cover
Contact Name
Muchtar A H Labetubun
Contact Email
mahlabetubun@gmail.com
Phone
+6285243175321
Journal Mail Official
jurnalpalasrev@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Ruang PATTIMURA Law Study Review, Lantai 2 Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Kampus Unpatti, Jl. Ir. M. Putuhena Kampus Poka, Ambon, Maluku 97233, Indonesia.
Location
Kota ambon,
Maluku
INDONESIA
PATTIMURA Law Study Review
Published by Universitas Pattimura
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30252245     DOI : https://doi.org/10.47268/palasrev
Core Subject : Social,
PATTIMURA Law Study Review yang dsingkat (PALASRev) adalah media peer-review yang dikelola dan diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura. PATTIMURA Law Study Review menerbitkan karya ilmiah di bidang hukum, terbit tiga kali setahun pada bulan April, Agustus dan Desember. Tujuan jurnal ini adalah untuk menyediakan tempat bagi Mahasiswa untuk mempublikasikan artikel ilmiah dari luaran Skripsi dan atau sebagain dari Skripsi Mahasiswa Strata Satu (S1). Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura mewajibkan mahasiswa menggunggah karya ilmiah sebagai syarat ujian sarjana. Jurnal ini memberikan akses terbuka langsung ke kontennya berdasarkan prinsip bahwa membuat penelitian tersedia secara bebas untuk publik mendukung pertukaran pengetahuan global yang lebih besar. PATTIMURA Law Study Review tersedia secara online. Bahasa yang digunakan dalam jurnal ini adalah Bahasa Indonesia dan Bahasa Inggris. Ruang lingkup artikel yang dimuat dalam jurnal ini membahas berbagai isu di bidang Ilmu Hukum (Hukum Perdata, Hukum Islam, Hukum Bisnis/Ekonomi, Hukum Tata Negara, Hukum Administrasi Negara, Hukum Pidana, Hukum Internasional.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 243 Documents
Pendudukan Wilayah Oleh Negara Musuh dan Pelaksanaan Referendum Salampessy, Sal Sabila; Tuhulele, Popi; Daties, Dyah Ridhul Airin
PATTIMURA Law Study Review Vol 3 No 2 (2025): Agustus 2025 PATTIMURA Law Study Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/palasrev.v3i2.24018

Abstract

Occupation is a form of sovereignty enforcement over a territory that is not under the control of another state, and the UN Charter prohibits the acquisition of territory by force. The referendum conducted by Russia in Ukrainian territory constitutes a violation of Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, UN General Assembly Resolution Number 2625 of 1970, and UN General Assembly Resolution Number 2131 of 1965 on the prohibition of intervention in the internal affairs of other states. The principle of self-determination through a referendum should be conducted without external interference and in accordance with international law. This research employs normative legal methods with case and legislative approaches to examine the regulations regarding referendums in international law and the feasibility of conducting them in enemy-occupied territories. The findings indicate that a referendum cannot be lawfully conducted in an enemy-occupied territory as it violates fundamental principles of state sovereignty, territorial integrity, and the non-intervention principle in international law. Concrete examples, such as the referendums conducted by Russia in Crimea and the regions of Donetsk, Lugansk, Kherson, and Zhaporizhia, illustrate violations of international law, with the results of these referendums being legally unrecognized by the international community.
Maladministrasi Dalam Bidang Pendidikan di Indonesia Ohorella, Muhammad Fawwaz; Nirahua, Salmon Eliazer Marthen; Nendissa, Renny Heronia
PATTIMURA Law Study Review Vol 3 No 2 (2025): Agustus 2025 PATTIMURA Law Study Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/palasrev.v3i2.24349

Abstract

The legal issue in this study is the finding of intolerance against students in the school environment, namely the polemic of non-Muslim students at SMK Negeri 2 Padang, West Sumatra who are required to wear hijab. Therefore, it is interesting to examine whether intolerance can be categorized as a form of maladministration so that administrative sanctions can be applied to the action itself. The purpose of this study is to find out and analyze acts of intolerance against female students that can be categorized as maladministration and administrative sanctions that can be applied to acts of intolerance for female students in the school environment. The research method used in this writing is a normative juridical research method with a legislative approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this study can be concluded that Intolerance Actions for female students in the school environment can be categorized as a form of maladministration in the education sector. This is based on Article 1 point 3 of Law Number 37/2008 and Article 11 of Ombudsman Regulation Number 26/2017 which defines maladministration as a form of behavior or unlawful act, one of which is discrimination, on the grounds that it does not provide freedom for students to behave and express their opinions through the way of wearing a uniform in accordance with the religion adhered to and this action is a violation of government administration and public services. Administrative sanctions that can be applied to acts of intolerance for students in the school environment are that they can be subject to disciplinary sanctions based on the rule of law.
Bentuk Perlindungan Dan Pertanggungjawaban Terhadap Hak-Hak Anak Dalam Konflik Bersenjata Ferrara, Dendy Anugrah; Wattimena, Josiana Agusthina Yvonne; Hanafi, Irma Halima
PATTIMURA Law Study Review Vol 2 No 3 (2024): Desember 2024 PATTIMURA Law Study Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/palasrev.v2i3.24587

Abstract

The armed conflict that occurred in Afghanistan in 2001 and the use of child soldiers in the Congo conflict in 1996 are types of conflicts related to human rights that require protection and accountability in accordance with International Law which regulates the Geneva Conventions 1949, Additional Protocols I and II 1977, Rome Statute 1998, and Optional Protocols. The problems studied include: First, how is the protection of children's rights in situations of armed conflict. How is the responsibility of the relevant parties to the protection of children's rights in armed conflict. The research method used is normative juridical by using case approach, conceptual approach, and statutory approach. The purpose of the research is to analyze and find out the form of protection of children's rights in situations of armed conflict, as well as the responsibility of the parties concerned for the protection of children's rights in armed conflict. The results of this study explain that the form of protection of children's rights in situations of armed conflict consists of preventive legal protection regulated in the 1949 Geneva Convention Additional Protocol I Article 51 Paragraphs 1 to 3, and repressive legal protection related to legal protection for children recruited as child soldiers based on the 1989 Convention on the Rights of the Child regulated in Article 38. The final mechanism for accountability to parties who recruit children to serve as soldiers can be tried at the International Criminal Court (ICC). Thus, there is a need to harmonize the provisions of armed conflict and the protection of children's rights in International Law. Each state must ensure effective law enforcement as a means of accountability for violations of International Law, including through thorough investigations and fair trials of perpetrators of violations involving the use of child soldiers.