cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Brawijaya Gedung Graha Medika Lt. 1, Ruang 104
Location
Kota malang,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Jurnal Kedokteran Brawijaya
Published by Universitas Brawijaya
ISSN : 02169347     EISSN : 23380772     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.jkb
Core Subject : Health,
Medicine & Pharmacology
JKB contains articles from research that focus on basic medicine, clinical medicine, epidemiology, and preventive medicine (social medicine).
Arjuna Subject : Kedokteran - Kedokteran (Lain-Lain)
Articles 13 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 31 No. 4 (2021)" : 13 Documents clear
Effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing on Self-Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Systematic Review Siska Puji Lestari; Titin Andri Wihastuti; Dina Dewi Sartika Lestari Ismail
Jurnal Kedokteran Brawijaya Vol. 31 No. 4 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.jkb.2021.031.04.11

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus is a health problem that will affect the health status of patients. Motivational interviewing a counseling technique focusing on clients and it is designed for helping individuals explore and accomplish ambivalence in behavior. This systematic review aimed at describing effectiveness motivationaI interviewing on self-management of diabetes mellitus type 2 patients. There are 1359 articles of 526 ScienceDirect articles, 422 ProQuest, 290 PubMed, and 121 Ebsco articles. The systematic review method began by identifying 20 articles from four electronic databases for previous studies that were published during 2011-2021. The results of the systematic review obtained that motivational interviewing can provide improved self-management and control blood glucose DM type 2 patients. The conclusion motivational interviewing can affect the patient's self-management especially on blood glucose profile, dietary compliance, quality of life, self-efficacy, HbA1c levels of DM type 2 patients.
Cardiovascular Outcomes in High-Risk Patients Undergoing OPCAB Surgery Compared to Traditional CABG Widya Trianita Suwatri; Dudy Arman Hanafy; Sugisman Sugisman
Jurnal Kedokteran Brawijaya Vol. 31 No. 4 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.jkb.2021.031.04.9

Abstract

The benefit of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) for coronary artery disease (CAD) with Ejection Fraction (EF) 30% and ischemic burden (IB) 10% is still debatable. The objective of this study is to analyze mortality and morbidity in patients with EF 30% and ischemic burden 10% undergoing OPCAB compared to traditional CABG (TCABG).  The retrospective analytic cohort study was performed using data from January 2015–November 2018 at National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita Jakarta, Indonesia. 109 patients were included. 35 patients undergoing OPCAB and 74 patients undergoing TCABG. The primary outcomes were mortality rate, morbidity rate, and length of stay. Arrhythmia is statistically lower in OPCAB compared to TCABG (8.6% vs 39.2%; p=0.001). Kidney injury is statistically lower in OPCAB (8.6% vs 27.0 %; p=0.027). Stroke is statistically lower in OPCAB (1.0 % vs 17.6%; p=0,032). There is no significant difference between OPCAB and TCABG in mortality, 5.7% vs 16.2%, (RR=3.20; CI 95%=0.67–15.12; p= 0.126). There was a statistically significant difference in the occurrence of postoperative morbidity in CAD patients with EF <30% and IB<10% who underwent OPCAB surgery compared with patients who underwent TCABG. Mortality that occurred after OPCAB procedure was lower in CAD patients with EF < 30% and IB<10% compared to TCABG although the statistical difference was not significant. Therefore, patients with this condition are more advisable to undergo OPCAB.
Predictive measure for Ischemic Heart Disease among Workers in Jakarta, Indonesia Leli Hesti Indriyati; Gea Pandhita S; Nurhayati Anis; Anna Suraya
Jurnal Kedokteran Brawijaya Vol. 31 No. 4 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.jkb.2021.031.04.8

Abstract

Ischemic Heart Disease (IHD) is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in many countries, including Indonesia. Therefore, cardiovascular risk-prediction models are required in clinical practice for early detection in high-risk populations, including the worker population. This study intends to develop a predictive risk measure for early detection of IHD incidences among employees in Jakarta, Indonesia. Source of data was the database of 4,100 medical check-up (MCU) results of employees and entrepreneurs in Jakarta and surrounding areas in January to October 2019. Multivariate analysis showed that being aged >40 years (p=0.000; OR=5.329 (95% CI 2.621-10.833)), having a history of dyspnea (p=0.000; OR=5.699 (95% CI 2.524-12.871)), smoking (p=0.048; OR=2.007 (95% CI 1.924-4.359)) and HDL<50 mg/dL (p=0.049; OR=1.811 (95% CI 1.099-3.281)) were all good predictors to detect IHD in the worker population. The combination of these predictors results with a cut-off point of 2.5, showed accuracy (79.2% sensitivity and 66.3% specificity). Workers who have a score >2.5 are at high risk of developing IHD in the future. This scoring system can be used by workers or companies to take early preventive measures.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 13

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2021 2021


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 33 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 33 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 33 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 33 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 33 Supplement 1 (2024) Vol. 32 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 32 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 32 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 32 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 32 Supplement 1 (2022) Vol. 32 Supplement 1 (2021) Vol 31, No 4 (2021) Vol. 31 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 31 No. 3 (2021) Vol 31, No 3 (2021) Vol. 31 Supplement 2 (2021) Vol 31, No 2 (2020) Vol 31, No 1 (2020) Vol 30, No 4 (2019) Vol 30, No 3 (2019) Vol 30, No 2 (2018) Vol 30, No. 1 (2018) Vol 29, No. 4 (2017) Vol 29, No. 3 (2017) Vol 29, No 3 (2016) Vol 29, No. 2 (2016) Vol 29, No 1 (2016) Vol 28, No 4 (2015) Vol 28, No 3 (2015) Vol 28, No 2 (2015) Vol 28, No 2 (2014) Vol 28, No 1 (2014) Vol 27, No 4 (2013) Vol 27, No 3 (2013) Vol 27, No 2 (2012) Vol 27, No 1 (2012) Vol 26, No 4 (2011) Vol 26, No 3 (2011) Vol 26, No 2 (2010) Vol 26, No 1 (2010) Vol 25, No 3 (2009) Vol 25, No 2 (2009) Vol 25, No 1 (2009) Vol 24, No 3 (2008) Vol 24, No 2 (2008) Vol 24, No 1 (2008) Vol 23, No 3 (2007) Vol 23, No 2 (2007) Vol 23, No 1 (2007) Vol 22, No 3 (2006) Vol 22, No 2 (2006) Vol 22, No 1 (2006) Vol 21, No 3 (2005) Vol 21, No 2 (2005) Vol 21, No 1 (2005) Vol 20, No 3 (2004) Vol 20, No 2 (2004) Vol 20, No 1 (2004) Vol 19, No 3 (2003) Vol 19, No 2 (2003) Vol 19, No 1 (2003) Vol 18, No 3 (2002) Vol 18, No 2 (2002) Vol 18, No 1 (2002) Article in Press 2 Article in Press More Issue