cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Albertus Drepane Soge
Contact Email
albertus.soge@up45.ac.id
Phone
+62274485517
Journal Mail Official
caraka.justitia@up45.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Proklamasi No. 1 Babarsari, Caturtunggal, Depok, Kab. Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, 55281
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Hukum Caraka Justitia
Published by Universitas Proklamasi 45 Yogyakarta
ISSN : -     EISSN : 28083512     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.30588/jhcj.v3i1
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Hukum Caraka Justitia is a periodic scientific journal published by the Faculty of Law of Proclamation University 45 twice a year. This journal is intended to collect scientific writing, a summary of research results, book reviews, or fresh original ideas that are mainly related to the study of Legal Science. The editorial invites experts, practitioners, or anyone with great concern for the development of science in these areas to submit their works.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 85 Documents
 5   6   7   8   9 
Akibat Hukum Perkawinan Campuran di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Hukum Perdata Internasional: Kewarganegaraan Anak dan Waris Nia Noviyani; Sigit Wibowo
Jurnal Hukum Caraka Justitia Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Proklamasi 45

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30588/jhcj.v6i1.2631

Abstract

These mixed marriages have resulted in increased cross-border interactions, giving rise to various legal issues, particularly regarding children's citizenship and inheritance rights. Differences in citizenship principles and legal systems between countries have the potential to create legal openness for children from mixed marriages. The main focus of this study is to analyze the legal consequences of mixed marriages in Indonesia from the perspective of international civil law, particularly regarding the citizenship status of children and their position as heirs. The research methodology applied is normative juridical with a statutory and conceptual approach through a literature review. An interesting finding is that Law Number 12 of 2006 concerning Citizenship has not been fully optimal in providing legal protection through the recognition of limited dual citizenship for children from mixed marriages, but there is still potential for conflict in determining the child's personal status. Furthermore, differences in citizenship do not eliminate children's rights as heirs, although their implementation is limited by certain legal provisions. This study emphasizes the need for regulatory harmonization to ensure legal certainty and equitable protection of children's rights.
Peran Keaktifan Hakim dalam Mekanisme Keadilan Restoratif Terhadap Terdakwa pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Narkotika Sebagai Penyalahguna Bagi Diri Sendiri Sulfi Amalia; Moch. Ivan Fadhila; Suci Romadhani
Jurnal Hukum Caraka Justitia Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Proklamasi 45

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30588/jhcj.v6i1.2635

Abstract

This study aims to understand and analyze the role of judges' activeness in implementing restorative justice mechanisms for Defendants who are drug abusers. This research is a normative legal research, with a statutory and conceptual approach. The type of data used is secondary data, while the legal materials consist of primary, secondary, and non-legal materials, with the data collection technique being a library study. The processing of legal materials is carried out using a systematization technique on the legal materials. The research results indicate that judges must play an active role in implementing the phrase 'victim recovery' in cases of Defendants as drug abusers, in which the restorative justice mechanism in these cases allows the Panel of Judges examining the case to summon investigators as officials who elevate a person to suspect status in the case. Thus, victim recovery in this context refers to the restoration of the situation for the Defendant himself. Although this mechanism does not solely halt the legal process, it can be a consideration for the Panel of Judges in deciding the case.
Perlindungan Hukum Pekerja Migran: Studi Kasus di The Peninsular And Oriental Steam Navigation Company (P&O Maritime Logistics) Dubai Dedy Arman Wijaya; Bresca Merina; Idham Ibty; Syamsudin
Jurnal Hukum Caraka Justitia Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Proklamasi 45

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30588/jhcj.v6i1.2636

Abstract

This study aims to analyse the implementation of legal protection for migrant workers in the maritime sector employed at P&O Maritime Logistics, Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Migrant seafarers are exposed to high occupational risks, long working hours, and operational pressures that may affect their occupational safety and welfare. This research applies a qualitative descriptive approach using in-depth interviews with occupational safety and health (OSH) management, ship captains, technicians, and migrant crew members, supported by document analysis. The findings indicate that legal protection has been normatively regulated through international instruments such as the Maritime Labour Convention (MLC) and the International Safety Management (ISM) Code. However, the effectiveness of these protections largely depends on company policies, safety culture, supervision mechanisms, and operational conditions in practice. Although migrant crews possess internationally recognized safety certifications, factors such as work fatigue, the implementation of a customer priority system, and insufficient supervision of working and rest hours may hinder the fulfilment of occupational safety rights. Therefore, strengthening legal protection for migrant seafarers requires integrated compliance with international regulations, safety-oriented corporate governance, and consistent occupational safety and health management.
Implementasi Mediasi Elektronik dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Purwodadi: Study tentang Pasca Berlakunya Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 Ahmad Khoirul Amin; Sigit Wibowo; Lucia Setyawahyuningtyas
Jurnal Hukum Caraka Justitia Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Proklamasi 45

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30588/jhcj.v6i1.2649

Abstract

This research seeks to evaluate the application and identify the obstacles associated with electronic mediation (e-mediation) in handling divorce proceedings at the Purwodadi Religious Court. After the introduction of Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) Number 3 of 2022 regarding Electronic Mediation in Courts, the Purwodadi Religious Court has started to apply e-mediation as a method for resolving disputes, which is viewed as more adaptable and effective. This research adopts a normative juridical framework utilizing a legal perspective and case analyses. Information was gathered via document analysis (including PERMA, court documentation, and case records), comprehensive interviews with judges, mediators, and parties involved, along with direct observation at the Purwodadi Religious Court. The findings from this analysis indicate that the execution of electronic mediation has been conducted in alignment with the guidelines set forth in PERMA No. 3 of 2022, with a success rate of reaching a peaceful agreement of 36.3% of 215 cases in the 2023-2025 period. E-mediation has been proven to increase efficiency by shortening the average settlement time to 25 days and expanding access for parties with distance constraints. However, this implementation faces technical obstacles (internet infrastructure, digital literacy), non-technical (difficulties in building rapport, face-to-face preferences), and administrative obstacles (lack of detailed internal SOPs).
JHCJ Editorial, Vol. 6 No. 1, Mei 2026 Editor JHCJ
Jurnal Hukum Caraka Justitia Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Proklamasi 45

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Jurnal Hukum Caraka Justitia merupakan jurnal ilmiah berkala yang dikelola oleh Fakultas Hukum Universitas Proklamasi 45 dua kali dalam satu tahun. Jurnal ini dimaksudkan untuk mengumpulkan dan mempublikasikan tulisan ilmiah, ringkasan hasil penelitian, resensi buku, atau ide-ide orisinal yang baru terkait dengan kajian ilmu hukum. Redaksi mengundang para pakar, praktisi, atau siapa saja yang memiliki kepedulian besar terhadap perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan di bidang hukum untuk mengirimkan karya-karyanya. Jurnal Hukum Caraka Justitia is a periodical scientific journal organised by the Faculty of Law, Universitas Proklamasi 45 twice a year. This journal is intended to collect and publish scientific writings, summaries of research results, book reviews, or new original ideas related to the study of law. The editors invite experts, practitioners, or anyone who has great concern for the development of science in the field of law to submit their works.

Page 9 of 9 | Total Record : 85

 5   6   7   8   9 

Filter by Year

2020 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020) More Issue