cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Fuad Mustafid
Contact Email
fuad.mustafid@uin-suka.ac.id
Phone
+6281328769779
Journal Mail Official
asy.syirah@uin-suka.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum
Published by Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
ISSN : 08548722     EISSN : 24430757     DOI : 10.14421/ajish
Core Subject : Religion, Social,
Religion Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
2nd Floor Room 205 Faculty of Sharia and Law, State Islamic University (UIN) Sunan Kalijaga, Marsda Adisucipto St., Yogyakarta 55281
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 13 Documents
 1   2 
Search results for , issue "Vol 47 No 1 (2013)" : 13 Documents clear
Rekontruksi Asas Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (Onrechtmatigedaad) Dalam Gugatan Sengketa Konsumen Tanaya, Velliana
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 47 No 1 (2013)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.v47i1.65

Abstract

In a dispute over consumer protection, the plaintiff in this case is that consumers do not necessarily use the basic claim (posita) with the construction of Tort, but need to be reviewed again is there any legal relationship between consumers and business actors. If there is any relationship between the consumer and an entrepreneur based on contract thus the claim is based on breach of contract and if the consumer complaint using the qualification of tort, then the contractual relationship is not required. It is necessary to reconstruct the lawsuit to avoid an obscuur libel lawsuit which will end up to be niet ontvantkelijkverklaard.
Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Yang Mengembalikan Barang Bukti Dalam Tindak Pidana Di Bidang Perikanan Rifai, Eddy
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 47 No 1 (2013)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.v47i1.66

Abstract

This study examines the return of court evidence in criminal acts in the field of fisheries. Type a descriptive study using the analytical approach of normative juridical approach and empirical jurisdiction. The results showed that the court ruling that restores used boats evidence of a crime in the field of fisheries compassionate grounds because the ship is the sole property of the convict to earn a living to feed their family law is not based on a logical construction. Against the perpetrators as well as ship owners should ship seized evidence to the state, while the evidence may ship returned to its owner by legal construction that ship owners not guilty conspiracy or involved in crime. Perspective court against criminal case evidence in fishing is to use the legal construction under the provisions of the legislation that provides protection to the owner of the evidence in criminal cases throughout the legislation does not specify otherwise. Therefore Fisheries Act determines that the evidence in the criminal case in the field of fisheries can be taken to the state or to be destroyed, then the judge should seize the evidence for the state if the offender is also the owner of the evidence, but if the evidence is that other people have not involved in the crime (no conspiracy between actors with the owner of the evidence), the evidence can be returned to the owner of the evidence.
Pemungutan Pajak Bumi Dan Bangunan Oleh Pemerintah Kota Yogyakarta Kritik atas Peraturan Daerah Kota Yogyakarta Nomor 2 Tahun 2011) Hakim, Faisal Luqman
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 47 No 1 (2013)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.v47i1.67

Abstract

Since the enactment of Law Number 28 Year 2009 voting Land and Building Tax (PBB), which is the authority of the central government turning to local authorities. So that local governments can levy the PBB must have a local regulation as its legal basis. Actually it is very potential to be able to provide improvements to the original income (PAD). Unfortunately, not all areas are ready to implement. From 492 existing local government, only about 245 local governments that already have a regulation of PBB, 64 local governments are still in the process and 183 local governments have not compiled at all. Local governments are already doing PBB since in 2011 only Surabaya City Government, then in 2012 increased 17 local governments (including the City of Yogyakarta), and in 2013 there are 113 local governments plan, and in 2014 there will be 117 local governments. To be able to pick up PBB Yogyakarta Government issued Regulation Number 2 of 2011, but the contents of this legislation still needs to be improved because there are chapters that give rise to many interpretations, there is also the use of the word/term is confusing and unclear, the inclusion of legislation as a basis law is no longer valid, and there is a conflict with the legislation higher. The articles need to be improved such as in the section 3 Given the points, then Article 1 paragraph 15, Article 1 paragraph 16, Article 1 paragraph 17, and Article 1 paragraph 18, Article 4, Article 16, Article 29, Article 34 , and Article 36.

Page 2 of 2 | Total Record : 13

 1   2 

Filter by Year

2013 2013


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 59 No 2 (2025) Vol 59 No 1 (2025) Vol 58 No 2 (2024) Vol 58 No 1 (2024) Vol 57 No 2 (2023) Vol 57 No 1 (2023) Vol 56, No 2 (2022) Vol 56 No 2 (2022) Vol 56 No 1 (2022) Vol 56, No 1 (2022) Vol 55, No 2 (2021) Vol 55 No 2 (2021) Vol 55 No 1 (2021) Vol 55, No 1 (2021) Vol 54, No 2 (2020) Vol 54 No 2 (2020) Vol 54 No 1 (2020) Vol 54, No 1 (2020) Vol 53, No 2 (2019) Vol 53 No 2 (2019) Vol 53 No 1 (2019) Vol 53, No 1 (2019) Vol 52, No 2 (2018) Vol 52 No 2 (2018) Vol 52, No 1 (2018) Vol 52 No 1 (2018) Vol 51, No 2 (2017) Vol 51 No 2 (2017) Vol 51, No 2 (2017) Vol 51 No 1 (2017) Vol 51, No 1 (2017) Vol 50 No 2 (2016) Vol 50, No 2 (2016) Vol 50, No 1 (2016) Vol 50 No 1 (2016) Vol 49 No 2 (2015) Vol 49, No 2 (2015) Vol 49, No 1 (2015) Vol 49 No 1 (2015) Vol 49, No 1 (2015) Vol 48 No 2 (2014) Vol 48, No 2 (2014) Vol 48, No 1 (2014) Vol 48 No 1 (2014) Vol 47, No 2 (2013) Vol 47 No 2 (2013) Vol 47 No 1 (2013) Vol 47, No 1 (2013) Vol 46 No 2 (2012) Vol 46, No 2 (2012) Vol 46 No 1 (2012) Vol 46, No 1 (2012) Vol 45, No 2 (2011) Vol 45 No 2 (2011) Vol 45, No 1 (2011) Vol 45 No 1 (2011) Vol 44 No 2 (2010) Vol 44 No 1 (2010) Vol 43, No 2 (2009) Vol 43 No 2 (2009) Vol 43 No 1 (2009) Vol 43, No 1 (2009) Vol 42, No 2 (2008) Vol 42 No 2 (2008) Vol 42, No 1 (2008) Vol 42 No 1 (2008) More Issue