cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. kampar,
Riau
INDONESIA
Hukum Islam
ISSN : 14118041     EISSN : 24430609     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Jurnal Hukum Islam dengan nomor (Print ISSN 1411-8041) (Online ISSN 2443-0609) merupakan jurnal yang diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau sebagai media pengkajian dan penyajian karya ilmiah terutama bidang hukum Islam. Jurnal ini pertama kali terbit sejak tahun Desember 1998, Jurnal ini terbit 2 kali dalam satu tahun yakni pada bulan Juni dan Nopember
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 248 Documents
Harmonisation Of Sharia-Based Regional Regulations In Banjarmasin City With The Constitution: A Normative Juridical Study Trenadi Prasetia; Muhammad Torieq Abdillah; Ahmad Gelora Mahardika
Hukum Islam Vol 25 No 2 (2025): Islamic Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/hi.v25i2.38828

Abstract

This study aims to examine the conformity of sharia-based regional regulations in Banjarmasin City with the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and to formulate harmonization strategies to ensure that such regulations remain consistent with the principles of the rule of law, legal pluralism, and the protection of constitutional rights. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The data were collected through a literature review of relevant legislation, sharia-based regional regulations in Banjarmasin City, and legal scholarship, and were analyzed qualitatively using systematic and constitutional interpretation. The findings indicate that several sharia-based regulations contain provisions that potentially conflict with constitutional principles, particularly freedom of religion, equality before the law, and non-discrimination. Although these regulations were enacted based on the aspirations of the local majority and intended to promote morality and public order, their implementation has not fully accommodated societal diversity and constitutional rights. This study proposes harmonization through substantive normative revisions, the application of inclusive legal principles, and the establishment of continuous evaluation and monitoring mechanisms. The results of this research are expected to contribute to policy formulation by local governments in developing regional regulations that are constitutional, equitable, and responsive to legal and social pluralism.
The Effectiveness Of Pre-Marital Counseling For Prospective Couples In Enhancing Family Resilience : A Structured Literature Review Andi Marwah
Hukum Islam Vol 25 No 2 (2025): Islamic Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/hi.v25i2.34783

Abstract

Pre-marital counseling has emerged as an essential tool for fostering strong, resilient marriages by equipping couples with the skills and knowledge needed to address marital challenges. This qualitative study explores the effectiveness of pre-marital counseling, focusing on its impact on communication, conflict resolution, and alignment of shared expectations. Through an in-depth review of case studies and interviews with couples who participated in counseling programs, this research highlights key factors influencing participation, such as accessibility, societal stigma, and awareness.The findings reveal that pre-marital counseling significantly enhances marital satisfaction by improving couples' ability to navigate differences and build mutual understanding. However, barriers such as limited availability of services, financial constraints, and cultural stigmas were identified as significant challenges. Participants emphasized the importance of culturally sensitive and affordable counseling programs, as well as the need for increased public awareness to normalize counseling as a proactive measure.The study concludes that pre-marital counseling is a vital component of marital preparation, contributing to stronger, more stable families. Recommendations include promoting awareness campaigns, implementing policies for mandatory counseling, and enhancing the quality and accessibility of services. These efforts are essential to supporting future couples and ensuring the long-term success of marital relationships. 
Kebijakan Vasektomi Sebagai Instrumen Perencanaan Keluarga Perspektif Maqashid Al-Usrah Jamaluddin Athiyyah Nabiela Rafa Callysta; Nabila Salma Amaliya; Firmansyah Firmansyah; Suwandi Suwandi; Saifullah Saifullah
Hukum Islam Vol 26 No 1 (2026): Islamic Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/hi.v26i1.38199

Abstract

This study aims to analyze vasectomy policy as a family planning instrument through the lens of Maqashid al-Usrah formulated by Jamaluddin Athiyyah. Using a qualitative method and a normative-juridical approach, the study examines legal regulations, religious fatwas, Islamic literature, and relevant medical data. The findings reveal that although vasectomy is a permanent contraceptive method, it does not inherently contradict Islamic principles if performed voluntarily, based on mutual consent, and not intended as irreversible sterilization. From the Maqashid al-Usrah framework, vasectomy can represent: (1) Tanzhim al-‘Alaqah baina al-Jinsayn justice and shared responsibility between spouses; (2) Hifz an-Nasl responsible limitation to protect the quality of offspring; (3) Tahqiq as-Sakan wa al-Mawaddah wa ar-Rahmah preservation of emotional harmony and spousal compassion through health-oriented decisions; (4) Tanzhim al-Janib al-Mu’assis lil Usrah collective and ethical family decision-making; and (5) Tanzhim al-Mal lil Usrah financial stability through proportional family planning. This study argues that a contextual maqashid approach allows vasectomy to be understood not as prohibited sterilization, but as a preventive measure for long-term family welfare. The implication of this research underscores the urgency of formulating family policies that are just, Sharia-compliant, and uphold the reproductive rights of both partners
Territorial Sovereignty And The Role Of Wilāyat Al-Ḥukmī In Establishing The Beginning Of Kamariah Months In Indonesia Novi Arisafitri; Rizal Ramadhan; Youla Afifah Azkarrula
Hukum Islam Vol 26 No 1 (2026): Islamic Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/hi.v26i1.37865

Abstract

The divergence in determining the beginning of Kamariah (Hijri) months consistently triggers controversy, primarily due to differences in methodology, schools of thought, and the concept of mathla’ (horizon). Although Indonesia adopts a mathla’ concept based on its national territory, in practice, there remains a significant distortion regarding the precise geographical boundaries of the Indonesian territory in relation to the Kamariah calendar calculations.As stated in Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 43 of 2008 concerning State Territory, the jurisdiction of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia (NKRI) includes land, sea, and air space. This raises critical questions: What are the juridical boundaries of Mathla’ Wilāyah al-Ḥukmī in Indonesia for the determination of the beginning of the Kamariah months? Furthermore, how is Mathla’ Wilāyah al-Ḥukmī applied within the framework of the MABIMS Neo-Hilal Visibility Criteria?
Dilalah Lafzhiyah In The Hanafiyah Version From The Perspective Of Syafi'iyyah: A Case Study Of The Law Of Ai (Artificial Intelligence) As A Substitute For Mufti Firsta Yuliano; Melia Risnawati; Muchlis Bahar; Firdaus Firdaus
Hukum Islam Vol 26 No 1 (2026): Islamic Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/hi.v26i1.31417

Abstract

This article discusses the concept of Dilalah Lafzhiyah in the Hanafi school of thought by reviewing it from the Shafi'i perspective and applying it to contemporary cases involving the use of artificial intelligence (AI) as a substitute for muftis. The development of AI technology capable of generating religious answers raises questions regarding the legitimacy of AI's role in providing religious information such as fatwas. This issue requires an analysis of usul fiqh, particularly in the discussion of ad-dilalah as the main instrument for understanding and deriving laws from the texts of the Qur'an and Sunnah. In usul al-fiqh, the Hanafi and Shafi'i schools of thought have different methods of classifying and using ad-dilalah. The Hanafi school divides dilalah into two broad categories: dilalah lafzhiyyah and dilalah ghairu lafzhiyyah, while the Shafi'i school divides it into dilalah manthuq and mafhum. This study uses a descriptive-comparative analysis method by examining the main literature of both schools and then applying it to arguments related to fatwa authority. The results of the study show that, terminologically, there are differences in expression between the Hanafi and Shafi'i schools, but substantively, many concepts have equivalent meanings. For example, the concepts of Ibarah Nash, Isyarah Nash, and Iqtidha' Nash in Hanafiyah are comparable to Manthuq in the jumhur ulama. Similarly, Dilalah Nash in Hanafiyah is equivalent to Mafhum Muwafaqah in the jumhur. However, the main difference lies in Mafhum Mukhalafah, which is recognized by the jumhur ulama but not by Hanafiyah. In the context of AI as a substitute for muftis, the Shafi'i approach, which accepts mafhum mukhalafah, tends to reject the legitimacy of AI as an independent mufti, because it understands ahl adz-dzkr as rational and competent subjects. Conversely, the Hanafi approach, which does not consider mafhum mukhalafah as evidence, opens up a more limited scope of analysis on the function of AI as a tool, not as an authority on fatwas.
A Comparative Analysis Of Abortion For Rape Victims From The Perspectives Of Fiqh Jinayah And Indonesian Positive Law Sumantri Adenin; Helmi Basri; M Ihsan; Deri Eka Putra; Muh Rizki
Hukum Islam Vol 26 No 1 (2026): Islamic Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article comparatively analyzes abortion practices and regulations for rape victims from the perspectives of Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh jinayah) and Indonesian positive law. The study aims to examine the normative foundations, limitations, and legal consequences related to the protection of rape victims in both legal systems. This research employs normative legal methods, drawing on classical and contemporary Islamic legal sources as well as national legislation governing abortion. The findings indicate that Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh jinayah) fundamentally prohibits abortion; however, in certain emergency circumstances—such as pregnancies resulting from rape—it allows abortion based on the principle of hifz al-nafs (protection of life). Meanwhile, Indonesian positive law permits abortion for rape victims in a limited manner, subject to strict legal requirements, particularly concerning gestational age and medical procedures. This study underscores the importance of a legal approach that prioritizes substantive justice and the protection of victims’ rights. Furthermore, a humane response to abortion resulting from rape requires the reconciliation of the values of Islamic law and national law. Keywords: Abortion, Rape, Islamic Jurisprudence, Indonesian Positive Law
Ta’lil Al-Ahkam (The Legal Analogy) Between Harta Pusako Tinggi In Minangkabau And Waqf Hanif A'la Ilhami; Busyro Busyro; Ikhwan Ikhwan
Hukum Islam Vol 26 No 1 (2026): Islamic Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/hi.v26i1.39077

Abstract

This research examines the position of harta pusako tinggi in Minangkabau and the process of ta’lil al-ahkam in relation to waqf property, identifying the similarities and differences between the two. The research employs a qualitative approach, utilizing library sources and interviews, which are then formulated through inductive and deductive reasoning. The findings indicate that Minangkabau scholars analogize harta pusako tinggi to waqf, with particular emphasis on the aspect of legal validity (the permissibility of its utilization). Harta pusako tinggi and waqf are not entirely identical; rather, they share many similarities while also exhibiting several differences. Nevertheless, these differences do not hinder the validity of the analogy. From the perspective of ta’lil al-ahkam, waqf functions as the ashl (principal case), while harta pusako tinggi constitutes the furu‘ (derivative case). The ‘illah underlying this analogy is the characteristic of al-ḥabs, namely the practice of restraining property so that it may provide long-term benefits and prevent various forms of taṣarruf (disposal or transfer) over it. The legal ruling of the ashl is the permissibility of its utilization and legal legitimacy; such property may be used and continuously transmitted to subsequent generations in accordance with the established system. This form of analogy serves as a rebuttal to views that prohibit the utilization of harta pusako tinggi and, instead, reinforces its existence, continuity, and protection from extinction. In this regard, the concepts inherent in waqf can contribute to refining and complementing the existing regulations governing harta pusako tinggi.
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION MODELS IN ISLAMIC ECONOMIC CASES: A STUDY OF THE MAHKAMAH SYAR’IYYAH IN BANDA ACEH Shobirin Shobirin; Luqman Nurhisam
Hukum Islam Vol 24 No 2 (2024): Islamic Family and Economic Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/10gbz866

Abstract

Mahkamah Syar’iyyah as an Islamic judicial institution in Indonesia has special authority to resolve disputes in Islamic economic matters for Muslims and/or those who declare themselves subject to Islamic law. Based on Law No. 3 of 2006, the Mahkamah Syar’iyyah was granted new authority to adjudicate Islamic economic disputes. Consequently, the Mahkamah Syar’iyyah is required to be prepared in many aspects, including substantive law, which is inseparable from Islamic law as its foundation.This study employs field research with a socio-legal approach. Data collection techniques include observation and interviews. Primary data sources for this research are the Mahkamah Syar’iyyah of Banda Aceh, Dinas Syariat Islam (DSI), Majelis Permusyawaratan Ulama (MPU) Aceh, and the Sharia Supervisory Board (DPS) of Bank Syariah Aceh.The findings indicate that the model of Islamic economic dispute resolution at the Mahkamah Syar’iyyah of Banda Aceh is conducted through two pathways: reconciliation/mediation and ordinary litigation. The process begins with reconciliation, followed by mediation. If no solution is reached, the case proceeds to ordinary litigation, either through regular lawsuits or simplified claims, provided that dispute resolution clauses are included in the contract or agreement. Furthermore, the most effective model of Islamic economic dispute resolution at the Mahkamah Syar’iyyah of Banda Aceh is mediation, due to its relatively short process, simple mechanism, and the fact that no party is disadvantaged, resulting in a win-win solution.
Reconceptualizing Marriage Validity: From Legal Formalism To Maqāṣid-Based Philosophical Foundations Sheila fakhria; Sulung Najmawati Zakiyya; Muhammad Ma’mun; Muzayyin Akhyar
Hukum Islam Vol 26 No 2 (2026): Islamic Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/9hastg97

Abstract

The interpretation of marriage validity in Indonesia is frequently trapped in legal formalism, which reduces "validity" to mere administrative compliance and procedural norms. This normative legal research employs philosophical, statutory, and conceptual approaches to reconceptualize the nature of marriage validity. The analyzed legal materials encompass Quranic verses, Hadith, Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh) and legal theory (uṣūl al-fiqh), the doctrine of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah, the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), and marriage legislation. The findings present a reconstruction of marriage validity, shifting from formal validity to substantive validity grounded in maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah. Under this paradigm, marriage registration is established as a legal-religious instrument (wasīlah shar‘iyyah) that perfects religious legitimacy to operationalize the protection of honor (ḥifẓ al-‘irḍ), lineage (ḥifẓ an-nasl), and property (ḥifẓ al-māl). Concretely, this research provides significant contributions to legal policy reform and judicial decision-making in safeguarding the civil rights of women and children—specifically lineage certainty, inheritance, and maintenance—while assigning an active obligation to the state in facilitating marriage registration.
Regulatory Interoperability and Readiness for Sukuk Smart Contracts: a Comparative Systemic Maqasid Analysis of Indonesia and the United Arab Emirates Through Jasser Auda's Systems Approach Ifra Wahyuni; Shulhah Nurullaily; Ach. Tahir; Assmaa Guerra
Hukum Islam Vol 26 No 2 (2026): Islamic Law
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/bmaj1n82

Abstract

The digitization of the Islamic capital market is entering a new phase with the advent of smart contracts self-executing programs that automatically enforce the terms of an agreement on a blockchain network without requiring human intervention once the conditions are met. This study aims to analyze the regulatory readiness for smart contract-based sukuk in Indonesia, compare it with regulatory readiness in the United Arab Emirates, this study employs a normative legal research method with a descriptive-comparative nature, utilizing three approaches simultaneously: the legislative approach, the comparative law approach, and the conceptual approach. The primary data sources used in this study are Indonesian regulations on sukuk and digital assets (POJK No. 18/POJK.04/2015, POJK No. 27/2024, and DSN-MUI Fatwa No. 117/2018), as well as the United Arab Emirates’ tokenization framework published by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA). This article finds that Indonesia's sukuk and digital asset regulations suffer from insufficient regulatory interoperability, whereas the UAE has developed a more advanced tokenization regulatory pathway, although it remains multi-jurisdictional in nature. Drawing on Jasser Auda's systemic approach to maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah, which encompasses cognitive nature, comprehensiveness, openness, hierarchy, multidimensionality, and goal-orientation, this article develops a Systemic Maqāṣid Regulatory Readiness Framework and identifies that Indonesia's core regulatory challenge lies in the interoperability gap among its sukuk, digital asset, electronic contract, and Sharī'ah governance regimes. It is hoped that this article can provide a more comprehensive picture of the future direction of Indonesia's Islamic capital market regulation, by learning from the UAE's regulatory experience without sacrificing the Islamic institutional capital that Indonesia has already established

Filter by Year

2013 2026


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 26 No 2 (2026): Islamic Law Vol 26 No 1 (2026): Islamic Law Vol 25 No 2 (2025): Islamic Law Vol 25, No 1 (2025): Islamic Law Vol 24 No 2 (2024): Islamic Family and Economic Law Vol 24, No 2 (2024): ISLAMIC FAMILY AND ACONOMIC LAW Vol 24, No 1 (2024): ISLAMIC LAW Vol 23, No 2 (2023): HUKUM ISLAM Vol 23, No 1 (2023): HUKUM ISLAM Vol 22, No 2 (2022): HUKUM KELUARGA SOSIOLOGIS-ANTROPOLOGIS Vol 22, No 1 (2022): HUKUM KELUARGA DAN MUAMALAH Vol 21, No 2 (2021): PROBLEMATIKA HUKUM KELUARGA DAN EKONOMI SYARI'AH Vol 21, No 1 (2021): PROBLEMATIKA HUKUM KELUARGA DAN EKONOMI SYARI'AH Vol 20, No 2 (2020): PROBLEMATIKA HUKUM KELUARGA DAN EKONOMI SYARI'AH Vol 20, No 1 (2020): PROBLEMATIKA HUKUM KELUARGA DAN EKONOMI SYARI'AH Vol 19, No 2 (2019): HUKUM TATA NEGARA, KELUARGA DAN EKONOMI SYARIAH Vol 19, No 1 (2019): HUKUM TATA NEGARA, KELUARGA DAN EKONOMI SYARIAH Vol 18 No 2 (2018): Hukum Ekonomi dan Hukum Keluarga Syariah Vol 18, No 2 (2018): Hukum Ekonomi dan Hukum Keluarga Syariah Vol 18, No 2 (2018): Hukum Ekonomi dan Hukum Keluarga Syariah Vol 18, No 1 (2018): HUKUM KELUARGA DAN EKONOMI SYARIAH Vol 17, No 2 (2017): Hukum Keluarga dan Ekonomi Syariah Vol 17, No 1 (2017): PROBLEMATIKA HUKUM KELUARGA Vol 16, No 2 (2016): VOL 16 NO. 2 (2006) NOPEMBER 2016 Vol 16, No 1 (2016): VOL 16 NO. 1 (2006) JUNI 2016 Vol 15, No 1 (2015): VOL 15, NO 1 (2015): JUNI 2015 Vol 15, No 2 (2015): Hukum Islam, Vol. XV No. 1 Nopember 2015 Vol 14, No 2 (2014): Vol 14, No 2 (2014) Nopember 2014 Vol 14, No 2 (2014): Vol 14, No 2 (2014) Nopember 2014 Vol 14, No 1 (2014): Vol 14, No 1 (2014): Juni 2014 Vol 13, No 2 (2013): Nopember 2013 Vol 13, No 2 (2013): Nopember 2013 Vol 13, No 1 (2013): Juni 2013 More Issue