Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Economic, Technology and Social Sciences (Injects) Global Journal of Law, AI & Ethics (GJLAE) Proceedings International Conference on Economic Business and Social Science INLAW
Saidin
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Juridical Analysis of Proof in Intellectual Property Rights Disputes that Contain Trade Secrets Dedi Kurnia Suranta Ginting; Saidin; Tengku Keizerina Devi; Jelly Leviza
International Journal of Economic, Technology and Social Sciences (Injects) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023): May 2023
Publisher : CERED Indonesia Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (402.592 KB)

Abstract

The aim to be achieved from this research is to analyze and find out the legal protection for trade secret holders; to analyze and find out the contractual relationship between employees and companies in maintaining and protecting Trade Secrets; and to analyze and find out the application of information confidentiality proving law in cases of violations of boiler machine trade secrets based on Supreme Court Decision No. 3305/K/Pdt/2016 dated 24 January 2017 and the Lunpia Express trade secret violation case based on Supreme Court Decision No. 2535K/Pdt/2016 dated 8 December 2016. This research used a documentation study approach with qualitative data analysis. The results of the study show that the Supreme Court's Decision No. 3305/K/Pdt/2016 dated 24 January 2017 stated that PT. HCMI was proven to have violated trade secrets by using the same production and sales methods as PT. BPE obtained from Calvin Jonathan Barus, et al as former employees of PT. BPE. This is inseparable from the verification process which proves that PT. BPE is the first distributor of boiler machines that have economic value and keep their production methods secret.
Legal Protection Against the Imitation of the Well-Known Jollibee Trademark Based on Court Decision Number 36/Pdt.Sus-Merek/2024/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst Qaterunnada Salshabilla Siregar; Saidin; Zulfi Chairi
Global Journal of Law, AI & Ethics Vol. 2, No. 1, February 2026
Publisher : CV. Cognispectra Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65917/gjlae.v2.i1.58

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the legal framework governing well-known trademarks in Indonesia, the legal consequences of registering trademarks that resemble well-known marks, and the forms of legal protection against the imitation of the well-known trademark Jollibee based on Decision Number 36/Pdt.Sus-Merek/2024/PN Niaga Jakarta Pusat. The research adopts a normative juridical method, employing statutory and conceptual approaches through a literature review of trademark regulations, legal doctrines, and court decisions. The findings indicate that Law Number 20 of 2016 provides protection for well-known trademarks, including those not yet registered, by limiting the application of the first-to-file principle through the requirement of good faith. The a quo decision affirms the application of substantive protection by prioritizing the reputation and distinctiveness of well-known trademarks over mere registration formalities, and by invalidating a trademark proven to imitate and exploit the reputation of the Jollibee trademark. This research concludes that although judicial protection for well-known trademarks in Indonesia has developed in line with international standards, strengthening administrative mechanisms remains necessary to more effectively prevent trademark imitation and to ensure legal certainty
Legal Certainty Regarding the Legal Status of Riau Tabir Batik Based on Law Number 28 of 2014 on Copyright Endang Suparta; Ismansyah; Runtung; Saidin
International Conference on Economic Business and Social Science Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Proceeding International Conference on Economic Business and Social Science (IC
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/icebss.v3i1.31

Abstract

Initially, the only known batik was hand-drawn batik. Along with the increasing use of batik, batik technology has also developed rapidly.Now, in addition to traditional batik making, there is also "modern" batik production, the result of which is called modern batik. Based on the use of the terms traditional and modern, batik cloth can be distinguished into. The method used in this research employs several cases of copyright infringement. The approach to analyze the existing issues by conducting an analysis of several regulations related to copyright. There is an issue regarding the Legal Certainty Related to the Legal Status of Batik Tabir Riau. Based on Law Number 28 of 2014 on Copyright. The research concluded that batik works receive legal protection because they possess artistic value, both in their motifs, images, and color compositions. Batik is one of the products based on traditional knowledge with characteristic features inherent to batik as a cultural product that aligns with traditional knowledge, requiring comprehensive legal protection.
Tinjauan Yuridis Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Perbankan Yang Tidak Menyerahkan Uang Tabungan Nasabah Yang Telah Meninggal Dunia Kepada Ahli Waris Nasabah (STUDI PUTUSAN PN MEDAN NOMOR 41/PDT.G/2020/PN MDN) Nabila Aprilia Nasution; Saidin; Mahmul Siregar; Syarifah Lisa
Indonesian Journal of Law Vol. 2 No. 8 (2025): INLAW - JULI 2025
Publisher : PT. INOVASI TEKNOLOGI KOMPUTER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Tanggung jawab hukum perbankan atas pencairan dana milik nasabah warga negara asing yang menjalin hubungan perkawinan secara sah dengan warga negara Indonesia kemudian meninggal dunia, menjadi fokus kajian ini, terutama dalam konteks penerapan prinsip kehati-hatian, perlindungan hukum terhadap ahli waris, serta indikasi perbuatan melawan hukum yang dilakukan oleh lembaga perbankan. Penelitian ini menerapkan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif serta analisis kualitatif berdasarkan data sekunder. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kelalaian bank dapat dikenai pertanggungjawaban secara perdata sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 1367 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata terkait tanggung jawab perdata, serta ketentuan pidana yang tercantum dalam Pasal 44A ayat (2) Undang-Undang tentang Perbankan. Perlindungan hukum terhadap ahli waris mengacu pada asas lex domicili, karena semasa hidupnya, nasabah tinggal dan menikah di Indonesia, sehingga tunduk pada hukum nasional. Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Medan Nomor 41/Pdt.G/2020/PN Mdn dianggap tepat karena bank dinyatakan melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum akibat penolakan pencairan dana tanpa dasar hukum yang sah. Dengan demikian, ahli waris memiliki hak penuh atas simpanan tersebut dan layak memperoleh perlindungan hukum serta keadilan.
Co-Authors Dedi Kurnia Suranta Ginting Endang Suparta Ismansyah Ismansyah Jelly Leviza MAHMUL SIREGAR Nabila Aprilia Nasution Qaterunnada Salshabilla Siregar Runtung Syarifah Lisa Tengku Keizerina Devi