cover
Contact Name
Utami Dwi Astuti
Contact Email
jurnal@brin.go.id
Phone
+6281381929484
Journal Mail Official
treubia@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Treubia Secretariat Journal, OR Hayati dan Lingkungan, Jl. Raya Jakarta-Bogor No.Km. 46, Pakansari, Kec. Cibinong, Kabupaten Bogor, Jawa Barat 16911
Location
Kota tangerang selatan,
Banten
INDONESIA
Treubia
Published by BRIN Publishing
ISSN : 00826340     EISSN : 2337876X     DOI : https://doi.org/10.55981/treubia
Core Subject :
Treubia is a scientific journal on zoology of the Indo-Australian Archipelago. We publish original research papers, review articles and case studies focused on animal systematics, animal ecology, and wildlife conservation, encompassing the Indo-Australian region. Animal systematics - New species discovery - Taxonomic assessment of an animal taxon - Systematic revision - Biological evolution of an animal taxon Animal ecology - Animal behavior - Animal distribution and biogeographic overview - Population assessment of an animal taxon Animal conservation - Threatened status assessment of an animal taxon - Environmental issues of an animal taxon
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 781 Documents
NEW SPECIES OF STAPHYLINIDAE (COL.) FROM NEW GUINEA AND MISOOL MALCOLM CAMERO
Treubia Vol. 21 No. 2 (1952): Vol. 21 No. 2, 1952
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/treubia.v21i2.2657

Abstract

-
FRUCHTFLIEGEN (TRYPETIDAE) VON INDONESIEN (Dipt.) Prof. Dr E. M HERING
Treubia Vol. 21 No. 2 (1952): Vol. 21 No. 2, 1952
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/treubia.v21i2.2660

Abstract

-
SYSTEMATIC STUDIES ON THE NON-MARINE MOLLUSCA OF THE INDO-AUSTRALIAN ARCHIPELAGO W.S. S Van Benthem Jutting
Treubia Vol. 21 No. 2 (1952): Vol. 21 No. 2, 1952
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/treubia.v21i2.2661

Abstract

-
BUTTERFLIES RECENTLY RECORDED FROM LOMBOK Kazuma Matsumoto; Woro A Noerdjito; Endang Cholik
Treubia Vol. 39 (2012): Vol. 39, December 2012
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/treubia.v39i0.21

Abstract

Ten species of butterflies were recently recorded from Lombok, i.e., Papilio demoleus malayanus, Appias olferna, Eurema andersoni kashiwaii, Theclinesthes miskini gaura, Tirumala ishmoides linea, Acraea andromacha, Acraea terpsicore, Junonia villida, Lexias aegle miyatai and Mycalesis mineus macromalayana. Papilio demoleus malayanus, A. olferna and A. terpsicore were thought to be recent immigrants from the mainland Asia, and likewise J. villida from Australia. We could not determine whether A. andromacha, recorded by only one specimen, is a native species or a stray from Sumbawa. The other species were supposed to be native to Lombok.
THE HONEY BEES OF INDONESIA (HYMENOPTERA: APIDAE) Michael S Engel
Treubia Vol. 39 (2012): Vol. 39, December 2012
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/treubia.v39i0.22

Abstract

A brief account is provided for the native and introduced species of honey bees (Apini: Apis L.) occurring across Indonesia. Keys to the tribes of corbiculate bees and the species of the genus Apis are provided to aid melittologists and apiculturists working in the country.
MORPHOLOGICAL VARIATION IN CHIRONAX MELANOCEPHALUS (CHIROPTERA: PTEROPODIDAE) FROM INDONESIA AND DESCRIPTION OF NEW SUBSPECIES Maharadatunkamsi
Treubia Vol. 39 (2012): Vol. 39, December 2012
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/treubia.v39i0.23

Abstract

The taxonomy of small fruit bat members of the genus Chironax was examined. Morphological character, as well as statistical analyses of skull and external characters revealed that the Kalimantan population is sub-specifically different from Sulawesi and Sumatra-Jawa populations. The Kalimantan population is desribed herein as Chironax melanocephalus dyasae subsp. nov.
A LIST OF THE BUTTERFLIES OF UJUNG KULON NATIONAL PARK, JAVA, INDONESIA Djunijanti Peggie
Treubia Vol. 39 (2012): Vol. 39, December 2012
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/treubia.v39i0.25

Abstract

The occurrence of butterfly species at Ujung Kulon National Park is presented based on collection and observation data obtained in 2005, 2006 and 2010 and previous reports. As many as 101 butterfly species were recorded during the recent surveys. The data are compared with previous findings. To date, there are 177 species reported from Ujung Kulon.
TERRITORIAL AND MATING BEHAVIOURS OF TWO FLOWER-BREEDING DROSOPHILA SPECIES, D. elegans AND D. gunungcola (DIPTERA: DROSOPHILIDAE) AT CIBODAS, WEST JAVA, INDONESIA Awit Suwito; Takahide A Ishida; Kouhei Hattori; Masahito T Kimura
Treubia Vol. 39 (2012): Vol. 39, December 2012
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/treubia.v39i0.24

Abstract

Drosophila elegans and D. gunungcola are closely related flower-breeding species, mainly exploiting Ipomoea flowers. Here, we report their territorial and mating behaviours in Ipomoea indica flowers at Cibodas, West Java, Indonesia. Flies of both species were almost absent from newly opened flowers in the early morning, and the number of individuals in flowers increased thereafter. Territorial males of these species fought against intruders of both species, but the frequency of fighting was significantly lower when intruders were heterospecific. Territorial males usually showed intensive courtship to conspecific females, but rarely to heterospecific females. Intensive courtship to conspecific females often led the females to desert the flowers, possibly because male’s courtship was annoying. The frequency of desertion was lower in D. gunungcola than in D. elegans. This difference may be attributable to the difference in sexual size dimorphism. Thorax size was smaller in males than in females in D. gunungcola but did not differ between the sexes in D. elegans, and therefore male courtship may be less annoying for females in D. gunungcola than in D. elegans. Copulation duration was shorter in D. elegans than in D. gunungcola, while the unreceptive period of females after copulation is shorter in D. elegans than in D. gunungcola.
GENETIC DIVERGENCE AND GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION OF FROGS IN GENUS FEJERVARYA FROM INDONESIA INFERRED FROM MITOCHONDRIAL 16S rRNA GENE ANALYSIS Nia Kurniawan; Tjong Hon Djong; Tesri Maideliza; Amir Hamidy; Takeshi Igawa; Masayuki Sumida; Mahmudul Hasan
Treubia Vol. 41 (2014): Vol. 41, December 2014
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/treubia.v41i0.361

Abstract

The Indonesian archipelago is an ideal setting for the study of speciation and biogeography. This archipelago is divided into three island groups based on zoogeography: Sundaland, Wallacea and the Australian region. In this paper we used frogs in genus Fejervarya (Bolkay) to study biogeography and examine patterns of gene flow across proposed zoogeographic boundaries. Several molecular studies on Fejervarya species from Indonesia have been carried out, but comparative studies among members of the genus Fejervarya have yet to be performed. In order to elucidate genetic divergence and geographic distribution of these frogs, we conducted a molecular analysis of the mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene using 179 frogs from five Fejervarya species. In total we collected from 32 localities in Sumatra, Kalimantan (Indonesian part of Borneo), Java, Bali, Sulawesi and Lesser Sunda Islands in Indonesia. Molecular phylogenetic analysis recovered 35 haplotypes and showed that frogs in the genus Fejervarya were divided into two well-supported clades. The first group were of three species, F. limnocharis, F. iskandari and F. cf. verruculosa and the other group clade consisted of Fejervarya cancrivora and Fejervarya sp. (Sulawesi-type). The average sequence divergence among these four species ranged from 1.09 to 16.03% (mean = 11.29±2.83%). The present results clearly show that there are five Fejervarya species in the Indonesian archipelago. Fejervarya limnocharis and F. cancrivora are widely distributed and sympatric in Sumatra, Borneo and Java. Fejervarya iskandari is not endemic to Java and also occurs in the Lesser Sundas. Fejervarya cf. verruculosa and Fejervarya sp. (Sulawesi-type) are endemic to Lesser Sunda and Sulawesi Island, respectively.
TAXONOMIC PROBLEMS ON FOUR SPECIES OF PONTELLA (COPEPODA, CALANOIDA) DESCRIBED BY A. SCOTT (1909) IN INDO-MALAYAN WATERS Mulyadi
Treubia Vol. 41 (2014): Vol. 41, December 2014
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/treubia.v41i0.364

Abstract

Four species of Pontella, i.e., P. alata, P. cerami, P. denticauda, and P. forficula, which were originally described by A. Scott (1909) were found from Indo-Malayan waters. Some misidentifications resulting in wrong species identity were discovered on P. cerami and P. forficula. Pontella cerami A. Scott, 1909, described based on two male specimens from the Banda Sea, Indonesia is here recognised as the male of P. alata. Similarly, P. forficula, also known from two male specimens from the Sulu Sea, Philippine must be reassigned as the male of Ivellopsis elephas (Brady, 1883). Another Indo-Malayan Pontella, i.e., P. denticauda A. Scott, 1909 must also be moved to the genus Ivellopsis Claus 1893, as Ivellopsis denticauda (A. Scott, 1909) by its having posterior corners of Pdg5 produced into rounded lobes in both sexes; particularly in the female, by (1) the genital double-somite with a large lateral process, (2) the CR asymmetrical with the right ramus longer than the left, and (3) the Re of P5 with 3 apical spines and with an acuminate Ri. The male has, (1) the CR asymmetrical with right ramus slightly longer than the left, and (2) the thumb of Re2 of right P5 is elongated, and (3) the Re2 of the left P5 bifurcate at apex. Descriptions, measurements and figures of the four species are given, along with a review of their distribution and that of their species groups over Indo-West Pacific waters, together with taxonomic remarks and synonymies in each case.

Filter by Year

1921 2025


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 52 No. 2 (2025): Treubia, 52(2) Vol. 52 No. 1 (2025): Treubia 52 (1) Vol. 51 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 51 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 50 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 50 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 49 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 49 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 48 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 48 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 47 No. 2 (2020): Vol. 47, No. 2, December 2020 Vol. 47 No. 1 (2020): Vol. 47, No. 1, June 2020 Vol. 46 (2019): Vol. 46, December 2019 Vol. 45 (2018): Vol. 45, December 2018 Vol. 44 (2017): Vol. 44, December 2017 Vol. 43 (2016): Vol. 43, December 2016 Vol. 42 (2015): Vol. 42, December 2015 Vol. 41 (2014): Vol. 41, December 2014 Vol. 40 (2013): Vol. 40, December 2013 Vol. 39 (2012): Vol. 39, December 2012 Vol. 38 (2011): Vol. 38, December 2011 Vol. 37 (2010): Vol. 37, December 2010 Vol. 36 (2008): Vol. 36, December 2008 Vol. 35 (2007): Vol. 35, December 2007 Vol. 34 (2006): Vol. 34, December 2006 Vol. 33 No. 2 (2004): Vol. 33 No. 2, December 2004 Vol. 33 No. 1 (2003): Vol. 33 No. 1, December 2003 Vol. 32 No. 1 (2002): Vol. 32 No. 1, August 2002 Vol. 31 No. 3 (2000): Vol. 31 No. 3 (Supplement), December 2000 Vol. 31 No. 3 (1999): Vol. 31 No. 3, December 1999 Vol. 31 No. 2 (1997): Vol. 31 No. 2, December 1997 Vol. 31 No. 1 (1994): Vol. 31 No. 1, Januari 1994 Vol. 30 No. 3 (1992): Vol. 30 No. 3, January 1992 Vol. 30 No. 2 (1991): Vol. 30 No. 2, January 1991 Vol. 30 No. 1 (1989): Vol. 30 No. 1, January 1989 Vol. 29 No. 4 (1988): Vol. 29 No. 4, 1988 Vol. 29 No. 3 (1986): Vol. 29 No. 3, 1986 Vol. 29 No. 2 (1984): Vol. 29 No. 2, 1984 Vol. 29 No. 1 (1983): Vol. 29 No. 1, 1983 Vol. 27 No. 4 (1970): Vol. 27 No. 4, November 1970 Vol. 27 No. 2-3 (1968): Vol. 27 No. 2-3, October 1968 Vol. 27 No. 1 (1966): Vol. 27 No. 1, August 1966 Vol. 26 No. 4 (1965): Vol. 26 No. 4, 1965 Vol. 26 No. 3 (1964): Vol. 26 No. 3, 1964 Vol. 26 No. 2 (1963): Vol. 26 No. 2, 1963 Vol. 26 No. 1 (1962): Vol. 26 No. 1, 1962 Vol. 25 No. 3 (1961): Vol. 25 No. 3, 1961 Vol. 25 No. 2 (1960): Vol. 25 No. 2, 1960 Vol. 25 No. 1 (1959): Vol. 25 No. 1, 1959 Vol. 24 No. 2 (1958): Vol. 24 No. 2, 1958 Vol. 24 No. 1 (1957): Vol. 24 No. 1, 1957 Vol. 23 No. 2 (1956): Vol. 23 No. 2, 1956 Vol. 23 No. 1 (1955): Vol. 23 No. 1, 1955 Vol. 22 No. 3 (1954): Vol. 22 No. 3, 1954 Vol. 22 (1954): Vol. 22, 1954 Vol. 22 No. 2 (1953): Vol. 22 No. 2, 1953 Vol. 22 No. 1 (1953): Vol. 22 No. 1, July 1953 Vol. 21 No. 3 (1953): Vol. 21 No. 3, 1953 Vol. 21 No. 2 (1952): Vol. 21 No. 2, 1952 Vol. 21 No. 1 (1951): Vol. 21 No. 1, 1951 Vol. 20 No. 3 (1950): Vol. 20 No. 3, 1950 Vol. 20 No. 2 (1949): Vol. 20 No. 2, 1949 Vol. 20 No. 1 (1949): Vol. 20 No. 1, 1949 Vol. 18 No. 3 (1941): Vol. 18 No. 3, 1941 Vol. 18 No. 2 (1941): Vol. 18 No. 2, 1941 Vol. 18 No. 1 (1941): Vol. 18 No. 1, 1941 Vol. 17 No. 5 (1940): Vol. 17 No. 5, 1940 Vol. 17 No. 4 (1940): Vol. 17 No. 4, 1940 Vol. 17 No. 3 (1939): Vol. 17 No. 3, 1939 Vol. 17 No. 2 (1939): Vol. 17 No. 2, 1939 Vol. 17 No. 1 (1939): Vol. 17 No. 1, 1939 Vol. 16 No. 4 (1937): Vol. 16 No. 4, 1937-1938 Vol. 16 No. 3 (1937): Vol. 16 No. 3, 1937-1938 Vol. 16 No. 2 (1937): Vol. 16 No. 2, 1937-1938 Vol. 16 No. 1 (1937): Vol. 16 No. 1, 1937-1938 Vol. 15 No. 4 (1935): Vol. 15 No. 4, 1935-1936 Vol. 15 No. 3 (1935): Vol.15, No. 3, 1935-1936 Vol. 15 No. 2 (1935): Vol. 15, No 2, 1935-1936 Vol. 15 No. 1 (1935): Vol. 15, No.1, 1935-1936 Vol. 14 No. 4 (1932): Vol. 14, No. 4, 1932-1934 Vol. 14 No. 3 (1932): Vol. 14, No. 3, 1932-1934 Vol. 14 No. 2 (1932): Vol. 14, No. 2, 1932-1934 Vol. 14 No. 1 (1932): Vol. 14 No. 1, 1932-1934 Vol. 13 No. 3-4 (1931): Vol. 13 No. 3-4, 1931 Vol. 13 No. 2 (1931): Vol. 13 No. 2, 1931 Vol. 13 No. 1 (1931): Vol. 13 No. 1, 1931 Vol. 12 No. 3-4 (1930): Vol. 12 No. 3-4, 1930 Vol. 12 No. 2 (1930): Vol. 12 No. 2, 1930 Vol. 12 No. 1 (1930): Vol. 12 No. 1, 1930 Vol. 11 No. 3 (1929): Vol. 11 No. 3, 1929-1930 Vol. 11 No. 2 (1929): Vol. 11 No. 2, 1929-1930 Vol. 11 No. 1 (1929): Vol. 11 No. 1, 1929-1930 Vol. 10 No. 2-3 (1928): Vol. 10 No. 2-3, 1928-1929 Vol. 10 No. 4 (1928): Vol. 10 No. 4, 1928-1929 Vol. 10 No. 1 (1928): Vol. 10 No. 1, 1928-1929 Vol. 9 No. 1-3 (1927): Vol. 9 Livr. 1-3, 1927 Vol. 9 No. 4 (1927): Vol. 9 Livr. 4, 1927 Vol. 8 No. 3-4 (1926): Vol. 8 No.3-4, 1926 Vol. 8 No. 1-2 (1926): Vol. 8 No. 1-2, 1926 Vol. 6 (1926): Vol. 6, (Supplement), 1926 Vol. 7 No. 4 (1925): Vol. 7 No. 4, 1925-1929 Vol. 7 No. 3 (1925): Vol. 7 No. 3, 1925-1929 Vol. 7 No. 2 (1925): Vol. 7 No. 2, 1925-1929 Vol. 7 No. 1 (1925): Vol. 7 No. 1, 1925-1929 Vol. 5 No. 1-3 (1924): Vol.5 No. 1-3, 1924 Vol. 5 No. 4 (1924): Vol.5 No. 4, 1924 Vol. 5 (1924): Vol. 5, (Supplement), 1924 Vol. 4 (1923): Vol. 4, 1923 Vol. 3 (1923): Vol. 3, 1923 Vol. 2 No. 2-4 (1921): Vol. 2 No. 2-4, 1921-1922 Vol. 2 No. 1 (1921): Vol. 2 No. 1, 1921 More Issue