cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Agro Ekonomi
Published by Universitas Gadjah Mada
ISSN : 02158787     EISSN : 25411616     DOI : -
Core Subject : Economy, Agriculture,
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Economics, Econometrics & Finance
AE is a media for dissemination information of thinking and research from lecturers, researchers, students, and practitioners who are interest to produce the scientific work in the agricultural and natural resource policies, agribusiness and agricultural extension & communication sciences. The focus and scopes of the articles in this journal are : (1) The macro approach of agricultural socio economic as a system which comprehensive and integrated from subsystems up-stream, subsystems on-farm, subsystems down-stream, subsystems support and the impact of their interrelationships with government policy, international economics, agricultural marketing, environmental resources, agricultural extension and communication, agricultural sociology, farmer institutions, and community empowerment; (2) The micro approach includes the study in the development of agribusiness (finance, farm management, functional and technical aspects) and agricultural local institutional.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 12, No 2 (2005): DESEMBER 2005" : 6 Documents clear
KEUNGGULAN KOMPETITIF USAHA TERNAK SAPI POTONG DI KABUPATEN GUNUNGKIDUL Nandang Sunandar
Agro Ekonomi Vol 12, No 2 (2005): DESEMBER 2005
Publisher : Department of Agricultural Socio-Economics Faculty of Agriculture Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (3356.538 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/agroekonomi.16951

Abstract

The research has been conducted to find out a competitive advantage of beef cattle farming. Data used in this research was primary data collected through survey in Gunungkidul Regency, Province od Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. The location determination was cinducted in purposive based on population of beef cattle. The selected location was Sub District of Karang Mojo and Semanu. Total sample was defined in quota that is 240 beef cattle farmers, each 120 beef cattle farmers in Karang Mojo and Semanu. Sample selection was taken  random sampling.  The result suggested that (1) on the whole, without considering various production system and management that much occurred upon its actual condition, beef cattle farming in Gunung Kidul had have competitive advantage because has PCR value < 1, (2) breeding was more competitive advantage than fattening, (3) local cattle breeding has better competitive advantage than crossbreeding cattle, (4) local cattle fattening was more competitive advantage than fattening of crossbreeding cattle, (5) the competitive advantage indicates the usage of domestic resources that has been valued in actual price were quite efficient so that the beef cattle farming is proper to develop on giving economic live for its performer, and (6) the competitive advantage were acquired from the use of greenery, dedak (mixture of rice and bran), gaplek,and family force because the whole input were from field or farmer family source until there is no need cash to achieve it.
ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN PENDAPATAN PETANI KARET DALAM MEMENUHI BIAYA KEBUTUHAN RUMAHTANGGA DI SUMATERA SELATAN Tirta Jaya Jenahar
Agro Ekonomi Vol 12, No 2 (2005): DESEMBER 2005
Publisher : Department of Agricultural Socio-Economics Faculty of Agriculture Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (5348.42 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/agroekonomi.16976

Abstract

The objecting of this study is to analysis the ability of income farmer to handle need of household and how to increasing ability of farmer household income. The data are collected multi stage sampling for district, sub district and village randomly for farmer household and the data collection is on October 2004 till August 2005. The instrument is interview for 360 farmers household 210 non-modern farmers and 150 modern framers as sample at 12 villages are representative of Musi Rawas, Muara Enim and Musi Banyuasin District in South Sumatra.The result indicate that the average income of modern and non-modern farmers able to handle ned of household about 95% and 87%. The ability of income will be increasing through increasing income with used leisure time and intercrop.
KETAHANAN PANGAN RUMAHTANGGA MISKIN PEDESAAN Rita Hanafie
Agro Ekonomi Vol 12, No 2 (2005): DESEMBER 2005
Publisher : Department of Agricultural Socio-Economics Faculty of Agriculture Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (4067.904 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/agroekonomi.16977

Abstract

Food diversification as effort to increase food security, one of which is conducted by promoting the society’s awareness in consuming varieties of food using a balance of nutrition principle. Though it has been implemented for nearly 40 years, food consumption diversification as the main component of food security, especially for the poor families at villages, has not run as it has been expected. This study reveals that the food consumption of the poor household has not fulfilled the criteria of four healthy the consumption of energy is 60,40% AKE and the protein is 34,31% AKP, had not reflected the food security condition. The food consumption dversification quality score is only 23,69%. Only one fod group, namely beans was consumed with the proportion nearly PPH norm, two fod grops, namely tubers and fruits.oliy seed were consumed beynd the normative proportion and the five groups of food, namely rice, animal food, fat oil, sugar and vegetables and fruit were consumed under the normative proportion.
KELEMBAGAAN LAHAN DAN TENAGA KERJA PADA USAHATANI TANAMAN PANGAN DI KABUPATEN GUNUNGKIDUL Suwarto Suwarto
Agro Ekonomi Vol 12, No 2 (2005): DESEMBER 2005
Publisher : Department of Agricultural Socio-Economics Faculty of Agriculture Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (4239.146 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/agroekonomi.16978

Abstract

This research aims to find out the effect of land and labour institution on land productivity, cost of production, and farm income.The research was conducted at Candisari, Hargosari Village, Kecamatan Tanjungsari, and at Widoro, Balong Village, Kecamatan Giri Subo, Gunung Kidul. The primary data was taken during Septembe to December 2004.The result of this research found that the household labour, head of household education and age, the use of nitrogen and phosphat fertilizer increases the land productivity. On the contrary , farmer’s asset value and size of farm decrease land productivity. The self-owned land productivity is higher than the rented one belonging to Hamengku Buwono (HB), land productivity of forestation department lan is lower than the rented one belonging to HB.Land productivity, age and education of the household head, and the use of input (nitrogen, phosphate, and organic fertilizer, and seed) increase the production cost of food crop farming. Similarly, the uses of tenaga kerja upahan, royongan, and Rtan or arisan increase the production cost of food crop farming. The farm production cost in Lungguh-Kas Desa-milik Perseorangan (LKP) rented land is greater than the one in HB-rented land.The size of farm, the use of household labour, and education of household head increases the food crop farm income. On the contrary, the use of non household labour decrease the farm income. The food crop farm income of the workr-owner-farmer is higher than the one of farmer renting HB land. The income of farmer renting LKP land is lower than the one of the farmer renting the HB land, and farm income of the farmer easily accesing market is higher than that one who is relatively difficult to acces market.
ECONOMIC-ENVIROMENTAL APPROACHES FOR ASSESING SUSTAINABLE HOUSEHOLD FARMING SYSTEM IN COASTAL PLAIN OF BALI I Wayan Budiasa
Agro Ekonomi Vol 12, No 2 (2005): DESEMBER 2005
Publisher : Department of Agricultural Socio-Economics Faculty of Agriculture Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (6905.889 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/agroekonomi.16980

Abstract

Keberlanjutan pembangunan pertanian tergantung pada pengelolaan teknologi pertanian dan intervensi pemerintah. Proyek Sustainable Development of Irrigated Agriculture in Buleleng and Karangasem (SDIABKA project) merupakan salah satu wujud pembangunan pertanian beririgasi di lahan pesisir di Bali dengan dukungan investasi sistem iirgasi pompa air tanah. Proyek tersebut mengembangkan 39 unit sistem usahatani campuran beririgasi yang masing-maisng dikelola oleh rumahtangga tani yang tergabung dalam subak sumur pompa. Keberlnajutan sistem usahatani beririgasi dinilai dengan pendekatan kesepadanan teknologi irigasi yang digunakan sebagai pendukung sistem usahatani rumahtangga dan pendektan effisiensi atau optimasi penggunaan sumberdaya pertanian secara berkelanjutan dari sudut pandang ekonomi-lingkungan.
TINGKAT PENDAPATAN DALAM HUBUNGAN DENGAN DISTRIBUSINYA DIANTARA RUMAHTANGGA PEDESAAN A. Rozana Nurmanaf
Agro Ekonomi Vol 12, No 2 (2005): DESEMBER 2005
Publisher : Department of Agricultural Socio-Economics Faculty of Agriculture Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (2075.712 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/agroekonomi.16952

Abstract

Level of income is usually used as the indicator of economic development successful. But, increasing in income is not always followed by the improvement of its distribution. The purpose of this paper is to examine interrelationship between level of income and skewed level of its distribution among households. By using data Patanas ( National Panel of Farmer Study) done by Puslitbang Sosek Pertanian 2004, relationship analysis has been done between income per head and Gini Coefficient as the measurement of skewed level of income distribution. The result show a complete stage of economic development, these are first stage and next stage. In the first stage, income and welfare society distribution tend to skewer together with increasing level of income and economic development successful. Modern sector of economy with just a few actors contributes larger income to society. Whie, traditional sector of economy contributes ust small income yet a lot of actors involve. In the next stage , development successful increase income level and society welfare skewed level. The improvement of traditional sector contributes larger income than modern sector that also improves especially in the number of its actors.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2005 2005


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 36, No 2 (2025): DECEMBER 2025 Vol 36, No 1 (2025): JUNE 2025 Vol 36 (2025): ARTICLE IN PRESS Vol 35, No 2 (2024): DECEMBER 2024 Vol 35, No 1 (2024): JUNE 2024 Vol 34, No 2 (2023): DECEMBER 2023 Vol 34, No 1 (2023): JUNE 2023 Vol 33, No 2 (2022): DECEMBER 2022 Vol 33, No 1 (2022): JUNE 2022 Vol 32, No 2 (2021): DECEMBER 2021 Vol 32, No 1 (2021): JUNE 2021 Vol 31, No 2 (2020): DECEMBER 2020 Vol 31, No 1 (2020): JUNE 2020 Vol 30, No 2 (2019): DECEMBER 2019 Vol 30, No 1 (2019): JUNE 2019 Vol 29, No 2 (2018): DECEMBER 2018 Vol 29, No 1 (2018): JUNE 2018 Vol 28, No 2 (2017): DECEMBER 2017 Vol 28, No 1 (2017): JUNI 2017 Vol 27, No 2 (2016): DESEMBER 2016 Vol 27, No 1 (2016): JUNI 2016 Vol 26, No 2 (2015): DESEMBER 2015 Vol 26, No 1 (2015): JUNI 2015 Vol 25, No 2 (2014): DESEMBER 2014 Vol 25, No 1 (2014): JUNI 2014 Vol 24, No 2 (2013): DESEMBER 2013 Vol 24, No 1 (2013): JUNI 2013 Vol 18, No 1 (2011): JUNI 2011 Vol 17, No 2 (2010): DESEMBER 2010 Vol 17, No 1 (2010): JUNI 2010 Vol 15, No 2 (2008): DESEMBER 2008 Vol 15, No 1 (2008): JUNI 2008 Vol 14, No 1 (2007): JUNI 2007 Vol 13, No 2 (2006): DESEMBER 2006 Vol 12, No 2 (2005): DESEMBER 2005 Vol 11, No 2 (2004): DESEMBER 2004 Vol 11, No 1 (2004): JUNI 2004 Vol 10, No 2 (2003): DESEMBER 2003 Vol 10, No 1 (2003): JUNI 2003 Vol 9, No 2 (2002): DESEMBER 2002 Vol 9, No 1 (2002): JUNI 2002 Vol 8, No 2 (2001): DESEMBER 2001 Vol 8, No 1 (2001): JUNI 2001 Vol 7, No 1 (2000): JUNI 2000 Vol 6, No 2 (1999): DESEMBER 1999 Vol 6, No 1 (1999): JUNI 1999 Vol 4, No 2 (1994): DESEMBER 1994 No 5 (1990): 1990 Vol 9, No 1 (1988) No 4 (1986): 1986 No 12 (1979): 1979 No 11 (1978): 1978 No 3 (1978): 1978 More Issue