cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Hariyadi Fajar Nugroho
Contact Email
gjlae@journals.cognispectra.com
Phone
+6285725769193
Journal Mail Official
gjlae@journals.cognispectra.com
Editorial Address
Sejahtera Street Number 15, Gumpang, Kartasura, Sukoharjo, Indonesia
Location
Kab. sukoharjo,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Global Journal of Law, AI & Ethics (GJLAE)
Published by CV. Cognispectra Publishing
ISSN : -     EISSN : 31108733     DOI : https://doi.org/10.65917/gjlae.1.1.2025
Core Subject : Science, Education, Social,
Computer Science & IT Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other
Focus and Scope Focus and Scope The Global Journal of Law, AI & Ethics (GJLAE) is a peer-reviewed international journal dedicated to exploring the intersection of law, ethics, and emerging technologies in a global context. In an era of rapid technological advancement and increasing legal complexity, GJLAE provides a dynamic platform for discussing regulatory frameworks, ethical considerations, and comparative legal developments. GJLAE aims to contribute to legal scholarship by fostering interdisciplinary discussions and in-depth comparative legal analysis. The journal encourages contributions that analyze legal, ethical, and technological challenges from a transnational perspective, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of legal transformations worldwide. GJLAE is an open-access, peer-reviewed, and refereed journal published by the Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia. Scope The journal covers a broad range of topics, with a particular focus on comparative studies in public and private law, AI governance, and digital ethics. The Editors encourage submissions that integrate interdisciplinary approaches and examine legal issues through a comparative and global lens. Key topics include but are not limited to: Jurisprudence, Philosophy of Law, and Legal Theories Islamic Law, Customary Law, and Legal Pluralism in the Digital Era Comparative Studies in Constitutional and Administrative Law International Human Rights Law and Global Justice Ethical AI and the Role of Law in Tech Policy Digital Platform Law and Regulatory Challenges Legal and Ethical Implications of AI & Emerging Technologies Cyberlaw, Data Protection, and Digital Privacy AI Law & Governance, including Algorithmic Accountability Corporate Governance, Business Ethics, and International Trade Law Criminal Law and Cybercrime Regulations Environmental Law and Sustainable Development in the Age of AI The journal invites original contributions from scholars, practitioners, and policymakers worldwide. Priority is given to submissions that address contemporary legal challenges with a focus on novelty, innovation, and the application of comparative legal methods
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 2, No. 1, February 2026" : 5 Documents clear
Presidential Decree on Legal Protection for Advocates: A Neglected Pillar of Justice in a State Based on the Rule of Law A. Muhammad Hasgar; Amir Sohail
Global Journal of Law, AI & Ethics Vol. 2, No. 1, February 2026
Publisher : CV. Cognispectra Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65917/gjlae.v2.i1.23

Abstract

In a state based on the rule of law, the existence of advocates as one of the pillars of law enforcement should be firmly guaranteed by the state. However, in practice, advocates often experience criminalization, intimidation, and even violence while carrying out their professional duties, especially when assisting vulnerable groups or handling cases that overlap with power. The background of this problem encourages the importance of the Presidential Regulation (Perpres) on Legal Protection for Advocates as a concrete effort by the state to protect the advocacy profession as part of a fair justice system. The formulation of the problem in this study is: Why is legal protection for advocates still weak in practice? and What is the urgency of establishing a Perpres as an instrument of legal protection for advocates in the context of a state based on the rule of law? The method used is normative juridical with a statute approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach to the criminalization of advocates. The results of the discussion indicate that the weak protection of advocates is caused by the lack of implementation of the norms of Article 16 of the Advocates Law, the absence of a mechanism for enforcing immunity rights, and the absence of derivative regulations that are binding on law enforcement officers. In conclusion, the formation of a Presidential Regulation is a strategic and urgent step to ensure that advocates are protected institutionally, while strengthening their position in upholding justice and human rights. Without concrete protection, the rule of law risks losing an important pillar in its justice system
Toward a Moral Grounded Legal Order: India–Indonesia Heritage and the Prophetic Paradigm of Law Laode Azizul Kadir; Priyanka Kacker
Global Journal of Law, AI & Ethics Vol. 2, No. 1, February 2026
Publisher : CV. Cognispectra Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65917/gjlae.v2.i1.32

Abstract

Purpose of the Study: This study aims to examine the limitations of the positivistic paradigm in understanding Indonesian law and analyse the legal paradigms of prophetic-transcendental. Absorbs as an alternative epistemology that is capable of presenting justice, spirituality, and meaning in more humane laws. Methodology: This research uses a qualitative normative methodology with a philosophical approach to law through conceptual, hermeneutic, and comparative studies, and a positivistic law perspective. Results: The Study finds that the legal paradigm is prophetic, not only critiquing positivism, but also offering a transformative framework that integrates reason, moral values, and spirituality as the foundation for developing a more national, holistic, and civilised law. Applications of This Study: The results of this study can be implemented in reforming the education law, drafting regulations based on value, updating practice responsive ​ to justice, as well as formulating a direction for national political law. Novelty / Originality of This Study: This research focuses on the formulation of prophetic legal paradigms as a legal epistemology, a unifying alternative that combines knowledge, faith, and context, as well as social aspects, while simultaneously reconstructing the ontology, epistemology, and axiology of Indonesian law towards a system that values fairness, humanity, and spirituality. In essence, the prophetic legal paradigm offers Indonesia a transformative path toward a just system, rooted not only in legality but also in morality, human dignity, and spiritual wisdom. By drawing from its own traditions and learning from India's value-based constitutional practices, Indonesia can build a legal order that is fair, humane, and oundly meaningful
The High Number of Marriage Dispensations in Religious Courts: A Systematic Review from the Perspective of Human Rights and Maqashid Syariah Jasser Auda Irma Afifatul Mursyidah Irma Afifah; Martha Eri Safira
Global Journal of Law, AI & Ethics Vol. 2, No. 1, February 2026
Publisher : CV. Cognispectra Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65917/gjlae.v1.i1.50

Abstract

The widespread practice of marriage dispensations in Indonesia, and the ease with which judges grant them, demonstrates the continued weakness of law enforcement, particularly in the private sphere. In Malang Regency, for example, 1,009 marriage dispensation cases were recorded in 2024, with 95% being granted. A similar pattern occurred in the Lumajang Religious Court (682 cases), the Tasikmalaya Religious Court (519 cases), and the Garut Religious Court (391 cases). This research is a systematic literature review using an integrative analytical framework between human rights and the maqashid sharia (Islamic principles) of Jasser Auda. The results indicate that the surge in dispensations and the ease with which they are granted reflect the weak enforcement of the marriageable age limit, potentially violating the rights to education, health, and child protection. However, in emergency situations, dispensations are understood as mitigation to avoid greater harm. The study concludes that dispensations can only be justified if they truly guarantee the benefit, justice, and welfare of children. The implications require responsive policies, strict monitoring mechanisms, and an integrative approach between human rights and maqashid sharia in handling dispensations.
Legal Protection Against the Imitation of the Well-Known Jollibee Trademark Based on Court Decision Number 36/Pdt.Sus-Merek/2024/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst Qaterunnada Salshabilla Siregar; Saidin; Zulfi Chairi
Global Journal of Law, AI & Ethics Vol. 2, No. 1, February 2026
Publisher : CV. Cognispectra Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65917/gjlae.v2.i1.58

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the legal framework governing well-known trademarks in Indonesia, the legal consequences of registering trademarks that resemble well-known marks, and the forms of legal protection against the imitation of the well-known trademark Jollibee based on Decision Number 36/Pdt.Sus-Merek/2024/PN Niaga Jakarta Pusat. The research adopts a normative juridical method, employing statutory and conceptual approaches through a literature review of trademark regulations, legal doctrines, and court decisions. The findings indicate that Law Number 20 of 2016 provides protection for well-known trademarks, including those not yet registered, by limiting the application of the first-to-file principle through the requirement of good faith. The a quo decision affirms the application of substantive protection by prioritizing the reputation and distinctiveness of well-known trademarks over mere registration formalities, and by invalidating a trademark proven to imitate and exploit the reputation of the Jollibee trademark. This research concludes that although judicial protection for well-known trademarks in Indonesia has developed in line with international standards, strengthening administrative mechanisms remains necessary to more effectively prevent trademark imitation and to ensure legal certainty
Legal Protection for Marine Hull and Machinery Insurance Policyholders Against Default by Insurance Companies (Study of Decision Number 951/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Jkt Brt) Alisa Reynamora; Mulhadi; Zulfi Chairi
Global Journal of Law, AI & Ethics Vol. 2, No. 1, February 2026
Publisher : CV. Cognispectra Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65917/gjlae.v2.i1.62

Abstract

Marine hull and Machinery insurance policyholders against claim rejections by insurance companies, as reflected in Decision Number 951/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Jkt.Brt. This study aims to analyze the factors causing default by insurance companies, the legal consequences that arise for policyholders, and the legal considerations of the panel of judges in providing legal protection. The research method used is normative juridical with a descriptive nature, through a statutory approach and a case approach. Data were obtained from a literature review of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, which were analyzed qualitatively with deductive conclusions drawn. The results of the study indicate that rejections of marine hull and machinery insurance claims are caused by, among others, claims for risks not covered by the policy, including those included in policy exclusions, inaccurate information provided by the insured, and the unseaworthy condition of the vessel. However, in Decision Number 951/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Jkt.Brt, the panel of judges emphasized that rejection of claims made without a valid basis for agreement constitutes a form of breach of contract, so that the policyholder has the right to demand compensation for the insurer's failure to fulfill its obligations based on the principle of good faith in the insurance agreement

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2026 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 2, No. 1, February 2026 Vol. 1, No. 1, August 2025