Scripta-English Department Journal
Scripta-English Department Journal is Journal that publishes academic articles that recognize successful engaged learning depends on effective partnerships between students, faculty, community agencies, administrators, disciplines, and more. The journal invites submission of 1) Research that emanates from or informs campus-community partnerships; 2) Studies co-authored by faculty, students, and/or community partners; 3) Literature, Teaching English as Foreign Language and Technology; and 4) Commentary on emerging trends, developments, and/or challenges. The publication of this journal aims to spread conceptual thinking or ideas and the research findings obtained in the field of English Education and Literature. This journal will publish twice a year; May and November. The scope of Scripta-Journal of English Language Education is on Research on English linguistics and literature. We focus on: 1) LANGUAGE SCIENCE (phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, pragmatics, psycholinguistics, sociolinguistics, mother tongue, language acquisition, ethnolinguistics, Critical Discourse Analysis/CDA, forensic linguistics). 2) LITERATURE SCIENCE (Oral literature and written literature with various approaches to structuralism, literary psychology, sociology of literature, post colonial. 4) Teaching English as a second or foreign language. The journal welcomes contributions in such areas of current analysis in: Teaching English as a foreign / second language Curriculum and material development Multimodality in language learning Teaching Englsih to Young Learners Literature in language education Systemic functional linguistics in language education Critical discourse analysis Critical narrative inquiry in language learning English for specific purposes. 5) educational technology that contains literature review, action research, case study research, and empirical findings in scientific disciplines of educational technology. Study in related articles: · The foundation and philosophy of educational technology, ·Design and Implementation, · Assessment and evaluation, · Strategies and models of general and specific learning, ·Research and development methods, · Emerging technologies, and ·Integration of technology in learning · Development learning media · Smart learning environment · Online learning ·Adaptive learning · Mobile learning · Digital classroom · Hypermedia in learning · Quality assurance of learning
Articles
11 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"Vol. 9 No. 2 (2022)"
:
11 Documents
clear
Linguistic Awareness of Teenagers: How They Apply the Role of Punctuation in English Writing
Muhamad Sofian Hadi;
Lidiyatul Izzah;
Melawati Melawati
Scripta : English Department Journal Vol. 9 No. 2 (2022)
Publisher : Department of English Language Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo, Indonesia
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.37729/scripta.v9i2.2305
The purpose of this research is to determine the students’ errors in using punctuation marks at Cakung East Jakarta. this research approach was descriptive quantitative method. In collecting the data, the researcher asked the students to rewrite the sentence with the right punctuation. The total population teenagers at Cakung and samples was 20 teenagers as the respondents. For the exam, The researcher discovers that the test's average score is 52.5, with 100 being the highest and 80 being the lowest possible scores. For the questioonnaire, the researcher finds the result of the questionnaire for the first statement always use a period to end statement sentence is 70% participant choose always, second statement use period in every sentence statement is 40% choose always, third statement use comma before writing a direct sentence is 35% choose sometimes, fourth statement use a comma in the middle of sentence is 40% choose often, fifth statement use quotation is 45% choose always, sixth statement exclamation point is 50% choose always, and the last use exclamation when showing a surprised expression is 45% choose always. The reason why they made erorr is because they did not know the limitation and the role of the structure and context.