cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Gadjah Mada Journal of Psychology
Published by Universitas Gadjah Mada
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject :
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 4 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 32, No 1 (2005)" : 4 Documents clear
Iri dalam Relasi Sosial Faturochman, -
Jurnal Psikologi Vol 32, No 1 (2005)
Publisher : Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (346.977 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpsi.7956

Abstract

Envy is not a new concept but psychologically has not been studiedintensively. As a preliminary study, this research describes five basic data on the meaning, experience, time, subject, and coping of envyamong university students. The findings show that respondents met difficulties to define envy, however, they had experiences envy towardfriends and relatives. Respondents showed many positive startegies to cope with envy that can reduce the potential problems in their socialrelations.
Efektivitas Metode Problem‐Based Learning dalam Pembelajaran Mata Kuliah Teori Psikologi Kepribadian II Supratiknya, -; Kristiyani, Titik
Jurnal Psikologi Vol 32, No 1 (2005)
Publisher : Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (340.504 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpsi.7958

Abstract

This study aims at uncovering: (1) whether the problem‐based learning (PBL) method is effective to teach a theoretical subject such as Personality Psychology II; (2) how effective is the PBL method compared to the traditional method to teach a theoretical subject such as Personality Psychology II; and (3) whether the teacherfactors affect the effectiveness of the PBL method to teach a theroretical subject such as Personality Psychology II. Three available classes of Subjects enrolling in Personality PsychologyII, two of which were taught with the PBL method by a senior‐male‐demanding teacher and a junior‐female‐easy‐going teacher respectively while the other one was taught with the traditional method by the senior‐male‐demanding teacher, participated in the study. Designed as a quasi‐experimental research, the results showed that the first two aims of the study were confirmed. Regarding the teacher factors effect, the study showed a direct and positive relation between the Subjects’ number of study hour andtheir achievement disregarding both the teaching method and the teacher factors as well as a complicated relation between the Subjects’ learning satisfaction and their achievement presum‐ably involving both the teaching method and the teacher factors with the various aspects of teacher competencies. A further study on the last matter seems to be needed.
Evaluasi Terhadap Asumsi Teoritis Individualisme dan Kolektivisme: Sebuah Studi Meta Analisis Susana, Tjipto
Jurnal Psikologi Vol 32, No 1 (2005)
Publisher : Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (392.712 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpsi.7959

Abstract

Since Hofstede (1980) published his research about individualism‐collectivism differences among countries, interest in crosscultural study increased dramatically. However not all studies support each other. So the purpose of this study is to evaluate primary studies that studied individualism‐collctivism differences. Articles selected from electronic database (e.g. Proquest, EBSCO, and ERIC) forpublication. Forty nine studies were found, but only 15 studies that were relevant. After final evaluation, only 3 studies with 7 data points that actually could be analized. This study found that there are differences between individualist and collectivist countriesin horizontal collectivism. People in collectivist countries are more collectivist than people in individualist countries. In vertical individualism, horizontal individualism, and vertical collectivism dimension, homogeneity coefficient (Q) shows that sample drawn from the same source differ systematically. However we cannot do moderator analysis because of number of studies are limited. Thus, this study can not explain moderator variables that influence effectc size variation.
Perbedaan Reaksi Emosional Antara Olahragawan Body Contact dan Non Body Contact Sukadiyanto, -
Jurnal Psikologi Vol 32, No 1 (2005)
Publisher : Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (348.022 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jpsi.7961

Abstract

This research aimed to know the difference of emotional reaction status between athletes of body contact and non body contact, and also aimed to know the difference of emotional reaction status between boys and girls. The research method is survey, and datacollecting by questionnaire which consist of seven factors, that is desire, assertiveness, sensitivity, tension control, confidence, personal accountability, and self‐discipline. In each factorconsist of six statement item, three positive statement and three negative statements. Research populations are all athletes inKabupaten Sleman, and with purposive sampling technique there were 204 boys and girls. Data analyzed by analysis of variancewith level of significance 5%. Result of research indicate that: (1) There are difference of emotional reaction status between an athelete of body contact and non body contact, where an athelete of body contact higher than non body contact, (2) There aredifference of emotional reaction status between sportsman of boys and girls, where boys higher than girls, and (3) There is no interaction between the kind of sports and the gender on theemotional reaction status.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 4

 1 

Filter by Year

2005 2005


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 48, No 2 (2021) Vol 48, No 1 (2021) Vol 47, No 3 (2020) Vol 47, No 2 (2020) Vol 47, No 1 (2020) Vol 46, No 3 (2019) Vol 46, No 2 (2019) Vol 46, No 1 (2019) Vol 45, No 3 (2018) Vol 45, No 2 (2018) Vol 45, No 1 (2018) Vol 44, No 3 (2017) Vol 44, No 2 (2017) Vol 44, No 1 (2017) Vol 43, No 3 (2016) Vol 43, No 2 (2016) Vol 43, No 1 (2016) Vol 42, No 3 (2015) Vol 42, No 2 (2015) Vol 42, No 1 (2015) Vol 1, No 1 (2015) Vol 41, No 2 (2014) Vol 41, No 1 (2014) Vol 40, No 2 (2013) Vol 40, No 1 (2013) Vol 39, No 2 (2012) Vol 39, No 1 (2012) Vol 38, No 2 (2011) Vol 38, No 1 (2011) Vol 37, No 2 (2010) Vol 37, No 1 (2010) Vol 36, No 2 (2009) Vol 36, No 1 (2009) Vol 35, No 2 (2008) Vol 35, No 1 (2008) Vol 34, No 2 (2007) Vol 34, No 1 (2007) Vol 33, No 2 (2006) Vol 33, No 1 (2006) Vol 32, No 2 (2005) Vol 32, No 1 (2005) Vol 31, No 2 (2004) Vol 31, No 1 (2004) Vol 30, No 2 (2003) Vol 30, No 1 (2003) Vol 29, No 2 (2002) Vol 29, No 1 (2002) Vol 28, No 2 (2001) Vol 28, No 1 (2001) Vol 27, No 2 (2000) Vol 27, No 1 (2000) Vol 26, No 2 (1999) Vol 26, No 1 (1999) Vol 25, No 2 (1998) Vol 25, No 1 (1998) Vol 24, No 2 (1997) Vol 24, No 1 (1997) Vol 23, No 2 (1996) Vol 23, No 1 (1996) Vol 4, No 1 (1976) More Issue