cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
ELINVO (Electronics, Informatics, and Vocational Education)
Published by Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
ISSN : 25806424     EISSN : 24772399     DOI : 10.21831
Core Subject : Science, Education, Engineering,
Computer Science & IT Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering
ELINVO (Electronics, Informatics and Vocational Education) is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality scientific articles in Indonesian language or English in the form of research results (the main priority) and or review studies in the field of electronics and informatics both in terms of their technological and educational development.
Arjuna Subject : Teknik (semua kategori) - Teknik Listrik dan Elektro
Articles 2 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 4, No 2 (2019): November 2019" : 2 Documents clear
Studi Komparasi Simulasi Sistem Kendali PID Pada Matlab, GNU Octave, SciLab dan Spyder Ardy Seto Priambodo
Elinvo (Electronics, Informatics, and Vocational Education) Vol 4, No 2 (2019): November 2019
Publisher : Department of Electronic and Informatic Engineering Education, Faculty of Engineering, UNY

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1.543 KB) | DOI: 10.21831/elinvo.v4i2.28347

Abstract

Dalam penelitian ini perbandingan antara perangkat lunak MATLAB, GNU Octave, Scilab dan Spyder akan diamati. Proses yang menjadi obyek dalam penelitian ini adalah sistem kendali PID yang digunakan untuk mengendalikan plant yang berupa model motor DC. Fungsi alih dari motor DC merupakan model dari motor DC yang diturunkan dari hukum newton ke-2 dan hukum kirchoff tegangan. Simulasi dilakukan pada perangkat lunak menggunakan 2 cara yaitu kode program dan block programming. Jumlah baris kode program yang terpendek adalah MATLAB dengan 17 baris dan yang terpanjang adalah Spyder dengan 20 baris kode program. Untuk block programming hanya dapat dilakukan pada MATLAB dan Scilab karena perangkat lunak yang lain tidak memiliki fitur tersebut. Waktu eksekusi kode program diamati padan masing-masing perangkat lunak dan Spyder adalah yang tercepat dengan waktu 0.0682 detik. Hasil plot dari masing-masing perangkat lunak tidak banyak memiliki perbedaan. MATLAB adalah perangkat lunak yang terbaik dengan fiturnya namun diperlukan biaya lisensi dalam menggunakannya.
Analisa Pengujian Repeatability Timbangan Elektronik dengan Metode Syarat Teknis Timbangan Non Otomatis dan Metode NMI Australia ponco wali
Elinvo (Electronics, Informatics, and Vocational Education) Vol 4, No 2 (2019): November 2019
Publisher : Department of Electronic and Informatic Engineering Education, Faculty of Engineering, UNY

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (231.345 KB) | DOI: 10.21831/elinvo.v4i2.28356

Abstract

Testing repeat electronic scales with non-automatic scales technical requirements so far is fairly long if not using a calculator or computer. The aim of this research is to compare the repeatability testing method of electronic scales using methods according to the technical requirements of non-automatic scales and the Australian NMI method, both of which refer to OIML R76 in determining the validity or cancellation of electronic scales repeatability testing. This research method is done through repeat testing on 3 samples of electronic scales, then on each electronic scale 2 test methods are performed. The conclusion is that the electronic scales repeatability testing uses the non-automatic scales technical requirements method and the Australian NMI method has some differences although both refer to OIML R76. These differences include several points, namely the charge used, the method of adding additions, the formula for determining electronic scales, and different test results. The Australian NMI method is deemed to make it easier and more time efficient compared to the non-automatic weighing technical requirements method.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 2

 1 

Filter by Year

2019 2019


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): November 2025 (In-Press) Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): May 2025 Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): November 2024 Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): Mei 2024 Vol. 8 No. 2 (2023): November 2023 Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023): Mei 2023 Vol 7, No 2 (2022): November 2022 Vol 7, No 1 (2022): Mei 2022 Vol. 7 No. 1 (2022): Mei 2022 Vol 6, No 2 (2021): November 2021 Vol. 6 No. 2 (2021): November 2021 Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021): Mei 2021 Vol 6, No 1 (2021): Mei 2021 Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020): November 2020 Vol. 5 No. 1 (2020): Mei 2020 Vol 4, No 2 (2019): November 2019 Vol. 4 No. 2 (2019): November 2019 Vol. 4 No. 1 (2019): May 2019 Vol 4, No 1 (2019): May 2019 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2018): November 2018 Vol 3, No 1 (2018): May 2018 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2018): May 2018 Vol 3, No 1 (2018): May 2018 Vol. 2 No. 2 (2017): November 2017 Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017): May 2017 Vol 2, No 1 (2017): May 2017 Vol 2, No 1 (2017): May 2017 Vol. 1 No. 3 (2016): November 2016 (Consist of 7 Articles) Vol 1, No 3 (2016): November 2016 (Consist of 7 Articles) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2016): May 2016 (Consist of 7 Articles) Vol 1, No 2 (2016): May 2016 (Consist of 7 Articles) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2015): November 2015 (Consist of 9 Articles) Vol 1, No 1 (2015): Oktober More Issue