cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota denpasar,
Bali
INDONESIA
SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian
Published by Universitas Udayana
ISSN : 14117177     EISSN : 26156628     DOI : -
Core Subject : Economy, Agriculture,
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Economics, Econometrics & Finance
SOCA merupakan jurnal ilmiah yang diterbitkan berkala di bidang social-ekonomi pertanian dan agribisnis, diterbitkan dua kali setahun (Januari-Juni & Juli-Desember). Jurnal SOCA merupakan media untuk penyebarluasan hasil penelitian bagi dosen, peneliti, praktisi maupun masyarakat umum yang yang konsen terhadap pembangunan pertanian di Indonesia. Jurnal SOCA dikhususkan untuk menampung hasil penelitian, kajian pustaka/teoritis, kajian metodologis, gagasan original yang kritis, ulasan masalah penting/isu pembangunan pertanian yang hangat dan ulasan suatu hasil seminar.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 13 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 4, No. 2 Juli 2004" : 13 Documents clear
KERAGAAN BENIH HORTIKULTURA DI TINGKAT PRODUSEN DAN KONSUMEN (Studi kasus : Bawang merah, Cabai merah, Kubis dan Kentang) VALERIANA DARWIS; BAMBANG IRAWAN; CHAERUL MUSLIM
SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Vol. 4, No. 2 Juli 2004
Publisher : Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Udayana Jalan PB.Sudirman Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. Telp: (0361) 223544 Email: soca@unud.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (84.275 KB)

Abstract

Seed and seedling is one of main factors in determining the product of horticultural crops. Theuse seed production on horticultural crops, could be produced by government institution orprivate sector. In the last 21 years (1980 – 2001) the government has released 183 improvedvariety of vegetables, including 26 red onion, red chili, cabbage and potato. These number ismuch Owen compared to number of improved variety of crops. For instance 105 newimproved varieties for rice, 50 varieties for corn and 33 varieties for soybean. The role ofprivate sectors on the horticultural seed is much more dominant to the high demandcommodities and cannot be produced by the farmers it can be seen on the production of redchili seed compared to three other commodities. The performance of seed on the levelconsumer, represented by the farmers in the area production central, namely red onion, redchili in the central Java Province, and potato and cabbage in North Sumatera Province. Thefindings of the study are : the farmers are influencing by the group on the selection of seed tobe use, the role of field extension worker is very limited, the seed has been use by the farmersbefore introducing by government, at any planting time the farmers not always use a newseed, even there are some farmers never used improved variety of potato.
PROYEKSI PRODUKSI DAN PERMINTAAN JAGUNG, PAKAN DAN DAGING AYAM RAS DI INDONESIA (Projections of Maize, Feed and Chicken Meat Production and Demand in Indonesia) KETUT KARIYASA; BONAR M. SINAGA; M.O. ADNYANA
SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Vol. 4, No. 2 Juli 2004
Publisher : Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Udayana Jalan PB.Sudirman Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. Telp: (0361) 223544 Email: soca@unud.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (118.29 KB)

Abstract

Assessment on “Projections of Maize, Feed and Chicken Meat Production andDemand in Indonesia is focused to analyze a balance between the domesticproduction and demand for the next ten years, as well as to analyze its levelresponse to influence factors.This research used the national time series data for1980 to 2001 period. The econometric model (simultaneous regression) approachthrough the two stage least squares (2SLS) method had been implemented in orderto reach the objectives of this research. The projection results shown that ontechnology level and policies unchanged, the domestic production from thosecommodities until 2010 year are predicted not sufficient to meet its demand, so thattargeting for the maize and chicken meat self-sufficient in 2005 can not be reach. It isbetter, if effort to increase of the corn domestic production is more prioritized onimprovement of the technology aspect, because corn productivity is more responseto this aspect than to the other ones. The feed production and demand that weremore response to the maize price than to the feed price, and also the chicken meatproduction and demand that were more response to the chicken meat price itselfthan the feed price proofed that the feed market structure in Indonesia tend is closeto oligopoly market structure.
ANALISIS DAMPAK PENGKAJIAN TEKNOLOGI PERTANIAN UNGGULAN SPESIFIK LOKASI TERHADAP PRODUKTIVITAS KASUS: BPTP NUSA TENGGARA TIMUR RITA NUR SUHAETI; EDI BASUNO
SOCA: Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Vol. 4, No. 2 Juli 2004
Publisher : Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Udayana Jalan PB.Sudirman Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia. Telp: (0361) 223544 Email: soca@unud.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (106.154 KB)

Abstract

Impact Analysis of Improved and Location Specific Agricultural Technologieson Productivity, AIAT East Nusa Tenggara Case. By selecting six topics ofimproved research and assessments (R&A), impact analysis on productivity hadbeen carried out in 2002 fiscal year. However, only four out of six topics wereanalyzed, because the other two were still in adaptive level. Application of introducedtechnologies, in fact, resulted in some additional yield. The highest production andproductivity were experienced by R&A of Backyard Farming System, i.e. 569.63percent, then followed by Milk Fish Culture, Bisma Corn Based Agribusiness, BeefCattle Based Agribusiness 482.10 percent, 284.76 percent and 45.0 percent,respectively. Corn Agribusiness gave the largest impact area of 1,365 ha, while itsimpact on production was also excellent, by adding production of 2,319,308.33kg/planting season. Milkfish culture, on the other hand gave the highest income/haper production cycle. Based on relatively high MBCRs, all analyzed topics werefeasible to be developed in the future. Milkfish culture on brackish water was themost profitable business, reflected by the highest MBCR of 14,08. MBCR figures forBackyard Farming, Beef Cattle Agribusiness and Bisma Corn Agribusiness were1.38, 6.24 and 8.61, respectively. Cost and price ratio of each topics were 0.47; 0.21;0.22 and 0.33 for Backyard Farming System, Bisma Corn Agribusiness, Milk FishCulture and Beef Cattle Agribusiness, respectively. The smallest adoption cost perKg product was indicated by Backyard Farming System (Rp 935.85), followed byBisma Corn Agribusiness (Rp 1,028.30) and Milk Fish Culture (Rp 2181.32), whilethe highest was for Beef Cattle Agribusiness (Rp 9,770.03).

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 13

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2004 2004


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 19 No 1 (2025) Vol 18 No 2 (2024): Vol 18 No 2 (2024) Vol 18 No 1 (2024): Vol 18 No 1 (2024) Vol 18 No 3 (2024) Vol 17 No 3 (2023): Vol 17 No 3 (2023) Vol 17 No 2 (2023): Vol 17 No 2 (2023) Vol 17 No 1 (2023): Vol 17 No 1 (2023) Vol 16 No 3 (2022): Vol 16 No 3 (2022) Vol 16 No 2 (2022): Vol 16 No 2 (2022) Vol 16 No 1 (2022): Vol.16, No.1, 2022 Vol 15 No 3 (2021): Vol.15, No.3, 2021 Vol 15 No 2 (2021): Vol.15, No.2, 2021 Vol 15 No 1 (2021): Vol.15, No.1, 2021 Vol 14 No 3 (2020): Vol.14, No.3, 2020 Vol 14 No 2 (2020): Vol.14.No 2, 2020 Vol 14 No 1 (2020): Vol. 14 No. 1, 2020 Vol 13 No 3 (2019): Vol. 13, No. 3, 2019 Vol.13, No.2, 2019 Vol.13, No.1, 2019 Vol.12, No.2, 2018 Vol.12, No.1, 2018 Vol. 11, No. 1 Juli 2011 Vol. 10, No. 2 Juli 2010 Vol. 10, No. 1 Februari 2010 Vol. 9, No. 3 November 2009 Vol. 9, No. 2 Juli 2009 Vol. 8, No. 2 Juli 2008 Vol. 8, No. 1 Februari 2008 Vol. 7, No. 3 November 2007 Vol. 7, No. 2 Juli 2007 Vol. 7, No. 1 February 2007 Vol. 6, No. 3 November 2006 Vol. 6, No. 2 Juli 2006 Vol. 6, No. 1 Februari 2006 Vol. 5, No. 3 November 2005 Vol. 5, No. 2 Juli 2005 Vol. 5, No. 1 Februari 2005 Vol. 4, No. 2 Juli 2004 Vol. 4, No. 1 Februari 2004 Vol. 3, No. 2 Juli 2003 Vol. 3, No. 1 Februari 2003 Vol. 2, No. 2 Juli 2002 Vol. 2, No. 1 Februari 2002 Vol. 1, No. 2 Juli 2001 Vol. 1, No. 1 Februari 2001 Vol. 0, No. 1 November 2000 Vol. 4, No. 3 November2004 More Issue