cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
Sekaran, Gunungpati, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Lembaran Ilmu Kependidikan
Published by Universitas Negeri Semarang
ISSN : -     EISSN : 02160847     DOI : 10.15294/lik
Core Subject : Education,
Education
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 12 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 48, No 2 (2019): September" : 12 Documents clear
Model-Model Pembelajaran Vokasional 4Cs Pada Sekolah Menegah Kejuruan
Lembaran Ilmu Kependidikan Vol 48, No 2 (2019): September
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lik.v48i2.18570

Abstract

Penelitian ini merupakan studi literatur dari berbagai sumber yang membahas model Pembelajaran vokasional di SMK. Studi literatur ini meneliti model pembelajaran vokasional di SMK dikaitkan dengan 4Cs. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa pentingnya analisis model pembelajaran yang disesuaikan dengan tujuan pembelajaran berdasarkan kompetensi dasar yang diajarkan. Selain itu, TeFa yang digalakan oleh pemerintah mengahadapi berbagai tantangan sehingga dibutuhkan solusinya. Penelitian berikutnya yang menarik untuk dikembangkan sebagai riset adalah keefektifan masing-masing model pembelajaran yang sudah disesuaikan dengan 4Cs. Selain itu, model pembelajaran vokasional perlu diintegrasikan dengan model pembelajaran vokasional lainnya. This research is a literature study from various sources that discuss vocational learning models in vocational high schools. This literature study examines the vocational learning model in SMK associated with 4Cs. The results of the study show that the importance of analyzing learning models that are adjusted to the learning objectives based on the basic competencies taught. In addition, TeFa which is promoted by the government faces various challenges so a solution is needed. The next research that is interesting to be developed as research is the effectiveness of each learning model that has been adapted to 4Cs. In addition, vocational learning models need to be integrated with other vocational learning models.
Collaborative Process for Evaluating Education Technology In School
Lembaran Ilmu Kependidikan Vol 48, No 2 (2019): September
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lik.v48i2.22993

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to uncover a collaborative process of educational technology in schools, they call evaluating, decision making, and applying. Through qualitative methods revealed how evaluative processes can include interdisciplinary stakeholders, and then to explore the process of applying technology in school in the context of teaching and learning in real terms on subjects. The research design begins with the identification of learning activities, the development of evaluation criteria that maps the objectives of learning activities and the needs of policy makers, and the interventions of educational technology activities in the teaching and learning process. The results of the study are identified evaluation methods that involve collaborating interdisciplinary stakeholders on teacher teaching abilities for the purpose of exposing several divergent perspectives and views. The implication for academics who need pedagogical is the exposure of patterns and completeness of administrative support.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 12

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2019 2019


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 52, No 2 (2023): September: Technology and Innovation in Education, Inclusive Education and Equi Vol 52, No 1 (2023): April: Curriculum and Learning, Technology and Innovation in Education Vol 51, No 2 (2022): September: Curriculum and Learning, Inclusive Education and Equity Vol 51, No 1 (2022): April: Technology and Innovation in Education, Leadership, Policy, and Educatio Vol 50, No 2 (2021): September: Leadership, Policy, and Educational Governance Vol 50, No 2 (2021): September Vol 50, No 1 (2021): April: Curriculum and Learning, Technology and Innovation in Education Vol 50, No 1 (2021): April Vol 49, No 2 (2020): September Vol 49, No 1 (2020): April Vol 48, No 2 (2019): September Vol 48, No 1 (2019): April Vol 47, No 2 (2018): September Vol 47, No 1 (2018): April Vol 46, No 2 (2017): September 2017 Vol 46, No 1 (2017): Lembaran Ilmu Kependidikan: April 2017 Vol 46, No 1 (2017): April 2017 Vol 45, No 2 (2016): Lembaran Ilmu Kependidikan: September 2016 Vol 45, No 2 (2016): September 2016 Vol 45, No 1 (2016): Lembaran Ilmu Kependidikan: April 2016 Vol 45, No 1 (2016): April 2016 Vol 44, No 2 (2015): September 2015 Vol 44, No 2 (2015): Lembaran Ilmu Kependidikan: September 2015 Vol 44, No 1 (2015): Lembaran Ilmu Kependidikan: April 2015 Vol 44, No 1 (2015): April 2015 Vol 43, No 2 (2014): September 2014 Vol 43, No 2 (2014): Edisi September 2014 Vol 43, No 1 (2014): April 2014 Vol 43, No 1 (2014): Edisi April 2014 Vol 42, No 2 (2013) Vol 42, No 2 (2013) Vol 42, No 1 (2013) Vol 42, No 1 (2013) Vol 41, No 2 (2012) Vol 41, No 2 (2012) Vol 41, No 1 (2012) Vol 41, No 1 (2012) Vol 40, No 1 (2011) Vol 40, No 1 (2011) Vol 39, No 2 (2010) Vol 39, No 2 (2010) Vol 39, No 1 (2010) Vol 39, No 1 (2010) Vol 38, No 2 (2009) Vol 38, No 2 (2009) Vol 38, No 1 (2009) Vol 38, No 1 (2009) Vol 37, No 2 (2008) Vol 37, No 2 (2008) Vol 37, No 1 (2008) Vol 37, No 1 (2008) Vol 36, No 2 (2007) Vol 36, No 2 (2007) Vol 36, No 1 (2007) Vol 36, No 1 (2007) More Issue