cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Utami Dwi Astuti
Contact Email
jurnal@brin.go.id
Phone
+6281381929484
Journal Mail Official
treubia@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Treubia Secretariat Journal, OR Hayati dan Lingkungan, Jl. Raya Jakarta-Bogor No.Km. 46, Pakansari, Kec. Cibinong, Kabupaten Bogor, Jawa Barat 16911
Location
Kota tangerang selatan,
Banten
INDONESIA
Treubia
Published by BRIN Publishing
ISSN : 00826340     EISSN : 2337876X     DOI : https://doi.org/10.55981/treubia
Core Subject :
Treubia is a scientific journal on zoology of the Indo-Australian Archipelago. We publish original research papers, review articles and case studies focused on animal systematics, animal ecology, and wildlife conservation, encompassing the Indo-Australian region. Animal systematics - New species discovery - Taxonomic assessment of an animal taxon - Systematic revision - Biological evolution of an animal taxon Animal ecology - Animal behavior - Animal distribution and biogeographic overview - Population assessment of an animal taxon Animal conservation - Threatened status assessment of an animal taxon - Environmental issues of an animal taxon
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 781 Documents
 74   75   76   77   78 
REVIEW OF PARASITIC WASP SUBFAMILY EULOPHINAE (HYMENOPTERA: EULOPHIDAE) WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE OF THE TRIBE CIRROSPILINI Rosichon Ubaidillah
Treubia Vol. 34 (2006): Vol. 34, December 2006
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/treubia.v34i0.464

Abstract

The Cirrospilini LaSalle, 2000, belongs to the Eulophinae, along withEulophini and Elasmini. This tribe consists of about 17 genera and almost 300 species, which are ectoparasitoids, mainly on Diptera, Lepidoptera and Coleoptera in semi-concealed situations. Some species may act as obligate or facultative hyperparasitoids and a few species are gall-formers. Historically, the genera included in the Cirrospilini have been placed in the Eulophinae and the Elachertinae sensu Ashmead, 1904. However, the relationships and the placement of genera into subfamilies or tribes have always been problematical. Based on the current evidence, it appears that the Cirrospilini is a monophyletic taxon and the sister-group of the Eulophini plus Elasmini. This paper summarizes the current taxonomic status and systematic background of the Cirrospilini.
NEW RECORD OF Synhimantus (Dispharynx) nasuta (RUDOLPHI, 1819) CHABAUD, 1975 (NEMATODA, ACUARIOIDEA) IN THE YELLOW VENTED BULBUL (Pycnonotus goivier) FROM EAST KALIMANTAN, INDONESIA Kartika Dewi; Mohammad Irham; Dewi M. Prawiradilaga; Kazuto Kawakami
Treubia Vol. 34 (2006): Vol. 34, December 2006
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/treubia.v34i0.465

Abstract

Abstract not available
Cover and Preface Volume 51 Number 2 (2024) Andri Agus Rahman
Treubia Vol. 51 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

-
INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS Andri Agus Rahman
Treubia Vol. 51 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

-
REVIEW OF THE MORPHOLOGY OF TRIMERESURUS BROGERSMAI (SERPENTES: CIPERIDAE), A RARE PIVIPER OF SIMEULUE AND THE MENTAWAI ISLANDS, INDONESIA Michael B Harvey; Irvan Sidik
Treubia Vol. 40 (2013): Vol. 40, December 2013
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/treubia.v40i0.179

Abstract

Trimeresurus brongersmai is a rare pitviper from Simeulue and the Mentawai Islands. We comment on the morphology and examine new specimens from Siberut Island. The four new specimens differ morphologically from the eight specimens known previously. A distinctive banding pattern on the distal tail characterises T. brongersmai and the related species T. puniceus. Juveniles lack the distinctive projecting supraoculars of adult T. brongersmai and these scales apparently develop during ontogeny. We propose the new term “rostronasal†for a large scale positioned between the rostral and nasal on each side of the snout in this species. In addition, we discuss several features of this species that were not mentioned in earlier accounts.
Micro-spatial and seasonal distributions of two sympatric host races of the phytophagous ladybird beetle Henosepilachna diekei (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and their host plants in West Java, Indonesia Kei W Matsubayashi; Sih Kahono; Sri Hartini; Hauro Katakura
Treubia Vol. 40 (2013): Vol. 40, December 2013
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/treubia.v40i0.181

Abstract

Divergent adaptation to different host plants may promote reproductive isolation between hostspecific populations in phytophagous insects, since strict preferences for different host plants act as an isolating barrier between populations on the different hosts. Moreover, a high dependence on the host plants may cause additional reproductive barriers, e.g., differences in micro-spatial distribution and phenology between host-specific populations when the host plants differ in these characters. However, few studies have specifically addressed these two types of host-plant-induced isolating barriers. Here we compared the microspatialdistribution and seasonal fluctuation of two host races of the phytophagous ladybird beetle Henosepilachna diekei (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae: Epilachnine) in Bogor, West Java, one depending on Mikania micrantha (Asteraceae) and the other on Leucas lavandulifolia (Lamiaceae). In the field, M. micrantha was far more abundant and common than L. lavandulifolia throughout the year. M. micrantha was found in relatively moist habitats with moderate sunlight, while L. lavandulifolia was found in dry, sunny, open habitats. Consequently, the beetles depending on M. micrantha were more common and abundant than those depending on L. lavandulifolia. Although the two host races could encounter one another where the two host plants occurred in close proximity, they infrequently did so because of strict host fidelity coupled with differences in the abundance and habitat of the two host plants. On the other hand, we detected no evidence of host-related seasonal isolation between the two host races.
MORPHOLOGICAL VARIATION AND STATUS OF THE PLANTAIN SQUIRREL Callosciurus notatus (Boddaert, 1785) IN INDONESIA Ibnu Maryanto; Maharadatunkamsi Maharadatunkamsi; A. Suyanto
Treubia Vol. 32 No. 1 (2002): Vol. 32 No. 1, August 2002
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/treubia.v32i1.590

Abstract

The study of morphological variation of the plantain squirrel Callosciurusnotatus was done based on MZB (Museum Zoologicum Bogoriense) collections. A total of 160 adult specimens from Sumatra, Bangka, Serutu, Siantan-Anamba, Kalimantan, Jawa, Madura, Bali and Selayar Islands. Indonesia were examined. Thirty four skulls, dental and dentary characters were measured. Univariate and multivariate statisticalanalyses were applied to asses morphological variation.The results show that the population of plantain squirrel from Sumatra,Kalimantan and Jawa overlaps in discriminant function space indicating low variation in skull, dentary and dental size. The Maduran was suggested as an intermediate form between Kalimantan and Jawa; Bangka, Belitung, Batam cluster together with Sumatra; Natuna with Jawa; Serutu with Kalimantan; and Siantan appears to be betweenSumatra, Kalimantan and Jawa. There are two subspecies in Sumatera (C. n. vittatus and C. n. tapanulius) and one in Jawa (e. notatus notatus) and Kalimantan (C. n. dulitensis). The colour differences detected between populations within an island of Sumatra is not sufficient to justify that they subspecifically distinct within an island, except for the Tapanuli populations.
MORPHOLOGICAL VARIATION OF THE THREE SPECIES FRUIT BAT GENUS MEGAEROPS FROM INDONESIA WITH ITS NEW DISTRIBUTION RECORD Maharadatunkamsi Maharadatunkamsi; Ibnu Maryanto
Treubia Vol. 32 No. 1 (2002): Vol. 32 No. 1, August 2002
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/treubia.v32i1.591

Abstract

Morphological variation in the fruit bat Megaerops spp. from five islands in Indonesia were examined. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses based on 19 skull characters and 12 external body chcracrers from 32 adult specimens were conducted to examine morphological variation. Multiple regression analysis on the three species examined indicated that there were not sexually dimorphic in both skull and external body characters. Between these species examined showed a marked distinction, as detected by using discriminant function analysis, Specimens of Megaerops from Bali and Lombok were not morphologically distinct from M. kusnotoi, while our additional Sumatran Megaerops were morphologically similar to M. w. albicollis. This is the first report of M. kusnotoi from Bali and Lombok, and for M. w.albicollis from Sumatra.
VERHOEVEN'S GIANT RAT OF FLORES, INDONESIA (Papagomys theodorverhoeveni Musser, 1981; Muridae) IS A MODERN SPECIES A. Suyanto, C. H.S. Watts 10.14203/treubia.v32i1.592 A. Suyanto; C. H. S. Watts
Treubia Vol. 32 No. 1 (2002): Vol. 32 No. 1, August 2002
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/treubia.v32i1.592

Abstract

The giant rat of Flares, Papagomys armandvillei (Jentink, 1892) lives in small remnants of relatively undisturbed forest on the island of Flores, Eastern Indonesia. It is a rare animal but in recent years specimens have been collected from Ruteng, Manggarai, (Ruteng is the capital of district Manggarai) West Flores. It appears to be most abundant (or most easily obtained) in the area around Ruteng in West Flares. Within museum collections it is represented by 13 specimens, the vast majority collectedprior to 1970. From the locality records of 13 specimens the species is, or was, distributed in Potjong, Sika, Mboera, Ruteng, Manggarai, Nunang and Wewo Pongkor, Flores, Indonesia. It is also presented as subfossils of recent age from Liang Toge, a cave near Warukia, 1 km south of Lepa, in Manggarai District (ill printed as Menggarai Province), Western Flores (Musser, 1981). Also present in this deposit are the fragmentary remains of a closely related species of giant rat which has been described asPapagomys theodorverhoeveni by Musser (1981). This material consisted of 18 mandibular fragments with either partial or intack tooth rows (Hooijer, 1957, Musser 1981). We record here a modem specimen among other 4 specimens of Papagomys armandvillei collected after 1970, unfortunately represented only by skull and mandibles that was discovered in the collections of the Museum Zoologicum Bogoriense (MZB) during a check following the transfer of the mammals (and other zoological collections) from the Bogor Botanical Garden to new modem building at Cibinong, 23 km north of Bogor City.
ADDITIONAL DESCRIPTIVE DATA FOR THE NEW COELACANTH, Latimeria menadoensis Pouyaud et al. FROM SULAWESI, INDONESIA Soetikno Wirjoatmodjo
Treubia Vol. 32 No. 1 (2002): Vol. 32 No. 1, August 2002
Publisher : BRIN Publishing (Penerbit BRIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14203/treubia.v32i1.593

Abstract

Morphometries and meristies data of Latimeria menadoensis, a new species of Coelacanth from Sulawesi, Indonesia (Pouyaud et al. 1999) are reported. Comparison with data of L. chalumnae as reported by McAllister and Smith (1978) and Forey (1998) are presented. Among the 22 descriptive characters only 41% are different. Some more specimens of L. menadoensis are still needed for more detail study of its morphological differences with L. chalumnae.

Page 76 of 79 | Total Record : 781

 74   75   76   77   78 

Filter by Year

1921 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 52 No. 2 (2025): Treubia, 52(2) Vol. 52 No. 1 (2025): Treubia 52 (1) Vol. 51 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 51 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 50 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 50 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 49 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 49 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 48 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 48 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 47 No. 2 (2020): Vol. 47, No. 2, December 2020 Vol. 47 No. 1 (2020): Vol. 47, No. 1, June 2020 Vol. 46 (2019): Vol. 46, December 2019 Vol. 45 (2018): Vol. 45, December 2018 Vol. 44 (2017): Vol. 44, December 2017 Vol. 43 (2016): Vol. 43, December 2016 Vol. 42 (2015): Vol. 42, December 2015 Vol. 41 (2014): Vol. 41, December 2014 Vol. 40 (2013): Vol. 40, December 2013 Vol. 39 (2012): Vol. 39, December 2012 Vol. 38 (2011): Vol. 38, December 2011 Vol. 37 (2010): Vol. 37, December 2010 Vol. 36 (2008): Vol. 36, December 2008 Vol. 35 (2007): Vol. 35, December 2007 Vol. 34 (2006): Vol. 34, December 2006 Vol. 33 No. 2 (2004): Vol. 33 No. 2, December 2004 Vol. 33 No. 1 (2003): Vol. 33 No. 1, December 2003 Vol. 32 No. 1 (2002): Vol. 32 No. 1, August 2002 Vol. 31 No. 3 (2000): Vol. 31 No. 3 (Supplement), December 2000 Vol. 31 No. 3 (1999): Vol. 31 No. 3, December 1999 Vol. 31 No. 2 (1997): Vol. 31 No. 2, December 1997 Vol. 31 No. 1 (1994): Vol. 31 No. 1, Januari 1994 Vol. 30 No. 3 (1992): Vol. 30 No. 3, January 1992 Vol. 30 No. 2 (1991): Vol. 30 No. 2, January 1991 Vol. 30 No. 1 (1989): Vol. 30 No. 1, January 1989 Vol. 29 No. 4 (1988): Vol. 29 No. 4, 1988 Vol. 29 No. 3 (1986): Vol. 29 No. 3, 1986 Vol. 29 No. 2 (1984): Vol. 29 No. 2, 1984 Vol. 29 No. 1 (1983): Vol. 29 No. 1, 1983 Vol. 27 No. 4 (1970): Vol. 27 No. 4, November 1970 Vol. 27 No. 2-3 (1968): Vol. 27 No. 2-3, October 1968 Vol. 27 No. 1 (1966): Vol. 27 No. 1, August 1966 Vol. 26 No. 4 (1965): Vol. 26 No. 4, 1965 Vol. 26 No. 3 (1964): Vol. 26 No. 3, 1964 Vol. 26 No. 2 (1963): Vol. 26 No. 2, 1963 Vol. 26 No. 1 (1962): Vol. 26 No. 1, 1962 Vol. 25 No. 3 (1961): Vol. 25 No. 3, 1961 Vol. 25 No. 2 (1960): Vol. 25 No. 2, 1960 Vol. 25 No. 1 (1959): Vol. 25 No. 1, 1959 Vol. 24 No. 2 (1958): Vol. 24 No. 2, 1958 Vol. 24 No. 1 (1957): Vol. 24 No. 1, 1957 Vol. 23 No. 2 (1956): Vol. 23 No. 2, 1956 Vol. 23 No. 1 (1955): Vol. 23 No. 1, 1955 Vol. 22 No. 3 (1954): Vol. 22 No. 3, 1954 Vol. 22 (1954): Vol. 22, 1954 Vol. 22 No. 2 (1953): Vol. 22 No. 2, 1953 Vol. 22 No. 1 (1953): Vol. 22 No. 1, July 1953 Vol. 21 No. 3 (1953): Vol. 21 No. 3, 1953 Vol. 21 No. 2 (1952): Vol. 21 No. 2, 1952 Vol. 21 No. 1 (1951): Vol. 21 No. 1, 1951 Vol. 20 No. 3 (1950): Vol. 20 No. 3, 1950 Vol. 20 No. 2 (1949): Vol. 20 No. 2, 1949 Vol. 20 No. 1 (1949): Vol. 20 No. 1, 1949 Vol. 18 No. 3 (1941): Vol. 18 No. 3, 1941 Vol. 18 No. 2 (1941): Vol. 18 No. 2, 1941 Vol. 18 No. 1 (1941): Vol. 18 No. 1, 1941 Vol. 17 No. 5 (1940): Vol. 17 No. 5, 1940 Vol. 17 No. 4 (1940): Vol. 17 No. 4, 1940 Vol. 17 No. 3 (1939): Vol. 17 No. 3, 1939 Vol. 17 No. 2 (1939): Vol. 17 No. 2, 1939 Vol. 17 No. 1 (1939): Vol. 17 No. 1, 1939 Vol. 16 No. 4 (1937): Vol. 16 No. 4, 1937-1938 Vol. 16 No. 3 (1937): Vol. 16 No. 3, 1937-1938 Vol. 16 No. 2 (1937): Vol. 16 No. 2, 1937-1938 Vol. 16 No. 1 (1937): Vol. 16 No. 1, 1937-1938 Vol. 15 No. 4 (1935): Vol. 15 No. 4, 1935-1936 Vol. 15 No. 3 (1935): Vol.15, No. 3, 1935-1936 Vol. 15 No. 2 (1935): Vol. 15, No 2, 1935-1936 Vol. 15 No. 1 (1935): Vol. 15, No.1, 1935-1936 Vol. 14 No. 4 (1932): Vol. 14, No. 4, 1932-1934 Vol. 14 No. 3 (1932): Vol. 14, No. 3, 1932-1934 Vol. 14 No. 2 (1932): Vol. 14, No. 2, 1932-1934 Vol. 14 No. 1 (1932): Vol. 14 No. 1, 1932-1934 Vol. 13 No. 3-4 (1931): Vol. 13 No. 3-4, 1931 Vol. 13 No. 2 (1931): Vol. 13 No. 2, 1931 Vol. 13 No. 1 (1931): Vol. 13 No. 1, 1931 Vol. 12 No. 3-4 (1930): Vol. 12 No. 3-4, 1930 Vol. 12 No. 2 (1930): Vol. 12 No. 2, 1930 Vol. 12 No. 1 (1930): Vol. 12 No. 1, 1930 Vol. 11 No. 3 (1929): Vol. 11 No. 3, 1929-1930 Vol. 11 No. 2 (1929): Vol. 11 No. 2, 1929-1930 Vol. 11 No. 1 (1929): Vol. 11 No. 1, 1929-1930 Vol. 10 No. 2-3 (1928): Vol. 10 No. 2-3, 1928-1929 Vol. 10 No. 4 (1928): Vol. 10 No. 4, 1928-1929 Vol. 10 No. 1 (1928): Vol. 10 No. 1, 1928-1929 Vol. 9 No. 1-3 (1927): Vol. 9 Livr. 1-3, 1927 Vol. 9 No. 4 (1927): Vol. 9 Livr. 4, 1927 Vol. 8 No. 3-4 (1926): Vol. 8 No.3-4, 1926 Vol. 8 No. 1-2 (1926): Vol. 8 No. 1-2, 1926 Vol. 6 (1926): Vol. 6, (Supplement), 1926 Vol. 7 No. 4 (1925): Vol. 7 No. 4, 1925-1929 Vol. 7 No. 3 (1925): Vol. 7 No. 3, 1925-1929 Vol. 7 No. 2 (1925): Vol. 7 No. 2, 1925-1929 Vol. 7 No. 1 (1925): Vol. 7 No. 1, 1925-1929 Vol. 5 No. 1-3 (1924): Vol.5 No. 1-3, 1924 Vol. 5 No. 4 (1924): Vol.5 No. 4, 1924 Vol. 5 (1924): Vol. 5, (Supplement), 1924 Vol. 4 (1923): Vol. 4, 1923 Vol. 3 (1923): Vol. 3, 1923 Vol. 2 No. 2-4 (1921): Vol. 2 No. 2-4, 1921-1922 Vol. 2 No. 1 (1921): Vol. 2 No. 1, 1921 More Issue