cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
lawreviewuph@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang - 15811
Location
Kota tangerang,
Banten
INDONESIA
LAW REVIEW
Published by Universitas Pelita Harapan
ISSN : 14122561     EISSN : 26211939     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Law Review is published by the Faculty of Law of Universitas Pelita Harapan and serves as a venue for scientific information in the field of law resulting from scientific research or research-based scientific law writing. Law Review was established in July 2001 and is published triannually in July, November, and March. Law Review provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The aim of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers, and practitioners for publishing original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deals with a broad range of topics, including Business Law, Antitrust and Competition Law, Intellectual Property Rights Law, Criminal Law, International Law, Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, Agrarian Law, Medical Law, Adat Law, and Environmental Law.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Volume XX, No. 1 - July 2020" : 5 Documents clear
PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KEBIJAKAN PRODUK KEMASAN POLOS PRODUK ROKOK AUSTRALIA DALAM WTO [Resolution of the Dispute over Australia's Rules and Policies for the Plain Packaging of Cigarette Products in the WTO] Jantarda Mauli Hutagalung; Clara Ignatia Tobing
Law Review Volume XX, No. 1 - July 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v20i1.2437

Abstract

AbstractThe sovereignty of a country to issue a policy or regulation in the field of international trade is limited by the enactment of the provisions in the World Trade Organization (WTO), especially for countries that have ratified the GATT / WTO. If a country issues rules and/or policy that conflict with WTO provisions, it will result in the country being sued by another country. As happened with the policy issued by Australia. Indonesia is suing Australia to the WTO for the rules and/or policies for the plain packaging of cigarette products (The Tobacco Plain Packaging Act 2011) imposed by Australia. The policy is considered contrary to the provisions of the WTO, specifically the provisions of TRIPS (Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights). This research utilizes a normative juridical method by paying attention to legal materials such as legal principles, legal principles, international conventions, and legislation relating to the problem of The Tobacco Plain Packaging Act. From the results of the study can be seen WTO considerations in this case. In addition, there are also advantages and disadvantages of the implementation of The Tobacco Plain Packaging Act in the future.Keywords: WTO/GATT, The Tobacco Plain Packaging Act, International Economic Law AbstrakKedaulatan suatu negara untuk mengeluarkan suatu kebijakan atau peraturan dalam bidang perdagangan internasional dibatasi oleh berlakunya ketentuan-ketentuan dalam World Trade Organization (WTO), terutama bagi negara-negara yang telah meratifikasi GATT/WTO. Apabila negara mengeluarkan aturan dan/atau kebijakan yang bertentangan dengan ketentuan WTO akan  mengakibatkan negara tersebut digugat oleh negara lain. Seperti yang terjadi dengan kebijakan yang dikeluarkan oleh Australia. Indonesia menggugat Australia ke WTO atas aturan dan/atau kebijakan kemasan polos produk rokok (The Tobacco Plain Packaging Act 2011) yang diberlakukan oleh Australia. Kebijakan tersebut dianggap bertentangan dengan ketentuan WTO, khususnya ketentuan TRIPS (Trade Related Aspect of Intellectual Property Rights). Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan memperhatikan bahan hukum seperti asas-asas hukum, prinsip-prinsip hukum, konvensi internasional, serta perundang-undangan yang berkaitan dengan masalah The Tobacco Plain Packaging Act. Dari hasil penelitian dapat terlihat pertimbangan WTO dalam kasus ini. Selain itu, terlihat juga keuntungan dan kekurangan dari pemberlakuan The Tobacco Plain Packaging Act ke depannya.Kata kunci: WTO/GATT, The Tobacco Plain Packaging Act, Hukum Ekonomi Internasional
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN HUKUM PIDANA PERSENGKONGKOLAN DALAM PERSAINGAN USAHA TIDAK SEHAT (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 03/KPPU-L/2018) [Criminal Law Liability in Unfair Business Competition (Case Study of Decision Number 03/ KPPU-L/ 2018)] Margo Hadi Pura; Hana Faridah
Law Review Volume XX, No. 1 - July 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v20i1.2428

Abstract

Abstract The concept of criminal liability is when a person is legally responsible for certain actions that are subject to a sanction, because the act itself makes people responsible. According to Law No. 5 of 1999, three indicators determine unfair business competition, namely: 1. Business competition that is done dishonestly. 2. Business competition carried out by means of violating the law. 3. Business competition carried out by inhibiting competition among business actors. Factors that make the cause of unhealthy business competition in decision number 03 / KPPU-L / 2018 There are similarities in the Implementation Method Similarity in Bidding Documents of Reported Party II, Reported Party III, and Reported Party IV. There are similarities in writing / typing errors in the bidding documents of Reported Party II, Reported Party III and Reported Party IV. There are similarities in the value of the Analysis Unit of Work Unit Price Quantity (Coefficient) in the bidding documents of Reported Party II, Reported Party III, and Reported Party IV. belonging to Reported Party II, Reported Party III, and Reported Party IV There are similarities in IP Address of Reported Party II, Reported Party III, and Reported Party IV Commission Council Analysis. Criminal Law Liability Collusion in unfair business competition case study of decision number 03 / KPPU-L / 2018 that reported I, II, III, accounted for criminal law for their actions through the KPPU judge's decision to impose sanctions or fines according to KPPU regulations.Keywords: Criminal Law Liability, Business Competition AbstrakKonsep pertanggung jawab hukum pidana seseorang bertanggung jawab secara hukum atau perbuatan tertentu bahwa dikenakan suatu sanksi, karena perbuatan sendiri yang membuat orang bertanggung jawab. Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 memberikan tiga indikator untuk menyatakan terjadinya persaingan usaha tidak sehat, yaitu: 1) Persaingan usaha yang dilakukan secara tidak jujur, 2) Persaingan usaha yang dilakukan dengan cara melawan hukum,dan 3) Persaingan usaha yang dilakukan dengan cara menghambat terjadinya persaingan diantara pelaku usaha. Metode penelitian dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif, yaitu penelitian yang menggunakan legis positivis. Spesifikasi penelitian ini adalah preskriptif, yaitu suatu penelitian yang menjelaskan keadaan objek yang akan diteliti melalui kaca mata disiplin hukum. Data hasil penelitian kepustakaan dan data hasil penelitian lapangan dianalisis denganmenggunakan metode normatif kualitatif. Faktor yang menjadikan penyebab persaingan uasaha tidak sehat dalam Putusan Nomor 03/KPPU-L/2018 adalanya adanya kesamaan metode pelaksanaan pada dokumen penawaran Terlapor II, Terlapor III, dan Terlapor IV. Pertanggungjawaban hukum pidana persekongkolan dalam persaingan usaha tidak sehat pada studi kasus Putusan Nomor 03/KPPU-L/2018 bahwa Terlapor I, II, III bertanggung jawab secara hukum pidana atas perbuatannya melalui putusan hakim KPPU dan dikenakan sanksi atau pidana denda yang sesuai dalam peraturan KPPU.Kata Kunci: Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Pidana, Persaingan Usaha
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI TANAH ULAYAT MASYARAKAT ADAT KESULTANAN DELI AKIBAT NASIONALISASI NV DELI MAATSCHAPPIJ [Legal Protection of the Communal Land Rights of the Deli Sultanate due to the Nationalization of NV Deli Maatschaapij] Jeremy Aidianto Naibaho; Bambang Daru Nugroho; Yusuf Saepul Zamil
Law Review Volume XX, No. 1 - July 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v20i1.2401

Abstract

AbstractNationalization of a Dutch-owned plantation company, NV Deli Maatschappij, was an attempt by the government to improve national economic situation. However, during the process, communal land which was concessioned to the plantation, was also nationalized and not given compensation by the government which resulted the indigenous people of Deli Sultanate losing their customary land. The former plantation land was converted to Cultivation Rights and handed over to the State Plantation Company This problem led to a prolonged conflict over ownership of the former estate. The purpose of this study is to determine the validity of the nationalization process carried out by Indonesian government on the existence of indigenous peoples’ customary land rights and obtain  settlement of customary land rights of indigenous peoples as the impact on nationalization. Furthermore, this research is normative legal research (library research) with a statutory approach (statue approach).Keywords: Nationalization, Communal Land, CompensationAbstrakProses nasionalisasi Perusahaan Perkebunan milik Belanda, yaitu NV Deli Maatschappij adalah upaya pemerintah untuk memperbaiki perekonomian Negara. Namun dalam pelaksanaannya tanah ulayat yang dikonsesikan kepada perkebunan juga ikut ternasionalisasi dan tidak diberikan ganti kerugian oleh pemerintah yang berakibat Masyarakat Adat Kesultanan Deli kehilangan tanah ulayatnya. Tanah bekas perkebunan diubah menjadi Hak Guna Usaha dan diserahkan kepada Perusahaan Perkebunan Negara. Hal ini menimbulkankonflik berkepanjangan tentang kepemilikan tanah bekas perkebunan tersebut. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif (library research) dengan pendekatan undang-undang (statue approach). Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menilai keabsahan proses nasionalisasi yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah Indonesia terhadap eksistensi hak ulayat Masyarakat Adat dan memperoleh penyelesaian sengketa tanah ulayat Masyarakat Adat sebagai dampak atasnasionalisasi.Kata Kunci: Nasionalisasi, Tanah Ulayat, Ganti Rugi
PELAKSANAAN HAK EKSEKUSI KREDITOR SEPARATIS DALAM KEPAILITAN [Implementation of the Right to Execute by Separated Creditors in Bankruptcy] Grace Iskandar Darmawan
Law Review Volume XX, No. 1 - July 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v20i1.2481

Abstract

AbstractThis study aims to understand and analyze the implementation of the right to execute of the separated creditors from the perspective of Law on Bankruptcy, and the implementation of the time limitation set by Article 59 paragraph (1) dan (2) Law on Bankruptcy. It was normative legal study, using primary, secondary and tertiary materials. The data were collected by documentation method using the document study tools and was analyzed qualitatively. The study has found that the collateral rights on the property hold by the separated creditors, are considered as bankruptcy estate at the time of the bankruptcy declaration, so the execution implementation is affected by the process of bankruptcy. The separated creditors must have started to implement the rights within no more than two months since the commencement of insolvency. If the execution has been completed, the separated creditors are required to provide the accountability report to curator. If there is remaining after the sale, the separated creditors should hand it over to the curator to be distributed to other creditors. The beginning and completion of the right to execute are firmly stipulated in the Law on Bankruptcy. However, the action of the separated creditors which could be considered as stop or no longer carry out the rights, do not have a definite measurement. In conclusion, 1) the collateral rights on the property hold by the separated creditors, are considered as bankruptcy estate at the time of the bankruptcy declaration, so the execution must be implemented with regard to the Law on Bankruptcy, and 2) the time limitation of the right to execute is not relevant to be set since there is a mechanism to protect the right of concurrent and preferred creditors though the bankruptcy process has been ended.Keywords: The Right to Execute, Separated Creditors, Bankruptcy AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis pelaksanaan hak eksekusi kreditor separatis dalam perspektif UU Kepailitan dan PKPU, serta penerapan pembatasan jangka waktu pelaksanaan hak eksekusi kreditor separatis berdasarkan Pasal 59 ayat (1) dan (2) UU Kepailitan dan PKPU. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif, dengan menggunakan bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder dan bahan hukum tersier. Data dikumpulkan studi kepustakaan, yang kemudian dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa objek jaminan kebedaan yang dipegang oleh kreditor separatis merupakan bagian dari harta pailit terhitung sejak putusan pernyataan pailit diucapkan, sehingga pelaksanaan eksekusinya tidak tak terpengaruh proses kepailitan. Kreditor separatis harus sudah mulai dilaksanakan dalam waktu dua bulan sejak insolvensi. Apabila eksekusi telah selesai, maka kreditor separatis wajib memberikan laporan pertanggungjawaban kepada kurator. Jika terdapat sisa hasil penjualan objek jaminan kebendaan, maka bagian tersebut harus diserahkan kepada kurator untuk dibagikan kepada kreditor lainnya. Penentuan mulainya dan selesainya hak eksekusi kreditor separatis diatur secara tegas dalam UU Kepailitan dan PKPU, namun kapan kreditor separatis dianggap berhenti atau tidak lagi melaksanakan haknya, belum memiliki tolok ukur yang pasti. Kesimpulan yang diperoleh adalah: 1) terhitung sejak putusan pernyataan pailit diucapkan, seluruh harta kekayaan debitor termasuk objek jaminan kebendaan yang telah diagunkan secara otomatis menjadi harta pailit, sehingga pelaksanaan eksekusinya wajib dilaksanakan dengan mengindahkan UU Kepailitan dan PKPU, dan 2) pembatasan jangka waktu pelaksanaan hak eksekusi kreditor separatis tidak relevan untuk diatur mengingat sudah ada perlindungan terkait pelunasan piutang bagi kreditor preferen dan kreditor konkuren meskipun kepailitan telah berakhir.Kata kunci: Hak Eksekusi, Kreditor Separatis, Kepailitan
PANCASILA SEBAGAI ETIKA POLITIK DAN HUKUM NEGARA INDONESIA [Pancasila as Political Ethics and Indonesian State Law] Thomas Tokan Pureklolon
Law Review Volume XX, No. 1 - July 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v20i1.2549

Abstract

AbstractPancasila is not only a source of derivation of legislation, but also a source of morality, especially in relation to the legitimacy of power, law and various policies in the implementation and administration of the state. The existence of the first precept of "The Almighty Godhead", and the second precept of "Fair and Civilized Humanity" is the source of moral values for national and state life. The state of Indonesia which is based on the first precept of "The Almighty God" is not a "theocracy" state which bases state power and state administration on religious legitimacy. The power of the head of state is not absolute based on religious legitimacy but based on legal legitimacy and democratic legitimacy. Therefore, the principle of the principle of "Godhead of the Almighty" has more to do with moral legitimacy. This is what distinguishes the Almighty God from theocracy. The writing method in this journal is a qualitative method, with an interdisciplinary approach. Although in the Indonesian state it is not based on religious legitimacy, morally the life of the state must be in accordance with the values derived from God, especially the law and morals in the life of the state.Keywords: Political Ethics, Law, Pancasila AbstrakPancasila tidak hanya merupakan sumber derivasi peraturan perundang-undangan, melainkan juga merupakan sumber moralitas, terutama dalam hubungannya dengan legitimasi kekuasaan, hukum serta berbagai kebijakan dalam pelaksanaan dan penyelenggaraan negara. Eksistensi sila pertama “Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa”, serta sila kedua “Kemanusiaan yang Adil dan Beradab” merupakan sumber atas nilai-nilai moral bagi kehidupan kebangsaan dan kenegaraan. Negara Indonesia yang berdasarkan sila pertama “Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa” bukanlah negara “teokrasi” yang mendasarkan kekuasaan negara dan penyelenggaraan negara pada legitimasi religius. Kekuasaan kepala negara tidak bersifat mutlak berdasarkan legitimasi religius, melainkan berdasarkan legitimasi hukum serta legitimasi demokrasi. Oleh karena itu asas sila “Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa” lebih berkaitan dengan legitimasi moral. Hal inilah yang membedakan negara yang Berketuhanan Yang Maha Esa dengan negara teokrasi. Metode penulisan dalam jurnal ini adalah metode kualitatif, dengan pendekatan interdisipliner. Walaupun dalam negara Indonesia tidak mendasarkan pada legitimasi religius, secara moralitas kehidupan negara harus sesuai dengan nilai-nilai yang berasal dari Tuhan, terutama hukum serta moral dalam kehidupan negara.Kata kunci: Etika Politik, Hukum, Pancasila

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2020 2020


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Volume 25 Issue 1 (March 2025) Volume 24 Issue 2 (November 2024) Volume 24 Issue 1 (March 2024) Volume 23 Issue 2 (November 2023) Volume 23 No. 2 (November 2023) Volume XXII, No. 3 - March 2023 Volume XXIII, No. 1 - July 2023 Volume XXI, No. 3 - March 2022 Volume XXII, No. 2 - November 2022 Volume XXII, No. 1 - July 2022 Volume XX, No. 3 - March 2021 Volume XXI, No. 2 - November 2021 Volume XXI, No. 1 - July 2021 Volume XIX, No. 3 - March 2020 Volume XX, No. 2 - November 2020 Volume XX, No. 1 - July 2020 Volume XVIII, No. 3 - March 2019 Volume XIX, No. 2 - November 2019 Volume XIX, No. 1 - July 2019 Volume XVII, No. 3 - March 2018 Volume XVIII, No. 2 - November 2018 Volume XVIII, No. 1 - July 2018 Vol 11, No 2 (2011) Vol 11, No 1 (2011) Vol 6, No 2 (2006) Vol 6, No 1 (2006) Vol 5, No 3 (2006) Vol 5, No 2 (2005) Vol 5, No 1 (2005) Vol 4, No 3 (2005) Vol 4, No 2 (2004) Vol 4, No 1 (2004) Vol 3, No 3 (2004) Vol 2, No 3 (2003) Vol 2, No 2 (2002) Vol 2, No 1 (2002) Vol 1, No 3 (2002) Vol 1, No 2 (2001) Vol 1, No 1 (2001) More Issue