cover
Contact Name
Heppy Hyma Puspytasari
Contact Email
heppypuspytasari@unesa.ac.id
Phone
+6282233456463
Journal Mail Official
ijsl@unesa.ac.id
Editorial Address
https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/ijsl/about/editorialTeam
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Indonesian Journal of Sport Law
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30906156     DOI : https://doi.org/10.26740/ijsl.v2i01
Core Subject : Education, Social,
Indonesian Journal of Sports Law (IJSL) is a peer reviewed journal published biannual (Juni and Desember) by Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Surabaya. IJSL published both Printed and Online version Online ISSN 30906156. IJSL is intended to be the journal for publishing of results of research on Sport Law, Administrative Sport Law, Financial Sport Law, and other laws relating to Sport.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 4 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 2 No. 01 (2025): INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS LAW" : 4 Documents clear
Implementation Doping Tests Persebaya vs Mitra Kukar Match: Evaluating Anti-Doping Regulations in Indonesian Football: English Lumbanraja, Christian Felix; Arvitto, Rafi Satrya
Indonesian Journal of Sports Law Vol. 2 No. 01 (2025): INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS LAW
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/ijsl.v2i01.38790

Abstract

Doping tests play a crucial role in ensuring fairness and integrity in football. The implementation of these tests in the Persebaya vs Mitra Kukar match raised several legal and regulatory concerns regarding compliance with national and international anti-doping frameworks. This study examines the enforcement of doping regulations in Indonesian football, particularly in relation to FIFA and WADA standards. Using a qualitative approach, this research analyzes legal inconsistencies, procedural challenges, and their impact on players, clubs, and the league. The findings highlight the need for stricter enforcement mechanisms, better coordination among stakeholders, and improved transparency in the doping control process. The study concludes with recommendations for strengthening anti-doping policies in Indonesian football to enhance integrity and prevent future controversies. The study concludes with recommendations for strengthening anti-doping policies in Indonesian football by improving regulatory frameworks, enhancing enforcement mechanisms, and increasing collaboration between national football authorities, anti-doping agencies, and international governing bodies. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of transparency in the doping control process, regular education for athletes and officials on anti-doping regulations, and the development of stricter sanctions for violations. These measures are essential to ensuring the integrity of Indonesian football, maintaining fair competition, and preventing future controversies that could undermine public trust in the sport.
Analysis of Norm Conflict Between Law Number 11 of 2022 Concerning Sports and the Regulation of the Minister of Youth and Sports Number 14 of 2024 Concerning Management Standards for Sports Organizations within the Scope of Achievement Sports Ikram, Denial; Sri Undy Mahardika, I Made; Hyma Puspytasar, Heppy
Indonesian Journal of Sports Law Vol. 2 No. 01 (2025): INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS LAW
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/ijsl.v2i01.40810

Abstract

This research analyzes the norm conflict between Law Number 11 of 2022 concerning Sports (Law 11/2022) and the Regulation of the Minister of Youth and Sports Number 14 of 2024 concerning Management Standards for Sports Organizations within the Scope of Achievement Sports (Permenpora No. 14 of 2024). The main objective is to identify potential normative contradictions and their implications for the autonomy and governance of achievement sports organizations in Indonesia. The analysis finds that a number of provisions in Permenpora No. 14 of 2024, such as the requirement for ministerial recommendations/approvals for internal organizational processes (congresses, changes to statutes/bylaws, legal entity ratification, changes in management), the minister's authority to intervene in internal disputes and form transition teams, and the establishment of detailed management criteria, potentially conflict with the principle of independence for sports organizations mandated by Law 11/2022. By applying the principle of lex superior derogat legi inferiori, it is concluded that the provisions of Permenpora No. 14 of 2024 that contradict Law 11/2022 are juridically null and void by law. This norm conflict has implications for the erosion of sports organizations' autonomy, the risk of excessive government intervention, legal uncertainty, and potential misalignment with international sports governance principles. It is recommended that Permenpora No. 14 of 2024 be comprehensively reviewed and revised to align with Law 11/2022, to ensure that management standards strengthen good governance without sacrificing the fundamental independence of sports organizations.
Legal Review of Umpire's Decision in England vs New Zealand Cricket Final Ade Putra Hasibuan; Vikas Kumar Chaudhary
Indonesian Journal of Sports Law Vol. 2 No. 01 (2025): INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS LAW
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/ijsl.v2i01.40942

Abstract

Abstract Cricket is a game played by 2 (two) antagonistic teams that can be played by anyone, both young and old. Cricket means a game that is almost similar to softball and baseball. Cricket does not mean an individual game but a team game. Each team consists of 11 people so that there is cooperation between players to produce victory. Cricket is a sport that originated in England, cricket has been very popular in British colonies such as India, Pakistan, Australia, Malaysia and others. For those who are new to cricket, this sport uses a bat, stump, ball and field. However for matches such as the final, there must be an additional match so that the rules of international matches need to be changed. What are the Cricket rules that should be changed and considered to neutralize the laws, which currently tend towards batsman? The ICC should do something about the bails. During IPL as well as the World Cup, so many times we have seen that bails are not falling despite ball hit the stumps. It should not be like that. In an event like the world cup, it happened 5 times so far in the first ten days. Nothing can be more frustrating for a bowler than this. There are a few things that I think can resolve this issue. Keywords: Cricket, Umpire’s Decision, International Cricket Council
Analysis of the IHP Decision on BWF Sanctions Against Eight Indonesian Badminton Players in Sports Law Violations Renanda Ayu Krisdianty; Fadhilatul Ma'rifah Fi Kamilatil Mahabbah
Indonesian Journal of Sports Law Vol. 2 No. 01 (2025): INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS LAW
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/ijsl.v2i01.40952

Abstract

This article analyzes the decision of the Independent Hearing Panel (IHP) of the Badminton World Federation (BWF) concerning eight Indonesian badminton players involved in a match fixing case. This research aims to examine the legal considerations used by the IHP in imposing sanctions and to assess how the principle of Lex Sportiva was applied in resolving international sports disputes. This research employs normative legal methods through statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The findings indicate that the IHP exercised its authority based on Articles 29 and 31 of the BWF Statutes and applied the balance of probabilities standard. The defendants were found to have violated various provisions of the BWF Code of Conduct (2012, 2016, and 2017 editions), particularly in relation to match manipulation, betting activities, failure to report, and lack of cooperation during investigations. This decision illustrates the application of Lex Sportiva, a body of transnational norms developed in international sports law. By referring to BWF regulations and jurisprudence from the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), the panel emphasized the importance of maintaining sports integrity through firm sanctions. The ruling serves not only to penalize but also to safeguard the values of fair play and public trust in the sport of badminton.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 4