cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Erwin Hikmatiar
Contact Email
jurnal.salam@uinjkt.ac.id
Phone
+6281282648901
Journal Mail Official
jurnal.salam@uinjkt.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Ir. H. Juanda No. 90 Ciputa Tangsel
Location
Kota tangerang selatan,
Banten
INDONESIA
SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
ISSN : 23561459     EISSN : 26549050     DOI : 10.15408
Core Subject : Religion, Humanities, Education, Social,
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other
SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i (ISSN 2356-1459) is a national journal published by the Faculty Sharia and Law Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University of Jakarta, INDONESIA. The focus is to provide readers with a better understanding of Indonesia social and sharia culture and present developments through the publication of articles, research reports, and book reviews. SCOPE of SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i specializes in Indonesian social and sharia culture, and is intended to communicate original researches and current issues on the subject. This journal warmly welcomes contributions from scholars of related disciplines. SCOPE of SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i specializes in Indonesian social and sharia culture, and is intended to communicate original researches and current issues on the subject. This journal warmly welcomes contributions from scholars of related disciplines.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Sosial (Lain-Lain)
Articles 1 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 10 No. 3 (2023)" : 1 Documents clear
Urgensi Implementasi Doktrin Business Judgment Rule Dalam Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 3 Tahun 2019 Tentang Investasi Pemerintah (restracted) Haekal, Muhammad Husein; Suparji, Suparji; Hidayat, Yusuf
SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Vol. 10 No. 3 (2023)
Publisher : SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/sjsbs.v10i3.32119

Abstract

The business judgment rule is a legal principle of the common law legal system which aims to provide protection to the board of directors in carrying out their duties as decision-makers in the company from being legally responsible if the decision turns out to be detrimental to the company. The new paradigm of government investment in Government Regulation No. 63 of 2019 On Government Investment which adopts the principle of business judgment rule in Law No. 40 of 2007 On Limited Liability Companies aims to mitigate the risk of actions or decisions in government investments that can cause state losses. This study aims to analyze the urgency of applying the doctrine of business judgment rule in government investment governance based on Government Investment Regulations The application of the business judgment rule doctrine in the supervision authority of the Government Investment Committee (KIP) and the operational authority of the Government Investment Operator (OIP) was found to be one of the answers to what legal protection is regulated in Government Investment PP to KIP and OIP in this study, which was carried out using the normative legal research method. In order to provide OIP and KIP, to the parties involved in the implementation of government investment, with legal protection, the business judgment rule doctrine, which was previously outlined in the Company Law, will be applied to Government Investment PP arrangements. So that assuming that there is a decline in the worth of the venture so it can't be ordered as an activity that can make misfortunes the state, insofar as KIP and OIP have completed their obligations sincerely, as per and in accordance with the arrangements of regulations and guidelines, and have given many advantages to the public interest.Keywords: Business Judgment Rule; Government Investment Abstrak                                                                                                    Business judgment rule merupakan doktrin yang mengajarkan bahwa keputusan direksi mengenai aktivitas perseroan tidak dapat langsung dipersalahkan oleh siapa pun meski keputusan tersebut merugikan perseroan. Paradigma baru investasi pemerintah dalam Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 63 Tahun 2019 tentang Investasi Pemerintah yang mengadopsi pengaturan doktrin business judgment rule dalam Undang Undang Nomor 40 tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas bertujuan untuk mengurangi risiko tindakan dan/atau keputusan dalam aktivitas investasi pemerintah yang dapat mengakibatkan kerugian negara. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis urgensi penerapan doktrin business judgment rule dalam tata kelola investasi pemerintah berdasarkan PP Nomor 3 Tahun 2019 tentang Investasi Pemerintah. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan metode penelitian hukum normatif, yang di dalamnya ditemukan bahwa diterapkannya doktrin business judgment rule dalam kewenangan supervisi pada Komite Investasi Pemerintah (KIP) dan kewenangan operasional pada Operator Investasi Pemerintah (OIP) adalah salah satu jawaban atas perlindungan hukum yang diatur dalam PP Investasi Pemerintah untuk KIP maupun OIP. Penerapan doktrin business judgement rule yang sebelumnya telah diatur di dalam UUPT dan diadopsi ke dalam PP Investasi Pemerintah bertujuan untuk memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi pihak-pihak terkait dalam pelaksanaan investasi pemerintah, yang dalam hal ini OIP dan KIP. Sehingga apabila terjadi penurunan nilai investasi, tidak langsung dapat dikategorikan sebagai tindakan yang dapat menimbulkan kerugian negara, sepanjang KIP maupun OIP telah melakukan tugas dengan itikad baik, sesuai dan sejalan dengan ketentuan peraturan perundangan, dan telah memberikan banyak kemanfaatan bagi kepentingan umum.Kata Kunci: business judgment rule; investasi pemerintah

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 1

 1 

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 12, No 2 (2025): Summer Edition Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025): Summer Edition Vol 12, No 1 (2025): Spring Edition Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025): Spring Edition Vol 11, No 4 (2024): Winter Edition Vol. 11 No. 4 (2024): Winter Edition Vol 11, No 3 (2024): Autum Edition Vol. 11 No. 3 (2024): Autum Edition Vol. 11 No. 2 (2024): Summer Edition Vol 11, No 2 (2024): Summer Edition Vol. 11 No. 1 (2024): Spring Edition Vol 11, No 1 (2024): Spring Edition Vol 10, No 6 (2023) Vol. 10 No. 6 (2023) Vol 10, No 5 (2023) Vol 10, No 5 (2023): Article-in-Press Vol 10, No 4 (2023) Vol 10, No 3 (2023) Vol. 10 No. 3 (2023) Vol 10, No 3 (2023): Article-in-Press Vol 10, No 2 (2023) Vol 10, No 1 (2023) Vol 10, No 1 (2023): Article-in-Press Vol. 9 No. 6 (2022) Vol 9, No 6 (2022) Vol 9, No 5 (2022) Vol 9, No 4 (2022) Vol 9, No 3 (2022): Mei - Juni Vol 9, No 3 (2022) Vol 9, No 2 (2022): Maret-April Vol 9, No 2 (2022) Vol 9, No 1 (2022) Vol 9, No 1 (2022): Januari-Februari Vol 8, No 6 (2021) Vol 8, No 6 (2021): November-Desember Vol 8, No 5 (2021) Vol 8, No 5 (2021): September - Oktober Vol 8, No 4 (2021): Juli - Agustus Vol 8, No 4 (2021) Vol 8, No 3 (2021) Vol 8, No 3 (2021): Mei-Juni Vol 8, No 2 (2021) Vol 8, No 2 (2021): Maret-April Vol 8, No 1 (2021): Januari-Februari Vol 8, No 1 (2021) Vol 7, No 10 (2020): Special Issue Coronavirus Covid-19 Vol 7, No 8 (2020): Special Issue Coronavirus Covid-19 Vol 7, No 7 (2020): Special Issue Coronavirus Covid-19 Vol 7, No 6 (2020): Special Issue Coronavirus Covid-19 Vol 7, No 5 (2020): Special Issue Coronavirus Covid-19 Vol 7, No 3 (2020): Special Issue Coronavirus Covid-19 Vol 7, No 12 (2020) Vol 7, No 11 (2020) Vol 7, No 9 (2020) Vol. 7 No. 6 (2020) Vol 7, No 6 (2020) Vol 7, No 5 (2020) Vol 7, No 4 (2020) Vol 7, No 2 (2020) Vol 7, No 1 (2020) Vol 6, No 5 (2019) Vol 6, No 4 (2019) Vol 6, No 3 (2019) Vol 6, No 2 (2019) Vol 6, No 1 (2019) Vol 5, No 4 (2018) Vol 5, No 3 (2018) Vol 5, No 2 (2018) Vol 5, No 1 (2018) Vol 4, No 3 (2017) Vol 4, No 2 (2017) Vol 4, No 1 (2017) Vol 3, No 3 (2016) Vol 3, No 2 (2016) Vol 3, No 1 (2016) Vol 2, No 2 (2015) Vol 2, No 1 (2015) Vol 1, No 2 (2014) Vol 1, No 1 (2014) More Issue