cover
Contact Name
Natris Idriyani
Contact Email
natrisidriyani@uinjkt.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
natrisidriyani@uinjkt.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota tangerang selatan,
Banten
INDONESIA
Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia (JP3I)
ISSN : 20896247     EISSN : 26545713     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education, Social,
Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia (JP3I) adalah jurnal ilmiah yang diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. Jurnal ini bertujuan untuk memfasilitasi interaksi, diskusi, dan gagasan di antara para ilmuwan psikologi Indonesia. Jurnal ini difokuskan pada Psikologi Pengukuran.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 6 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 13 No. 1 (2024): JP3I" : 6 Documents clear
The Impact of Sample Size, Test Length, and Person-Item Targeting on the Separation Reliability in Rasch Model: A Simulation Study Bintang, Rahmat S.; Suprananto, Suprananto
JP3I (Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia) Vol. 13 No. 1 (2024): JP3I
Publisher : FAKULTAS PSIKOLOGI UIN SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH JAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jp3i.v13i1.27975

Abstract

This research is a simulation study using resampling methods to see the effect of sample size, test length, and person-item targeting on separation reliability in the Rasch Model. Simulation conditions were created with several predetermined factors, namely sample size with five conditions (200, 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 person), test length with three conditions (20, 40, and 60 items), and person-item targeting with five conditions (-2, -1, 0, 1, and 2 logit). The total number of conditions is 75 conditions where each condition is replicated 50 times so that a total of 3.750 data are generated. The data is generated using WinGen software. The results of the separation reliability analysis were analyzed using Winsteps software. The separation reliability criteria set are for Person Separation Reliability (PSR) > 0.80 and for Item Separation Reliability (ISR) > 0.90. The results showed that 75 conditions (100%) resulted in ISR estimates that met the criteria (> 0.90). For PSR estimation, 37 conditions (49%) resulted in PSR estimates that met the criteria (> 0.80) and 38 conditions (51%) resulted in PSR estimates that did not meet the criteria (< 0.80). In addition, PSR estimation is influenced by test length and person-item targeting.
Adapting and Validating the Covid-19 Anxiety Scale (CAS-7) in Indonesia Thiefanee, Gilda; Kumalasari, Asteria Devy
JP3I (Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia) Vol. 13 No. 1 (2024): JP3I
Publisher : FAKULTAS PSIKOLOGI UIN SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH JAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jp3i.v13i1.30228

Abstract

There has been a lack of anxiety assessments designed explicitly in the context of COVID-19, particularly screening tools that are easy to understand for diverse demographics and easily administered to accommodate Indonesia’s large population. CAS-7 has proven to be an effectively administrable, reliable, and valid assessment to measure pandemic‑related anxiety among the Indian population. This study aimed to adapt and validate CAS-7 to provide a reliable and valid screening tool to timely identify citizens of Indonesia suffering from pandemic-related anxiety and assign them suitable interventions. There were 1,121 subjects from 29 provinces participated in the study. Factorial validity was tested with Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) in JASP 15.0.0. while convergent validity, test-retest reliability, and internal reliability were tested with Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficient, and Cronbach’s alpha in SPSS 25. The adaptation of CAS-7 has proven to be a satisfactory, reliable, and valid screening tool for identifying citizens of Indonesia suffering from pandemic-related anxiety, with changes made in item arrangement and factor interpretation.
Technostress Construct Validity Test with Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) Method Subchi, Imam; Muhammadiyah, Hilmi; Dewi, Putri Aisyiyah Rachma; Anwar, Moh. Khoerul; Naim, Juanda; Syukrilla, Wara Alfa
JP3I (Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia) Vol. 13 No. 1 (2024): JP3I
Publisher : FAKULTAS PSIKOLOGI UIN SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH JAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jp3i.v13i1.31423

Abstract

This study aims to test the construct validity of the technostress instrument using an instrument developed by Ragu-Nathan et al. (2008) contained 20 modified items using the Indonesian language. The research data was obtained from middle adult teaching staff, namely teachers and lecturers aged 35-60 who taught online learning during Covid-19. 212 respondents participated in this study. The test used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with first-order per-dimensional, first-order unidimensional, and second-order models. The analysis was done in MPLUS. Based on CFA first-order unidimensional results, the model fits the data with one item discarded (Item 17). The CFA second-order model is also fit according to the goodness criteria with all items being valid except item 6. According to CFA first-order per-dimensional testing, results show that items for three dimensions (techno-overload, techno-complexity, and techno-insecurity) are valid, while the other two dimensions (techno-uncertainty and techno-invasion) are not fit because the number of items is too small. The instrument can be used to measure technostress and is considered to be unidimensional measuring technostress.
Optimal Scale Points for Reliable Measurements: Exploring the Impact of Scale Point Variation Ismail, Raoda; Retnawati, Heri; Sugiman, Sugiman; Setiawati, Farida Agus; Imawan, Okky Riswandha; Santoso, Purwoko Haryadi
JP3I (Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia) Vol. 13 No. 1 (2024): JP3I
Publisher : FAKULTAS PSIKOLOGI UIN SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH JAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jp3i.v13i1.34173

Abstract

Ensuring reliable measurements is crucial for minimising errors in assessments. The assessmentcommunity commonly employs the evaluation of reliability coefficients to estimate the dependability oftest scores. Despite its significance, limited research has explored the relationship between the estimated reliability coefficient and the number of scale points utilised. This study aims to provide valuable insights to practitioners by investigating the optimal number of scale points required for the most accurate reliability coefficient estimation. Using simulated data, the research scrutinises scales with varying points, ranging from 2 to 11. The results reveal a substantial impact of the number of scale points on reliability estimation. The most accurate estimate of reliability is obtained for scales with 8 points. This study helps us understand the optimal number of scale points for reliable measurements and guides future assessment improvements.
Modeling of Colorado Learning Attitude Science Survey in Indonesian Version: A Study with Applying Item Response Theory Mutmainna, Mutmainna; Hasyim, Mutahharah; Syamsuriwal, Syamsuriwal; Setiaji, Bayu; Setiawati, Farida Agus
JP3I (Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia) Vol. 13 No. 1 (2024): JP3I
Publisher : FAKULTAS PSIKOLOGI UIN SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH JAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jp3i.v13i1.36745

Abstract

Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey (CLASS) is an instrument designed to explore students' perceptions of physics and assess how closely their beliefs correspond with those of professional physicists. Before the development of CLASS, several similar instruments were developed in the field of Physics Education such as the Maryland Physics Expectation (MPEX), Views About Science Survey (VASS), and Epistemological Beliefs Assessment for Physical Science (EBAPS). Adams et al. developed CLASS in 2006 by evaluating these three instruments. Since then, CLASS has been extensively studied for its use in research, especially in the field of Physics Education, and has also been applied in other fields and translated into several languages. As a form of community strengthening, this article attempts to report the research findings related to the use of the CLASS instrument that has been translated into Indonesian. A total of 292 undergraduate students were sampled in this study, who are students from four universities. The respondents in this study were students who had enrolled in the Fundamental of Physics course. The data obtained were analysed with Item Response Theory (IRT) for the polytomous scale. There are Grade Response Model (GRM), Partial Credit Model (PCM), Rating Scale Model (RSM), and Generalized Partial Credit Model (GPCM). The research results show that among the four models of approach and based on the criteria used, the model considered most suitable is GRM. The research also shows that the number of items declared consistent with the model does not cover all CLASS items but rather some items. This finding indicates that further exploration is needed regarding the CLASS instrument items, especially in the Indonesian version. The findings of this study also add to the wealth of knowledge related to the quality assessment of the CLASS instrument through the modern test theory approach (IRT). Thus, the CLASS instrument can be regarded as a standard instrument and can be used globally across various populations.
The Use of Stocking-Lord and Haebara Methods in Horizontal Equating: A Case of Indonesian Madrasah Competence Assessment Kusaeri, Kusaeri; Ridho, Ali; Wahyudi, Noor
JP3I (Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia) Vol. 13 No. 1 (2024): JP3I
Publisher : FAKULTAS PSIKOLOGI UIN SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH JAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jp3i.v13i1.38300

Abstract

Indonesian Madrasah Competence Assessment (AKMI) is a national assessment implemented each year held by the Ministry of Religious Affairs. One of the uniqueness of the AKMI is the use of different tests every year. AKMI focuses on capturing the development of learning in Madrasa by comparing the test scores of the current year with the previous year. An equating process is crucial for valid results when comparing scores. Therefore, this research aims to (a) equate the scientific literacy assessment tools at AKMI in 2022 with 2023 and (b) evaluate the business process of developing AKMI scientific literacy instruments (along with the MSAT design), which has implications for the equating process. This study adopted a Non-Equivalent Anchor Test (NEAT) design because the two test sets were parallel years, and the participants were from a diverse population. The data is from the AKMI Science Literacy of the Ministry of Religious Affairs, with 303,987 participants in 2022 and 342,987 in 2023 from the Islamic elementary school level. A total of 674 scientific literacy instrument items in 2022 and 1,392 items in 2023, with 90 items used as anchor items. There are 3 stages of analysis: pre-equalization, equalization calibration, and post-equalization analysis. The results show that there are differences in item parameter estimation results between 2022 and 2023, where 2022 has a higher level of item difficulty. Furthermore, the Stocking-Lord and Haebara methods had proven to be effective and had produced estimates with minimal differences in the equating process. In addition, the anchor items used as the basis for the equating do not represent the items as a whole in the item pool. These findings indicate the need for firm, careful standardization based on psychometric principles of the process at AKMI, from developing items to assembling items, testing, determining anchor items, and assembling items in the MSAT application.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6