cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Agro Ekonomi
Published by Universitas Gadjah Mada
ISSN : 02158787     EISSN : 25411616     DOI : -
Core Subject : Economy, Agriculture,
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Economics, Econometrics & Finance
AE is a media for dissemination information of thinking and research from lecturers, researchers, students, and practitioners who are interest to produce the scientific work in the agricultural and natural resource policies, agribusiness and agricultural extension & communication sciences. The focus and scopes of the articles in this journal are : (1) The macro approach of agricultural socio economic as a system which comprehensive and integrated from subsystems up-stream, subsystems on-farm, subsystems down-stream, subsystems support and the impact of their interrelationships with government policy, international economics, agricultural marketing, environmental resources, agricultural extension and communication, agricultural sociology, farmer institutions, and community empowerment; (2) The micro approach includes the study in the development of agribusiness (finance, farm management, functional and technical aspects) and agricultural local institutional.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 5 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 32, No 2 (2021): DECEMBER 2021" : 5 Documents clear
Asymmetric Information, Transaction Costs, and Farmers Decision To Participate In Tobacco Voor-Oogst Kasturi Contract Farming M Rondhi; Rokhani Rokhani; Anik Suwandari; Kintani Sekarkundi Lahitani; Ahmad Fatikhul Khasan; Dian Permata Sari
Agro Ekonomi Vol 32, No 2 (2021): DECEMBER 2021
Publisher : Department of Agricultural Socio-Economics Faculty of Agriculture Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/ae.60706

Abstract

Contract farming is a vital tool to connect farmer and industry. However, contracts participation between tobacco farmers and tobacco leaf supplier (TLS) was still low even though the benefit of the contract is enormous. The low participation was related to factors that affect the contract, demographics, farm characteristic, and other related factors.  However, farmer participation on the contract was still low. Besides, contracts initially became a tool to prevent market failure since it regulated how economic actors acted against others causing transaction costs (TC) due to asymmetric information that made the contract not function ideally. Therefore, this study attempts to (1) explain factors underlying farmer decision to participate in contract farming (CF), (2) explain asymmetric information. Respondents in this study were 100 respondents consisting of 50 tobacco contract farmers, and 50 independent farmers. This study applied logistic regression analysis to analyze factors affecting farmer participation in CF. Besides, the New Institutional Economy approach was exerted to analyze asymmetric information on product transfer from farmer to TLS. The results showed that factors that significantly influenced tobacco farmers' decision-making to participate in CF are farming experience, land size, risk aversion level (RAL), the certainty of price, and source of capital. Asymmetric information caused adverse selection and moral hazard. About 30% of farmers had sold products to other parties (other TLSs and middleman), and 8% of farmers had applied pesticides that TLS prohibited. Contracts that were not ideal due to asymmetric information must be re-enforced by using additional costs called transaction costs, divided into three types, (1) search and information costs, (2) cost to design, negotiate and conclude and (3) the monitor and contract enforcement costs. Monitoring costs had the potential to absorb the most considerable portion compared to the other types of transaction costs. The greater the asymmetric information generated, the greater the transaction costs incurred.
The Factors That Affect The Satisfaction of Local Coffee Shop Customers in The 4.0 Industry Era Nanda Rusti; Irham Irham; Any Suryantini
Agro Ekonomi Vol 32, No 2 (2021): DECEMBER 2021
Publisher : Department of Agricultural Socio-Economics Faculty of Agriculture Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/ae.60861

Abstract

Customer satisfaction is the opinion of consumers, in the form of the performance of a product or service that meets their expectations. Generally, successful businesses highly care about customer satisfaction as profit. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the effects of: (1) perceived quality, (2) price, (3) industrial application 4.0, and (4) products innovation on customer satisfaction in the local coffee shop business in the Special Region of Yogyakarta. The data were collected using online questionnaires sent through direct message on instagram account of each customer who posted a photo with a tag or a hashtag from one of the 31 local coffee shops whilst they were enjoying a cup of coffee drink. All customers had the same opportunity to be sampled according to a representative proportion at each local coffee shop. The determination of the minimum sample used was 165 respondents. The samples analyzed were 173 respondents collected from 450 questionnaires completed by customers in which only 176 questionnaires were returned, and three questionnaires happened to be outliers that needed to be eliminated. The data were analyzed using the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) provided in the AMOS application. The results indicated that customer satisfaction was positively influenced by perceived quality, industry 4.0 implementation, and products innovation, while price negatively affected customer satisfaction. It is highly recommended to maintain and improve perceived quality, industry 4.0 implementation, products innovation, and consider in determining extremely crucial prices for the local coffee shops to acquire customer satisfaction.
Decision-Making Process Of Corporate-Farming Innovation In Bantul Regency Alia Bihrajihant Raya; Siti Fatonah; Ratih Ineke Wati; Sri Peni Wastutiningsih
Agro Ekonomi Vol 32, No 2 (2021): DECEMBER 2021
Publisher : Department of Agricultural Socio-Economics Faculty of Agriculture Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/ae.61255

Abstract

Corporate farming is an agricultural innovation to answer narrow land tenure problems due to widespread land conversion and land fragmentation. The principle of corporate farming is land consolidation with one joint management. This research attempts to determine the decision-making process for corporate farming innovation in Bantul Regency, using an exploratory approach with the Social Network Analysis (SNA) method and ego-centered network analysis. The ego in this study is the innovator and chairman of the corporate farming team. The results of the study were presented in a sociogram using Pajek software. The actors involved in the corporate farming innovation decision-making process are the head of farmer groups, administrators, team leaders, member farmers, Bantul Regency Agricultural Service, local extension agents, and stakeholders including the Research Team of the UGM Faculty of Agriculture, Bank Indonesia Regional DIY, and BPTP DIY. The introduction stage was carried out in a farmer group meeting, and the UGM Faculty of Agriculture Research Team acts as the innovator. It is followed by the persuasion stage, which explains the benefits of implementing corporate farming during subsequent farmer group meetings. The decision stage is indicated by providing direction, assistance, and financial support, which relied on group agreement to commit corporate farming. The farmer groups’ heads dominated the persuasion stage, the decision stage, and the implementation stage. The differences between corporate farming and individual farming lie in some aspects, such as working together rather than individual work, semi-organic cultivation systems, and optimizing the use of agricultural machinery. At the confirmation stage, 62% of informants disagree to continue corporate farming due to significant drops in production yields. The change in the cultivation system from chemical to semi-organic is one reason for the decline in production.Keywords: corporate farming, ego-centered network, decision-making process, social network analysis
Farmer Preference to High Elevation Rice Technological Packages for Accelerating Technological Dissemination (A case Study in Humbang Hasundutan Regency) Agung B Santosa; Setia Sari Girsang; Tommy Purba; Deddy R Siagian; Khadijah E Ramija
Agro Ekonomi Vol 32, No 2 (2021): DECEMBER 2021
Publisher : Department of Agricultural Socio-Economics Faculty of Agriculture Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/ae.61367

Abstract

Accelerating the introduction of a new technological package is needed to increase the productivity of high elevation puddled rice in Humbang Hasundutan. The objectives of the study are to find out the perception of the existence of technological packages and farmers' preference for a new technological package. The study used a survey method with primary data gathered using questionnaires. The criteria of locations and respondents were used to obtain relevant respondents and data concerning their knowledge of high elevation puddled rice cultivation.  The collected data were processed by using Importance Performance Analysis in order to find out the level of Importance and Satisfaction of the indicators and the valued aspects in the technological package components. The results of the study showed that the socio-economic aspects had to be heeded in organizing the technological package. Indicators having a high level of importance and a low level of satisfaction consisted of production cost, quality of seeds, farmer groups empowerment, technology information institution, capital cost, agricultural tools and machines, pest control, sales price, irrigation canals, and farm roads. On the other hand, introducing new superior seeds, productivity attribute and planting age were important indicators for local farmers as to improve the quality of existing seeds. Farmers group expected that the technological package had a high level of productivity, better access to input, low cost, and good user-friendliness in its application.
Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) of Asean 5 Countries Watermelon in the Global Market Saw Yan Naing; Masyhuri Masyhuri; Dwidjono Hadi Darwanto
Agro Ekonomi Vol 32, No 2 (2021): DECEMBER 2021
Publisher : Department of Agricultural Socio-Economics Faculty of Agriculture Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/ae.66371

Abstract

Watermelon Citrullus Lanatus (Thunb) is an important commercial fruit crop in ASEAN. One way to improve economic growth is through trade and comparative advantage. There are very some researches regarding with comparative advantage of watermelon trade in ASEAN. The purpose of this article is to determine the comparative advantage of watermelon trade in five ASEAN member countries. This article uses secondary data only. Watermelon trade data covering the six years period 2014-2019 were obtained from the United Nations Commodity Trade Statistics Database. This article applies the original index of the revealed comparative advantage (RCA) and revealed symmetric comparative advantage (RSCA) to find out the level of comparative advantage of watermelon commodity. Results show that Lao Peoples Democratic Republic, Myanmar and Viet Nam have a comparative advantage of watermelon trade in the global market. This study suggests that ASEAN 5 member nations should try to maintain its comparative advantage of watermelon exports in the international market.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 5

 1 

Filter by Year

2021 2021


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 36, No 2 (2025): DECEMBER 2025 Vol 36, No 1 (2025): JUNE 2025 Vol 36 (2025): ARTICLE IN PRESS Vol 35, No 2 (2024): DECEMBER 2024 Vol 35, No 1 (2024): JUNE 2024 Vol 34, No 2 (2023): DECEMBER 2023 Vol 34, No 1 (2023): JUNE 2023 Vol 33, No 2 (2022): DECEMBER 2022 Vol 33, No 1 (2022): JUNE 2022 Vol 32, No 2 (2021): DECEMBER 2021 Vol 32, No 1 (2021): JUNE 2021 Vol 31, No 2 (2020): DECEMBER 2020 Vol 31, No 1 (2020): JUNE 2020 Vol 30, No 2 (2019): DECEMBER 2019 Vol 30, No 1 (2019): JUNE 2019 Vol 29, No 2 (2018): DECEMBER 2018 Vol 29, No 1 (2018): JUNE 2018 Vol 28, No 2 (2017): DECEMBER 2017 Vol 28, No 1 (2017): JUNI 2017 Vol 27, No 2 (2016): DESEMBER 2016 Vol 27, No 1 (2016): JUNI 2016 Vol 26, No 2 (2015): DESEMBER 2015 Vol 26, No 1 (2015): JUNI 2015 Vol 25, No 2 (2014): DESEMBER 2014 Vol 25, No 1 (2014): JUNI 2014 Vol 24, No 2 (2013): DESEMBER 2013 Vol 24, No 1 (2013): JUNI 2013 Vol 18, No 1 (2011): JUNI 2011 Vol 17, No 2 (2010): DESEMBER 2010 Vol 17, No 1 (2010): JUNI 2010 Vol 15, No 2 (2008): DESEMBER 2008 Vol 15, No 1 (2008): JUNI 2008 Vol 14, No 1 (2007): JUNI 2007 Vol 13, No 2 (2006): DESEMBER 2006 Vol 12, No 2 (2005): DESEMBER 2005 Vol 11, No 2 (2004): DESEMBER 2004 Vol 11, No 1 (2004): JUNI 2004 Vol 10, No 2 (2003): DESEMBER 2003 Vol 10, No 1 (2003): JUNI 2003 Vol 9, No 2 (2002): DESEMBER 2002 Vol 9, No 1 (2002): JUNI 2002 Vol 8, No 2 (2001): DESEMBER 2001 Vol 8, No 1 (2001): JUNI 2001 Vol 7, No 1 (2000): JUNI 2000 Vol 6, No 2 (1999): DESEMBER 1999 Vol 6, No 1 (1999): JUNI 1999 Vol 4, No 2 (1994): DESEMBER 1994 No 5 (1990): 1990 Vol 9, No 1 (1988) No 4 (1986): 1986 No 12 (1979): 1979 No 11 (1978): 1978 No 3 (1978): 1978 More Issue