cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Mochammad Faisal Karim
Contact Email
mkarim@binus.edu
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jas@binus.edu
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota adm. jakarta barat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
JAS (Journal of ASEAN Studies)
Published by Universitas Bina Nusantara
ISSN : 23381361     EISSN : 23381353     DOI : https://doi.org/10.21512/jas
Core Subject : Social,
Social Sciences
The Journal of ASEAN Studies (JAS) is a peer-reviewed bi-annual journal that enriches understanding of the past, current, and future issues relevant to ASEAN and its circle of issues. The article shall address any research on theoretical and empirical questions about ASEAN. The Topics addressed within the journal include: diplomacy, political economy, trade, national development, security, geopolitics, social change, transnational movement, environment, law, business and industry, and other various related sub-fields. JAS expects the articles encourage debate, controversy, new understanding, solid theory, and reflection on ASEAN. The articles sent should have a sharp analysis and rigorous methodologies quantitative or qualitative as well as written in an engaging and analytical style. The JAS does publish original research, reviewing research, book review, opinion pieces of current affairs. However JAS does not publish journalistic or investigative style of article. The JAS would not be responsible for any implied or written statements of articles published. Each author would be responsible for their own writing.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Politik dan Hubungan Internasional
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 5 No. 1 (2017): Journal of ASEAN Studies" : 6 Documents clear
Redefining ASEAN Way: Assesing Normative Foundation on Inter-governmental Relationship in Southeast Asia M. Faishal Aminuddin; Joko Purnomo
JAS (Journal of ASEAN Studies) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2017): Journal of ASEAN Studies
Publisher : Centre for Business and Diplomatic Studies (CBDS) Bina Nusantara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21512/jas.v5i1.962

Abstract

Abstract This paper endeavors to review the inter-state relation in Southeast Asia countries. Especially in government policy. The most significant problem in regional relationship is about the absence of political awareness. As a consequence, ASEAN only provides limited positive achievement in political performance regionally. This article provides an alternative explanation for the limited achievement in political performance of ASEAN by assessing the implication of using non-interference principe to the incidence of ignorance and disconnection between ASEAN countries that leads to lack of political awareness. In this paper, we try to propose a combination between formal diplomacy actions done by state institution  and informal diplomacy actions done by non-government actors. We also points out an alternative strategy to promote political awareness on the future of SEA community. First, open policy to connecting diplomatic based community. Second, optimalize the regional cooperation with more concern with democracy and human rights issue. Third, building and institutionalizing political awareness through people participation. Keywords: regional cooperation, non-interference principal, political awareness, comunitarian
The Rohingya Muslim in the Land of Pagoda Leni Winarni
JAS (Journal of ASEAN Studies) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2017): Journal of ASEAN Studies
Publisher : Centre for Business and Diplomatic Studies (CBDS) Bina Nusantara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21512/jas.v5i1.1812

Abstract

Regarding Southeast Asia as a multi-ethnics region, this paper attempts to examine about why Buddhist Community turns into religious violence against Rohingyas in the State of Rakhine (formerly known as Arakan). Through understanding the triggers of conflicts, this paper applies historical perspective to analyze why ethnic-religious conflict occur nowadays between Buddhist and Rohingya in Myanmar. This paper also discusses how the influence of history has constructed the government’s policy under military regime to exclude Rohingya. However, the ethno-religious conflict is either an indication of a weak state or failure state in managing diversity.Key words: Ethnic-
Sub-National Government and the Problem of Unequal Development in ASEAN Economic Integration: Case of Indonesia Agus Suman; Pantri Muthriana Erza Killian; Ni Komang Desy Arya Pinatih
JAS (Journal of ASEAN Studies) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2017): Journal of ASEAN Studies
Publisher : Centre for Business and Diplomatic Studies (CBDS) Bina Nusantara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21512/jas.v5i1.2060

Abstract

Economic integration, as a prevalent phenomenon in contemporary international relations, brings with it several problems including in the practice of development. Krapohl & Fink (2013) argue that regional integration can follow three different developmental paths which are intra-regional interdependence, extra-regional dependence and intra-regional asymmetries and hence regional integration can actually reinforce current situations rather than changing it. With regards to this, ASEAN is following the second path, creating a reliance on external actors and thus requiring member states to be highly competitive in the global level. However, this strategy ignores an important element, the intra-national development gap, since ASEAN is mostly focused in overcoming the intra-regional gap. This paper therefore seeks to elaborate the problem of increasing intra-national development gap due to regional integration by using Indonesia as a case study. The findings show that regional integration in Indonesia can actually widen the national development gap due to three main reasons. First, ASEAN integration is highly top-down in nature, thus limiting the role of Indonesia’s sub-national governments (SNGs) and private actors in the process; second, differing capacity of Indonesia’s sub-national governments to engage in IR provides higher opportunities for some while creating hindrances for others and lastly, the high transactional cost of intra-national economic activities in Indonesia causes the benefits of economic integration to be highly concentrated in one area. Therefore, there needs to be a larger role for SNGs in regional integration particularly in the most underpriviliged area of Indonesia. 
Liberal World Order in the Age of Disruptive Politics: A Southeast Asian Perspective Moch Faisal Karim
JAS (Journal of ASEAN Studies) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2017): Journal of ASEAN Studies
Publisher : Centre for Business and Diplomatic Studies (CBDS) Bina Nusantara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21512/jas.v5i1.2129

Abstract

There is no question that the current liberal world order faces yet another challenge. The upcoming challenge that we are about to confront is an exceptionally different kind of challenge. This challenge is the emergence of what I call a disruptive politics in the heartland of consolidated liberal states. The two main side effects of disruptive politics can be seen at both the domestic and international levels. Domestically, there is growing rise of populism in stable western democracies epitomized with the election of Donald Trump as President of the United States of America. Internationally, there is a growing rejection of globalization and integration, exemplified by the UK leaving the EU. Many commentators and pundits have observed that the rise of disruptive politics is the very threat to the liberal world order that could eventually cause it to collapse from within. While the side effects of disruptive politics should be addressed with caution; however, it is misleading to equate the disruptive politics with its side effects such as the rise of populism and the growing contend with the globalization. I would argue that disruptive politics is necessary for the survival of the liberal world order. Disruptive politics is a way to make us realize that liberal democracy is not perfect and we need to fix it. This essay explores the notion of disruptive politics and the challenge it poses. It begins by unpacking the notion. It then offers three insights on how to maintain the liberal world order in an age of disruptive politics.
Higher Education Integration in ASEAN: ASEAN University Network Case Teuku Rezasyah; Neneng Konety; Affabile Rifawan; Wahyu Wardhana
JAS (Journal of ASEAN Studies) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2017): Journal of ASEAN Studies
Publisher : Centre for Business and Diplomatic Studies (CBDS) Bina Nusantara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21512/jas.v5i1.4155

Abstract

Higher education has an important role in the region’s economic growth, with talents and   ideas developing in the process. ASEAN University Network (AUN) is the institution that facilitates cooperation among ASEAN universities and beyond. This research attempts to describe the role of AUN in enhancing regional integration in the higher education sector in ASEAN. This research uses qualitative method to get depth information and the bigger picture in the governance of AUN’s role and mechanism in regional integration of higher education system. The results of this research showed that AUN helped enhancing regional cooperation.
The Evolution of Southeast Asian Regionalism: Security, Economic Development and Foreign Power Support for Regional Initiatives, 1947-77 Sue Thompson
JAS (Journal of ASEAN Studies) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2017): Journal of ASEAN Studies
Publisher : Centre for Business and Diplomatic Studies (CBDS) Bina Nusantara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21512/jas.v5i1.4160

Abstract

Policy objectives for Southeast Asian regionalism had been evolving since the end of the Second World War.  Economic development viewed as essential for establishing peace and stability in Southeast Asia and the links between development and security were evident in the elaboration of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN).  Also evident was the second-line support provided by external powers.  While ASEAN was a regional initiative that came out of the Bangkok talks to end Confrontation, Western governments had been formulating regional cooperation policies in Southeast Asia decades prior.  Economic development viewed as essential for containing communist influence and preventing internal insurgencies in the region.  Growth and prosperity would come through regional development programs with external support.  This would then expand to some form of collective security led by the Southeast Asian nations themselves.  Regionalism viewed as one way of providing economic assistance to newly independent nations without the appearance of foreign interference in regional affairs.  Therefore, the evolution of Southeast Asian regionalism was a combined effort of foreign power support for Asian initiatives throughout the economic development with the aim to provide security during the political transformation of the region from the post-war period into the early years of ASEAN and the aftermath of the war in Vietnam.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2017 2017


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 12 No. 2 (2024): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 12 No. 1 (2024): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 11 No. 2 (2023): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 10 No. 2 (2022): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 10 No. 1 (2022): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 9 No. 2 (2021): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 9 No. 1 (2021): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 8 No. 2 (2020): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol 8, No 1 (2020): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 8 No. 1 (2020): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol 7, No 2 (2019): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 7 No. 2 (2019): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 7 No. 1 (2019): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol 7, No 1 (2019): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol 6, No 2 (2018): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 6 No. 2 (2018): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol 6, No 1 (2018): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 6 No. 1 (2018): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol 5, No 2 (2017): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 5 No. 2 (2017): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol 5, No 1 (2017): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2017): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 4 No. 2 (2016): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 4 No. 1 (2016): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 3 No. 2 (2015): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 3 No. 1 (2015): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 2 No. 2 (2014): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 2 No. 1 (2014): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2013): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol. 1 No. 1 (2013): Journal of ASEAN Studies Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Journal of ASEAN Studies More Issue