cover
Contact Name
Dermiyati
Contact Email
dermiyati.1963@fp.unila.ac.id
Phone
+62721781822
Journal Mail Official
j.tnhtrop@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Faculty of Agriculture, University of Lampung, Jl. Sumantri Brojonegoro No. 1, Bandarlampung 35145, Indonesia
Location
Kota bandar lampung,
Lampung
INDONESIA
Journal of Tropical Soils
Published by Universitas Lampung
ISSN : 0852257X     EISSN : 20866682     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.5400/jts.v25i1
Core Subject : Agriculture, Social,
Journal of Tropical Soils (JTS) publishes all aspects in the original research of soil science (soil physic and soil conservation, soil mineralogy, soil chemistry and soil fertility, soil biology and soil biochemical, soil genesis and classification, land survey and land evaluation, land development and management environmental), and related subjects in which using soil from tropical areas.
Articles 12 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 17 No. 3: September 2012" : 12 Documents clear
Methods for Delineating Degraded Land at Citarum Watershed, West Java, Indonesia Tarigan, Suria Darma
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL SOILS Vol. 17 No. 3: September 2012
Publisher : UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5400/jts.2012.v17i3.267-274

Abstract

Accurate information on the extent and spatial location of degraded lands is very important to plan their rehabilitation. So far, various institutions issue different estimation on the extent of degraded land in Indonesia led to big confusion for rehabilitation planning.  Ministry of Forestry estimates around 30.2 million ha of degraded land both inside and outside forestry area throughout Indonesia based on data released in 2007. Ministry of Forestry implementes the so called scoring method in delineating degraded land. Criteria used in the scoring methods are: land cover, slope steepness, erosion, and management. Scoring method applies different weight to each of those criteria. This study aimed to analyze accuracy of scoring method and to compare it to propose alternative methods in delineating degraded land such as: a) Inconsistency of land use, and b) Combination of Inconsistency of land use and scoring method. The accuracy of these methods were obtained by comparing to the field observation. The slope map was derived from SRTM 30 m, soil map was obtained from Soil Research Institute and land cover/land use from Ministry for Environment.  Using GIS analysis, those maps were used to compose land capability classification (LCC) and inconsistency of land use. The study showed that scoring method had 66% accuracy in delineating degraded land. When scoring method was combined with Inconsistency method the accuracy increased about 7%.Keywords: Degraded land; inconsistency of land use; land capability class; scoring method[How to Cite: Tarigan SD. 2012. Methods for Delineating Degraded Land at Citarum Watershed, West Java, Indonesia. J Trop Soils, 17 (3): 267-274. doi: 10.5400/jts.2012.17.3.267][Permalink/DOI: www.dx.doi.org/10.5400/jts.2012.17.3.267]
Physical Feasibility Study of Agroforestry Farm Systems to Support Sustainable Agriculture in Konaweha Sub Watershed of Southeast Sulawesi Marwah, Sitti
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL SOILS Vol. 17 No. 3: September 2012
Publisher : UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5400/jts.2012.v17i3.275-282

Abstract

The farming systems in Konaweha watershed are mostly mixed garden that are partly managed intensively as wellas traditionally. The objectives of this research were to identify and classify agroforestry systems that were practicedby farmers, to study the effect of the agroforestry systems on soil properties, hydrological indicators, and erosion,as well as to analyze farm management feasibility of agroforestry systems to establish sustainable agriculturesystem. The study was carried out in Konaweha watershed, Southeast Sulawesi. The results indicated thatagroforestry systems in this area were devided into four types i.e. sylvopastoral-perennial crops with pasture,agrosylvicultural-perennial crops, agrosylvicultural-multystrata systems, and sylvopastoral-multystrata systems.The four types of agroforestry systems significantly increased the soil aggregate stability, soil porosity at 30 cm indepth, organic matter, soil organic carbon, and microorganisms population. In addition, the agroforestry haddecreased runoff and erosion significantly. Therefore, the erosion rate from the four types of agroforestry systemwas below the value of tolerated soil loss (TSL), except that of agrosylvicultural-perennial crops with an elevationof > 30%. The best quality of soil and environment was found at sylvopastoral-multystrata systems.Keywords: Agroforestry; erosion; soil properties; sustainable agriculture[How to Cite: Marwah S. 2012. Physical Feasibility Study of Agroforestry Farm Systems to Support Sustainable Agriculture in Konaweha Sub Watershed of Southeast Sulawesi. J Trop Soils, 17 (3) : 275-282. doi: 10.5400/jts.2012.17.3.275][Permalink/DOI: www.dx.doi.org/10.5400/jts.2012.17.3.275] 

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 12


Filter by Year

2012 2012


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 30, No 3: September 2025 (in Progress) Vol. 30 No. 3: September 2025 (in Progress) Vol 30, No 2: May 2025 Vol. 30 No. 2: May 2025 Vol 30, No 1: January 2025 Vol. 30 No. 1: January 2025 Vol. 29 No. 3: September 2024 Vol 29, No 3: September 2024 Vol. 29 No. 2: May 2024 Vol 29, No 2: May 2024 Vol 29, No 1: January 2024 Vol. 29 No. 1: January 2024 Vol 28, No 3: September 2023 Vol. 28 No. 3: September 2023 Vol. 28 No. 2: May 2023 Vol 28, No 2: May 2023 Vol 28, No 1: January 2023 Vol. 28 No. 1: January 2023 Vol 27, No 3: September 2022 Vol. 27 No. 3: September 2022 Vol. 27 No. 2: May 2022 Vol 27, No 2: May 2022 Vol 27, No 1: January 2022 Vol. 27 No. 1: January 2022 Vol. 26 No. 3: September 2021 Vol 26, No 3: September 2021 Vol 26, No 2: May 2021 Vol. 26 No. 2: May 2021 Vol. 26 No. 1: January 2021 Vol 26, No 1: January 2021 Vol 25, No 3: September 2020 Vol. 25 No. 3: September 2020 Vol. 25 No. 2: May 2020 Vol 25, No 2: May 2020 Vol 25, No 1: January 2020 Vol. 25 No. 1: January 2020 Vol. 24 No. 3: September 2019 Vol 24, No 3: September 2019 Vol 24, No 2: May 2019 Vol. 24 No. 2: May 2019 Vol 24, No 1: January 2019 Vol. 24 No. 1: January 2019 Vol. 23 No. 3: September 2018 Vol 23, No 3: September 2018 Vol. 23 No. 2: May 2018 Vol 23, No 2: May 2018 Vol. 23 No. 1: January 2018 Vol 23, No 1: January 2018 Vol 22, No 3: September 2017 Vol. 22 No. 3: September 2017 Vol. 22 No. 2: May 2017 Vol 22, No 2: May 2017 Vol 22, No 1: January 2017 Vol. 22 No. 1: January 2017 Vol. 21 No. 3: September 2016 Vol 21, No 3: September 2016 Vol. 21 No. 2: May 2016 Vol 21, No 2: May 2016 Vol 21, No 1: January 2016 Vol. 21 No. 1: January 2016 Vol 20, No 3: September 2015 Vol. 20 No. 3: September 2015 Vol. 20 No. 2: May 2015 Vol 20, No 2: May 2015 Vol. 20 No. 1: January 2015 Vol 20, No 1: January 2015 Vol 19, No 3: September 2014 Vol. 19 No. 3: September 2014 Vol. 19 No. 2: May 2014 Vol 19, No 2: May 2014 Vol 19, No 1: January 2014 Vol. 19 No. 1: January 2014 Vol 18, No 3: September 2013 Vol. 18 No. 3: September 2013 Vol 18, No 2: May 2013 Vol. 18 No. 2: May 2013 Vol 18, No 1: January 2013 Vol. 18 No. 1: January 2013 Vol. 17 No. 3: September 2012 Vol 17, No 3: September 2012 Vol 17, No 2: May 2012 Vol. 17 No. 2: May 2012 Vol. 17 No. 1: Januari 2012 Vol 17, No 1: Januari 2012 Vol 16, No 3: September 2011 Vol. 16 No. 3: September 2011 Vol 16, No 2: May 2011 Vol. 16 No. 2: May 2011 Vol 16, No 1: January 2011 Vol. 16 No. 1: January 2011 Vol. 15 No. 3: September 2010 Vol 15, No 3: September 2010 Vol 15, No 2: May 2010 Vol. 15 No. 2: May 2010 Vol. 15 No. 1: January 2010 Vol 15, No 1: January 2010 Vol 14, No 3: September 2009 Vol. 14 No. 3: September 2009 Vol. 14 No. 2: May 2009 Vol 14, No 2: May 2009 Vol. 14 No. 1: January 2009 Vol 14, No 1: January 2009 Vol 13, No 3: September 2008 Vol. 13 No. 3: September 2008 Vol 13, No 2: May 2008 Vol. 13 No. 2: May 2008 Vol. 13 No. 1: January 2008 Vol 13, No 1: January 2008 More Issue