cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Agus Budianto
Contact Email
agus.budianto@uph.edu
Phone
+622125535168
Journal Mail Official
lexprospiciteditor@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Kampus Pascasarjana Universitas Pelita Harapan Plaza Semanggi lt. 16, Jl. Jend. Sudirman No. 50, RT.1/RW.4, Karet Semanggi, Kecamatan Setiabudi, Kota Jakarta Selatan, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 12930
Location
Kota tangerang,
Banten
INDONESIA
Lex Prospicit
Published by Universitas Pelita Harapan
ISSN : 29881781     EISSN : 29881773     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Lex Prospicit is a scientific journal published by the Master of Law Study Program, Faculty of Law, Universitas Pelita Harapan in collaboration with Asosiasi Advokat Indonesia (AAI) and serves as a venue for scientific information in the field of law resulting from scientific research or research-based scientific law writing. The articles published in this journal cover a broad range of topics, including Business Law, Antitrust and Competition Law, Intellectual Property Rights Law, Criminal Law, International Law, Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, Agrarian Law, Health Law, Adat Law, Environmental Law, Banking Law, Cyber Law, Bankruptcy Law, WTO Law, Investment Law, Tax Law, Human Rights Law, ADR and Arbitration Law, and Labor Law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 2, No 1: February 2024" : 5 Documents clear
PROBLEMA KEWAJIBAN PELAKU USAHA UNTUK MEMBUAT PEMBERITAHUAN PELAKSANAAN AKSI KORPORASI KE KOMISI PENGAWAS PERSAINGAN USAHA [PROBLEMS OF THE OBLIGATIONS OF BUSINESS ACTORS TO NOTIFY THE EXECUTION OF CORPORATE ACTIONS TO BUSINESS COMPETITION SUPERVISORY COMMISSION] Wonggo, Jeremy; Ketrina, Amanda
Lex Prospicit Vol 2, No 1: February 2024
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v2i1.7055

Abstract

There are regulations that require business entities to notify the implementation of corporate actions such as mergers, consolidations and takeovers to the KPPU. Violations of these regulations tend to dominate cases tried by the KPPU recently. Even though this regulation has good intentions to prevent monopolistic practices and unfair business competition, in practice it is very detrimental to the position of business entities and has the potential to cancel corporate actions that have previously been approved by the Minister. The aim of this research is to find a format for regulating the obligations of business actors in making corporate actions to the KPPU. The method used in this research is normative juridical, using secondary data. The research results show that corporate actions are accompanied by prohibited agreements, prohibited activities, and/or abuse of dominant positions. This regulation uses a rule of reason approach, where it is necessary to carry out prior proof/assessment regarding the impact on business competition carried out by the KPPU using various analyses. In addition, there are regulations that require business actors who carry out corporate actions to notify the KPPU a maximum of 30 (thirty) days from the effective date. This notification obligation is only required for transactions that cause the asset value to exceed 2 trillion rupiah (20 trillion for the banking business sector) and/or a transaction value of 5 trillion rupiah. In this case, there is ineffectiveness in regulating notification obligations for business actors because such notifications are very detrimental to business actors and only make tasks easier which should be the responsibility of the KPPU.Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Terdapat pengaturan yang mewajibkan badan usaha untuk melakukan pemberitahuan pelaksanaan aksi korporasi seperti penggabungan, peleburan, dan pengambilalihan ke KPPU. Pelanggaran atas aturan tersebut cenderung mendominasi kasus yang diadili oleh KPPU belakangan ini. Walaupun aturan ini bertujuan baik untuk mencegah terjadinya praktek monopoli dan persaingan usaha tidak sehat tetapi dalam prakteknya sangat merugikan posisi badan usaha hingga potensi pembatalan aksi korporasi yang sebelumnya telah disetujui oleh Menteri. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk mencari format tentang pengaturan kewajiban pelaku usaha dalam membuat aksi korporasi ke KPPU. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah normatif yuridis, dengan menggunakan data sekunder. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa aksi korporasi yang disertai dengan adanya perjanjian yang dilarang, kegiatan yang dilarang, dan/atau penyalahgunaan posisi dominan. Pengaturan ini menggunakan pendekatan rule of reason, di mana perlu dilakukannya pembuktian/penilaian terlebih dahulu mengenai dampaknya terhadap persaingan usaha yang dilakukan oleh KPPU dengan menggunakan berbagai analisis. Selain itu, terdapat pengaturan yang mewajibkan pelaku usaha yang melakukan aksi korporasi untuk memberitahukannya kepada KPPU maksimal 30 (tiga puluh) hari sejak tanggal berlaku efektifnya. Kewajiban pemberitahuan tersebut hanya diwajibkan untuk transaksi yang menyebabkan nilai aset melebihi 2 triliun rupiah (20 triliun untuk bidang usaha perbankan) dan/atau nilai transaksi 5 triliun rupiah. Dalam hal ini, terjadi ketidakefektifan dari pengaturan kewajiban pemberitahuan bagi pelaku usaha karena pemberitahuan tersebut sangat merugikan pelaku usaha dan hanya mempermudah tugas yang seharusnya menjadi tanggung jawab KPPU.
LEGAL STANDING OF LAND OWNERSHIP FOR MIXED-MARRIAGES BETWEEN BALINESE WIVES AND FOREIGN HUSBANDS IN BALI Mirabel, Aurellia Valeda
Lex Prospicit Vol 2, No 1: February 2024
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v2i1.7253

Abstract

The influx of foreign visitors to Bali has naturally led to increased interaction between foreign nationals and the local Balinese population. With mixed-marriages, there are special provisions for the nationality of the spouse, the nationality of the spouse, the nationality of the children, and property in the marriage.  Therefore, awareness is needed, especially for people of mixed-marriages to understand the provisions that apply to mixed-marriage spouses. This study uses normative juridical law which is a normative legal approach. The research emphasises the need for foreign nationals to understand the special provisions and restrictions for land ownership compared to Indonesian citizens. The Basic Agrarian Law of Indonesia (UUPA) governs land ownership regulations for mixed-marriages in Bali. Foreigners in Bali can acquire the right to use land through a Right to Use (Hak Pakai) or enter into leasehold agreements with Indonesian citizens or legal entities following to asas nasionalitas. However, land ownership rights are reserved exclusively for Indonesian citizens involved in mixed-marriages. The research highlights the influence of Hukum Adat, Balinese customary law, on land ownership in Bali. Mixed-marriage spouses should be aware of the regulatory disparities that arise after marriage and necessitate the arrangement of asset division. The customary law in Bali is in line with the existing statutory law in Indonesia.
THE ROLE OF ROAD TRAFFIC LAWS IN INCREASING COMPETITIVENESS AND OVERCOMING VIOLATIONS Lookman, Kyatmaja
Lex Prospicit Vol 2, No 1: February 2024
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v2i1.7954

Abstract

This research analyzes the role of the Road Traffic and Transportation Law in increasing the competitiveness of trucking companies and also addressing violations committed. Transport companies are part of another company's supply chain. Not all trucking companies deal with the goods owner directly, some are through third-party intermediaries (brokers). Tiered transactions are the structure of this industry because there are several levels of parties between the carrier company and the owner of the goods. Field phenomena show that this condition has not yet been achieved. This research aims to discover existing problems with existing laws for future improvements. This research uses normative juridical methods by studying existing laws and conducting comparative studies. Secondary data is also used to obtain the desired results. The results show that current laws cannot increase competitiveness and optimally prevent violations committed by trucking companies. Therefore, future legislation must be able to solve this problem.
PROTECTION OF MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS FROM FRAUD IN LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY DIVIDEND DISTRIBUTION Hartanto, Stefanie
Lex Prospicit Vol 2, No 1: February 2024
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v2i1.8020

Abstract

This research investigates the potential fraudulent actions carried out by majority shareholders and other corporate organs in the context of stock distribution. The primary focus is on the continuity of practices that may disadvantage minority shareholders and undermine the legal protections they should receive. Majority shareholders, often wielding significant influence in the General Meeting of Shareholders (RUPS), may exploit their power to manipulate decisions related to stock distribution. The presence of a quorum that can be achieved without the participation of minority shareholders increases the risk of fraud in this process. The aim of this research is to identify various fraudulent actions that may occur in stock distribution by majority shareholders and related corporate organs. Using a legal analysis approach and case studies, this research also explores ways in which minority shareholders might prevent or respond to fraudulent actions. Furthermore, the research examines the extent to which Law No. 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies (UU PT) provides a legal basis to prevent and respond to fraudulent actions in stock distribution. Practical implications of potential fraud are analyzed to provide recommendations that can strengthen legal protections for minority shareholders. This research is expected to contribute to a deeper understanding of the dynamics of fraud in stock distribution, outline the legal challenges faced by minority shareholders, and formulate concrete steps to prevent and respond to such fraud in companies.
THE APPLICATION OF JOINT CUSTODY CONCEPT IN RELATION TO THE CUSTODY OF THE CHILD Effendy, Edrick Edwardina
Lex Prospicit Vol 2, No 1: February 2024
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lp.v2i1.8029

Abstract

In Indonesia, the execution of court decisions regarding child custody is still a matter of debate among legal experts because the object is a person (human), not an inanimate object. This research will focus on discussing how regulations and execution of court decisions regarding child custody are carried out as well as how the concept of joint custody can be applied to minimize disputes related to child custody. This research is normative juridical research with a statutory and conceptual approach. Even though there are no regulations in Indonesia that comprehensively regulate child custody or its execution, the execution related to child custody can still be carried out guided by generally applicable procedures regarding execution of court decisions. The execution of child custody rights carried out in this way has a low level of success and is prone to causing problems where children's rights which should be protected are violated. For this reason, it is hoped that the concept of joint custody can be applied to minimize the emergence of disputes related to child custody.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2024 2024


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 3 No. 2: July 2025 Vol. 3 No. 1: February 2025 Vol. 2 No. 2: July 2024 Vol. 2 No. 1: February 2024 Vol 2, No 1: February 2024 Vol 1, No 2: July 2023 Vol. 1 No. 2: July 2023 Vol. 1 No. 1: February 2023 Vol 1, No 1: February 2023