cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Kukuh Tejomurti
Contact Email
kukuhmurtifhuns@staff.uns.ac.id
Phone
+6281225027920
Journal Mail Official
yustisia@mail.uns.ac.id
Editorial Address
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret Jalan Ir. Sutami No. 36A, Kentingan, Surakarta Kodepos: 57126
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Yustisia
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : 08520941     EISSN : 25490907     DOI : https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v9i3
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
The scope of the articles published in Yustisia Jurnal Hukum deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Civil Law, Criminal Law, International Law, Administrative Law, Islamic Law, Constitutional Law, Environmental Law, Procedural Law, Antropological Law, Health Law, Law and Economic, Sociology of Law and another section related contemporary issues in Law (Social science and Political science). Yustisia Jurnal Hukum is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 2 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 1, No 2 (2012): MEI-AGUSTUS" : 2 Documents clear
THE CHALLENGES OF IMPLEMENTING PROHIBITION OF TORTURE IN TWO LEVELS: ASEAN AND INDONESIA Erna Dyah Kusumawati
Yustisia Jurnal Hukum Vol 1, No 2 (2012): MEI-AGUSTUS
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v1i2.10634

Abstract

ABSTRAKArtikel ini menganalisis implementasi larangan penyiksaan level ASEAN dan Indonesia. Pembahasan diawali perkembangan pengaturan dan ratifikasi Konvensi PBB di tingkat ASEAN. Kemudian perkembangan dalam hukum nasional Indonesia. Selanjutnya analisis ditujukan kepada tantangan dan hambatan yang mungkin dihadapi dalam mengimplementasikan larangan penyiksaan di kedua level, regional dan nasional. Hasil analisis menyatakan bahwa larangan penyiksaan termasuk sebagai hak asasi yang bersifat fundamental dan tidak dapat dicabut (non-derogable). Norma larangan penyiksaan juga termasuk sebagai ius cogen atau peremptory norm atau norma yang memaksa dan sudah dianggap sebagai hukum kebiasaan internasional. Dengan demikian, meratifikasi atau tidak negara-negara anggota ASEAN dianggap terikat dan harus memenuhi kewajiban diatur dalam Konvensi Anti Penyiksaan. Terdapat kelemahan dalam tingkat ASEAN, yaitu dalam hal monitoring pemenuhan kewajiban-kewajiban Negara anggota. Badan HAM ASEAN tidak didesain sebagai pengawas yang independen, karena berada di bawah organisasi ASEAN. Pada level Indonesia, penyiksaan masih banyak ditemukan terutama untuk mendapatkan pengakuan tersangka dalam proses penyidikan dan penyiksaan dalam tahanan. Hukum di Indonesia belum berlaku maksimal. Konstitusi dan Hukum Hak Asasi Nasional sudah mengatur bahwa hak terbebas penyiksaan merupakan hak yang tidak dapat dicabut, namun demikian perlindungannya belum maksimal, mengingat KUHP tidak menjamin keseragaman pelaksanaan hukuman bagi pelaku penyiksaan. Demikian juga Pengadilan Hak Asasi Manusia tidak mempunyai kewenangan memeriksa perkara penyiksaan. Sehingga masih banyak diperlukan koreksi dalam hukum nasional, termasuk wewenang investigasi KOMNAS HAM dalam hal terjadi penyiksaan.Kata Kunci : Implementasi, Anti Penyiksaan, Hak Asasi ManusiaABSTRACTThis article will address the issue regarding prohibition of torture and its challenges at two levels: ASEAN and Indonesia. The prohibition of torture is considered to be a rule of “jus cogens” or peremptory norm as well as customary law. In addition the prohibition of torture is absolute and non-derogable. Therefore, it entails some obligations for states whether or not they ratify the CAT. States have the universal obligations to prevent torture and inhuman degrading treatment in their jurisdiction under international customary law. Since many of ASEAN countries do not ratified ICCPR, the AICHR have to implement the prohibition of torture based on the customary international law. In addition, AICHR needs to monitor the national law regarding the prohibition of torture. However, the AICHR lacks of protection mandate and might not functioning well especially when dealing with the allegation of the prohibition of torture or other human rights’ allegations within ASEAN jurisdiction. In Indonesia, the use of torture to get the confession is widely used by the police. Not all the perpetrators are brought to the Court of Law and are given an equitable sentences; although, Indonesia does have a regulation on prohibition of torture; the Criminal Code, the Law No 39/1999 concerning Human Rights, and the Law No. 26/2000 concerning Human Rights Courts. There is lack of competence of the Indonesian Human Rights Court to hear the violation cases. Also, there is lack of competence of the Indonesian Commission on Human Rights to investigate cases concerning torture.Keywords: Implementation, Prohibition of Torture, Human Rights
PEMULIAAN (BREEDING) ASAS-ASAS HUKUM PERJANJIAN DALAM PERJANJIAN LEASING DI INDONESIA Siti Malikhatun Badriyah
Yustisia Jurnal Hukum Vol 1, No 2 (2012): MEI-AGUSTUS
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v1i2.10624

Abstract

AbstractLeasing agreement is extremely useful for society, but there are many deviations from the principles of contract law and the principles of leasing in actual practices, so that is needed to make the breeding of the principles contract law. In the leasing agreement practice, there are some deviations from the principles of contract law and the leasing principles, so that they create inbalancing in the legal  relations;  the breeding of contract law principles becomes an important  thing which must be done immediatly in order to have a fair and balancing legal relations; the principle of contract law as the result of breeding is the harmony principle as prismatic principles of contract. The harmony principles  that integrated of the principle of  the reasonableness/equity, laras, rukun, the balancing and the proportionality.Key Word: breeding, the principle of contract law, financial, leasing

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 2

 1 

Filter by Year

2012 2012


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 13, No 2: August 2024 Vol 13, No 1: April 2024 Vol 12, No 3: December 2023 Vol 12, No 2: August 2023 Vol 12, No 1: April 2023 Vol 11, No 3: December 2022 Vol 11, No 2: August 2022 Vol 11, No 1: April 2022 Vol 10, No 3: December 2021 Vol 10, No 2: August 2021 Vol 10, No 1: April 2021 Vol 9, No 3: December 2020 Vol 9, No 3: September - December 2020 Vol 9, No 2: May - August 2020 Vol 9, No 2: August 2020 Vol 9, No 1: April 2020 Vol 9, No 1: January - April 2020 Vol 8, No 3: December 2019 Vol 8, No 2: August 2019 Vol 8, No 1: April 2019 Vol 7, No 3: December 2018 Vol 7, No 2: August 2018 Vol 7, No 1: April 2018 Vol 6, No 3: December 2017 Vol 6, No 2: August 2017 Vol 6, No 1: April 2017 Vol 5, No 3: December 2016 Vol 5, No 2: August 2016 Vol 5, No 1: April 2016 Vol 4, No 3: December 2015 Vol 4, No 2: August 2015 Vol 4, No 1: April 2015 Vol 3, No 3: December 2014 Vol 3, No 2: August 2014 Vol 3, No 1: April 2014 Vol 2, No 3: December 2013 Vol 2, No 2: August 2013 Vol 2, No 1: April 2013 Vol 1, No 3: December 2012 Vol 1, No 2: August 2012 Vol 1, No 2 (2012): MEI-AGUSTUS Vol 1, No 1: April 2012 Vol 3, No 3: SEPTEMBER-DECEMBER Vol 3, No 2: MEI-AGUSTUS Vol 3, No 1: JANUARI-APRIL Vol 2, No 3: SEPTEMBER-DESEMBER Vol 2, No 2: MEI-AGUSTUS Vol 2, No 1: JANUARI-APRIL Vol 1, No 1: JANUARI-APRIL More Issue