cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
counterterrorism@mail.unnes.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
counterterrorism@mail.unnes.ac.id
Editorial Address
Sekaran, Kec. Gn. Pati, Kota Semarang, Jawa Tengah 50229
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Indonesian Journal of Counter Terrorism and National Security
ISSN : -     EISSN : 2829890X     DOI : https://doi.org/10.15294/counterterrorism
Core Subject : Social,
The journal focuses on advanced legal and policy analysis related to Counter-Terrorism, National Security Law, and Special Criminal Acts (Extraordinary Crimes).
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 5 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): January-June, 2025" : 5 Documents clear
The Legal Politics of Regulating Special Terrorism Crimes under Law No. 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code: Politik Hukum Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Terorisme Khusus dalam UU No. 1 Tahun 2023 tentang KUHP Indraswara, Dede; Wulandari, Cahya; Muhammad Azil Maskur; Aisyah Nur Rafidah
Indonesian Journal of Counter Terrorism and National Security Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): January-June, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijctns.v4i1.3480

Abstract

Legal politics in the context of criminal law must be analyzed seriously, both in relation to material criminal law and formal criminal law. Law No. 5 of 2018 concerning Terrorism Crimes and Law No. 9 of 2013 concerning Terrorism Financing Crimes underwent changes after the enactment of Law No. 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code (Indonesian Criminal Code). This amendment includes a bridge article relating to criminal acts of terrorism within the Criminal Code, which thus has implications for the elaboration of general and special rules. The purpose of this research is to find out how to use logical (Logische Specialiteit) or systematic (Systematische Specialiteit) specialties in interpreting this matter. The method used is juridical-normative with an analytical and conceptual approach based on various legal literature. This research obtained 2 (two) results, namely an explanation of the rules against terrorism in Indonesian positive law and an explanation of the bridging article in the reform of the Indonesian Criminal Code with logical specificity. So it is concluded that the regulation of special terrorism regulations in the Criminal Code does not mean that it weakens the Special Law, but instead strengthens these special regulations in the future if there is a criminal act of terrorism.
Non Penal Policy for Preventing Terorism Criminal Acts Through Contextualization Jihad Command in Islamic Sharia: Kebijakan Non Penal Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Terorisme Melalui Kontekstualisasi Perintah Jihad dalam Syariat Islam Errix Dwi Saputra; Indah Sri Utari
Indonesian Journal of Counter Terrorism and National Security Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): January-June, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijctns.v4i1.24024

Abstract

This research is a research in the field of criminal law with a study of non-penal policies regarding the prevention of criminal acts of terrorism, the purpose of this study is to determine the factors that cause perpetrators of criminal acts of terrorism to interpret their actions as jihad and what form of policy can be taken to prevent criminal acts of terrorism. The type of research used here is a normative research type with a conceptual approach, namely comparing the events of criminal acts of terrorism in the name of jihad with the concept of jihad in Islamic law. It is hoped that this research can contribute to criminal law both in terms of legal culture, legal structure and legal subtance in order to understand that Islam is a just religion and all incidents of criminal acts of terrorism are a form of deviation from Jihad.
Legal Analysis of the Modus Operandi of Terrorism Funding Under the Guise of Charity: Analisis Hukum Terhadap Modus Operandi Pendanaan Terorisme Berkedok Amal Ghoni, Muhammad Haidar; Ali Masyhar
Indonesian Journal of Counter Terrorism and National Security Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): January-June, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijctns.v4i1.24075

Abstract

Terrorist funding is an important part of a series of terrorist acts. Various methods are used by terrorist groups to obtain funds as an effort to continue to exist to spread radicalism and carry out acts of terror. According to data, the population in Indonesia has a high level of generosity in the world, this makes terrorist groups take advantage of opportunities by using the guise of charity by using non-profit organizations (NPOs) to obtain funds with structured methods and without using violence. This study aims to analyze the mode used by NPOs in carrying out the guise of charity as a medium for collecting funds and the form of formulation for eradicating terrorism funding that has been taken by the government, as well as to evaluate the effectiveness of these policies and actions in the national context. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statute approach. This study emphasizes the aspect of fundraising carried out by NPOs in a series of terrorism funding activities. The Indonesian government must always control NPOs by coordinating with related institutions. This is a step in overcoming terrorism funding under the guise of charity in order to create safe and responsible fundraising activities which will be explained in this study.
Role of Justice Collaborators in Uncovering Terrorist Networks: Effectiveness Analysis in Indonesia’s Criminal Justice System: Peran Saksi Pelaku yang Bekerjasama (Justice Collaborator) dalam Mengungkap Jaringan Terorisme: Analisis Efektivitas dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia Muhammad Faiq Zuhrul Anam; Shofriya Qonitatin Abidah
Indonesian Journal of Counter Terrorism and National Security Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): January-June, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijctns.v4i1.25935

Abstract

Terrorism is a type of organized crime that falls into the category of extraordinary crime. Overcoming this also requires the use of extraordinary measures. Justice collaborator (JC) is a scheme that can optimize the process of handling criminal acts of terrorism, which not only includes repressive efforts (penal path) but prevents similar crimes from occurring early by revealing a wider terrorist network. This study analyzes the role of justice collaborators (JC) in revealing terrorist networks and the effectiveness of their application in the criminal justice system. This study is a type of juridical-normative research using a statute approach. The role of justice collaborators (JC) in revealing terrorist networks has been regulated in several rules that are separate from regulations on overcoming criminal acts of terrorism. The non-single legal basis gives rise to different interpretations, thus having implications for the ineffectiveness of the role of justice collaborators (JC) in revealing terrorist networks. This can be seen from the absence of a unified coordination of law enforcement officers to ensure the fulfillment of the rights of protection and appreciation for justice collaborators (JC). The implementation in the criminal justice system raises several obstacles, including the mechanism, multi-agency coordination, qualifications, and credibility of the perpetrators who are made justice collaborators (JC). This study concludes that there needs to be an update to regulating justice collaborators (JC) into a single law binding on all criminal justice institutions. There are two update mechanisms: creating a single law or including it in the Criminal Code Bill. Further research is expected to deepen the understanding of empirical data and the use of normative data.
Juridical Analysis of the Double Track System in Countering Terrorism Acts In Indonesia: Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Double Track System Dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Terorisme Di Indonesia Wiratama, Kukuh Satria; Muhammad Azil Maskur; Shofriya Qanitatin Abidah
Indonesian Journal of Counter Terrorism and National Security Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): January-June, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijctns.v4i1.26407

Abstract

Terrorism has become a serious concern crime in Indonesia, where the methods of countering it through law enforcement are currently faced with a number of challenges. Countering terrorism is faced with the situation of rapid development of modern terrorism and the contradiction between the need to handle terrorism as holistically as possible with existing regulations and a shift in the paradigm of modern law. This study aims to analyze the regulation of terrorism crimes in Indonesia from the perspective of a double track system in imposing sanctions. This research is also intended to identify and elaborate on the need to reform the penal policy to counter terrorism through the application of a pattern of imposing sanctions with a double track system for terrorism act. The method used in this study is doctrinal legal reasearch using a statutory approach and conseptual approach. The results obtained through this research are that the double track system has not been used and is firmly stated as a pattern for imposing sanctions for terrorism crimes in Indonesia. Furthermore, the double track system in imposing sanctions for terrorism crimes can be an idea for reforming penal policies in effective and holistic countermeasures of terrorism. The implementation of the double track system is based on the need for the law to respond to the development of terrorism, increase the effectiveness of the Terrorism Law, and adjust the paradigm of modern law.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5