cover
Contact Name
Maman Suparman
Contact Email
jhdjournal@gmail.com
Phone
+6281294652477
Journal Mail Official
profgayuslumbuunstih@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jalan Raya Lenteng Agung Barat RT.06 / RW.01, Jagakarsa, RT.6/RW.1, Srengseng Sawah, Kota Jakarta Selatan, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 12630 Nama Panjang Institusi : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Prof Gayus Lumbuun Link Institusi : http://www.stih-pgl.ac.id/ Link OJS https://journal.stih-pgl.ac.id/ojs-stih/index.php/jhd email: jhdjournal@gmail.com
Location
Kota adm. jakarta selatan,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD)
ISSN : 14119765     EISSN : 3021825X     DOI : 10.61234
Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD) adalah Jurnal ilmiah dengan fokus dan skop ilmu hukum, hukum pidana, hukum perdata, politik dan demokrasi, hukum bisnis dan hukum lingkungan. Diterbitkan oleh Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Prof Gayus Lumbuun. Jurnal ini diterbitkan empat kali dalam satu tahun yaitu pada bulan Mei, Agustus, November, dan Februari. Jurnal Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD) melakukan proses peer review secara tertutup pada naskah yang diterima. P-ISSN 14119765 E-ISSN 3021825X
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 24 No 3 (2024): Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD)" : 5 Documents clear
Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan Gedung Olahraga (GOR) Tanjungbalai di Pengadilan Negeri Tanjungbalai Aqmarina, Ifni; Pratiwi, Irda
Jurnal Hukum dan Demokrasi (JHD) Vol 24 No 3 (2024): Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Prof Gayus Lumbuun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61234/hd.v24i3.18

Abstract

Land holds great importance for all individuals, including personal individuals (natuurlijk persoon) with ownership rights and public entities (rechtpersoon). Both are recognized as legal subjects with land as the object of their legal rights. The significance of land lies in its use for agriculture, settlements, commercial buildings like shops and structures, and other developments. This research focuses on the land dispute resolution process at the Tanjungbalai Sports Hall (GOR) in the Tanjungbalai District Court. The aim is to explore the factors considered by the panel of judges in making decisions on land disputes in the court. An empirical legal research method is used with a case study at the Tanjungbalai District Court Office. This study primarily relies on legal materials such as regulations, supplemented by secondary sources like legal books, and tertiary sources like non-legal books. Non-litigation dispute resolution is necessary to achieve a beneficial resolution for both parties. This applies to all cases brought to the District Court. Mediation or non-litigation dispute resolution aims for the parties to reach mutually beneficial agreements with the assistance of a neutral third party. However, ultimately, the parties themselves make the final decision. The settlement process is carried out through two mechanisms, namely compensation payments. In this case, the applicant demands compensation of 17 million, while the defendant requests 6 million. Despite reports that a budget of 9.6 billion is available, the Tanjungbalai City Government suddenly withdrew and refused to pay the agreed compensation. In deciding this case, the Judge must consider and prioritize the principles of justice, legal certainty, and practicality to reach an ideal, win-win decision that does not burden either party and is well accepted.
Pilihan Politik Masyarakat Melayu Pesisir Pantai di Kecamatan Tanjung Tiram Kabupaten Batu Bara Tahun 2019 Doni, Muhammad Rahma
Jurnal Hukum dan Demokrasi (JHD) Vol 24 No 3 (2024): Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Prof Gayus Lumbuun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61234/hd.v24i3.58

Abstract

Political choices are preferences, actions, and individual information processing to make political decisions. Although it is often assumed that political institutions play a major role in public policy making, individuals also have the ability to influence political institutions. Community participation in politics is when an individual or a group of people actively engage in political life, including in the election of national leaders, and directly or indirectly influence government policies, public policy. This research uses a qualitative method (Field Research) that is descriptive by using primary data sources, conducting interviews with the coastal Malay community of Tanjung Tiram, community leaders, Malay Youth, Head of the Batu Bara KPU, and Religious Leaders, regarding the political choices of the Tanjung Tiram coastal community in Batu Bara Regency, the political insights of the coastal Malay community, and the cultural impact of Malay culture on the political choices of the community.
Pertanggungjawaban Notaris terhadap Akta Otentik yang Dibuat Dihadapannya: Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 247/Pdt.G/2021/Pn Ckr Suparman, Maman; Sudirman, Dodi
Jurnal Hukum dan Demokrasi (JHD) Vol 24 No 3 (2024): Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Prof Gayus Lumbuun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61234/hd.v24i3.64

Abstract

Notaries in carrying out their duties and responsibilities are required to always apply the principle of caution, this is intended so that notaries can provide the best service to the public, and also notaries who do not apply the principle of caution can be subject to sanctions. The large number of notaries makes the competition among notaries increasingly tight and sometimes makes notaries less careful in carrying out their profession. Therefore, the emergence of this journal as an effort to discuss the main issue, namely how the accountability of a Notary towards authentic deeds made by or in front of them. The type of research used in this study is normative juridical, which is a research method by examining and analyzing secondary data. The research results show that authentic deeds as products of Notaries have very strong legal force as evidence in court, therefore the preparation of authentic deeds must be accountable if there are errors in their writing. Thus, the making of authentic deeds must be accountable.
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pembeli yang Beritikad Baik Terkait Jual Beli Tanah dan Implikasinya: Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung, Nomor 2943/K/Pdt/2016 Suparman, Maman; Pratama, Panji
Jurnal Hukum dan Demokrasi (JHD) Vol 24 No 3 (2024): Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Prof Gayus Lumbuun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61234/hd.v24i3.65

Abstract

The issue of buying and selling cannot be separated from everyday community life, and good intentions in buying and selling are crucial factors. This ensures that buyers with good intentions will receive legal protection in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. Good intentions in buying and selling are closely related to land transactions, as land plays a vital role in national development. This raises the question of the position of buyers with good intentions in land transactions carried out by PT Jasa Marga (Persero) and the position of legal entities acquiring land rights. This study uses a normative juridical research method. The position of PT Jasa Marga (Persero) in the purchase of a piece of land under SHM Number 3147 in the name of Dewi Astuti is seen as a buyer with good intentions. Despite the legal defect in the object of the transaction due to the issuance of a certificate based on a fake document, which fails to meet the objective requirements of an agreement, PT Jasa Marga (Persero) is considered a bona fide buyer. Therefore, they should receive legal protection under the prevailing laws. The legal consequences of the ownership of the land acquired by PT Jasa Marga (Persero) through the transfer of rights between Dewi Astuti and PT Jasa Marga (Persero) are invalid. As a legal entity, PT Jasa Marga (Persero) cannot have ownership rights to land in the form of full ownership; a legal entity can only have land rights under certain conditions, such as the Right to Cultivate, Right to Build, and Right to Use as stipulated in Article 30, Article 36, and Article 42 of UUPA Number 5 of 1960.
Penerapan Hukuman Mati Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia Ditinjau dari Sisi Hak Asasi Manusia Effendy, Andry; Magno, Nuno Gilherino Pacheco
Jurnal Hukum dan Demokrasi (JHD) Vol 24 No 3 (2024): Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Prof Gayus Lumbuun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61234/hd.v24i3.66

Abstract

The rampant corruption that has plagued Indonesia recently has prompted law enforcement officials to continuously strive and brainstorm hard on how to impose punishments or sanctions that can deter corrupt individuals and those contemplating such despicable acts. Many suggestions and viewpoints have been put forth by observers and legal experts in the country regarding appropriate punishments for corrupt individuals to instill a sense of deterrence among wrongdoers and provide a "shock therapy" for those considering corrupt activities. Various actions have been proposed, such as imposing social sanctions, seizing all their assets (leading to poverty), and even imposing the death penalty on corrupt perpetrators. In the current era of reform, efforts to prevent and eradicate corruption and the corresponding punishments for offenders have evolved alongside the increasing discourse on imposing the death penalty for criminal acts. There are many arguments for and against the death penalty in corruption cases. These differing opinions on the death penalty vary, with some agreeing to set an example and serve as a deterrent to those considering similar actions, while others disagree because they find it unjust and a violation of someone's right to life. In Indonesia, the implementation of the death penalty for corrupt individuals is already regulated by laws and regulations. Article 2 paragraph (2) of Law No. 20 of 2001 regarding the Eradication of Corruption states: "In the event that the act of corruption as referred to in paragraph (1) is committed under certain circumstances, the death penalty may be imposed." Paragraph (1) reads as follows: "Any person who, unlawfully, enriches oneself or others or a corporation to the detriment of the state's finances and economy, shall be punished with life imprisonment or a minimum of 4 (four) years and a maximum of 20 (twenty) years of imprisonment and a fine ranging from at least Rp200,000,000.00 (two hundred million rupiah) to a maximum of Rp1,000,000,000.00 (one billion rupiah).

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5