cover
Contact Name
Novianita Rulandari
Contact Email
journal@idscipub.com
Phone
+6285218596868
Journal Mail Official
journal@idscipub.com
Editorial Address
Gondangdia Lama Building 25, RP. Soeroso Street No.25, Jakarta, Indonesia, 10330
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Legalis : Journal of Law Review
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30308658     DOI : https://doi.org/10.61978/legalis
Core Subject : Social,
Legalis : Journal of Law Review with ISSN Number 3030-8658 (Online) published by Indonesian Scientific Publication, published original scholarly papers across the whole spectrum of law. The journal attempts to assist in the understanding of the present and potential ability law review.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): January 2024" : 5 Documents clear
The Responsibility of a Notary For Deeds Not Read In The Presence of The Parties Is Examined Based on Law Number 2 of 2014 Concerning The Position of a Notary Ngatiran
Legalis : Journal of Law Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): January 2024
Publisher : Indonesian Scientific Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61978/legalis.v2i1.227

Abstract

The notary, as a public official, has the responsibility to provide services to community members who require assistance in the drafting of written instruments, especially authentic deeds in the field of civil law. The existence of the notary is an implementation of the law of evidence. The Republic of Indonesia is a rule of law, based on the principle of the rule of law, ensuring certainty, order, and legal protection centered on truth and justice. Through the instruments drafted, the notary must provide legal certainty to the community utilizing notarial services. The purpose of this research is to understand how the notary assumes responsibility for the instruments they draft, which may cause issues due to the failure to read the instruments in the presence of the parties involved. This has been alleged as a violation of Law No. 30 of 2004, amended by Law No. 2 of 2014 concerning the notarial function carried out by a notary in the locality of Bencongan Kelapa Dua Tangerang, reported by NA (43) to the Criminal Investigation Unit (SPKT) of the South Tangerang Police Regional Office. The victim reported notaries AI, IG, and R, as well as other individuals involved, feeling deceived for about 3 years in the property title transfer process that remained incomplete from 2021 to 2023.
Legal Analysis of Co-Branding as an Identity for Creative Economy Products in Bangkalan Regency Kumala, Tannia Dinda; Abdulovna, Daryna Dzemish
Legalis : Journal of Law Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): January 2024
Publisher : Indonesian Scientific Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61978/legalis.v2i1.459

Abstract

Intellectual property rights provide exclusive protection as in brand protection. By registering a brand, a creative economy product will receive repressive legal protection, obstacles in brand registration are experienced by some creative economy actors in Bangkalan Regency. Until now, there has been no regional legal product regarding intellectual property protection, especially convenience through the concept of co-branding as the identity of creative economy products for business actors. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the concept of using a brand as co-branding in Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Brands and Geographical Indications and the views of stakeholders in Bangkalan Regency regarding the implementation of co-branding regulations in the future. The research method used is empirical juridical. The approaches used in this study are factual approaches and statutory approaches. The results of this study indicate that the use of brands as co-branding is closer to the concept of collective brands. Regional legal products in Bangkalan Regency regarding brand protection have not yet had a discourse on the creation and regarding the concept of using brands as co-branding related to creative economy products.
Legal and Ethical Validity of the Thesis Jockey Services Agreement Fathurrahman, Aditya; Mediawati, Noor Fatimah; Abdulovna, Daryna Dzemish
Legalis : Journal of Law Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): January 2024
Publisher : Indonesian Scientific Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61978/legalis.v2i1.460

Abstract

This research examines the validity of thesis jockey service agreements from a legal perspective, focusing on the complexities arising from paid academic work. The study analyzes the legal implications of intellectual property rights, contractual validity, and potential criminal liability under existing regulations. A normative juridical approach is employed, utilizing a statute-based analysis of relevant laws, particularly Law No. 20 of 2003 on the National Education System. The research relies on secondary data sources, including legal texts, court decisions, and scholarly articles. Data collection is conducted through a literature review, and the analysis technique follows qualitative juridical interpretation to assess legal risks and implications. The study identifies key legal concerns, such as intellectual property rights violations, contractual obligations, and the potential for fraud or document forgery. It highlights that payments for thesis writing services may constitute an employment relationship, raising ethical and legal dilemmas. The findings indicate that service providers and clients may face legal consequences, including criminal charges for academic dishonesty and violations of copyright law. The research underscores the legal risks associated with thesis jockey services and emphasizes the need for stricter enforcement of academic integrity policies. The study calls for increased awareness of legal consequences and improved regulatory measures to safeguard educational integrity. This research contributes to the understanding of academic integrity and legal accountability, providing insights for policymakers, educational institutions, and legal practitioners to address the challenges posed by paid thesis writing services.
Land Tenure and Legal Pluralism in Africa and Asia: Gender, Reform, and Recognition Sutikno, Aldilla Yulia Wielys
Legalis : Journal of Law Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): January 2024
Publisher : Indonesian Scientific Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61978/legalis.v2i1.795

Abstract

This narrative review examines the interplay between customary land rights and statutory legal frameworks within plural legal systems, with a focus on land tenure security in sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia. The objective is to assess how pluralism in land law affects the recognition and protection of customary land rights, particularly among marginalized communities. A systematic literature search was conducted using databases such as Scopus, Google Scholar, and PubMed. Keywords including "tenure security," "customary land rights," "land reform," "legal pluralism," and "community participation" guided the review. Inclusion criteria focused on empirical studies addressing policy impacts, gender dynamics, and community-based land governance. The results reveal that customary law plays a crucial role in ensuring tenure security, especially where formal systems are weak or exclusionary. In Ghana and Tanzania, customary tenure supports collective land stewardship and sustains agricultural livelihoods. However, legal ambiguities and inconsistent state recognition often render these systems vulnerable. Gender disparities remain pronounced, with women frequently excluded from land decision-making despite reform initiatives. Comparative insights from Kenya and Uganda underscore the challenges of harmonizing plural systems without undermining local autonomy. The discussion highlights the need for inclusive legal reforms, participatory documentation mechanisms, and targeted interventions to empower underrepresented stakeholders. The findings emphasize that integrating customary law into statutory systems and strengthening community roles in land governance are essential for achieving equitable, secure, and sustainable land rights. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of such integrative frameworks across jurisdictions and explore models that reconcile legal diversity with development goals.
International Humanitarian Law under Pressure: Legal Responses to 21st Century Armed Conflicts Hermansyah
Legalis : Journal of Law Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): January 2024
Publisher : Indonesian Scientific Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61978/legalis.v2i1.805

Abstract

This narrative review explores the evolution of International Humanitarian Law (IHL) in the context of contemporary armed conflicts, focusing on five key areas: technological innovation, gender-based protection, humanitarian intervention, urban warfare, and non-state actors. The study begins by framing the urgency to reevaluate IHL as conflicts become increasingly complex due to technological advancement and hybrid threats. The literature was collected from databases such as Scopus and Google Scholar using specific keywords including "autonomous weapons," "urban warfare regulations," and "non-state actors in armed conflict." Peer-reviewed articles published from 2000 onwards formed the basis of the analysis. The results reveal multiple gaps between existing legal frameworks and the realities on the ground. Technological developments such as drones and AI challenge core principles of distinction and proportionality. Gender-focused instruments like CEDAW and UNSC Resolution 1325 have enhanced protections but suffer from inconsistent implementation. The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine introduces ethical and legal tensions regarding sovereignty, with mixed success in cases like Libya and Rwanda. Urban warfare and sieges demonstrate IHL's difficulty in regulating densely populated battlegrounds. Non-state actors complicate legal accountability due to their diverse structures and cross-border operations. The discussion emphasizes the role of systemic legal constraints and advocates for reforms that reflect current military practices. This review concludes that advancing legal adaptability, international cooperation, and contextualized policy interventions is vital to ensure effective civilian protection and uphold humanitarian norms in modern warfare.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5