cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
M. Reza Saputra
Contact Email
journal.legitimacy@gmail.com
Phone
+6285117086910
Journal Mail Official
journal.legitimacy@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Cendana Residen blok i 7 no 23 pondok benda Pamulang Tangerang Selatan, 15416
Location
Kota tangerang,
Banten
INDONESIA
Legitimacy: Journal of Law and Islamic Law
Published by CV. Era Digital Nusantara
ISSN : -     EISSN : 31106749     DOI : https://doi.org/10.59066/jolil
Core Subject : Religion, Social,
Religion Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Legitimacy: Journal of Law and Islamic Law is a peer-reviewed academic journal dedicated to the advancement of scholarship in both legal studies and Islamic legal studies. Published three times annually in January, June, and August the journal serves as a comprehensive platform for the dissemination of rigorous analysis and original research. The scope encompasses a diverse array of topics, including but not limited to: Constitutional Law Civil and Criminal Law Administrative Law Comparative Law Islamic Jurisprudence (Fiqh) Islamic Legal Theory (Usul al-Fiqh) The intersection of contemporary legal systems with classical Islamic legal principles The journal seeks to bridge discourse between national and Islamic legal systems, exploring the development, application, and reform of legal norms across both fields. Legitimacy welcomes interdisciplinary contributions from academics and practitioners, aiming to foster dialogue and deepen understanding of legal principles as they manifest in both secular and Islamic contexts. Through this integrative approach, the journal aspires to enrich contemporary debates and scholarly engagement on law, legal reform, and the ongoing interaction between evolving state law and enduring Islamic legal traditions.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 22 Documents
 1   2   3 
Connectivity in the Criminal Justice System: Jurisdictional Issues Between Civilian and Military Courts
Legtimacy: Journal of Law and Islamic Law Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): Legitimacy: Journal of Law and Islamic Law
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jolil.v1i3.2233

Abstract

This study critically examines the adjudicative competence over connectivity offenses involving both civilian and military actors. The persistent jurisdictional ambiguity frequently causes significant legal uncertainty within the criminal justice system. Normatively, jurisdiction is determined by assessing the predominant loss, whether it impacts public or military interests. Although the Indonesian National Armed Forces Law mandates jurisdictional separation, its practical implementation remains heavily constrained by the ongoing stagnation of military court reform. Employing a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, this research analyzes the recent acid attack against the activist Andrie Yunus . The findings reveal that determining adjudicative authority strictly requires comprehensive joint investigations by civilian and military prosecutors. Furthermore, because this specific case fundamentally harmed public interests, transparency dictates that it must be adjudicated directly within the national civilian justice system. Resolving this institutional conflict demands immediate legislative harmonization to ensure absolute legal accountability and public institutional trust.
Controlling Peri-Urban Agricultural Land Conversion Based on Economic Constitutional Principles for Food Security
Legtimacy: Journal of Law and Islamic Law Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Legitimacy: Journal of Law and Islamic Law
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jolil.v1i2.2280

Abstract

This study examines the conversion of agricultural land in fringe areas and its severe threat to national food security across Indonesia. Despite the existence of the Sustainable Food Agricultural Land Protection Law, land conversion remains massive due to ineffective enforcement and rapid urban sprawl. Utilizing a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, this research analyzes the integration of economic constitutional principles, specifically Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution, into existing land control regulations. The findings clearly indicate that current regulations fail to adequately balance economic development with essential agricultural preservation. To fully realize a welfare state, government policies must strictly regulate regional land conversion by applying sound economic and moral logic. Integrating these constitutional principles directly ensures sustainable land use, actively protects rural livelihoods, and absolutely guarantees public access to basic food needs. Strict law enforcement and community participation are highly vital for maintaining truly optimal social welfare.

Page 3 of 3 | Total Record : 22

 1   2   3 

Filter by Year

2025 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): Legitimacy: Journal of Law and Islamic Law Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): Legitimacy: Journal of Law and Islamic Law Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Legitimacy: Journal of Law and Islamic Law