cover
Contact Name
Saifuddin Zuhri Qudsy
Contact Email
saifuddinzuhri@yahoo.com
Phone
+6281804192371
Journal Mail Official
johs.asilha@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Asosiasi Ilmu Hadis Indonesia (ASILHA) Jl. Pasekan, Stan RT 05 RW 44 Maguwoharjo Kec. Depok, Kab. Sleman, DI Yogyakarta
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Journal of Hadith Studies
ISSN : 25984810     EISSN : 25984802     DOI : https://doi.org/10.32506/johs
The journal receives articles from researchers who have new and progressive issues on scholarly study of all aspects of Hadith and Hadith Sciences related, but not limited, to Islamic teachings resources, Islamic thoughts, philosophy, geography, history, law, political science, economics, education, culture, anthropology, sociology, literature, Islamic propagation (dakwa), communication, psychology, science and technology, international relations, environmental and developmental issues, as well as ethical questions related to Hadith and Hadith Sciences research available all around the world. The journal also covers contemporary Hadith and Hadith Sciences issues emerging in the world. We invite and appreciate writers who write any Bahasa, English, or Arabic scientific work in the form of both research report and significant opinion on Hadith and Hadith Sciences and issues mentioned above. Any work published in this journal does not represent this journal editorial board opinion and perspective, but merely its writer findings and thought. For this reason, it is essential that the writer is fully responsible for whatever he or she wrote.
Articles 5 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): Journal of Hadith Studies" : 5 Documents clear
Ekspresi Tajdid dalam Syarah Hadis: Kajian Historis atas Subul al-Salām karya al-Ṣanʿānī (w. 1182 H/1769 M) Mukaromah, Kholila
Journal of Hadith Studies Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): Journal of Hadith Studies
Publisher : ASILHA (Asosiasi Ilmu Hadis Indonesia)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32506/johs.v6i2-01

Abstract

Subul al-Salām by al-Ṣanʿānī represents a critique of sectarian fanaticism within Islamic jurisprudence, articulated through his commentary on hadith. This critique is closely linked to al-Ṣanʿānī’s concern over the decline of the Muslim ummah in the Arab region during the 11th–12th centuries AH, which in turn spurred the discourse of Islamic intellectual reform as a response. Through a historical inquiry, this study aims to explore the relationship between his commentary on Bulūgh al-Marām and the socio-cultural dynamics experienced by al-Ṣanʿānī. This research is based on library sources and employs a qualitative method. It addresses three key questions: a) In what ways can the tendency to disengage from rigid adherence to a particular school of law be identified as a defining characteristic of al-Ṣanʿānī’s hadith commentary in Subul al-Salām? b) What historical factors contributed to the emergence of this characteristic? c) How do these factors correlate with the transformation toward a new model of understanding hadith commentary? The findings of this study reveal that al-Ṣanʿānī employed a critical and corrective approach to interpreting hadith, often engaging with and reassessing views from various legal schools. There is a close connection between the paradigm of Ibn Taymiyyah, which had developed as a discourse of tajdīd in the Arab-Islamic world at the time, and al-Ṣanʿānī’s dissatisfaction with sectarian conflicts, particularly in his homeland, Yemen. Ultimately, Subul al-Salām is also associated with his decision to renounce the Zaydī madhhab and adopt a non-aligned stance, free from commitment to any single madhhab.
Analisis Kriteria Kesahihan Matan dalam Hadis: Kajian Teori dan Metodologi Hikmah, Nur; Pangestu, Satrio Anugrah; Luthfia, Nisha
Journal of Hadith Studies Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): Journal of Hadith Studies
Publisher : ASILHA (Asosiasi Ilmu Hadis Indonesia)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32506/johs.v6i2-02

Abstract

The issue of hadith authenticity, particularly among Orientalist scholars, has generated a critical and controversial discourse. Prophetic hadith is often perceived as irrelevant to contemporary realities, largely due to the socio-cultural and environmental contexts in which it originated. This situation highlights the need for focused studies on matn (textual) criticism to identify the core criteria most commonly used in assessing the authenticity of hadith texts. This study addresses two main questions: (1) Have the criteria for matn authenticity evolved? and (2) How can these criteria be applied to contemporary issues? The research employs a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method, based on journal articles and books published between 2015 and 2023. Sources were collected using keywords such as “matn criticism” and “textual authenticity,” retrieved from Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar, then analyzed and displayed in tabular form. The findings indicate a notable evolution in methodological approaches and perspectives on hadith authenticity. Scholars have increasingly adopted contextual and hermeneutical frameworks to interpret hadith in light of current socio-historical realities. The debate on the validity of hadith texts also reflects shifting views on canonical collections like Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī and Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim. These developments illustrate the methodological diversity and the ongoing efforts to reinterpret Islamic intellectual heritage in a way that responds to modern challenges.
Teori dan Metodologi Sanad Hadis: Kajian Jarḥ wa Ta’dīl Imaduddin, Muhammad; Akbar, M Khairul Hafiz
Journal of Hadith Studies Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): Journal of Hadith Studies
Publisher : ASILHA (Asosiasi Ilmu Hadis Indonesia)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32506/johs.v6i2-05

Abstract

The status of hadith as a foundational source of Islamic law necessitates rigorous criticism and verification from various dimensions. This imperative becomes particularly significant in light of the proliferation of mawḍūʿ (fabricated) hadiths, which increased substantially following the era of Fitnah. The widespread circulation of such fabrications resulted in the merging of spurious reports with authentic traditions, thereby complicating the process of authentication. In this context, the role of hadith transmitters (narrators) emerges as a pivotal element in determining the validity of a hadith, wherein the assessment of a narrator’s credibility is essential. The discipline of jarḥ wa taʿdīl provides a systematic and methodological framework established by classical scholars to evaluate the reliability of narrators. As socio-religious contexts continue to evolve and knowledge becomes increasingly digitized, the urgency of revisiting and recontextualizing this field becomes more apparent. This study seeks to map the scholarly discourse on jarḥ wa taʿdīlby analyzing academic works published between 2016 and 2023. Employing the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method, this research reveals that the methodological development within jarḥ wa taʿdīl studies remains largely stagnant, with the majority of contemporary literature focusing on definitional aspects, historical trajectories, foundational principles, and classical applications as articulated by early Islamic scholars. However, the study also identifies emerging trends that suggest potential areas of innovation. These include the application of jarḥ wa taʿdīl principles in contemporary religious and social contexts, as well as a growing interest in digital methodologies for hadith evaluation. Such developments highlight the need for sustained and methodologically robust scholarly efforts aimed at revitalizing the study of jarḥ wa taʿdīl and adapting its principles to contemporary challenges.
Asbāb al-Wurūd dalam Dinamika Kajian Hadis di Indonesia (2011–2023): Pemetaan Systematic Literature Review Sadali, Ahmad David Imron; Baehaki, Ahmad; Fadlurahman, M. Hammam; Mubarak, M. Luthfi
Journal of Hadith Studies Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): Journal of Hadith Studies
Publisher : ASILHA (Asosiasi Ilmu Hadis Indonesia)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32506/johs.v6i2-03

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the trends and methodological tendencies of asbāb al-wurūd research in Indonesia between 2011 and 2024 using a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach. A total of 20 academic publications were systematically examined to map the trajectory and quality of this growing discourse. Findings indicate that the historical-contextual approach dominates, positioning asbāb al-wurūd as a crucial framework for understanding the relevance of hadith in contemporary socio-religious contexts. Rather than serving solely as a supporting tool, asbāb al-wurūd has emerged as an interpretive method addressing issues such as education, gender justice, and reinterpretation of controversial narrations. However, the research remains largely repetitive and descriptive, lacking theoretical and methodological innovation. Therefore, this study recommends interdisciplinary and reflective methodological expansion within asbāb al-wurūd research and suggests extending SLR applications to other hadith-related fields to support epistemological renewal.
Tarjīḥ Hadis dalam Dialektika Zaman: Kajian Sistematis atas Evolusi Metodologi dan Relevansi Praktis di Era Kontemporer Fahmi, Muhammad Zainul Arif; Bramasta, Mohammad Faqih
Journal of Hadith Studies Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): Journal of Hadith Studies
Publisher : ASILHA (Asosiasi Ilmu Hadis Indonesia)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32506/johs.v6i2-04

Abstract

This article explores the evolving academic landscape of Tarjīḥal-Hadith studies by examining the patterns, objectives, forms, and methodologies that have characterized scholarly discourse between 2012 and 2023. Responding to the fragmented understanding of contradictory hadiths (mukhtalif al-ḥadīth), the study investigates how tarjih—the method of preference—is developed and employed to address textual conflicts within prophetic traditions. Utilizing the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method, the authors critically analyzed 16 selected publications to identify dominant trends and scholarly responses. The findings reveal that early studies largely emphasized conceptual definitions and classical reiterations of tarjih, whereas recent works began to engage contemporary issues, including digital misinformation and pandemic-related challenges. The study also uncovers a recurring stagnation in epistemology and orientation, as many contributions remain trapped in descriptive traditions rather than analytical innovation. Nevertheless, a positive shift is observed from 2021 onwards, as some scholars began integrating tarjīḥinto real-life contexts, positioning it as a relevant interpretive and legal tool in contemporary Islamic thought. The research concludes that for tarjīḥto remain intellectually and practically significant, it must transcend repetitive theorization and be continuously adapted to respond to emerging socio-religious realities. This marks a necessary transition from textual preservation to contextual activation of hadith interpretation.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5