cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota adm. jakarta barat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Akuntansi Krida Wacana
ISSN : 1411691X     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Economy,
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 10 Documents
Search results for , issue "vol. 11 no. 2 November 2011" : 10 Documents clear
Manajemen Laba Sebagai Respon Atas Perubahan Tarif Pajak Penghasilan Badan di Indonesia ., Subagyo
Akuntansi Krida Wacana vol. 11 no. 2 November 2011
Publisher : Akuntansi Krida Wacana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Analisis Penerapan Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan Ekadjaja, Agustin; ., Marselina
Akuntansi Krida Wacana vol. 11 no. 2 November 2011
Publisher : Akuntansi Krida Wacana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Persistensi Laba Akuntansi, Struktur Modal, dan Variabel Indikator Terhadap Koefisien Respon Laba Akuntansi Perusahaan yang Terdaftar di BEI untuk Tahun 2009 ., Ngadiman; Hartini, Yurike
Akuntansi Krida Wacana vol. 11 no. 2 November 2011
Publisher : Akuntansi Krida Wacana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Peralataan Laba dan Kaitannya dengan Nilai Perusahaan ., Oktavia
Akuntansi Krida Wacana vol. 11 no. 2 November 2011
Publisher : Akuntansi Krida Wacana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Opini Going Concern Dewi, Sofia Prima
Akuntansi Krida Wacana vol. 11 no. 2 November 2011
Publisher : Akuntansi Krida Wacana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

 The purpose of this research is to examines the influence of auditor reputation, financial condition, prior opinion, sales growth, return on asset, debt default, and firm size on a going concern opinion. The data was collected using purposive sampling method. The sample used in this research were 96 observation covering the period from 2006 until 2009. Logistic regression on going concern opinion. On the other hand, auditor reputation, company’s financial condition, sales growth, return on asset, and firm size has no effect on going concern opinion. Keyword : Going Concern Opinion, Auditor Reputation, Financial Condition, Prior Opinion, Sales Growth, Return On Asset, Debt Default, Frim Size.
Peralataan Laba dan Kaitannya dengan Nilai Perusahaan Oktavia .
Jurnal Akuntansi vol. 11 no. 2 November 2011
Publisher : Jurnal Akuntansi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Manajemen Laba Sebagai Respon Atas Perubahan Tarif Pajak Penghasilan Badan di Indonesia Subagyo .
Jurnal Akuntansi vol. 11 no. 2 November 2011
Publisher : Jurnal Akuntansi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Analisis Penerapan Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan Agustin Ekadjaja; Marselina .
Jurnal Akuntansi vol. 11 no. 2 November 2011
Publisher : Jurnal Akuntansi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Persistensi Laba Akuntansi, Struktur Modal, dan Variabel Indikator Terhadap Koefisien Respon Laba Akuntansi Perusahaan yang Terdaftar di BEI untuk Tahun 2009 Ngadiman .; Yurike Hartini
Jurnal Akuntansi vol. 11 no. 2 November 2011
Publisher : Jurnal Akuntansi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Opini Going Concern Sofia Prima Dewi
Jurnal Akuntansi vol. 11 no. 2 November 2011
Publisher : Jurnal Akuntansi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

 The purpose of this research is to examines the influence of auditor reputation, financial condition, prior opinion, sales growth, return on asset, debt default, and firm size on a going concern opinion. The data was collected using purposive sampling method. The sample used in this research were 96 observation covering the period from 2006 until 2009. Logistic regression on going concern opinion. On the other hand, auditor reputation, company’s financial condition, sales growth, return on asset, and firm size has no effect on going concern opinion. Keyword : Going Concern Opinion, Auditor Reputation, Financial Condition, Prior Opinion, Sales Growth, Return On Asset, Debt Default, Frim Size.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 10


Filter by Year

2011 2011


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 23, No. 1, Januari - Juni 2023 Vol. 22, No. 2, Juli - Desember 2022 Vol. 22 No. 1, Januari - Juni 2022 Vol. 21 No. 2, Juli - Desember 2021 Vol. 21 No. 1, JANUARI - JUNI 2021 Vol. 20 No. 2, JULI - DESEMBER 2020 Vol. 20 No.1, JANUARI - JUNI 2020 VOL. 19, NO. 2, JULI - DESEMBER 2019 VOL. 19 NO. 1 JANUARI-JUNI 2019 VOL. 18 NO. 2 JULI-DESEMBER 2018 VOL. 18 NO. 2 JULI-DESEMBER 2018 VOL. 18 NO. 1A JANUARI-JUNI 2018 VOL. 18 NO. 1A JANUARI-JUNI 2018 Vol. 18 No. 1, Januari - Juni 2018 VOL. 17 NO. 2 JULI-DESEMBER 2017 VOL. 17 NO. 2 JULI-DESEMBER 2017 VOL. 17 NO. 1 JANUARI - JUNI 2017 VOL. 17 NO. 1 JANUARI - JUNI 2017 VOL. 16 NO. 2 JULI-DESEMBER 2016 VOL. 16 NO. 2 JULI-DESEMBER 2016 VOL. 16 NO. 1 JANUARI-JUNI 2016 VOL. 16 NO. 1 JANUARI-JUNI 2016 VOL. 15 NO. 2 JULI-DESEMBER 2015 VOL. 15 NO. 2 JULI-DESEMBER 2015 VOL. 15 NO. 1 JANUARI-JUNI 2015 VOL. 15 NO. 1 JANUARI-JUNI 2015 VOL. 14 NO. 2 NOVEMBER 2014 VOL. 14 NO. 2 NOVEMBER 2014 Vol. 14 No. 1 April 2014 Vol. 14 No. 1 April 2014 Vol. 13 No. 2 November 2013 Vol. 13 No. 2 November 2013 vol. 13 no. 1 April 2013 vol. 13 no. 1 April 2013 vol. 12 no. 2 November 2012 vol. 12 no. 2 November 2012 vol. 12 no. 1 April 2012 vol. 12 no. 1 April 2012 vol. 11 no. 2 November 2011 vol. 11 no. 2 November 2011 vol. 11 no. 1 April 2011 vol. 11 no. 1 April 2011 vol. 10 no. 3 September 2010 vol. 10 no. 3 September 2010 vol. 10 no. 2 Mei 2010 vol. 10 no. 2 Mei 2010 vol. 10 no. 1 Januari 2010 vol. 10 no. 1 Januari 2010 vol. 9 no. 3 September 2009 vol. 9 no. 3 September 2009 vol. 9 no. 2 Mei 2009 vol. 9 no. 2 Mei 2009 vol. 9 no. 1 Januari 2009 vol. 9 no. 1 Januari 2009 vol. 8 no. 3 Sepetember 2008 vol. 8 no. 3 Sepetember 2008 vol. 8 no. 2 Mei 2008 vol. 8 no. 2 Mei 2008 vol. 8 no. 1 Januari 2008 vol. 8 no. 1 Januari 2008 vol. 7 no. 3 September 2007 vol. 7 no. 3 September 2007 vol. 7 no. 2 Mei 2007 vol. 7 no. 2 Mei 2007 vol. 7 no. 1 Januari 2007 vol. 7 no. 1 Januari 2007 vol. 6 no. 3 September 2006 vol. 6 no. 3 September 2006 vol. 6 no. 2 Mei 2006 vol. 6 no. 2 Mei 2006 vol. 6 no. 1 Januari 2006 vol. 6 no. 1 Januari 2006 vol. 5 no. 3 Sseptember 2005 vol. 5 no. 3 Sseptember 2005 vol. 5 no. 2 Mei 2005 vol. 5 no. 2 Mei 2005 vol. 5 no. 1 Januari 2005 vol. 5 no. 1 Januari 2005 vol. 4 no. 3 September 2004 vol. 4 no. 3 September 2004 vol. 4 no. 2 Mei 2004 vol. 4 no. 2 Mei 2004 vol. 4 no. 1 Januari 2004 vol. 4 no. 1 Januari 2004 vol. 3 no. 3 September 2003 vol. 3 no. 3 September 2003 vol. 3 no. 2 Mei-Agustus 2003 vol. 3 no. 2 Mei-Agustus 2003 vol. 3 no. 1 Januari-April 2003 vol. 3 no. 1 Januari-April 2003 vol. 2 no. 3 September-Desember 2002 vol. 2 no. 3 September-Desember 2002 vol. 2 no. 2 Mei-Agustus 2002 vol. 2 no. 2 Mei-Agustus 2002 vol. 1 no. 2 September-Desember 2001 vol. 1 no. 2 September-Desember 2001 vol. 1 no. 1 (2001) vol. 1 no. 1 (2001) More Issue