cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota medan,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
PREMISE LAW JURNAL
Published by Universitas Sumatera Utara
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 10 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 9 (2015): Volume IX Tahun 2015" : 10 Documents clear
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP DEBITOR YANG TELAH DIJATUHI PUTUSAN SERTA MERTA DALAM KEPAILITAN ASTRI ESTER SILALAHI
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 9 (2015): Volume IX Tahun 2015
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (252.931 KB)

Abstract

Immediate verdict is decision which can be executed although it has not had any legal force which is final and conclusive (inkracht van gewijsde). The implementation of immediate verdict should be based on the prevailing regulations in order to forestall new problems as the result of the implementation of the immediate decision itself. The formulas of the problem were as follows: how about the immediate decision in Law on Bankruptcy, how about legal protection for debtors who had immediate decision imposed upon him in Law on Bankruptcy, and how about the consideration of the Constitutional Court on Judicial Review No. 144/PUU-VII/2009. The research used judicial normative, using primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The data were analyzed qualitatively by conducting library research. Keywords: Immediate Decision, Debtor, Bankruptcy
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KREDITUR ATAS PEMBATALAN SERTIPIKAT HAK MILIK YANG SEDANG DIBEBANI HAK TANGGUNGAN (STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG, NOMOR 140/KTUN/2011) BRANDO MICO SEMBIRING
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 9 (2015): Volume IX Tahun 2015
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (335.009 KB)

Abstract

The cancellation of the right to land certificate which is being imposed by the collateral right by the decision of the Supreme Court No.140/K/TUN/2011 due to its procedural deficiency in its issuance and this will inflict loss to the creditor because the creditor will lose the object of the collateral of the debitor’s credit. The theory used in analyzing this cancellation of the right to land certificate being imposed by the collateral right by the decision of the Supreme Court No.140/K/TUN/2011 was based on the principles of legal protection developed by Satjipto Raharjo supported by the legal certainty developed by E. Utrecht, and the principles of the legal purpose developed by Van Apeldoorn. This normative juridical study was to analyze the decision of the Supreme Court No.140/K/TUN/2011 and related it to the regulation of legislation, legal documents, and the text books related to the formulation of research problems. The data for this study were obtained through inventorying the basic reason of the decision of the Supreme Court. The cancellation of the right to land certificate being imposed by the collateral right waived the object of the collateral right, but since the issuance of collateral right because of the credit agreement made by the creditor and the debtor, that even though the collateral right has been waived, it does not mean that all of the debtor’s credit or debt was paid off, because it is still bound by the credit agreement made by the creditor and debtor, and all of the debtor’s properties both movable and fixed properties, both available and will be available become the responsibility of all contracts. Keywords: Legal Protection, Cancelation of Right to Land Certificate, Guarantee of Collateral Right
ANALISIS PENERAPAN PASAL 31 UNDANG-UNDANG NO 24 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG KEWAJIBAN PENGGUNAAN BAHASA INDONESIA TERHADAP KONTRAK INTERNASIONAL YANG BERPEDOMAN PADA ASAS-ASAS DALAM HUKUM KONTRAK (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PERKARA NO.451/Pdt.G/2012/PN.Jkt.Bar) CHANDRA HALIM
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 9 (2015): Volume IX Tahun 2015
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (177.041 KB)

Abstract

Since Law No. 24/2009 on Flag, Language, State Coat of Arms, and National Anthem was enacted, Article 31, called Law of Language in paragraph 1 has confirmed the word, “Wajib” (obligatory) in using Indonesian in every contract, and paragraph 2 has also confirmed the words, “Ditulis juga” (Also written) in foreign languages when foreigners are involved in the contract. However, there are manyarguments about the use of the word, “Wajib” which is considered by some lawyers and legal practitioners to be more prioritized than the words, “Ditulis juga”. The consequence is that any contract written in a foreign language becomes weak;eventually, the Verdict of West Jakarta District Court accepted the claim of the plaintiff who used foreign language in the contract so that it was legally null andvoid. Article 31 of Law on Language has fulfilled the principle of Contract Law, referred to the Principle of Enacting Legal Provision No. 12/2011 which concerns with Legal Certainty and states that every Law should meet Legal Principle in each field, particularly which is related to a contract on Property; in this case, the Principle of Contract Law should be fulfilled. A contract which is regulated in Law on Language also meets the Principle of Contract Law, especially Article 2 of Law No. 24/2009 on Regulation in Language which is implemented in point g which states that legal certainty on evidence and validity of a contract, which uses a foreign language in Court after Law on Language was enacted, can be used as valid evidence in Court as far as the contract is original and authentic as it is stipulated in the Notarial Act and as far as it is agreed by the parties concerned, and one of them can prove it before the Court in the case of underhanded contract. Keywords: Contract, Language, Principle of Contract Law, Evidence
STUDI MENGENAI PELAKSANAAN PERKAWINAN ANGKAP PADA MASYARAKAT GAYO DI KABUPATEN ACEH TENGAH DENGAN BERLAKUNYA UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 1 TAHUN 1974 TENTANG PERKAWINAN DEVI ERAWATI
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 9 (2015): Volume IX Tahun 2015
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (265.027 KB)

Abstract

Basically, the form of adat marriage in Gayonese is similar to that of the Indonesian people. In the Gayonese adat law, there is a specific marriage which is called ‘angkap’ marriage. This marriage usually consists of two types. First, a family that has the only daughter does not want her to move to her husband’s side. Secondly, a young man who has no family comes to a certain village; by conducting angkap marriage, he does not need to pay for dowry. This young man comes from the coastal area or from different ethnic group to Gayo; he has good manners and is willing to work. The angkap marriage has been ruled in the Gayonese adat law. Keywords: Implementation of Angkap Marriage, Controversy in Angkap   Marriage
ANALISIS YURIDIS ATAS TURUNNYA KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN AKTA NOTARIS MENURUT UUJN NO. 2 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG JABATAN NOTARIS FELIX CHRISTIAN ADRIANO
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 9 (2015): Volume IX Tahun 2015
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (261.148 KB)

Abstract

The result of the research showed that the lower level of the force of evidence of Notarial deeds was based on Article 16, paragraph 1, paragraph 7, and paragraph 8, Article 41 with reference to Article 38, Article 39, Article 40, Article 44, Article 48, Article 50, and article 52 of Notarial Act No. 2/2014. Violating these Articles will cause an authentic deed to be lower so thast it turned to an underhanded deed. These articles do not legally protect the position of a Notary because they are not needed through a judge’s verdict to prove the force of evidence of a Notarial deed. Verification for a Notarial deed which has the force of evidence as an underhanded deed must be done through a claim to a District Court to prove whether it violates the Articles above or not. If a Notary violates the provision under the Articles above, through the court’s verdict, he will be given a written warning, suspension, honorable discharge, and dishonorable discharge; according to the civil law, he has to reimburse the cost, the compensation, and interest. Keywords: The Force of Evidence of Notarial Deed
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEMILIK HAK ATAS TANAH YANG TELAH DITERBITKAN SERTIPIKATNYA ATAS NAMA PIHAK LAIN (Studi Pada Sertipikat Hak Milik Nomor 1.022 di Kecamatan Tarutung, Kabupaten Tapanuli Utara) KIKI RATNA PATRICIA SIREGAR
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 9 (2015): Volume IX Tahun 2015
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (245.229 KB)

Abstract

The position of the Letter of Notification of Land is legally used as the recommendation to request for land certificate. The Letter of Notification   can give evidence that the land has been tilled by the owner and the case has been acknowledged by the other tillers and strengthened village head, and subdistrict  head. The problems of the research were as follow  Certificate No. 1.022 could be issued on another person's land at Aek Ristop, Kelurahan Hutatoruan VII Tarutung Subdistrict. North Tapanuli. The research used judicial empirical approach with descriptive analytic as its specification. The data were gathered by conducting field research The result of the research showed that by government officials from village, subdistrict. until the Land Office has violated law and good government principles. and why due diligence and carefulness. The research was that the issuance of the Proprietary Rights Certificate No.1.022 was invalid  as follows: the factor of the authority that issued the certificate, the factor of lhe applicant's bad faith by hiding the judicial data, thirdly, the factor of ambiguity of the origin of Ihe land so that the mapping of registering the land in the Land Office is incomplete, In consequence, the certificate is legally and administratively defective and the certificate holder does not get legal protection. Keywords: Legal Protection, Land Rights Owner, Certificate
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM KEPENTINGAN ANAK DI BAWAH UMUR TERHADAP HIBAH YANG MELANGGAR LEGITIEME PORTIE NITA NILAN SRY REZKI PULUNGAN
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 9 (2015): Volume IX Tahun 2015
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (147.39 KB)

Abstract

In practice, the grant giver always grants his/her property to the grant recipient with the greater amount than the part available in the property to be granted or in fact a part of the grant received by the grant recepient absolutely belongs to the legitimaries heirs that the dispute of inheritance occurs among the heirs. To prove whether or not the grant given by the grant giver has violated the legitieme portie, and does not inform the total amount of all boedel of the inheritance. The attempt to protect thr ight to inherite of the underage heirs in terms of granting by the grant giver violating the legitieme portie is that it is a must to obtain a decision in relation to the transfer of the property of the underage from the court of law, the existence of representative instution towards the legal action for the property of the underage, the action of control or monitoring the property containing the right of the underage heirs with the condition that transferring the property owned by the underage heirs that should be allowed get license from the court of law in order to prevent the violation that might be done by the guardian of the underage heirs or other parties who can inflict loss to the underage heirs. Keywords: Legal Protection, Legitieme Portie, Underage Heir
PENETAPAN HAK PERWALIAN ANAK DIBAWAH UMUR PADA KASUS PERCERAIAN DALAM PERKAWINAN CAMPURAN WARGA NEGARA INDONESIA DAN WARGA NEGARA ASING TIURLAN SIHALOHO
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 9 (2015): Volume IX Tahun 2015
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (224.022 KB)

Abstract

Guardianship can accur in marriage when there is a divorce or the death of  one of the couple who is bound in wedlock. Before it occurs, the children are under their parents’ care, but if the parents are not responsible for them or do not take their repsponsibility to take care of them, the parents’ rights in the children are abolished. The requirements for the receiver of guardianship right are stipulated in the Civil Code, in the Marrieage Law, and in the Child Protection Law. The guardianship for children is in the hand of the judge when it is caused by a divorce. The consideration upon a guardianship right will be given. The right and the authority of a guardian on a child are equal to biological parents. The right includes the child personally and his property. The right of guardianship does not stop by determining who will have the right to be the guardian, either his biological father or his biological mother, through the Court’s valid verdict (inkracht). The task and the obligation of the Court in executing guardianship right do not only hand over the child to the guardian but also considers the child’s subsistence. Keywords: Mixed Marriage, Divorce, Citizenship, Guardianship Right, Guardian’s Responsibility, Execution of Guardianship
TINJAUAN YURIDIS KEDUDUKAN BENDA JAMINAN HAK TANGGUNGAN KEPADA BANK YANG TERKAIT KASUS KORUPSI YENNY YUSTISI YANTI
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 9 (2015): Volume IX Tahun 2015
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (213.037 KB)

Abstract

Immovable properties such as land and buildings which are bound in hypothecation give the privilege to preferred creditor as the receiver of the hypothecation to execute the collateral when debtors are not able to pay off their debts. The research used judicial normative method. The confiscation of the collateral by the Court can be opposed by the third party that believed to be harmed and is contradictory to the principle of legal protection for preferred creditor because every movable and immovable property which has been mortgaged cannot be confiscated since it has been the authority of the creditor as the receiver of the collateral. A creditor who has bound in the collateral with good faith must be legally protected, and every immovable property such as land and building which been bound in collateral becomes the full authority of the creditor as the mortgagee as the security from the debtor as the mortgagor. Keywords: Hypothecation, Bank, Confiscation, Criminal Act, Corruption
TINJAUAN YURIDIS ATAS TUGAS-TUGAS NOTARIS SEBELUM PELAKSANAAN PERJANJIAN KREDIT DI PERBANKAN HISKIA MEIKO AUNAMULA PANGGABEAN
PREMISE LAW JURNAL Vol 9 (2015): Volume IX Tahun 2015
Publisher : PREMISE LAW JURNAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (264.676 KB)

Abstract

Nowadays, notarial profession develops rapidly which indicates that it is highly needed by the Indonesian people. Not only individuals, but also corporations need Notaries’ services. One of the corporations is banking financial institution. In its management, a Bank needs a Notary for giving legal certainty to its debtors and to the Bank itself; it means that a Notary becomes a Bank’s partner. In the regulation on a Notary’s duty and authority as it is stipulated in Law No. 2/2014 on the Amendment of Law No. 30/2004 on the Regulation of Notaries Profession, states about the authority and automatically becomes the duty of a Notary in doing his profession. In order that the process of pre-credit contract and legal certainty can run smoothly, it is recommended that Notary should be able to examine and ask for all supporting documents from the parties concerned in order to obtain an administrative legal basis on whatever is needed to make a complete credit contract a law which can be obeyed by both parties with the minimum legal loophole or even to be eliminated. Keywords: Judicial Review, Implementation of Notary’s Duty in Pre-Credit Contract

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 10

 1 

Filter by Year

2015 2015


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 18 (2019): VOLUME 18 TAHUN 2019 Vol 17 (2019): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2019 Vol 16 (2019): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2019 Vol 15 (2019): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2019 Vol 14 (2019): VOLUME 14 TAHUN 2019 Vol 13 (2019): VOLUME 13 TAHUN 2019 Vol 12 (2019): VOLUME 12 TAHUN 2019 Vol 11 (2019): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2019 Vol 10 (2019): VOLUME 10 TAHUN 2019 Vol 9 (2019): VOLUME 9 TAHUN 2019 Vol 8 (2019): VOLUME 8 TAHUN 2019 Vol 7 (2019): VOLUME 7 TAHUN 2019 Vol 6 (2019): VOLUME 6 TAHUN 2019 Vol 5 (2019): VOLUME 5 TAHUN 2019 Vol 4 (2019): VOLUME 4 TAHUN 2019 Vol 3 (2019): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2019 Vol 2 (2019): VOLUME 2 TAHUN 2019 Vol 1 (2019): VOLUME 1 TAHUN 2019 Vol 17 (2018): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2018 Vol 16 (2018): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2018 Vol 15 (2018): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2018 Vol 14 (2018): VOLUME 14 TAHUN 2018 Vol 13 (2018): VOLUME 13 TAHUN 2018 Vol 12 (2018): VOLUME 12 TAHUN 2018 Vol 11 (2018): VOLUME 11 TAHUN 2018 Vol 10 (2018): VOLUME 10 TAHUN 2018 Vol 9 (2018): VOLUME 9 TAHUN 2018 Vol 8 (2018): VOLUME 8 TAHUN 2018 Vol 7 (2018): VOLUME 7 TAHUN 2018 Vol 6 (2018): VOLUME 6 TAHUN 2018 Vol 5 (2018): VOLUME 5 TAHUN 2018 Vol 4 (2018): VOLUME 4 TAHUN 2018 Vol 3 (2018): VOLUME 3 TAHUN 2018 Vol 2 (2018): VOLUME 2 TAHUN 2018 Vol 1 (2018): VOLUME 1 TAHUN 2018 Vol 24 (2017): VOLUME 24 TAHUN 2017 Vol 23 (2017): VOLUME 23 TAHUN 2017 Vol 22 (2017): VOLUME 22 TAHUN 2017 Vol 21 (2017): VOLUME 21 TAHUN 2017 Vol 20 (2017): VOLUME 20 TAHUN 2017 Vol 19 (2017): VOLUME 19 TAHUN 2017 Vol 18 (2017): VOLUME 18 TAHUN 2017 Vol 17 (2017): VOLUME 17 TAHUN 2017 Vol 16 (2017): VOLUME 16 TAHUN 2017 Vol 15 (2017): VOLUME 15 TAHUN 2017 Vol 14 (2017): VOLUME XIV TAHUN 2017 Vol 13 (2017): Volume XIII Tahun 2017 Vol 12 (2017): VOLUME XII TAHUN 2017 Vol 11 (2017): Volume XI Tahun 2017 Vol 10 (2017): VOLUME X TAHUN 2017 Vol 9 (2017): vol IX Tahun 2017 Vol 8 (2017): Volume VIII Tahun 2017 Vol 7 (2017): Volume VII Tahun 2017 Vol 6 (2017): VOLUME VI TAHUN 2017 Vol 5 (2017): VOLUME V TAHUN 2017 Vol 4 (2017): VOLUME IV TAHUN 2017 Vol 3 (2017): VOLUME III TAHUN 2017 Vol 2 (2017): VOLUME II TAHUN 2017 Vol 1 (2017): VOLUME I TAHUN 2017 Vol 21 (2016): VOLUME XXI TAHUN 2016 Vol 20 (2016): VOLUME XX TAHUN 2016 Vol 19 (2016): VOLUME XIX TAHUN 2016 Vol 18 (2016): VOLUME XVIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 17 (2016): VOLUME XVII TAHUN 2016 Vol 16 (2016): VOLUME XVI TAHUN 2016 Vol 15 (2016): VOLUME XV TAHUN 2016 Vol 14 (2016): VOLUME XIV TAHUN 2016 Vol 13 (2016): VOLUME XIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 12 (2016): VOLUME XII TAHUN 2016 Vol 11 (2016): VOLUME XI TAHUN 2016 Vol 10 (2016): VOLUME X TAHUN 2016 Vol 9 (2016): VOLUME IX TAHUN 2016 Vol 8 (2016): VOLUME VIII TAHUN 2016 Vol 7 (2016): VOLUME VII TAHUN 2016 Vol 6 (2016): VOLUME VI TAHUN 2016 Vol 5 (2016): Volume V Tahun 2016 Vol 4 (2016): Volume IV Tahun 2016 Vol 3 (2016): Volume III Tahun 2016 Vol 2 (2016): Volume II Tahun 2016 Vol 1 (2016): Volume I Tahun 2016 Vol 14 (2015): Volume XIV Tahun 2015 Vol 13 (2015): Volume XIII Tahun 2015 Vol 12 (2015): Volume XII Tahun 2015 Vol 11 (2015): Volume XI Tahun 2015 Vol 9 (2015): Volume IX Tahun 2015 Vol 8 (2015): Volume VIII Tahun 2015 Vol 7 (2015): Volume VII Tahun 2015 Vol 6 (2015): Volume VI Tahun 2015 Vol 5 (2015): Volume V Tahun 2015 Vol 4 (2015): Volume IV Tahun 2015 Vol 3 (2015): Volume III Tahun 2015 Vol 2 (2015): Volume II Tahun 2015 Vol 1 (2015): Volume I Tahun 2015 Vol 10 (2015) Vol 4: Volume 4 (2014) : Volume IV Tahun 2014 Vol 3 (2014): Volume III Tahun 2014 Vol 2 (2014) Vol 1: Volume I Tahun 2014 Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Volume II Tahun 2013 Vol 3: Volume III tahun 2013 Vol 1 (2013) More Issue