cover
Contact Name
Taufid Hidayat Nazar
Contact Email
syakhsiyah@metrouniv.ac.id
Phone
+6281366572019
Journal Mail Official
syakhsiyah@metrouniv.ac.id
Editorial Address
Kampus I IAN Metro Jl. Ki Hajar Dewantara 15A Iringmulyo, Metro Timur, Kota Metro, Lampung. Fax: 0725-47296
Location
Kota metro,
Lampung
INDONESIA
Syakhshiyyah Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam
ISSN : -     EISSN : 29865409     DOI : https://doi.org/10.32332/syakhshiyyah
Syakhshiyyah Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam is a scientific, peer-reviewed and open access interdisciplinary journal published twice a year (June and December). This journal is the result of a collaboration between Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Metro Lampung and the Association of Indonesian Family Law Lecturers (ADHKI). This journal is managed by the Ahwal Syakhshiyyah Study Program, Faculty of Sharia. The Journal of Islamic Family Law Syakhshiyyah provides a means for ongoing discussion of relevant issues that fall within the focus and scope of the journal, which can be examined empirically. The journal publishes research articles covering aspects of Islamic Family Law, Islamic Inheritance Law, and Review of Religious Court Decisions. The breadth of coverage of the Islamic Family Law context published by this journal not only covers local and regional dimensions but includes national to international dimensions.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 113 Documents
Child Rights Protection in Fasakh Cases Due to Apostasy: A Juridical Analysis of the Decision of the Cibadak Religious Court Number 3112/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Cbd Salman Al-Farisi; Ahmad Maula Hadi; Lena Ishelmiany Ziaharah
Syakhsiyah Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol 6 No 1 (2026): Syakhsiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga
Publisher : UIN Jurai Siwo Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/sjfh9705

Abstract

This study examines child protection in fasakh cases due to apostasy based on the Decision of the Cibadak Religious Court Number 3112/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Cbd, focusing on the tension between the application of the ultra petita principle and the best interests of the child principle in resolving such cases. This research employs a normative juridical method with a descriptive-analytical nature through literature review and judicial decision analysis, supported by interviews with judges. The findings reveal that the fasakh decision fulfilled both formal and substantive legal requirements, as evidenced by the proven element of apostasy as grounds for fasakh and the granting of the marriage validation (itsbat nikah) petition. However, the ruling did not explicitly regulate child custody (hadanah) or child support obligations because the judges were bound by the ultra petita principle. This condition reflects a normative-procedural gap regarding judges’ authority to provide child protection measures ex officio, potentially overlooking the best interests of the child due to the absence of legal certainty concerning post-fasakh custody, maintenance, and education. From the perspective of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah, this situation relates to the protection of hifz al-nafs and hifz al-nasl as objectives of Islamic law in ensuring the welfare, continuity, and upbringing of children. The novelty of this study lies in its analysis of the relationship between the limitation of judicial authority under the ultra petita principle and the need for child protection in fasakh cases due to apostasy. The findings indicate the need for regulatory reinforcement granting judges ex officio authority to determine hadanah in fasakh cases in order to better safeguard the best interests of the child in judicial practice
Judicial Challenges in Determining Marriage Dispensation under PERMA Number 5 of 2019: The Conflict Between Legal Certainty and Child Protection Principles in Indonesia Fatmawati; Iin Ratna Sumirat; Sayehu; Rohmani
Syakhsiyah Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol 6 No 1 (2026): Syakhsiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga
Publisher : UIN Jurai Siwo Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/nbahbx64

Abstract

Judges in Indonesia are frequently confronted with a dilemma between legal certainty and child rights protection. Law No. 16 of 2019 establishes the minimum age for marriage as a form of protection, yet it remains open to dispensation under specific circumstances. This study analyzes the challenges faced by judges in handling marriage dispensation cases and evaluates whether court rulings align with the principle of the best interests of the child. Employing a normative juridical research method with conceptual and statutory approaches, this study is supported by an analysis of court rulings, including Decision No. 85/Pdt.P/2025/PA.Srg as a case study. The findings reveal that in practice, positive law is not the sole factor influencing judicial decisions; social, cultural, moral, and Islamic values also play a significant role. Extensive judicial discretion has the potential to shift the orientation of child protection toward the legitimization of child marriage if it is not restricted by measurable indicators regarding the best interests of the child. Therefore, harmonization between legal certainty and child protection principles is required through the reinforcement of judicial guidelines to ensure that marriage dispensation rulings do not adversely affect children's futures.
Criminalization of Unregistered Polygamy under the 2026 Criminal Code: A Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah Analysis of the Protection of Women’s Rights Apriani Asnaye
Syakhsiyah Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol 6 No 1 (2026): Syakhsiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga
Publisher : UIN Jurai Siwo Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/tg0mdg86

Abstract

The criminalization of unregistered polygamy under Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP), which will take effect in 2026, reflects a shift in Indonesian family law policy from an administrative approach to a criminal law approach. Polygamous marriages conducted without the consent of the wife and court authorization often result in harm to women, particularly regarding maintenance rights, legal certainty of marriage, and access to justice. This study aims to analyze the criminalization of unregistered polygamy in the KUHP and examine it from the perspective of maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah concerning the protection of women's rights. This research employs a normative legal method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings show that the criminalization of unregistered polygamy serves as an instrument for protecting women's rights by strengthening legal certainty and the husband's responsibility. From the perspective of maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah, this policy is consistent with the objectives of preserving lineage (hifẓ al-nasl), life (hifẓ al-nafs), and property (hifẓ al-māl), as well as the principle of preventing harm (dar’u al-mafāsid). However, its effectiveness requires legal education and adequate supervision to prevent the emergence of more concealed polygamous practices. This study concludes that the criminalization of unregistered polygamy is a legal measure that aligns with the objectives of public welfare in Islamic law and the protection of women's rights.

Page 12 of 12 | Total Record : 113