cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Robert P. Radjagoekgoek
Contact Email
robert.pr@president.ac.id
Phone
+6281275555081
Journal Mail Official
jurnalhukum@president.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Ki Hajar Dewantara, Cikarang Baru, BEKASI 17550, Jawa Barat
Location
Kota bekasi,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Problematika Hukum
Published by President University
ISSN : 24771198     EISSN : 25034812     DOI : https://doi.org/10.33021/ph.v10i1
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Problematika Hukum is an open-access, peer-reviewed scientific journal that addresses legal issues in Indonesia and other Southern Hemisphere countries. This magazine aims to provide a comparative and multidisciplinary arena to communicate up to date analysis on Corporate Law and Litigation within the Global South perspective.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 4, No 1: January 2018" : 5 Documents clear
Death Penalty and Rights of Inmates on The Death Row under Indonesia Criminal Justice System Zenny Rezania Dewantary
Problematika Hukum Vol 4, No 1: January 2018
Publisher : President University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33021/ph.v4i1.1339

Abstract

Indonesia has executed approximately 84 inmates in the death row since 1998. Indonesia actively performed death execution until 2016. After 2016, although no execution has been done, there was a death penalty dropped in 2018. In relation to that, death penalty is stipulated in Indonesia Criminal Code (KUHP and other penal codes outside KUHP) and this makes Indonesia as a retentionist country. Death penalty delivers a death row. Death row is a prolonged death execution, which usualy measured in years. This situation caused a double-punishment, where the convicted must serve in an isolation room in prison, while waiting to be executed. This waiting period seems unavoidable due to some factors. Using normative-empirical research method, this research aims to bring the fact that in Indonesia, there are several factors that have been causing a death row. In this research, this situation is tested using state responsibility principle and some international conventions Indonesia has ratified. The absence of provision related to maximum death execution time after verdict is binding without further objections, together with the hierarchical system of court trial in Indonesia is the cause factor for the prolonged death execution. To encounter this situation The Government of Indonesia is proposed to (1) for short term goal, regulate strictly about the implementation of death execution; (2) for long term goal, to abolish capital punishment from the justice system.
Implikasi Pasal 32 ayat (2) dan (3) Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2011 terhadap Pemenuhan Standar Nasional Indonesia (SNI) Terkait Penyediaan Perumahan oleh Pengembang Real Estate Fennieka Kristianto
Problematika Hukum Vol 4, No 1: January 2018
Publisher : President University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33021/ph.v4i1.1335

Abstract

The enactment of Law Number 1 of 2011 concerning Housing and Settlement Areas (the Housing Act) since 2011 raises several counter-productive potentials for the housing sector in Indonesia. There are new problems related to the application of the Indonesian National Standard and it has implications for housing developers both in terms of technical and juridical aspects, which are interesting to examine in depth. What are the possibilities faced by a housing developer if the requirements for fulfilling the requirements of the Indonesian National Standard must be met by a housing developer? How is the application of Article 32 paragraph (2) and (3) of the Housing Law when faced with realities on the ground? The normative research method is used and is intended to criticize several articles in the Housing Law regarding their implications for housing provision by housing developers with the obligation to use domestic products that must meet the Indonesian National Standard (SNI).
ECFA and Taiwan from the Perspective of International Law Harryanto Aryodiguno
Problematika Hukum Vol 4, No 1: January 2018
Publisher : President University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33021/ph.v4i1.1336

Abstract

The Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) is an important milestone between the People's Republic of China and Taiwan; it is also the most critical achievement in improving the close cross-strait relations since President Ma Ying-Jeou took office in 2008. This article intends to use Guzman's rational choice theory of international law to analyze Taiwan's motivation for signing ECFA under East Asian regionalism, and to speculate whether Taiwan will abide by the relevant ECFA regulations. Signing the ECFA with China is mainly to break through the predicament of Taiwan's isolation under East Asian regionalism. As the first step in cooperation with East Asia, ECFA has a significant impact on Taiwan's credibility in East Asia. Regardless of whether there is a chance to cooperate with other East Asian countries in the future, if Taiwan gets off ECFA's relevant regulations, it will cause damage to Taiwan's credibility and may even obliterate the possibility of future cooperation with East Asian countries. Therefore, from the perspective of rational choice, in order to maintain Taiwan's good reputation and look forward to more cooperation possibilities in the future, complying with the relevant ECFA regulations is an obligation that Taiwan must fulfil.
Rechter Commisaris: A Dull Sword or A Medicine to Justice? Reynaldo Arya
Problematika Hukum Vol 4, No 1: January 2018
Publisher : President University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33021/ph.v4i1.1337

Abstract

In order to protect the fundamental rights of a human being from any violations during the process of investigation or trial proceedings, an institution called praperadilan was established through Indonesia Criminal Procedural Law. However, throughout 38 years of this institution implementation in Indonesia, the flaw and weakness of this institution has been identified. The example of weakness themselves posed as a great danger to the human rights of the suspect of accused, as on conducting coercive measures, the law enforcement may conduct the measures not in accordance with the law. This weakness has soon lead the society to thought of an alternative towards this institution, another institution that is better and may solve the weakness posed by praperadilan. The society then turn back to the history, realizing that prior to the implementation of Herziene Indische Reglement (HIR) in 1941 has erase a similar institution with the same purpose as in praperadilan, this institution was commonly known as “Rechter Commisaris”. In order to understand whether this reestablished institution may solve the weakness of praperadilan, the author decides to conducting a research on this topic through implementing normative legal method to procure the necessary materials. This writing will analyze the present status quo of praperadilan through understanding the changes made by Constitutional Court to this institution and identifying the weakness of praperadilan that still relevant in 2019. Then, this writing will further analyze the reasons behind the disappearance of this institution in HIR and Law Number 8 Year 1981 regarding Criminal Procedural Law. Finally, this writing will provide a comprehensive comparison and analysis on whether the present reestablished Rechter Commisaris that was contained within 2011 Draft of Criminal Procedural Law may lead to better protection of fundamental rights of a human being.
Tes Insolvensi Terhadap Kejahatan Insolvensi (Transplantasi Hukum Dan Urgensinya) Timotius Noto Susilo
Problematika Hukum Vol 4, No 1: January 2018
Publisher : President University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33021/ph.v4i1.1338

Abstract

UU No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang dalam proses revisi. Beberapa poin pada rancangan undang-undang menambahkan sejumlah poin pengaturan yang tidak ada sebelumnya. Satu dari sejumlah poin tambahan tersebut menarik untuk dikaji, yakni mengenai pasal tentang tes insolvensi. Membaca Naskah Akademik RUU akan ditemukan argumentasi bahwa tes insolvensi diatur demi mengukur keadaan perusahaan, dari aspek likuiditas, nilai aset, dan kemampuan perusahaan dalam membayar utang (termasuk utang yang kontingen dan prospektif). Dalam peristiwa hilangnya kemampuan perusahaan (debitor) memenuhi prestasinya terhadap para kreditor, aktivitas-aktivitas kejahatan seperti penggelapan atau penyelewengan pembukuan perusahaan –dalam genus ‘fraud’ dan ‘concealment’- tidak jarang menjadi faktor penyebab. Sementara itu, hasil tes insolvensi ini –sebagaimana jika nantinya ditransplantasikan ke dalam RUU Kepailitan- akan menjadi pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan pailit. Maka, tidakkah tes insolvensi perlu beroperasi ekstensif agar mampu turut mendeteksi apakah inabilitas perusahaan terhadap tanggungjawab utangnya ini murni karena resiko bisnis semata atau karena ada kejahatan sebagai faktor predominan? Atau jika tes insolvensi begitu limitatif berfokus untuk mengukur solvensi debitor, maka tidakkah tes insolvensi jadi kehilangan urgensinya.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2018 2018


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 10, No 1 (2024) Vol 9, No 2 (2023) Vol 9, No 1 (2023) Vol 8, No 2 (2022) Vol 8, No 1 (2022) Vol 7, No 2 (2021) Vol 7, No 1 (2021) Vol 6, No 2 (2020) Vol 6, No 1 (2020) Vol 5, No 2: July 2019 Vol 5, No 1: January 2019 Vol 4, No 2: July 2018 Vol 4, No 1: January 2018 Vol 3, No 2 (2017): July 2017 Vol 3, No 1: January 2017 Vol 2, No 2: July 2016 Vol 2, No 1: January 2016 Vol 1, No 2: July 2015 Vol 1, No 1: January 2015 More Issue