cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
Sekaran, Gunungpati, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Lembaran Ilmu Kependidikan
Published by Universitas Negeri Semarang
ISSN : -     EISSN : 02160847     DOI : 10.15294/lik
Core Subject : Education,
Education
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 12 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 45, No 2 (2016): September 2016" : 12 Documents clear
INKUIRI-REFLEKTIF: PARADIGMA PENDIDIKAN IPS YANG TERABAIKAN Farisi, Mohammad Imam
Lembaran Ilmu Kependidikan Vol 45, No 2 (2016): September 2016
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lik.v45i2.3331

Abstract

This paper describes the result of philosophical inquiry about the existence and development of inquiry-reflective paradigm of the Social Studies in the scholar community thoughts, and the curriculum development within the schools' level. Analysis focused on the social studies competences to be achieved (objectives); approaches need to be done (methods); learning contents need to be given (content). The analysis shows that the development paradigm-reflective inquiry at the social studies community is still the academic discourse, and not been yet a shared commitment. In fact, there are strong indications of the paradigm in Indonesia have 'stagnant’. The Social Studies curriculum also not consistently provides space for the development of inquiry-reflective thinking skills in a whole.
Meaning Negotiation and Learners’ Uptake in The Process of Teacher’s Corrective Feedback Nurwulandari, Eki; Sofwan, Ahmad
Lembaran Ilmu Kependidikan Vol 45, No 2 (2016): September 2016
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lik.v45i2.3179

Abstract

This research described and analyzed the teacher’s corrective feedback and learners’ uptake in the classroom interaction. This is a descriptive research. The sample of this research was 34 students of the eleventh graders of Medika Vocational High School Pekalongan. The data comprised of trancripts of 10 hours of narural classroom interactions recorded from a class of a teacher. The findings show that recast, clarification request, elicitation, repetition and explicit correction which successfully lead to student-generated repair, are rarely used by the teacher.  Dalam interaksi, ada memiliki negosiasi makna. Secara kualitatif, penelitian ini menggambarkan cara peserta didik memberikan serapan untuk umpan balik korektif guru di dialog transaksional siswa dengan mengumpulkan data. Secara quantitative, peneliti menganalisi presentase yang didapat dari masing –masing type yang digunakan pada umpan balik guru dan serapan dari peserta didik, dan presentase quesioner siswa dengan mempresentase kan masing- masing bagian dari quesioner. Peneliti bertujuan untuk menganalisis bagaimana dan dimana guru mengoreksi kesalahan yang diucapkan selama suatu aktivitas tertentu di kelas XI SMK Medika. Hasil juga memperlihatkan bahwa corrective feedback sangat efektif dalam menghasilkan perbaikan siswa secara relatif yang jarang terjadi di kelas. Berdasarkan studi ini menuang kembali, meminta klarifikasi, penimbulan, pengulangan, dan perbaikan secara eksplisit sukses membuat siswa melakukan perbaikan yang jarang digunakan oleh guru. Data dasar terdiri trancripts dari 10 jam interaksi kelas naruralistic direkam dari kelas guru. Dari total berubah, peneliti telah menghitung 228 episode masing-masing berisi kesalahan yang dihasilkan oleh pelajar, sebuah Umpan bergerak korektif dari guru dan serapan berikutnya pelajar dalam menanggapi CF. Episode umpan balik korektif diidentifikasi dan diklasifikasikan menggunakan model modifikasi dari Lyster dan Ranta (1997). 

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 12

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2016 2016


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 52, No 2 (2023): September: Technology and Innovation in Education, Inclusive Education and Equi Vol 52, No 1 (2023): April: Curriculum and Learning, Technology and Innovation in Education Vol 51, No 2 (2022): September: Curriculum and Learning, Inclusive Education and Equity Vol 51, No 1 (2022): April: Technology and Innovation in Education, Leadership, Policy, and Educatio Vol 50, No 2 (2021): September: Leadership, Policy, and Educational Governance Vol 50, No 2 (2021): September Vol 50, No 1 (2021): April: Curriculum and Learning, Technology and Innovation in Education Vol 50, No 1 (2021): April Vol 49, No 2 (2020): September Vol 49, No 1 (2020): April Vol 48, No 2 (2019): September Vol 48, No 1 (2019): April Vol 47, No 2 (2018): September Vol 47, No 1 (2018): April Vol 46, No 2 (2017): September 2017 Vol 46, No 1 (2017): Lembaran Ilmu Kependidikan: April 2017 Vol 46, No 1 (2017): April 2017 Vol 45, No 2 (2016): Lembaran Ilmu Kependidikan: September 2016 Vol 45, No 2 (2016): September 2016 Vol 45, No 1 (2016): Lembaran Ilmu Kependidikan: April 2016 Vol 45, No 1 (2016): April 2016 Vol 44, No 2 (2015): September 2015 Vol 44, No 2 (2015): Lembaran Ilmu Kependidikan: September 2015 Vol 44, No 1 (2015): April 2015 Vol 44, No 1 (2015): Lembaran Ilmu Kependidikan: April 2015 Vol 43, No 2 (2014): September 2014 Vol 43, No 2 (2014): Edisi September 2014 Vol 43, No 1 (2014): Edisi April 2014 Vol 43, No 1 (2014): April 2014 Vol 42, No 2 (2013) Vol 42, No 2 (2013) Vol 42, No 1 (2013) Vol 42, No 1 (2013) Vol 41, No 2 (2012) Vol 41, No 2 (2012) Vol 41, No 1 (2012) Vol 41, No 1 (2012) Vol 40, No 1 (2011) Vol 40, No 1 (2011) Vol 39, No 2 (2010) Vol 39, No 2 (2010) Vol 39, No 1 (2010) Vol 39, No 1 (2010) Vol 38, No 2 (2009) Vol 38, No 2 (2009) Vol 38, No 1 (2009) Vol 38, No 1 (2009) Vol 37, No 2 (2008) Vol 37, No 2 (2008) Vol 37, No 1 (2008) Vol 37, No 1 (2008) Vol 36, No 2 (2007) Vol 36, No 2 (2007) Vol 36, No 1 (2007) Vol 36, No 1 (2007) More Issue