Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Article Per Year (5 Year)

All

Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika

Website

Published by Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

ISSN : 23562684 EISSN : 24771503 DOI : 10.21831

Core Subject : Science, Education,

Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Mathematics

Arjuna Subject : -

Articles 14 Documents

1 2

Search results for , issue "Vol 4, No 1: May 2017" : 14 Documents clear

BACK MATTER (Publication Ethics, Acknowledgment, Template, Author Guidelines) - -
Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika Vol 4, No 1: May 2017
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Program Pascasarjan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Komparasi pembelajaran statistika melalui pendekatan CTL dan problem posing ditinjau dari prestasi belajar dan minat belajar matematika Nevi Narendrati
Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika Vol 4, No 1: May 2017
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Program Pascasarjan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan pembelajaran statistika melalui pendekatan CTL dan pendekatan problem posing ditinjau dari prestasi belajar dan minat belajar matematika, dan menyelidiki manakah yang lebih efektif antara pembelajaran statistika melalui pendekatan CTL dan pendekatan problem posing ditinjau dari prestasi belajar dan minat belajar matematika siswa SMK. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian eksperimen semu, dengan rancangan pretest-posttest non-equivalent group design. Populasi penelitian mencakup seluruh siswa kelas XI SMK Negeri 5 Yogyakarta. Dari populasi yang ada diambil secara acak dua kelas sebagai sampel penelitian. Untuk menguji keefektifan pendekatan CTL dan problem posing digunakan analisis one sample t-test pada aspek prestasi dan uji proporsi pada aspek minat. Selanjutnya untuk membandingkan keefektifan pembelajaran matematika melalui pendekatan CTL dan problem posing, data dianalisis secara multivariat menggunakan uji T2 Hotelling. Jika terdapat perbedaan keefektifan, maka dilakukan uji lanjut t-univariat untuk menentukan variabel tertentu yang berkontribusi terhadap perbedaan secara keseluruhan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) pembelajaran statistika melalui pendekatan CTL efektif ditinjau dari prestasi belajar matematika; (2) pembelajaran statistika melalui pendekatan problem posing efektif ditinjau dari prestasi belajar dan minat belajar matematika siswa SMK; (3) tidak terdapat perbedaan keefektifan antara pembelajaran statistika melalui pendekatan CTL dan pendekatan problem posing ditinjau dari prestasi belajar dan minat belajar matematika siswa SMK.Kata Kunci: pendekatan CTL, pendekatan problem posing, prestasi belajar, minat belajar matematika A Comparison of Statistics Learning Through CTL and Problem-Posing Approach in Terms of Learning Achievement and Interest in Learning Mathematics AbstractThis research aims to describe the effectiveness of statistics learning through the CTL approach and problem posing approach in terms of learning achievement and interest in learning mathematics and to investigate which approach is more effective in learning mathematics for Vocational School students. This research is a quasi-experimental research using the pretest-posttest non-equivalent group design. The research population comprised all year XI students of SMK Negeri 5 Yogyakarta. From the population, two classes were randomly selected as the research sample. To test the effectiveness of statistics learning through the CTL and problem-posing approach, one sample t-test was used in the aspect of learning achievement and a proportion test on the aspect of interest in learning. The data were analyzed using the T2Hotelling’s test to compare the effectiveness of the CTL approach and problem-posing approach. If differences in effectiveness were found, then further study of t-univariate was done to determine certain variables that contributed to the overall difference. The results show that: (1) statistics learning through the CTL approach is effective in terms of learning achievement; (2) statistics learning through the problem-posing approach is effective in terms of learning achievement and interest in learning mathematics; (3) there is no difference between the effectiveness of teaching using the CTL approach and teaching using the problem-posing approach in terms of learning achievement and interest in learning mathematics among Vocational School students.Keywords: CTL approach, problem-posing approach, learning achievement, interest in learning mathematics

Developing teaching material based on realistic mathematics andoriented to the mathematical reasoning and mathematical communication Fitria Habsah
Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika Vol 4, No 1: May 2017
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Program Pascasarjan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

This research aims to produce mathematics textbook for grade VII junior high school students based on realistic mathematics and oriented to the mathematical reasoning and mathematical communication. The quality is determined based on Nieveen criteria, including validity, practicality, and effectiveness.This study was a research and development and used Borg Gall model. The subject of this research were the students of SMPN 2 Pujon-Kabupaten Malang, that is 30 students in an experimental class (using the developed textbook) and 29 students in a control class (using BSE book from the government). The teaching material was categorized valid if the expert's judgment at least is categorized as “good”. The teaching material was categorized practical if both of teachers and students assessment at least categorized as “good”. The teaching material was categorized effectively if minimum 75% of student scores at least is categorized as “good” for the mathematical reasoning test and mathematical communication test. This research resulted in a valid, practical, and effective teaching material. The resulted of the validation show that material teaching is valid. The resulted of teachers and students assessment show that the product is practical. The tests scores show that the product is effective. Percentage of students who categorized at least as “good” is 83,33% for the mathematical reasoning and 86,67% for the mathematical communication. The resulted of statistic test shows that the product more effective than the BSE book from the government in terms of mathematical reasoning and mathematical communication.

Keefektifan model search, solve, create, and share ditinjau dari prestasi, penalaran matematis, dan motivasi belajar Rody Satriawan
Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika Vol 4, No 1: May 2017
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Program Pascasarjan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan pembelajaran matematika dengan model search, solve, create, and share (SSCS) dan apakah pembelajaran matematika dengan model SSCS lebih baik dibandingkan dengan model konvensional ditinjau dari prestasi, penalaran matematis, dan motivasi belajar. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu dengan desain kontrol grup non-ekuivalen. Populasi dalam penelitian adalah seluruh siswa kelas VIII SMP Muhammadiyah Banguntapan yang terdiri dari lima kelas. Sampel penelitian diambil dua kelas secara acak, yaitu kelas VIII-D dan VIII-E. Analisis data yang digunakan adalah uji T2 Hotteling’s, uji MANCOVA, dan uji lanjut dengan prosedur t-test. Setiap analisis dilakukan pada taraf signifikansi 5%. Hasil penelitian ini adalah pembelajaran matematika dengan model SSCS efektif ditinjau dari prestasi dan motivasi belajar, tetapi tidak efektif ditinjau dari penalaran matematis siswa dan pembelajaran matematika dengan model SSCS lebih baik dibandingkan dengan pembelajaran konvesional ditinjau dari prestasi dan penalaran matematis, tetapi tidak lebih baik ditinjau dari motivasi belajar siswa kelas VIII SMP Muhammadiyah Banguntapan.Kata Kunci: model SSCS, model konvensional, prestasi belajar, penalaran matematis, motivasi belajar siswa The Effectiveness of the Model of Search, Solve, Create, and Share Terms of Achievement, Mathematical Reasoning, and Motivation to Learn AbstractThe purpose of this study is to describe the effectiveness of teaching with the teaching model search, solve, create, and share (SSCS) and to describe whether teaching by teaching model SSCS better than by model conventional regarding students’ achievement, mathematical reasoning, and mathematics learning motivation. This research was quasi-experimental with the non-equivalent control group design. The population was all students of class VIII SMP Muhammadiyah Banguntapan consisting of five classes. The sample taken at random consisted of two classes: classes VIII-D dan VIII-E. Class VIII-D was taught by using the model conventional, while class VIII-E was taught by using the SSCS teaching model. The data were analyzed by using a multivariate test Hotelling's T2, MANCOVA test, and tested further by using t-test procedures. Each analysis regarding at the significance level of 5%. The results showed that: the first, the teaching of mathematics by using the SSCS model is effective regarding students’ achievement and students’ mathematics learning motivation, but it is not effective in terms of mathematical reasoning Banguntapan Muhammadiyah junior high school students of class VIII. The second, the SSCS teaching model is better than the conventional teaching model regarding students’ achievement and mathematical reasoning abilities, but not better terms of students’ mathematics learning the mathematics of class VIII SMP Muhammadiyah Banguntapan.Keywords: teaching model of SSCS, teaching model of conventional, academic achievement, mathematical reasoning ability, mathematics learning motivation

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 14

1 2

Filter by Year

2017 2017

Filter By Issues

All Issue Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025): May 2025 Vol. 11 No. 2 (2024): November 2024 Vol. 11 No. 1 (2024): May 2024 Vol. 10 No. 2: November 2023 Vol. 10 No. 1: May 2023 Vol 9, No 2: November 2022 Vol. 9 No. 2: November 2022 Vol. 9 No. 1: May 2022 Vol 8, No 2: November 2021 Vol. 8 No. 1: May 2021 Vol 8, No 1: May 2021 Vol 7, No 2: November 2020 Vol. 7 No. 1: May 2020 Vol 7, No 1: May 2020 Vol. 6 No. 2: November 2019 Vol 6, No 2: November 2019 Vol 6, No 1: May 2019 Vol 6, No 1: May 2019 Vol 5, No 2: November 2018 Vol 5, No 1: May 2018 Vol. 5 No. 1: May 2018 Vol 4, No 2: November 2017 Vol 4, No 1: May 2017 Vol 3, No 2: November 2016 Vol 3, No 1: May 2016 Vol 2, No 2: November 2015 Vol 2, No 1: May 2015 Vol. 1 No. 2: November 2014 Vol. 1 No. 1: May 2014 More Issue

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name
-

Contact Email
-

Phone
-

Journal Mail Official
-

Editorial Address
-

Location
Kab. sleman,

Daerah istimewa yogyakarta

INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name -

Contact Email -

Phone -

Journal Mail Official -

Editorial Address -

Location Kab. sleman, Daerah istimewa yogyakarta INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Contact Name
-

Contact Email
-

Phone
-

Journal Mail Official
-

Editorial Address
-

Location
Kab. sleman,

Daerah istimewa yogyakarta

INDONESIA