cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Ikhsan Nendi
Contact Email
Ikhsan Nendi
Phone
+6289680104255
Journal Mail Official
journalpolitiscope@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl Pakembaran, Blok Kamarang, Desa Penambangan, Kec. Sedong, Kabupaten Cirebon, Jawa Barat
Location
Kab. cirebon,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Journal of Political Innovation and Analysis
Published by Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional
ISSN : 30897424     EISSN : 30897424     DOI : https://doi.org/10.59261/jpia.v2i1.8
Core Subject : Social,
Environmental Science
Journal of Political Innovation and Analysis (JPIA) is a peer-reviewed academic journal that publishes original research articles, theoretical studies, and critical reviews focusing on innovation in the field of politics and policy analysis. The journal aims to serve as a scholarly platform for researchers, academics, policymakers, and practitioners to explore contemporary political developments through an interdisciplinary lens. - The journal covers, but is not limited to, the following topics: - Innovations in political systems and institutions - Democratic transformation and governance reforms - Digital technology and politics (e-democracy, big data in politics, AI and public policy) - Political participation and voter behavior - Public policy analysis and its societal impacts - Politics of identity, gender, and policy inclusiveness - International relations and contemporary geopolitical dynamics - Institutional reform and the role of political actors - Environmental politics and sustainability - Political security and conflict dynamics
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Politik dan Hubungan Internasional
Articles 33 Documents
 1   2   3   4 
Bureaucratic Accountability Analysis Through Application-Based Monitoring System in the Enforcement of Class C Mineral Quarrying in Kupang Regency Naftali Arkilaus Natumnea
Journal of Political Innovation and Analysis Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Political Innovation and Analysis
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jpia.v3i2.29

Abstract

Background: Bureaucratic accountability in the management of Class C mineral quarrying (Galian C) in Kupang Regency faces a serious crisis, evidenced by alleged revenue leakage of IDR 570 million across three budget years (2019–2021) and the persistence of widespread illegal mining activities despite existing regulatory frameworks.Objective: This study aims to analyze bureaucratic accountability in the enforcement of Galian C mining through a digital application-based monitoring system launched in April 2025 by the Kupang Regency Government.Method: This research employs a qualitative descriptive approach relying on secondary data sources, including digital media reports (Timur Today, Victory News, Koran Timor, Lintas NTT), official government documents (Kupang Regency Government website, NTT Provincial ESDM IUP data), and academic publications. Data validation was conducted through source triangulation, requiring each key finding to be confirmed by at least two independent sources.Findings and Implications: The results indicate that the implementation of the Galian C Monitoring Application is still in its early stages, classifiable at Layne and Lee’s first e-government stage (cataloguing), and is hampered by three critical deficiencies: (1) limited ASN human resource capacity and dependence on external STIKOM Uyelindo personnel; (2) underdeveloped digital infrastructure across Kupang Regency’s 5,298.13 km² and 24 sub-districts; and (3) weak inter-agency coordination among Bapenda, Dinas ESDM, Satpol PP, and Polres Kupang.Conclusion: Bureaucratic accountability in Galian C enforcement in Kupang Regency has not yet functioned optimally; its success requires sustained ASN capacity building, reinforced cross-institutional coordination, digital infrastructure improvement, and firm law enforcement mechanisms.
Anthropocentrism and the Ecological Crisis: An Analysis of Laudato Si’ on the Church’s Role in Public Policy Transformation Losianus Harjon
Journal of Political Innovation and Analysis Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Political Innovation and Analysis
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jpia.v3i2.31

Abstract

Background: The ecological crisis has emerged as one of the most urgent global challenges, driven largely by anthropocentric paradigms that legitimize the exploitation of nature for economic and technological interests. Objective: This study aims to analyze the ecological crisis through an ecotheological interpretation of Laudato Si' and to examine the Church’s prophetic role in transforming ecological public policy. Method: This research employs a qualitative literature-based design using a hermeneutic-ecotheological approach. Primary data were obtained from Laudato Si’, while secondary sources included ecotheological literature, Catholic Social Teaching, environmental ethics, and public policy studies. Data were analyzed through textual interpretation, thematic categorization, and conceptual synthesis. Findings and Implications: The findings reveal that anthropocentrism contributes to deforestation, climate change, pollution, biodiversity loss, habitat destruction, and social inequality. Ecological degradation also fosters spiritual alienation and weakens human responsibility toward creation. The Church’s prophetic mission is reflected in ecological advocacy, environmental education, ethical criticism of exploitative development, and participation in policy discourse based on integral ecology. These findings suggest that ecological ethics can provide a normative basis for sustainable and socially responsible public policies. Conclusion: The ecological crisis represents an environmental, social, and moral challenge that requires a transformation of values and policies. Integral ecology offers a comprehensive framework for promoting sustainability, environmental justice, and the common good through collaborative action among religious institutions, governments, and society.
Dynamics of Living Law, Legal Pluralism, and the Challenges of Codifying Customary Law in Indonesia's National Legal System Titus Redisman Zebua
Journal of Political Innovation and Analysis Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Political Innovation and Analysis
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jpia.v3i2.26

Abstract

Background: The recognition of living law and legal pluralism in Indonesia's national legal system has become increasingly urgent, illustrated by a viral TikTok case in which derogatory content toward the Dayak people triggered a customary tribunal convened by indigenous youth organizations across fourteen districts in West and Central Kalimantan. Objective: this study examines the nature of living law as a cultural phenomenon, how two normative systems negotiate within the same social space, and what is at stake when the state codifies customary law. Method: this study employs a qualitative legal anthropology approach through a descriptive-analytical case study design, drawing on library research and document analysis of legislation and literature, analyzed through phenomenological, theoretical, and critical-reflective interpretive stages. Results: the study finds that the recognition of living law in the National Penal Code (Law No. 1/2023, Article 2) marks a significant legal advancement, though top-down codification risks turning customary law into a static, inflexible artifact. Implications: theoretically, this study integrates living law, legal pluralism, politics of recognition, and restorative justice into a unified anthropological framework for digital-space jurisdictional conflict; practically, it recommends that the state adopt a protective rather than colonizing role, allowing living law to develop organically through communal deliberation and participatory governance.

Page 4 of 4 | Total Record : 33

 1   2   3   4 

Filter by Year

2024 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Political Innovation and Analysis Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Political Innovation and Analysis Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Political Innovation and Analysis Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Political Innovation and Analysis Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Journal of Political Innovation and Analysis