoral cycle. This transition raises a constitutional dilemma between continuity of government and periodic democratic authorization, particularly for Regional People’s Representative Councils (DPRD) and regional heads. Using doctrinal legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches, this study evaluates competing transitional models through periodic democratic authorization, continuity of constitutional government, legal certainty, proportionality, regional autonomy, and temporariness. The study proposes a differentiated transitional design: a temporary DPRD arrangement preserving the representative composition produced by the 2024 election, and interim elections for regional heads to restore direct democratic authorization while protecting regional autonomy. The proposed design requires explicit legislative provisions, limited transitional authority, institutional safeguards, dispute-resolution mechanisms, and a clear sunset clause to prevent exceptional arrangements from becoming permanent electoral mechanisms.
Analysis of the Impact of Property and Land Tax Abolition on Regional Revenue in Indonesia Aditiya Aditiya; Ahmad Ahmad
Estudiante Law Journal VOL. 8 No. 2 JUNE 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33756/eslaj.v8i2.32925

Abstract

Proposals to abolish the Rural and Urban Land and Building Tax (Pajak Bumi dan Bangunan Perdesaan dan Perkotaan or PBB-P2) have entered Indonesian fiscal debate as a measure of tax relief, yet their legal consequences for regional own-source revenue (Pendapatan Asli Daerah or PAD) remain largely unexamined. Existing scholarship documents PBB-P2 collection performance and its contribution to PAD, but does not address what legal instruments abolition would require or how the forgone revenue could be replaced. This study asks three questions: what constitutional and statutory position PBB-P2 occupies within the regional fiscal framework; what legal consequences abolition would produce for regional autonomy and public service obligations; and what instruments could compensate for the loss. Using doctrinal legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches, the study analyses Article 23A and Article 18A(2) of the 1945 Constitution, Law No. 1 of 2022 on Financial Relations between Central and Regional Government, and the regional financial management framework. It argues that abolition would require statutory amendment rather than administrative action, would narrow the constitutional commitment to fiscal decentralisation, and would displace a statutory relief mechanism already available. Targeted exemption is proposed as the proportionate alternative.
Criminal Law Protection for Victims of Physical Dating Violence in Gorontalo Province Yusrianto Kadir; Sunarti S. Tabi
Estudiante Law Journal VOL. 8 No. 2 JUNE 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33756/eslaj.v8i2.41009

Abstract

Victims of physical violence in dating relationships fall into a protection gap in Indonesian criminal law because the Elimination of Domestic Violence Law is limited to household relations, the Sexual Violence Crimes Law requires a sexual element, and Article 466 of the 2023 Criminal Code treats assault without regard to intimate relational context. This socio-legal study examines how protection operates in Gorontalo Province and identifies the normative and institutional weaknesses that impede victim recovery. It combines fourteen legal instruments and five court decisions with ten interviews, an eight-participant focus group, and observation at four institutions, analysed through the Miles–Huberman–Saldaña model and triangulation. Dating violence proves statistically invisible in registration systems, procedures are standardised but not differentiated for intimate-partner harm, and approximately 60–70 per cent of cases are resolved informally without risk assessment, independent accompaniment, enforceable agreements, or monitoring. Normatively, Article 470 of Law Number 1 of 2023 narrows relational aggravation, while Article 82 of Law Number 20 of 2025 leaves restorative-justice screening for power imbalance under-specified at the stages where most cases are resolved. The article sets out a victim-centred design reconciling restorative justice with victim safety through relational aggravation, coercive-control screening, enforceable recovery agreements, and post-case monitoring.
Beyond the Principle of Legality: Integrating Indigenous Legal Values into the Modern Criminal Justice System Julisa Aprilia Kaluku; Mohammad Fadli
Estudiante Law Journal VOL. 8 No. 2 JUNE 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33756/eslaj.v8i2.40615

Abstract

The principle of legality constitutes a foundation of modern criminal law by ensuring legal certainty, constraining state power, and protecting individuals from arbitrary criminalization and punishment. Nevertheless, its rigidly formalistic application often reduces law to written legislation and overlooks customary norms that remain recognized and operational within plural communities. Customary law, however, embodies restorative values, including deliberation, reparation, reconciliation, social responsibility, and offender reintegration. This study examines how customary legal values may be incorporated into the criminal justice system through a reconstruction of the principle of legality without undermining legal certainty, human rights protection, fair-trial guarantees, or state responsibility for criminal law enforcement. It employs normative legal research supported by statutory, conceptual, comparative, and socio-legal approaches. The legal materials comprise constitutions, legislation, judicial decisions, human rights instruments, policy documents, and scholarly literature on legal pluralism, restorative justice, and legal decolonization. These materials are qualitatively examined through systematic, historical, teleological, and constitutional interpretation. The findings demonstrate that customary law should not be incorporated through the automatic recognition of all traditional norms. Instead, its integration must be subject to a meaningfulness test assessing social legitimacy, normative clarity, restorative orientation, participatory procedures, protection of vulnerable groups, proportionality, accountability, and conformity with constitutional and human rights standards. Norms satisfying these criteria may be incorporated through a multilayered model encompassing substantive, procedural, institutional, and supervisory dimensions. This study concludes that reconstructing legality does not entail abandoning it, but rather developing an inclusive conception that reconciles legal certainty, legal pluralism, restorative justice, and human rights protection.
An Adjudicative Filter for SMS Manual Gaps in Pilot Education: The Maritime Court Design Precedent Niko Arief Setyawan; Daniel Dewantoro Rumani; Yudha Bagus Tunggala Putra; Dimas Hari Cahyo; Chairustakmal Chairustakmal
Estudiante Law Journal VOL. 8 No. 2 JUNE 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33756/eslaj.v8i2.41442

Abstract

Formal safety-reporting norms exist internationally, nationally and institutionally, yet protection for reporters in Indonesian pilot training remains inoperative. This study asks why, and what design closes the gap. It compares the Safety Management System Manual of the Indonesian Civil Pilot Academy of Banyuwangi (Issued 02, Revision 02) with ICAO Annex 19, Third Edition, using normative legal research with a documentary case study. Soekanto’s legal-effectiveness theory supplies the diagnosis; responsive regulation, developed by Ayres and Braithwaite and refined by Baldwin and Black, supplies the prescription. Three connected gaps emerge. First, reporter protection travels through six referring levels, from the Manual’s “to the extent permissible by law” clause down to the 2017 Director General Regulations, which provide administrative de-identification only and whose delegating basis Ministerial Regulation 2/2026 revoked without a transitional provision. Second, the Manual grants cadets disciplinary immunity but withholds identity confidentiality. Third, no enforcement rung exists between internal correction and criminal proceedings. Annex 19 permits a non-judicial competent authority; Articles 364–369 of Law 1/2009 already provide for one. Because Government Regulation 62/2013 implemented only the investigation half of Article 369, the article proposes operationalising the Aviation Profession Council as a technical-professional adjudicative filter, on the Maritime Court design precedent
Implementation of Electronic Court (E-Court) in Case Resolution at the Gorontalo Administrative Court Adnan Nento; Fence M. Wantu; Mohamad Rivaldi Moha
Estudiante Law Journal VOL. 8 No. 2 JUNE 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33756/eslaj.v8i2.41357

Abstract

Judicial digitalisation makes the principle of simple, speedy, and low-cost justice the measure of its own success, yet that principle has rarely been tested in administrative courts located in regions with limited digital infrastructure. This article analyses the implementation of the Electronic Court (e-Court) system at the Gorontalo Administrative Court and the obstacles accompanying it. The study employs empirical legal research using statutory and case approaches; data were drawn from interviews, observation, the court's written responses, and the case register for 2020-2025, and analysed descriptively. Every case has been processed through e-Filing, e-Payment, e-Summons, and e-Litigation, with a consistent disposition rate. Digitalisation has deliberately been withheld from preliminary examination and evidentiary proceedings, a limitation proportionate only while certified electronic signature infrastructure remains unintegrated. The obstacles identified are unstable connectivity, centralised server disruption, and low digital literacy. This article identifies a normative gap in Supreme Court Regulation Number 7 of 2022, which treats failure to upload documents as a waiver of procedural rights without regulating technical force majeure, and proposes an institutionalised mechanism for restoring procedural deadlines.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 9

 1 

Filter by Year

2026 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue VOL. 8 No. 2 JUNE 2026 VOL. 8 NO. 1 FEBRUARY 2026 VOL. 7 NO. 3 OCTOBER 2025 VOL. 7 No. 2 JUNE 2025 VOL. 7 NO. 1 FEBRUARY 2025 VOL. 6 NO. 3 OCTOBER 2024 VOL. 6 NO. 2 JUNI 2024 VOL. 6 NO. 1 FEBRUARY 2024 VOL. 5 NO. 3 OCTOBER 2023 VOL. 5 NO. 2 JUNI 2023 VOL. 5 NO. 1 FEBRUARY 2023 VOL. 4 NO. 3 OKTOBER 2022 VOL. 4 NO. 2 JUNI 2022 VOL. 4 NO. 1 FEBRUARI 2022 VOL. 3 NO. 3. OKTOBER 2021 VOL. 3 NO. 2 JUNI 2021 VOL. 3 NO. 1 FEBRUARI 2021 VOL. 2 NO. 3 OKTOBER 2020 VOL. 2 NO. 2 JUNI 2020 VOL. 2 NO. 1 FEBRUARI 2020 VOL. 1 NO. 3 OKTOBER 2019 VOL. 1 No. 2 JUNI 2019 VOL. 1 NO. 1 FEBRUARI 2019 More Issue