cover
Contact Name
Evi Kongres
Contact Email
evikongres@untag-sby.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jurnaldih@untag-sby.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jalan Semolowaru Nomor 45 Surabaya
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
DiH : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
ISSN : 02166534     EISSN : 2654525X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is published by the by the University Law Faculty Doctor of Law Study Program August 17, 1945 Surabaya. First published in 1996 and up to now there are as many as two editions per year. This journal gives readers access to download journal entries in pdf file format. DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is created as a means of communication and dissemination for researchers to publish research articles or conceptual articles. The DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum only accepts articles related to the topic of law except business law. The DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is available in both print and online.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 5 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 7 No 14 (2011)" : 5 Documents clear
PERKAWINAN PADA GELAHANG DALAM MASYARAKAT HUKUM ADAT DI PROVINSI BALI DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 1 TAHUN 1974 TENTANG PERKAWINAN Dyatmikawati, Putu
DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 7 No 14 (2011)
Publisher : Doctor of Law Study Program Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/dih.v7i14.273

Abstract

Perkawinan bagi orang Bali-Hindu yang hidup dalam masyarakat hukum adat di Bali (dikenal dengan “desa adat” atau “desa pakraman”), relatif berbeda dengan perkawinan bagi masyarakat yang lainnya. Perbedaan ini terjadi sebagai konsekuensi sistem kekerabatan patrilenial atau purusadan kapurusa yang dianut. Sistem ini membawa konsekuensi adanya dua bentuk perkawinan, yaitu: (1) Perkawinan biasa (pihak wanita meninggalkan keluarganya dan masuk menjadi anggota keluarga suaminya); (2) Perkawinan nyentana atau nyeburin (pihak laki-laki yang meninggalkan keluarganya dan masuk menjadi anggota keluarga istrinya). Apabila calon pengantin tidak mungkin memilih bentuk perkawinan biasa dan bentuk perkawinan nyentana, maka akan dipilih bentuk perkawinan pada gelahang. Bentuk perkawinan ini masih menjadi pro dan kontra dalam masyarakat adat di Bali. Oleh karena itu perlu dilakukan kalian pada perkawinan Gelahang Masyarakat Hukum Adat di Provinsi Bali, Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang  No. 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan.Kata kunci: Masyarakat Adat, Sistem Kekeluargaan, Perkawinan Pada Gelahang.
PEMILIHAN UMUM DENGAN MODEL “PARLIAMENTARY THRESHOLD” MENUJU PEMERINTAHAN YANG DEMOKRATIS DI INDONESIA Rokhim, Abdul
DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 7 No 14 (2011)
Publisher : Doctor of Law Study Program Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/dih.v7i14.266

Abstract

Law Number 10 of 2008 as organic statute, as more comprehensive statute and comply with answering problem challenge in running general election.General election as democratic party, as symbol and also as democracy landmark. In the other side, general election as one of foremost means to reinforcing democracy living order which function as health instrument and accomplishing democracy, not as democracy aims. General election with parliamentary threshold 25% unable to realizes democratic government in Indonesia. Cause combination between presidential government system and multiparty system proved that emerging instability political, then president position become weak. Indonesia democratic parliamentary threshold in order to form legitimate governmental, by improving parliamentary threshold from 2,5 percent gradually.Keywords: general election, democracy, parliamentary threshold
PENGGUNAAN ALTERNATIEF DISPUTE RESOLUTION DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA ANTARA MASYARAKAT DENGAN PEMERINTAH Suhartono, Slamet
DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 7 No 14 (2011)
Publisher : Doctor of Law Study Program Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/dih.v7i14.264

Abstract

Alternative Dispute Resolution is a method that has many  advantages  compared  with setlement through the judiciary. In addition the process is quick, straight forward, low-cost, and more democratic, this method can also avoid the hostility  between the parties dispute. This method can remove the gap as the government's position is superior to the defendant as the plaintiff's society is moreinferior. Possible for use this method to settle disputes state administration, in asumtif and argumentative based for various reasons, namely the weakness methods of dispute resolution through court institutions, excess Alternative Dispute Resolution methods, the object of disputes, disputes charac-teristic state administration, the doctrine against the law, changes state paradigm, and the enactment of Law Number 30 of l999 on the Arbitrase, Law Number 25 of 2009 on the Public Service, and Law Number 38 of 2007 on Ombudsman.Keywords: dispute between people and government legal protection, alternative dispute resolution
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN DOKTER DAN RUMAH SAKIT AKIBAT TINDAKAN MEDIS YANG MERUGIKAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF UU No 44 Th 2009 TENTANG RUMAH SAKIT Njoto, Haryanto
DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 7 No 14 (2011)
Publisher : Doctor of Law Study Program Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/dih.v7i14.263

Abstract

Technology improvements and globalization invokes people’s realization about their rights as patients in a hospital.  They begin to demand getting those rights and when unsatisfied,   they may sue their doctors and the hospital. These litigation cases will, in the end, increase doctor’s and hospital’s risks. Increased risk means increased cost. It is mentioned in the forty sixth clause of the Hospital Law (Undang-Undang Nomor 44 Tahun 2009 tentang Rumah Sakit) that the hospital bears the responsibility of the mistakes done by it’s health workers. This clause seems unfair in taking the side of erroneous health workers, including doctors, and may result in the decrease of doctor’s feeling of responsibility in their patients. Being a corporation, a hospital can not being punished and so the responsibility falls on it’s owner and management. This can be seen as a violation of the human rights law against the hospital owner and management. The yudicial implications of a doctor’s mistakes in the process of taking care of their patients must be seen from the ethical and the law aspect. Seen from the ethical aspect, a doctor has to fulfill many requirements as a doctor. Seen from the law aspect, a doctor’s mistakes has to fulfill the criminal law, the civil law, and the administrative law. Doctor-patient relationships are usually inspanningsverbintenis (expedient relationship). In order to be able to sue their doctor, a patient has to provide provable evidence about the presence of mistakes or negligences made by the doctor, not just the absence of cure. Doctor-patient-hospital relationship is a tripartit relationship based on agreements between the three parties. Each party is entitled to his rights and obligations. A harmonious relationship and good communication between hospital, doctor and patient plays an important role in the prevention of medical litigations againts doctors and hospitals. Practicing dokctors have to realize that they better apply good responsibility by obeying the rules stated in the professional ethics and the law, always strive to increase their service, and master the art of good communication. Hospitals need to apply optimal service as required by the law by applying programs such hospital accreditation and patient safety programs. Medical committee need to be empowered to carry out is’s tasks, especially in credentialing, recredentialing, medical audit, and enforcing medical professional discipline and good clinical governance.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS PEMBUKTIAN KASUS PERJUDIAN SEPAK BOLA VIA INTERNET Marlando, Marcy
DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 7 No 14 (2011)
Publisher : Doctor of Law Study Program Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/dih.v7i14.272

Abstract

Pada hakekatnya perjudian merupakan perbuatan yang bertentangan dengan norma agama, moral, kesusilaan maupun hukum, serta membahayakan bagi penghidupan dan kehidupan masyarakat, bangsa dan negara. Dalam perspektif hukum dan semua tindak pidana perjudian sebagai kejahatan. Mengingat masalah perjudian sudah menjadi penyakit akut masyarakat, maka perlu upaya yang sungguh-sungguh dan sistematis, Apalagi didukung dengan kemajuan internet sehingga membuat orang jadi tidak takut lagi dalam berjudi meskipun telah di larang, hal ini sebenarnya dipicu oleh kurang sigapnya para aparat kepolisian yang kurang lengkap dalam masalah pembuktian.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5